Search results

(l) give advice on the processing operations referred to in Article 36(2); (m) encourage the drawing up of codes of conduct pursuant to Article 40(1) and

section! You can help us by filling in this section! The Hamburg DPA fined H&M Hennes & Mauritz Online Shop A.B. & Co KG. in October 2020 an amount of 35

guidelines, recommendations and best practices referred to in points (e) and (f); (m) issue guidelines, recommendations and best practices in accordance with point

authority the results of verifications of the measures referred to in point (j); (m) the mechanisms for reporting to the competent supervisory authority any legal

Article 21 GDPR, margin number 8 (C.H. Beck 2021, 39th Edition). LG Frankfurt a. M., 20 December 2018, 2/5 O 151/18, (available here). Herbst, in Kühling, Buchner

2019, 1st edition) ECHR, Abdolkhani and Karimnia v. Turkey, 2009, §§ 114-115; M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], 2011, §§ 301-304 and 319; Hirsi Jamaa and

personal data. Case Law: In C-708/18 - TK v Asociaţia de Proprietari bloc M5A-ScaraA the CJEU had to provide guidance on how to assess whether processing

audit. The ICO is the best-funded DPA in Europe with a total budget of €61m in 2019, according to a Brave study. The ICO had 680 staff in 2019, far outnumbering

6 practice. However, the European Court of Justice has in the judgment M.I.C.M. from 2021 and in the judgment Breyer struck provided that dynamic IP addresses

with far too little funding for the caseload it has. The current budget is 25M euro and 180 FTE employed. Independent analysis by KPMG concludes it requires

visiting the Website can will constitute personal data. Justices Breyer and M.I.C.M. provides support for the assessment that dynamic IP addresses i all cases

be issued, Art. 33 Para. 1 M 158/10 -, resolution of September 14, 2012 - 1 M 94/12 - and resolution of October 25, 2012 - 1 M 103/12 -, each juris). The

17 practice. However, the European Court of Justice has in the judgment M.I.C.M. from 2021 and in the judgment Breyer struck provided that dynamic IP addresses

i practice. However, the European Court of Justice has in the judgment M.I.C.M. from 2021 and in the judgment Breyer struck provided that dynamic IP addresses

lawsuits became PEIRAIOS LEASING M.A.E. Therefore, the Hellenic DPA considered the controller to be PEIRAIOS LEASING M.A.E., and considered both complaints

o,g,r,a,m){i['GoogleAnalyticsObject']=r;i[r]=i[r]|| function(){ (i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)

its registered office at [place of business] , defendant, attorney at law M.M.C. van Graafeiland in The Hague. The parties will hereinafter be referred

official authority was not transferred to the defendant (cf. LG Frankfurt a.M., judgment of 20 December 2018 - 2/5 O 151/18 - NZI 2019, 342). However, the

Brussels Court of Appeal on 16 September 2020 by: M. BOSMANS - President-in-Office of the Council A-M. WHITETERSRaadsheer , O. DUGARDYN Alternate Counsellor

contact the ***TELEPHONE number from 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. which I do not do, because I receive it at 7:04 p.m. When I arrive at my home, I try to enter

President M.V. Polak as chairman and councilors C.E. du Perron, M.J. Kroeze, H. M. Wattendorff and G. C. Makkink, and pronounced in public by Counsel H.M. Wattendorff

protection violations in H&M's service centre 01.10.2020 - H&M In the case of the monitoring of several hundred employees of the H&M service centre in Nuremberg

Content Management & Consulting (M.I.C.M.) Limited Proximus NV Telenet BVBA Scarlet Belgium NV Case Number/Name: C-597/19 M.I.C.M. European Case Law Identifier:

tribunal has deemed the d between tta m e n to d e i d a ti p e rs o n a li d e g li a d e re n ti a l sris te m a M evalaute because validated by consent

pour attributaire M. [...]. Par un courrier électronique du 2 octobre 2019, la délégation de contrôle a notifié le contrôle en ligne à M. [...], après l’avoir

appropriate technical measures to guarantee security processing. 17. The counsel for M. [...] replies that his client had no desire to allow free access to these

protection law, in particular the data protection and state hospital law (DSG M-V, LKHG M-V). He also referred to an article he wrote about the GDPR in the magazine

OF THE NETHERLANDS, established in The Hague , defendant, attorney at law M.M.C. van Graafeiland, The Hague. The parties will hereinafter be referred to

considered proven facts PROVEN FACTS FIRST: On February 18, 2018 at 6:27 p.m. an email was sent from the address ecooltra@email.ecooltra.com to ***USER

a certain period of time has elapsed as a human rights concern (see ECHR, M. L. and W. W. v. Germany, judgment of 28 June 2018, nos. 60798/10 and 65599/10

different codes of conducts under Article 41 GDPR (redacted as "code S***", code M*** and code U***"). These codes had been approved by the DSB under Article

ECLI:NL:HR:2016:1483, NJ 2017/262 m.nt. S.D. Lindenbergh and J.S. Kortmann, Ars Aequi 2017, p. 41 ff. m.t. W.H. van Boom, JOR 2016/332 m.nt. M.M.C. of the Moosdijk and

appellant, Attorney at law: Mr. J.M. Molkenboer in Tilburg, by ING BANK N.V. , based in Amsterdam, Intimate, Attorney at law: Mr. I.M.C.A. Reinders Folmer, Amsterdam

its content. This state of affairs is confirmed by the explanations of Mrs. M. K., ZSO teacher, classroom teacher [...] (the protocol of acceptance of oral

Handels- und Betriebsgesellschaft m.b.H. and stored there. In the past, employees of XY Handels- und Betriebsgesellschaft m.b.H. had access to the image material

fine on Ms M. Z. conducting business activity under the name K., the President of the Office for Personal Data Protection establishing that Ms M. Z. conducting

appeal. Thus determined by C.H.M. van Altena, Chairman, and C.M. Wissels and C.C.W. Lange, Members, in the presence of M.H. Kuggeleijn-Jansen, Registrar

brief dated November 4th, 2020, the plaintiff brought an action before the M. District Court. This was given to the defendant on Delivered on December 10th

represented by its agents. Third Party is represented by its agents and M.J.M. Piels. Considerations Why doesn't the court grant the plaintiff's request

otto.m***@at.com If you have any questions or concerns about the processing of your personal data, please feel free to contact contact us: otto.m***@at

qualified as minor for the purposes of the statute of limitations in Article 74.m) of the LOPDGDD. FOURTH: On 16/06/2020, FUNDACION SINDROME 5P MENOS DE C.V

for the data prepared in connection with epidemiological measures, e.g. á m. data obtained by sampling for COVID-19. The data received by the epidemiologist

lawyers, - Zs. Biró-Tóth and M. Z. Fehér, representing the Hungarian government, in the capacity of attorney, - T. Machovičová, M. Smolek and J. Vláčil, representing

cloudflare.com/terms/ httos://www.cloudflare.com/resources/assets/slt31c6tev37/1 M 1 j5uuFDuLTYiZJJDPBag/bda8d591447971 b3df2bccf5aa4e0916/Customer OPA v,3 1

XXXX p.m. The complaint regarding XXXX was submitted via ERV at XXXX p.m. The complainant's complaint regarding XXXX was filed via ERV at XXXX p.m. The complaint

his family, mother L. V., father Ž. V., brother I.V. and common-law wife M.M., so he could not determine with certainty who ... at ... hours was driving

(further) prosecution is undesirable (a so-called policy dismissal). T he M arket h o w a t w a ck both respect the orm e le and the material obligation

Office for Personal Data Protection to perform his tasks, i.e. to consider Mr. M. K.'s complaint about irregularities in the processing of his personal data

Inspection Service, 6 January 2020 (Exhibit 53), pp. 99 ff. 86C. SANTOS , M. OUWENS , M. OTH, N. IELOVA, V. OCA, "Consent Management Platforms Under the GDPR:

installation and use of surveillance cameras (hereinafter the Cameras Law), M.B., May 31, 2007. 6 Decision 19/2020 regarding the consultation of the National

resolution could lead to the commission of the offense typified in article 72.1 m) of the LOPDGDD, to be sanctioned, in accordance with art. 58.2 of the RGPD

the complaint to the APO are as follows. On February 18, 2020, Ie p/loving [M. X] is terminated by the defendant [Y]. Before handing over your equipment

truth (cf. ECtHR decision of 27 June 2017, Satakunnan M a r k k i n a p ö r s s i O y k a i S a t a m e d i a O y k a t a F i n l a n d i a s § 165). Also

mobile line was allegedly active with activity fraudulent since 2:52 p.m. until 7:22 p.m. on April 1, 2022. FUNDAMENTALS OF LAW Yo Competence In accordance

pharmacies via an Internet trading platform. 2. The plaintiff runs a pharmacy in M. . 3. The defendant is also a pharmacist and operates a pharmacy in O., which

motorway at a speed of 116 km/h was only 20 m away and thus less than 4/10 of half the speedometer value (58 m). The photograph taken by the police showed

profile (*** URL.2) the defendant exposed on 10/11/2018 from 12:01 a.m. to 2:49 p.m., the claimant's instance of 01/17/2018 containing name and surname

thisresolution could lead to the commission of the offense considered in article72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, in accordance with art. 58.2 GDPR

entrusting by the Housing Community with its registered office in S., ul. (…), (…) M.G. conducting business activity under the business name “(…)”, ul. (…), processing

regulatory content in this respect (OLG Hamburg MMR 2015, 740 m. Hansen/Struwe; KG MMR 2020, 239 m. Anm. Heldt, Ls. 5; Hacker, ZfPW 2019, 148 (184); Moos, in:

Authority and the imposition of an administrative fine. By letter of 31. s.m. The City of Reykjavík requested more information and explanations regarding

there have been a number of incidents related to the Bank's EDB Central A.M.B.A's (hereafter BEC) IT system. The incidents have resulted in accidental

further sanctioning of Vodafone España by the AEPD pursuant to Article 72(1)(m). The AEPD does not specify the provision of Article 21 on which it bases its

Code 188607912 Consultation tel. (8 5) 212 7532, Monday to Thursday, 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. and 1pm to 3pm © Government of the Republic of Lithuania Data 2121 2021

or failing to provide access in violation of Article 58(1).” Article 72.1 (m) of Organic Law 3/2018 on the Protection of Personal Data on the Personal Data

Madrid was alerted to a possible information leak on Sept. 16, 2020, 6:20 p.m. • On September 17, a data copy is detected from the network drive did the

owner of the line telephone *** TELEPHONE. 2 on January 31, 2020 at 11:34:50 a.m., and specifically in its ownership since October 2, 2019. The investigated

controller). RESULT OF INVESTIGATION ACTIONS 1. Regarding the facts:  Around 2:30 p.m. on *** DATE.2, the SGNEC states that it received telephone communication regarding

suitable basis for a claim. 27a) 28 A right to information from Section 666 i. V. m. Section 675, Paragraph 1 of the German Civil Code (BGB) is out of the question

and aldermen of the municipality of Dongen (defendant) (Agents: mr. W.C.J.M. Dankers and [name of attorney] ). Introduction 1. In this judgment, the court

confirms the challenged statement. Thus established by mr. A.W.M. Bijloos, chairman, and G.T.J.M. Jurgens and mr. J.Th. Drop, members, in the presence of mr

operating room report or delivery record. l) The pathological anatomy report. m) The evolution and planning of nursing care. n) The therapeutic application

k) The operating room report or delivery record. l) The pathology report. m) The evolution and planning of nursing care. n) The therapeutic application

within ten days would be considered a violation pursuant to Article 72(1)(m) of the LOPDGDD, which would be sanctioned according to Article 58(2) GDPR

euros). Thus determined by J.E.M. Polak, chairman, and E.A. Minderhoud and E.J. Daalder, members, in the presence of M.A.E. Planken, registrar. The chairman

by whoever had been represented, but also because of having consulted the R.M. could have known that the claimant no longer held the administrator status

forward, the claimed). The claimant states that on June 19, 2020 at 7:55 p.m. hours received on his mobile a phone call made from the number *** TELEPHONE

resolution could lead to the commission of the offense considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, in accordance with art. 58.2 of

classified as very serious for the purposes of prescription in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which is sanctioned in accordance with art. 58.2 of the GDPR

request for access was submitted on... via FAX to number... around the time... p.m., then by e-mail about the time..., and due to a missed connection, on... were

Lawyers: J.M. Brölmann and S.C.M.J.V.L. Kloppers in Utrecht, and 2 ABN AMRO Bank N.V, established at [place of business] , Attorney at law: Mr. C.M. Jakimowicz

ground. The area monitored in the K.-garten is rectangular in size of 60 m x 80 m. A total of ten cameras are installed there. Eight of them are permanently

Nineteen A of the Court of Appeal in Brussels 30jun2021 by M. BOSMANS Councilor dd. chair A.M. WITTERS Councilor O.DUGARDYN Deputy Councilor B. VANDERGUCHT

(respondent) from **** D***stadt, represented by R*** T*** Rechtsanwälte Ges.m.b.H. from **** B***, for violation of the right to deletion as a result of

2018, and that the last call was received on last August 21, 2019 at 7:08 p.m. from the calling line *** PHONE. 2. C / Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 -

Personal Data and Guarantee of Digital Rights (LOPDGDD) in its article 72.1 m), under the heading "Infringements considered to be very serious," he says:

the invitation of its President in a meeting on Tuesday 31.5.2022 at 10.00 a.m., in order to examine the case referred to in the present history. The President

Internet platform, TopfSecret Lower court: VG Munich, decision of 16.09.2019 - M 32 SN 19.2574 Place where it was found: BeckRS 2020, 6798   Tenor I. The appeal

with further information to ensure fair and transparent processing, e.g. á m. how long personal information will be stored or, if that is not possible,

hearing; reserves any further decision. This decision was made by J.F.M. Pols, M. van Ham and R.J. Voorink and was pronounced in public on 10 September

on March 31, 2023 I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal Administrative Court, judged by Mag. Bernhard SCHILDBERGER, LL.M. as chairperson and

Decided: 17.02.2021 Published: 03.06.2021 Fine: €15,000 EUR Parties: Purple Sea M.I.K.E. National Case Number/Name: 23/2021 European Case Law Identifier: n/a

certificate is NEGATIVE, It has been provided as a reason for the denial: “M. Tax Crime ”, for their transfer and that could request a review before the

ABN AMRO BANK N.V., established in Amsterdam, Intimate, Attorney at law: M.J.M.T. Keulaerds, The Hague. 1 Procedure The parties are hereinafter referred

and 15 hours he was working, paying its ordinary working day from 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. a) The claimant states that she received the complaint from the DGT,

subject of this claim, it was created on February 4, 2022 at 10:39 p.m. Spanish time (8:39 p.m. UTC time ), and was available until at least April 22, 2022. Both

only the date is seen in the first 08/20/2019 screen and another at 11:22 p.m. At the top is the line *** TELEPHONE. 1, parts of the conversation indicated

will be incorporated into the processing system owned by the company HOLIDAY M. OESTE, S.L, with registered office at Calle Rozabella, nº 6, 28290, Las Rozas

van de GBA stelt de verweerder dat de interne beslissing van de verweerder (m.b.t. het overschakelen van Microsoft tools naar een intern ontwikkelde oplossing)

on the same basis. In the decision of the European Court of Human Rights, M.L. and W.W. vs Germany (issued on June 28, 2018), it has been stated that in

(cf. BGH, judgment of May 27th, 2014 -XI ZR 264/13, NJW 2014, 3312 para. 24 m.w.N.). However, the latter is clearly the plaintiff's aim here. 27 (4) Finally

parties. Personal protection received the complainant's reply by e-mail on 11 a.m. 1. Complainant's point of view The complainant, who lives in an apartment

Authority met in a Chamber by teleconference on Wednesday 21-04-2021 at 10:30 a.m. at the invitation of its Chairperson, in order to examine the case mentioned

the telephone number to contact. On the same day, at approximately 2:00 p.m., a man who introduced himself as an "attorney [...]" called the Controller

for the period from Monday, August 16 2021 at 6:00 a.m. until Monday, August 23, 2021 at 6:00 a.m." (Government Gazette B' 3793). In addition, at the time

criminal offences, see paragraph 44. I also refer to judgment 18 April 2013 M.K. v. France paragraph 42 and Brunet v. France paragraph 37. (67) Furthermore

was pronounced in the public session of 09 October 2019 by M.BOSMANS Councilor dd.chairman A-M.WITTERS Councilor O.DUGARDYN Deputy Counselor B. VANDERGUCHT

place of business in the Republic of Estonia. On 12 August 2020, at 11:44 a.m., the applicant visited the controller’s website https://www.kuldnebors.ee

based on §§ 41, 50 ZPO. Supreme Court, Vienna, 18 February 2021 Dr S c h r a m m For the correctness of the copy, the head of the business department:

cents). Thus determined by J.E.M. Polak, chairman, and E.A. Minderhoud and E.J. Daalder, members, in the presence of M.A.E. Planken, registrar. The chairman

telephone number ***TELÉFONO.1 was provided for reservations between 9:15 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Information is provided at the bottom of the advertising brochure:

datapersonal (in Dumortier, F., Vander Geeten, V., Dargent, M., Docquir, B. and Forget, C., Knockaert, M., “Introduction »in Legal obligations for cybersecurity

statement was made by mr. VE van der Does, chairman, and mr. MP Glerum and mr. M. Eversteijn, members, in the presence of mr. MEC Bakker, registrar. The decision

20.40. This judgment was given by D.J. Post, judge, in the presence of Mr. M.W. Bolzoni, court clerk. The decision was publicly pronounced on: December

(instead of all Simitis/Schantz, DatenschutzR, 2019, Art. 6 marginal no. 98 f. w.m.n.). The data processing must be "necessary" to safeguard the legitimate interests

company had issued to M.M. M. Bricka as follows: KLD DECISIONS CPC November - December 2022 39 1. Serial No. *** with author and holder M.M., with author and

data In the answer of 10.11.2022, the data processor, i.e. M&M Inkasso OÜ, stated that M&M Inkasso The basis for publishing personal data published on

07/22/2013. Provides a screen print of an SMS received on 10/11/2021 at 8:25 p.m. SECOND: In accordance with article 65.4 of Organic Law 3/2018, of 5 December

E document contains the applicant’s request that “on 26 May 2018 (5:14 p.m. camera recording is saved by the company’s management ’because this is the

in reference to a treatment THE HONORABLE To E :G: D D t ot  m m F Fi Genl register number 30123/2022 Sectional number 4327/2023 General collection

The infringements also concern the carrying out of the Impact A s s e s s m e n t on the data protection. This obligation was only carried out after the

that you have been misinformed. 2.12. By e-mail of November 2, 2018 (11:58 a.m.) [defendant 2] then asks: Can you give me some indication of what time you

2009/341 m.nt. F.C.B. van Wijmen, AV&S 2005/37 m.nt. W.M.A. Kalkman and L.E. Kalkman-Bogerd, JA 2005/94 m.nt. M.H. Elferink and GJ 2005/104 m.nt. A.C.

secret, non-official data transfer by M., so of course only M. himself could be responsible for his data sharing. Only M. decided on his own that he had improperly

Stoffels (Roerdalen), R. Timmers (Valkenburg aan de Geul), M. Orasanin (Vaals) and Mr. A.A.C.M. Gidding-Baade and C.E.A. Bemelmans-Palmen (Brunssum) were

The IMY went through each complaint and determined that H&M had taken too long to react. As H&M is such a large company, it is important that it has functioning

or not, in possession of the data the ostension of which is requested". P.Q.M. accepts the first ground of appeal; declares the remaining reasons absorbed;

resolution could lead to the commission of the offense considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, in accordance with article 58.2

AEPD, otherwisecould incur a very serious infraction typified in article 72.1.m) of the LawOrganic 3/2018, of December 5, Protection of Personal Data and Guarantee

Knuddels must also bear the costs of the proceedings (§§ 105, 107 OWiG 1.V.m. with § 464 (1), § 465 StPO). The procedural fee is 5% of the fine, but at

resolution could lead to the commission of the offense considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be penalized, in accordance with art. 58.2 of the

approximately circular crater with a diameter of approx. 20 m and a depth of approx. 1.4 m formed. The plaintiffs' neighboring properties were also affected

Furthermore, the Board, represented by mr. M.B.J. Thijssen and mr. L.J. Gerritsen, both lawyers in Nijmegen, and C.A.M. Berntsen, heard. Considerations preface

of these actions by the C. Ges .m.b.H. or now the D. Ges.m.b.H., FN ..., had to be prescribed. or now by the D. Ges.m.b.H., FN ..., actions owed (within

April 24, 2019, in a letter from the client M. S. (1), who received a file with data by e-mail. The client of M. S. (1) asked the Company whether he should

DECISION The Federal Administrative Court decides by Judge Mag.a Barbara SIMMA LL.M. as chairperson and the expert lay judge Margareta MAYER-HAINZ and the expert

VG München - M 3 E 22.667 Court: VG München (Germany) Jurisdiction: Germany Relevant Law: Article 6(1)(c) GDPR Article 6(1)(e) GDPR Article 6(2) GDPR Article

The defendant "H.M.B." EAD is represented by Adv. M. with a power of attorney presented at the meeting and a valid lawyer's card. Lawyer M. contests the appeal

proceedings (cf. BGH ruling of January 17, 2023 - VI ZR 203/22, r+s 2023, 265 Rn. 14 m. w . N.). 53(2)              The application submitted at the Senate meeting

resolution could lead to the commission of the offense considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, in accordance with art. 58.2 of

measuring devices are read by the representative of M ... at equal intervals if possible or at the request of M ... by the connection owner himself. He must ensure

a simplified procedure on 24 March 2021, a case concerning a complaint by M. M. against the decision of the President of the Office for Personal Data Protection

cf. in particular the ECHR's Grand Chamber judgment of 28 June 2018 G.I.E.M. S.r.l. with others against Italy (EMD-2006-1828) and the ECtHR's judgment

salary of the attorney at law. This order was made by A.M.A. Verscheure, F.J. Verbeek and A.C.M. Kuypers and was pronounced publicly on 3 March 2020 by

within the framework of integral youth care of a motivation document, called M-document, drawn up by the controller as a result of the alarming situation

respondent consulted the data of the complainant on January 3, 2019 at 10:03 p.m., i.e. the day after the finding (from January 2, 2019 - see point 4 above)

(instead of all Simitis/Schantz, DatenschutzR, 2019, Art. 6 marginal no. 98 f. m.w.N.). The data processing must be "necessary" to safeguard the legitimate

the proceedings. The data subject was contacted by cleaning tool company T.S.M. Srl. (the controller) to take part in a professional course, and received

the defendant from §1004 para. 1 sentence 1 BGB analogous i. V. m. § 823 para. 1 BGB i. V. m. the general right of personality from Art. 2 Para. 1, Art. Para

Hopper who is known to the labor court in M... – Appendix 3 39 C. AGG Hopper fails before the labor court in M... 40 https://www.rechtsanwalts-kanzlei-w

337 F 1616/15, 337 F 3484/15, 337 F 3643/15, 337 F 1033/16, 442 M 10036/16 and 442 M 21 343/16 and a copy of the accounting transactions relating to the

Protection Authority met as a Department by teleconference on 03-23-2022 at 09.30 a.m. at the invitation of its President, in order to examine the case referred

following chronology of events: FIRST: PROMOFARMA, on August 6, 2019, at 5:30 p.m., was aware of a news item published in a foreign media regarding an alleged

documentation I have to provide. All the best".  November 9, 2018, 6:45 p.m. Once the study of Ms. B.B.B. (sister of the claimant) have to provide collateral

letter dated 3 May 2021. The plaintiff alleged that on 27 April 2021 at 2.18 p.m. he boarded a train of the defendant at the Schönhauser Allee station in Berlin

resolution could lead to the commission of the offense considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, in accordance with art. 58.2 of

resolution could lead to commission of the offense typified in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which is sanction, in accordance with art. 58.2 of the RGPD

03 hrs, the following article (Annex B 41) was posted on page "M" at F (Annex B 19): "M" will boycott Christmas again this year. We do not celebrate German-Christian

processing of personal data by M. Sp. z o. o. with its seat in K., ul. F. [...], hereinafter: "Company", "M." found a breach by M. of the provisions of Art

3:21 p.m. and 6:58 p.m. hours, from the telephone number *** TELEPHONE. 2. - On July 15, 2020, he received two calls, at 3:53 p.m. and 4:40 p.m. hours

“today” to 4:35 p.m.  Screen print of a telephone showing a "missed call" from the telephone number *** TELEPHONE.4 “yesterday” at 7:59 p.m.  Screen print

Frankfurt a.M., Urt. v. 25 May 2018 - 16 U 134/17; Frankfurt am Main Regional Court, judgment of 18 January 2018 - 2-03 O 156/17; LG Frankfurt a.M., judgment

rights were violated by Internet users using pseudonyms (nicknames) A., M., a., A., M. and demanded that their personal data (forenames, surname) be disclosed

also discussed the military's powers to access, inspect and monitor, e.g. á m. taking photographs and taking photographs , to all the places where Act no

jurisdiction to take cognizance of the request. This decision was given by mr. M.C.H. Broesterhuizen, assisted by mr. P.C.N. van Gelderen, Registrar, and pronounced

resolution could lead to the commission of the offense considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be penalized, in accordance with art. 58.2 of the

that "With regard to making a call dated January 10, 2019 between 5 and 8 p.m. from the calling number ***PHONE.1, we confirm that on that date and time

could lead to the commission of the infringement considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, in accordance with article 58.2

resolution could lead to commission of the offense typified in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which is sanction, in accordance with art. 58.2 of the RGPD

Federal Administrative Court decides through the judge Mag.a Barbara SIMMA LL.M. as chairwoman and the expert lay judge Margareta MAYER-HAINZ and the expert

tried to settle the dispute amicably. In an email of August 12, 2020 (2:48 p.m.), Mr. De Haan stated that the parties were unable to reach an amicable settlement

resolution could lead to the commission of the offense considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, in accordance with article 58.2

could lead to the commission of the infringement considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, according to art. 58.2 of the RGPD

by EASYJET from the email address ***EMAIL.3, dated 04/01/2022 at 10:22 a.m., to the complaining party (***EMAIL.5), with the subject “Data Request-A.A

(ECJ, Judgment of 16 June 2005 - C-105/03, NJW 2005, 2839 marginal no. 47 [M. Pupino]; KK-OWiG/Rogall, § 3 marginal no. 83 with further references). ),

jurisdiction of the Market Court (fifth plea in law of the GBA - eleventh m i- del by X: 10.1. X holds that if the Market Court annuls the contested decision

to keeping track of transactions on the transaction chip, in Debit M/C and Business M/C debit cards that are issued do not comply with this requirement

enter the land and buildings, premises or other premises between 6.00 a.m. and 10.00 p.m., 2. access documents and information directly related to the scope

it and a session of face-to-face training at the Clinic from 2:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. The attendance control sheet for said training is attached as Doc.6

previous one. (activation fraudulent was operational from 7:09 p.m. on 09/02/2021 until 2:26 p.m. approximately on 09/03/2021, in which the claimant was able

deadline granted until 19 August s.á. At 12 p.m. received a reply letter from ANR and the other 18. s.m. received an email from YAY ehf. where it was confirmed

first email sent at 2:55 p.m. is sent to the complainant and does not mention the request for erasure. Asecond email sent at 3:30 p.m. the same day, addressed

Surveillance Authority in accordance with Article 66(1) of the GDPR and Article 1(m) of the Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 154/2018. 7 3. Advance notification

from the Federal Office dated August 24, 2020, 3:24 p.m., and September 29, 2020, 7:32 a.m. and 7:33 a.m., at ......... However, such communication can still

after 9:00 p.m., however, do not result in the update at 10:30 p.m., as the banking day at the banks' Accounting Office ends at 9:00 p.m. If the claim

1, Paragraph 2 Sentence 1 No. 11 lit. b) i. V. m. § 3 Abs. 1 Nr. 1, 4 UKlaG as well as from § 3a i. V. m. Section 8 Paragraph 1 Paragraph 3 No. 3 UWG. The

connection with the complainant's work permit application by the city, i.e. on m. the delivery of a medical certificate to the city attorney for a legal assessment

Berlin NJW 2016, 1966; LG Frankfurt a.M., Urt. v. 27.09.2018 - 2-03 O 320/17, BeckRS 2018, 25130; LG Frankfurt a.M., Judgement of 10.10.2019 - 2-03 O 500/18

received sent by GUREAK LANEAN SA in which they show that on February 9 at 5:30 p.m. have detected the creation of a user with an Administrator profile as well

could lead to the commission of the infringement considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, according to with art. 58.2 of the

November 2019 in the matter of [plaintiff] at [place] , plaintiff, Lawyer M.A.C. de Vilder-van Overmeire in Amsterdam, against: the State of the Netherlands

resolution could entail the commission of the violation considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, of according to art. 58.2 of the

resolution could lead to the commission of the offense considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, in accordance with art. 58.2 of

Thursday December 10, 2020 Rapporteur Ms. Myriam Benlolo Carabot Public reporter M. Alexandre Lallet Lawyer (s) SCP BASEMENT, MOLINIE Full Text FRENCH REPUBLIC

may lead to the commission of the infringement considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, in accordance with article 58.2

broadcast of videos from a second phone number on May 31, 2019 at 11:45 a.m. corresponds to the contact number of the association. In the pictures provided

where [the appellant], assisted by L.A.M. van der Geld, attorney at law in Groningen, and the Board, represented by M.L.M. Lammerschot, appeared. Considerations

to you because of their status as employees of N*** Strassenbaugesellschaft m.b.H. were announced during customer visits, stored on your private mobile phone

at 1:20 p.m., from the account (...), with the matter "Informative newsletter Torremar Vol. 7.” — Message sent on 09/23/2021, at 1:34 p.m., from the account

- city. CHAIRMAN: MEMBERS: Vencislav Karadzov /m/ Tsanko Tsolov /m/ Maria Mateva /m/ Veselin Tselkov /m/ DECISION No. ппН-01-70/2022 Sofia, 01.12.2022

also been filed by fax. In the period from December 28, 2020, 8:45 p.m. to 10:44 p.m., five transmission attempts were made to the number #31036..., all

stated, however, that the document had already been handed over to P. M. P. M. then stated that she had submitted the document to B. Z., who denied it

the republic! The Federal Administrative Court, by Judge Barbara SIMMA LL.M. as chairperson and the expert lay judge Margareta MAYER-HAINZ and the expert

defendant informed neither the responsible data protection authority, the O.H.C.M., nor the plaintiff about the incident. 12In a letter from a lawyer dated June

"XXXX, XXXX (LDA)" <XXXXXXXX@lda.bayern.de> Date: December 21, 2023, 1:58 p.m. To: Legal <legal@noyb.eu> Your reference: C044 --------------------------

documents. On the 20th p.m. sent the complainant part of the requested data in a locked document to the City of Reykjavík. On the 23rd p.m. The complaining city

La chambre des litiges de l'autorité de protection des données, composée de M. Hielke Hijmans, président et MM. Dirk Van Der Kelen et Jelle Stassijns, membres ;

exemption from the application of Article 6 (1) (f) to the public authorities m: fasin clarification through practice. The Danish Data Protection Agency also

and attaches a screenshot taken at 6:11 p.m. The complainant adds in his e-mail from July 8, 2022 sent at 6:16 p.m. that his address is equivalent to personal

Chamber of the Court of Appeal in Brussels, composed of: M.BOSMANS Councilor dd.chairman A-M. WITTERS Councilor 0.DUGARDYN Deputy Counselor who have attended

data on the same basis. In the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights M.L. and W.W. vs Germany (dated 28 June 2018), on the other hand, states that

the case of the plaintiff Dr F***** B*****, represented by Robert Haupt, LL.M., Rechtsanwalt in Vienna, against the defendant Ö*****, represented by Wolf

could lead to the commission of the infraction considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, in accordance with art. 58.2 of

fifty-three cents). Thus established by Mr C.J. Borman, Chairman, and Mr S.F.M. Wortmann and Mr J. Gundelach, Members, in the presence of Mr P. Klein, Registrar

complainant, and by extension a/le customers, only of can benefit from discounts by m_ ddel of their electronic identity card, and by the the defendant is not offered

residing at [place of residence] ,applicant, hereinafter [applicant],lawyer mr. A.M. van Schaick in Tilburg, against the foundation STICHTING BUREAU CREDIT REGISTRATION

Department of the company, will attend the call on March 27 of 2023 at 10 a.m., at its registered office at Calle Goya 18 and that they will not allow the

an annual INFORMATION / INFORMATION about the insurancehis contract number M-056482, but the RIGHT OF ACCESS EXERCISE OF HIMTHE INSURANCE CONTRACT HAS NOT

Germany (September 21, 2017, ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0921JUD005140512), judgment M.L. and W.W. v. Germany (28.6.2018, ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0628JUD006079810) and

to make harassing calls, which is why K's client filed a complaint with the M police for stalking. 3. The Federal Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom

The complainant later withdrew that application by notification, dated. 11 p.m., and was subsequently ordered to leave the country within the prescribed seven-day

authorized representative: Mr. M.H. Elferink, and Dutch Data Protection Authority, hereinafter: AP, authorized representative: Mr. J.M.A. Koster. Introduction

personnel file or from the factual files kept at the Federal Police Directorate in M. that were before the administrative court - except for the requested removal

2022. A reiteration was sent on the 15th s.m. received a reply from the company by e-mail, i.e. the 20th p.m., but in the attachment the document in question

legally defined. However, administrative acts within the meaning of § 35 VwVfG M-V and according to § 35 VwVfG fall unproblematically under it. The right of

the granted conclusion periods, both the complainant (Ms. H.J.M.) and the parties (Ms. H.J.M.) submitted new elements that were not relevant to the subject

H&M was fined €50,000 for monitoring its employees with surveillance cameras in violation of the GDPR and of national labor provisions. Following a report

Protection, dated 19. p.m., with a request for specific information and data, but that letter was answered with a letter dated 30. s.m. As a result, a letter

legal costs to an amount of € 1,068. This statement was made by mr. A.J.G.M. van Montfort, judge, in the presence of C. Cooper, Registrar. The verdict

than 14 pixels - Publication is ordered for a period of 4 days from 12:00 p.m., Paris time (France), on the seventh day following notification of this deliberation

resolution could lead to the commission of the offense considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, in accordance with with art. 58

operating room report or birth record. l) The pathological anatomy report. m) The evolution and planning of nursing care. n) The therapeutic application

resolution could lead to the commission of the offence referred to in Article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned in accordance with Article 58.2 of

resolution could lead to the commission of the offense considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, in accordance with art. 58.2 of

C" (hereinafter the "publication"), which bore the signature of a certain M. Theodoros, a journalist (hereinafter the "journalist"). The article, both

resolution could lead to the commission of the offense considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, in accordance with art. 58.2 of

in the Law Foundation III, since thecomplainant, on July 8, 2019 at 2:27 p.m. received a business callon your personal mobile phone from the person claimed

[place of residence], applicants, hereinafter: [applicants], lawyer mr. C.M. Sent in Amsterdam, against the legal entity under public law GEMENTE LANGEDIJK

TELEPHONE 1 It was imported to the one claimed from YOIGO on 11/05/2018 at 02:00 a.m. TELEFÓNICA MÓVILES ESPAÑA, SAU and XFERA MÓVILES, SA (YOIGO) with C / Jorge

BV, located in Wormerveer, defendant, lawyers mrs. J.G. Reus, T.J.M. de Weerd and A.M. van Aerde in Amsterdam. Parties are hereinafter referred to as Blauw

on weekdays from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., on Saturdays from 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., and on Sundays from 4:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. According to the respondent's

12:28 p.m., the plaintiff canceled the appointment for health reasons. He had previously booked a hotel room in R. on November 30th, 2021 at 12:28 p.m. for

for sending an unsolicited e-mail advertisement. 2 On 18.05.2020 at 11:26 a.m., the plaintiff received, at the email address of his law firm, [...], from

decision is unfounded. This statement was made by mr. L.M. Reijnierse, judge, in the presence of mr. M.M. van Luijk-Salomons, Registrar. The decision was handed

workers, M.B. of July 2, 1981. 9Article 118, paragraph 1 of the coordinated law of 14 July 1994 on compulsory health care and compensation insurance, M.B. of

at www.bvwg.gv.at DECISIONS D A T U M 2 0 . 1 2 . 2 0 2 1 BUSINESS NUMBER W 2 7 4 2 2 4 2 6 3 8 - 1/1 0 E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal

the lake, or otherwise expert finish. This decision has been taken by mr. M. A. M. Essed, district court judge, and the public expressed on the 9th of February

simplified procedure on 23 March 2021, a case concerning a complaint filed by M. S. against the decision of the President of the Office for Personal Data Protection

they requested an inspection of the complaint file, on 12/28/2023 at 9 a.m. 1.2.7 On 12/30/2022, I re-approved the requested extension of time and informed

Instagram, etc.) and WhatsApp. […] FIRST.- On January 6, 2022, around 3 a.m., he was in the ***ADDRESS.1, with his dog (…). My client (…) found himself