Search results

demergers, contained in the provision adopted by the Guarantor on April 8, 2009 containing “Requirements for mergers and demergers between companies” (web

van Rotterdam vs M.E.E. Rijkeboer (Case C-553/07), decided on the 7" May 2009, para. 48. Page 12 of 13 the Regulation when it failed to comply with the

related to education of all kinds of subjects "," date of incorporation: 02/26/2009 ". FIFTH: On 05/14/2021, it was agreed by the Director of the AEPD: -INITIATE

Tribunal Procedure (First -Tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009 (as amended) Summary of Reasons 1.     Peter Wailes (“Mr Wailes and/or the

Hachette Filipacchi Associés (ICI PARIS) v. France, no. 12268/03, § 47, 23 July 2009; and MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom, no. 39401/04, §§ 143, 18 January

the action or omission to which the accusation relates (TC ruling n. 0 99/2009). Said in the formula used by the ruling of the ETS n. 1/2003, the rights

VI ZR 51/06, GRUR 2007, 527 para. 33; Judgment of March 10, 2009 - VI ZR 261/07, GRUR 2009, 584 para. 15; BGH, NJW 2012, 763 para. 30; BGH, judgment of

the context of its relevance and considered in isolation (BGH NJW 2009, 3580; NJW 2009, 1872; NJW 2005, 279; NJW 1994, 915). Distant interpretations must

2018 last changed by Federal Law Gazette I No. 133/2009 DSG Art. 2 § 24 valid from 01.01.2000 to 31.12.2009 VwGVG § 28 today VwGVG § 28 valid from 01/01/2019

Resolutions, citing by way of example, Resolution No. R / 01191/2009, of May 25, 2009, in which applying the previous judgments resolved: “Ultimately,

Reader contributions undoubtedly fall under the Personal Data Act § 7, cf. NOU 2009: 1 page 107. Collecting and presenting user experiences in a socially important

regard that the Articles 136.4 of the Penal Code and 17 of Royal Decree 95/2009, nor the Judgment of the National High Court of June 20, 2017, cited in Motion

confidentiality according to 25 ch. Section 1 of the Publicity and Confidentiality Act (2009:400). Because two of the concerned the care facilities only provide care

Grande Stevens et al. v. Italy, para. 138-139 and 161. Cf. ECtHR June 11, 2009, Dubus/France. See also: ANDRIES, K., Administrative sanction procedures:

objectively (VwGH 1994-01-24, 93/10/0192; 6 Nov 2001, 97/18/0160; January 19, 2011, 2009/08/0058; cf. also VfSlg 17.082/2003), with regard to the submission of August

by Directive 2006/24/EC of March 15, 2006 and by Directive 2009/136/EC of November 25, 2009 (hereinafter the “ePrivacy” Directive). 23. Article 5(3) of

transaction in rem (Federal Court of Justice, judgment of 03/26/2009, I ZR 153/06, GRUR 2009, 946 [948 para. 18 ff.] - Reifen-Progressiv), the consent under

by Directive 2006/24/EC of March 15, 2006 and by Directive 2009/136/EC of November 25, 2009 (hereinafter the "ePrivacy" Directive). 21. Article 5(3) of

the ePrivacy Directive, adopted in 2002 and amended in 2006 and again in 2009, does not itself explicitly establish the rule of territorial application

plaintiff refers to the judgment of the Federal Fiscal Court of October 28, 2009 (VIII R 78/05) and the order of the Bavarian State Office for Taxes of March

Court also found it constitutionally compliant in its judgment of 12 February 2009, file no. III. ÚS 989/08, according to which: “It is not a violation of the

Potsdam, judgment of 22 November 2012 - 10 K 272/07 -; Schmidt-Räntsch, 6th ed. 2009, DRiG, § 26, marginal no. 42; in the same vein, also BVerwG, judgment of

Certificate Services of the Digital and Population Information Agency (661/2009). This decision does not assess how the security ban granted to the student

October 1, 2014, Ra 2014/09/0022 with reference to VwGH September 16, 2009, 2009/09/0150). 4.12. According to the settled case law of the VwGH, considerations

Rec 258/2009). To the above it must be added, following the ruling of January 23, 1998, partially transcribed in the SSTS of October 9, 2009, Rec 5285/2005

several against Italy (EMD-2006-1828) and ECtHR's judgment of 20 January 2009 Sud Fondi S.r.l. with several against Italy (EMD-2001-75909). As a result

environment (see the same definition in Section 2 (3) No. 2 UIG BVerwG, Uv 9/24/2009 - 7 C 2.09 - juris; the Federal Administrative Court even concludes that

Church according to the principle of parity (cf. BVerfG, decision of May 12, 2009 - 2 BvR 890/06, juris para. 173), the tax authorities are obliged to to provide

plaintiff refers to the judgment of the Federal Fiscal Court of October 28, 2009 (VIII R 78/05) and the ruling of the Bavarian State Office for Taxes of March

2007, 42865/05, Timpul Info-Magazinet Anghel v. Moldova and ECtHR, 10 March 2009, 18897/91, Times Newspaper Limited v. United Kingdom; ECtHR 28 June 2018

pursuant to § 28 para 3 VwGVG is also out of the question (see VwGH 16.12.2009, 2008/12/0219). 3. 3.1 Material scope of application of the GDPR and the

25 May 2018. Article 26 of the former Personal Data Act was set aside in 2009.[6] This case regards processing executed in the period after these dates

essential for the protection of another individual (see CJEU order of 19 February 2009, C-557/07, LSG-Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung von Leistungschutzrechten GmbH

This change in the practice of the ECJ is related to the entry into force in 2009. of the Treaty of Lisbon and the recognition of the EU Charter of Primary

reference legislation, still applicable, is the GPDP Provision of 19 November 2009, n. 36 (web doc. no. 1679033) “Guidelines on online reports”, deemed compatible

communications, as amended by Directive 2009/136/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of November 25, 2009, hereinafter the “ePrivacy Directive”)

beyond the time of application, but in any case longer than until 24 November 2009. the entire data set of identity card no. XXXX had been stored beyond the

Law [2009], 141 ff [147], with reference to ErlRV on the StF of Section 1 DSG 2000, 1613 BlgNR 20. GP 34 f;, Handbook on Data Protection Law [2009], 141

whichcollect the data (see, in this regard, the judgments of May 7, 2009, Rijkeboer,C-553/07, EU: C: 2009: 293, paragraph 68, and of November 7, 2013, IPI, C-473/12

sanction of this decision by the administrative judge (see Adm. Court July 14, 2009, no. 23857C and 23871C of the docket, Pas. adm. 2022, V° Contentious procedure

applicant] only operated a practice in the Netherlands. As from 17 March 2009, [the applicant] was registered as a dentist in the BIG register. He has

sector units referred to in Art. 9 points 1-12 and 14 of the Act of 27 August 2009 on public finances, a research institute or the National Bank of Poland.

such as those handed down in the cases indicated with the numbers E/03468/2009, in which the AEPD brings up case law doctrine of the AN and the SC on error

called by telephone for promotional activities (see provision of 3 December 2009, in www.gpdp.it, web doc. n. 1679436). Therefore, also with reference to

in the regulatory area of Directive 2002/98/EC as defined by the Directive 2009/136/EC amended version (so-called ePrivacy Directive). a. Legal framework

Procedure(First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009 (StatutorInstrument2009 No. 1976 (L.20)) 27

personal data collected and processed for insurance purposes). See also prop. 2009/10:241 p. 43 and Ds 2011:7. The Swedish Privacy Agency Diary number: DI-2021-1905

II 2004, 387; BVerfG, decision of 03/10/2008 - 1 BvR 2388/03 -, BStBl II 2009, 23). Financial case law assumes that this restriction will continue to apply

Private Healthcare (152/1990). The operation of the registrar started in 2009. 23. The controller has operated as a provider of psychotherapy services

poderjudicial.es/search/juez/index.jsp , Rec. p. I-9705, paragraph 43, and of May 7, 2009, Rijkeboer,C- 553/07 https://www3.poderjudicial.es/search/juez/index.jsp

commercial register could be considered (cf. . BGH, ruling of December 2, 2009,IV ZR 65/09, juris Rn. 18). 31 2. In view of the statements under 1., it

authorized to determine the course of the legal proceedings (cf. BAG August 18, 2009 - 1 ABR 49/08 - Rn. 20, BAGE 131, 358). This also includes the possibility

Certificate Services of the Digital and Population Information Agency (661/2009). This decision does not assess how the security ban granted to the student

seeks a prohibition of the act as it was committed (BGH, judgment of 16 July 2009 - I ZR 56/07, juris para. 10 - Betriebsbeobachtung; BGH, judgment of 26 October

"there is reason to expect" that the fault "may" have had meaning, cf. Rt-2009-661 section 72, Bernt, comments to section 41 of the Administration Act on

the Code and Cons. 162 of the Regulation; Cons. 27 of the EC Regulation No. 2009/223 on European statistics and, at an international level, art. 4 of the

the unambiguous wording of the law (VwGH March 13, 2009, 2005/12/0240, with reference; 06/29/2011, 2009/12/0141). Even if one assumes that a word interpretation

described in STS 02/22/2016 (appeal 1354/2014) It invokes the SAN of 02/04/2009 (resource 304/2007) which maintains that the breach of the principle of legitimate

November 24, 2008, reference number II FPS 4 /08, published by ONSAiWSA from 2009, No. 4, item 62). Suspension of the proceedings should also be justified

Plaintiff is an employee of the Defendant, having been first employed in March 2009. In October 2015, the Plaintiff was promoted to Goods Inwards Line Lead and

instant messaging and web-based e-mail services - ECJ, Judgment of 13 December 2009, p. 467). June 2019 - C-193/18, juris para. 33 et seq. concerning Google's

and 11 Cape. Section 3 of the Public Access to Information and Secrecy Act (2009: 400), OSL. Starting point is thus that confidentiality applies to the information

confidentiality according to 25 ch. Section 1 of the Publicity and Confidentiality Act (2009:400). Because two of the concerned the care facilities only provide care

circumstances identified in Murray v Express Newspapers plc [2008] EWCA Civ 446; [2009] Ch 481, para 36, he concluded that the claimant had a reasonable expectation

Soriano, is a businessman, who was naturalised as a British citizen in May 2009 after moving to the United Kingdom in 2003. He also has Israeli nationality

Law Gazette I No. 3/2013, § 31 as amended by Federal Law Gazette I No. 90/2009, § 32 as amended Federal Law Gazette I No. 71/2005 and § 38c as amended by

31Chambers II, 2019/20, 26643, 641. 32 See, inter alia, CRvB 15 December 2009, ECLI:NL:CRVB:2009:BK8311 and CRvB 27 April 2010, ECLI:NL:CRVB:2010:BM:3881.

in 2011 as a result of the request for information included postings from 2009 that the plaintiff had deleted at least six months before the request for

references to its corresponding positions CIPL and ENISA. " Decision of 1 7-7-2009, no. ref. 205 1 1/2003 par. 37 up to 46. " See L. Mitrou, op.cit. p. 2 1

established case law, based on a judgment of the Administrative Court of 20 October 2009, n ° 25783C of the roll, that the trial judges refuse to sanction a violation

from an ECAI or from an ECAI in accordance with the Regulation (EC) No. 1060/2009 was confirmed. ... Article 171 Assignment to rating levels or risk pools

Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009 (StatutorInstrument2009 No. 1976 (L.20)). 44

continuation of accommodation service activities and the accommodation 239/2009 on the procedure for issuing an operating license. (X. 20.) Government Decree

Vaassen-Göbbels (EU:C:1966:39); CJEU, December 10, 2009, C-205/08, Umweltanwalt von Kärnten (EU:C:2009:767), edge no. 35. See also K. LENAERTS ,I.MASELI&K

the dates of birth of the then presumably eighth graders, 06.01.2008-04.30.2009. between the then presumably sixth graders, 06.01.2010-04.30.2011. date of

to the requirements of European Parliament and Council Regulation (EU) 223/2009. Compliance with the quality requirements require data of a certain content

para. 19 f.; OVG Greifswald, decision of June 21, 1999 - 1 M 63/99 - NVwZ-RR 2009, 93 <93 f.>; OVG Lüneburg, decision of April 25, 2014 - 11 ME 64/14 - juris

default') - established by resolution of ARERA (resolution of 11 December 2009, no. ARG/elt 191/09 and subsequent amendments) and regulated within the '

Decree of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health on Patient Records (298/2009) (hereinafter “the Patient Records Decree”), patient records must be kept

commissioned by the Minister for Justice and Equality (published 29 November 2009), Appendix 3, page 24; https://www.justice.ie/en/JELR/Pages/PB09000504 https://www

of his official duties - of (...) May 2009;4) a copy of the annex to the scope of duties employee No. (...) of 2009 9. The case files include a copy of:

specifications will be corrected by the Wikipedia community. On 7 January 2009, the complainant attempted to add an incomprehensible website (www.hof***

C-201/14, paragraph 34. Judgment of the European Court of Justice of 7 May 2009, Rijkeboer, C-553/07, paragraphs 34-35. Data Inspectorate DI-2018-9274 2

the full panel of judges of the Supreme Administrative Court of October 26, 2009, ref. no. I OPS 10/09, ONSAiWSA 2010 z. 1 item 1). Pursuant to Art. 176 P

finance sector referred to in Art. 9 points 1-12 and 14 of the Act of 27 August 2009 on Public Finance (consolidated text, Journal of Laws of 2019, item 869)

of the public finance sector (indicated in Art. 9 of the Act of 27 August 2009 on Public Finance) is within the scope specified in Art. 102 paragraph. 1

6Article 40 § 1 Data Protection Authority Establishment Act 7RvS 23 April 2009, no. 192.590, Crauwels, recital. 3.2.4. See also I. OPDEBEEK and S. DE SOMER

Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009 (Statutory Instrument 2009 No. 1976 (L.20)). 91

4th, 2018 - VI ZR 128/18 -, para. 9, juris and judgment of September 18th, 2009 - V ZR 75/08 -, para. 12, juris, each with further references). 82That is

protection of the collective interests of consumers and repealing Directive 2009/22/EC (…)” 2.5. In a letter dated September 8, 2020, SOMI held TikTok UK

2015, C-201/14, Smaranda Bara et al., para. 33 et seq.; see also ECJ 7.5.2009, C-553/07, Rijkeboer, para. 68, according to which Administrative Court Judenplatz

Court of December 3, 2008 (rec. 6602/2004) and April 12, 2012 (rec. 5149/2009) and Judgment of the National Court of May 5, 2021 (rec. 1437/2020), among

II 2004, 387; BVerfG, decision of 03/10/2008 - 1 BvR 2388/03 -, BStBl II 2009, 23). Financial case law assumes that this restriction will continue to apply

1019 [8] U.2016.3097V and the judgment of the Western High Court of 12 May 2009 in case 2528-08. [9] LFF No. 68 of 25 October 2017. [10] U.2019.3302Ø [11]

to which it refers are heterogeneous (judgment of May 7, 2009, Rijkeboer, C-553/07, EU:C:2009:293, paragraph 59 and cited jurisprudence). C/ Jorge Juan

application de l'article 4 de la directive 2009/22/ CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 23 avril 2009 modifiée relative aux actions en cessation

principle, both of article 44.3.d) LOPD. " (Judgment of 19 November 2009, rec 338/2009) In light of this, even though the precepts of the regulations that

C-486/12,EU:C:2013:836;Judgmentof7May2009,CollegevanburgemeesterenwethoudersvanRotterdamv M. E. E. Rijkeboer,C-553/07,EU:C:2009:293; Judgmentof9November2010injoinedcases

of 14 March 1989 - 1 BvR 1033/82 -, juris recital 58; decision of 28 April 2009 - 1 BvR 224/07 -, juris recital 14). According to this, here would be for

content of a contractual or pre-contractual legal relationship (cf. BGH GRUR 2009, 506, 507 Rn. 11 - Mobile phone). In this case - as with the interpretation

referred to in this procedure. On the other hand, the AEPD in its Report 624/2009 estimates that "despite the lack of specific regulation in Spain C/ Jorge

principle, both of article 44.3.d) LOPD. " (Judgment of 19 November 2009, rec 338/2009) In light of this, even though the precepts of the regulations that

in 2011 as a result of the request for information included postings from 2009 that the plaintiff had deleted at least six months before the request for

statement5 identified pursuant to article 1, paragraph 3 of law no. 31 December 2009. 196 and subsequent amendments. (Accounting and Public Finance Law). LAZIOcrea

September 2020 - 6 C 10.19 -, juris, para. 20, to ECJ, Judgments of 7 May 2009 - C-553/07 -, Rijkeboer, para. 49 et seq, of 17 July 2014 - C 141/12 -, YS

issued by the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health on patient documents (298/2009; patient document decree). 102. The Ship's Pharmacy Act (584/2015) provides

Others v Commission, (Case C-97/08 P, judgment delivered 10 September 2009) EU:C:2009:536, § 58 - 61 477Ori Martin and SLM v Commission (C-490/15 P, judgment

entoftheCourtofJusticeof7May2009,College vanburgemeesterenwethoudersvanRotterdamvM.E.E. Rijkeboer,C-553/07,ECLI:EU:C:2009:293;Judgment of the Court (GrandChamber)

Surprising Failure of Anonymization", published in the UCLA Law Review in 2009 (Vol. 57, No. 6, pp. 1701-1777), available here. https://www.uclalawreview

Judgment of December 22, 2010 (appeal contentious-administrative no. 257 / 2009), that << the principle of good faith protects the legitimate trust that

Judgment of December 22, 2010 (appeal contentious-administrative no. 257 / 2009), that << the principle of good faith protects the legitimate trust that

Judgment of December 22, 2010 (contentious-administrative appeal nº 257/2009), that «the principle pio of good faith protects the legitimate expectations

Judgment of December 22, 2010 (contentious-administrative appeal no. 257/2009), that "the principle of good faith protects legitimate expectations that

2007 (Rec.117/2006); April 23, 2008 (Rec. 274/2007), May 20, 2010 (Rec. 337/2009), October 14 2010 (Rec. 64/2010) etc. Thus, in the case of data processing