Search results

no allegation has been received from the party claimed. Article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP -provision of which the claimed party was informed in the agreement

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

sanctioning proceedings were initiated, based on Article 63 and Article 64 LPACAP and an infringement of Article 6(1) GDPR typified in Article 83(5) GDPR

the same Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure Common Public Administrations (hereinafter LPACAP) -provision of which

of articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, onCommon Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter,LPACAP), for the alleged violation

no allegation has been received by the respondent party. Article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP - provision of which the respondent was informed in the agreement

against EASYJET, in accordance with the provided in articles 63 and 64 of the LPACAP, for the alleged violation of article 15 of the RGPD, typified in article

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (in hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (in hereafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

provided in article 64.2.b) of the law 39/2015, of October 1, Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter LPACAP), the sanction

indicated in article 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Procedure Common Administrative Law of Public Administrations, which in its section f) establishes

established in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

established in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

indicated in article 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Procedure Common Administrative Law of Public Administrations, which in section f) establishes that

no allegation has been received any by the claimed party. Article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP - provision of which the claimed party was informed in the agreement

(SSTC 11/1981, of 8 April, F. 7; 196/1987, of 11 December [RTC 1987, 196] , F. 6; and with regard to art. 18, STC 110/1984, F. 5)". In relation to this

accordance with articles 64.2.f) and 85 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (LPACAP), at the Failure to

data without implementing adequate security measures, violating Article 5(1)f GDPR and Article 32 GDPR. The data subject had health problems arising from

resolution, as established in the article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP. In accordance with the provisions of article 85 of the LPACAP, you may recognize your responsibility

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

indicated in article 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Procedure Common Administrative Law of Public Administrations, which in section f) establishes that

stated in article 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations, which in its section f) establishes that

saidrequirements.28 In this regard, article 7, letter f), of Directive 95/46 - (current article 6.1.f) of the RGPD) - fixesthree cumulative requirements for

considered as a Resolution proposal” in the terms Article 64 letter f) Law 39/2015 (October 1). “f) Indication of the right to make allegations and to be

resolution, as established in the article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP. In accordance with the provisions of article 85 of the LPACAP, you may recognize your responsibility

stated in article 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations, which in its section f) establishes that

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of 1 of October, of the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

resolution, as established in the article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP. In accordance with the provisions of article 85 of the LPACAP, you may recognize your responsibility

considered as a Resolution proposal” in the terms Article 64 letter f) Law 39/2015 (October 1). “f) Indication of the right to make allegations and to be

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

against EDREAMS, in accordance with the provisions of Articles 63 and 64 of the LPACAP, for the alleged violation of Article 15 of the GDPR, typified in Article

indicated in article 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Procedure Common Administrative of Public Administrations, which in its section f) establishes that

consequently, dated July 6, 2022, for the purposes provided for in article 64.2 of the LOPDGDD, the Director of the Spanish Data Protection Agency agreed

specified in the art. 64.2 b) of Law 39/2015, of 1/10, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (LPACAP), the The penalty that

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

February 23, 2023 and check-in REGAGE23e00011468445, claim received from F.F.F. related to the C/ Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 – Madrid sedeagpd.gob

article 5.1.f) of the RGPD. VII Classification of the violation of article 5.1.f) of the RGPD The aforementioned violation of article 5.1.f) of the RGPD

article 5.1.f) of the RGPD. VII Classification of the violation of article 5.1.f) of the RGPD The aforementioned violation of article 5.1.f) of the RGPD

C.C.C. (claimant 3), D. DDD (claimant 4); by Dª E.E.E. (claimant 5) by D.F.F.F. (claimant 6), and D. GGG (claimant 7), and based on the following: ACTS

stated in article 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations, which in its section f) establishes that

indicated in article 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Procedure Common Administrative of Public Administrations, which in its section f) establishes that

article 5.1.f) of the RGPD. V Classification of the violation of article 5.1.f) of the RPGD The aforementioned violation of article 5.1.f) of the RGPD

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

the Spanish DPA concluded that there was an infringement of Articles 5(1)(f) and 32(1) of the GDPR. The complainant received a notification from Consellería

said action is not would have been carried out in accordance with arts. 5.1.f) and 32 of the GDPR, a request that is denied through Resolution dated 12/24/2021

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (in hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

the complained party, with according to the provisions of articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Pro- Common Administrative Assignment

SAW Article 5.1. f) GDPR Article 5.1.f) “Principles relating to processing” of the GDPR establishes: "1. The personal data will be: (…) f) treated in such

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP), for the following

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

the claimed party, in accordance with the provided in articles 63 and 64 of the LPACAP, when appreciating reasonable indications of violation of the provisions

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (in hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

adjusted to the provisions of article 68 of the LOPDGDD and article 64.2 of the LPACAP (in this case, of the different corrective powers provided for in

Description of the impression provided: . Header: Addressed to GOOGLE LLC by F.F.F., on 01/03/2019, as as a result of a court ruling. C/ Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd

b) of the aforementioned Regulation. For the purposes specified in the art. 64.2 b) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Common Administrative Procedure of Public

a violation of Articles 5(1)(f) and 32 GDPR. Finally, the DPA reprimanded the controller for violations of Articles 5(1)(f) and 32 GDPR. According to national

28001 – Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 5/26 hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged violation of article 5.1.f) of the RGPD and article 32 of the RGPD, typified

publication to have been lawful due to the legitimate interest (per Article 6(1)(f) GDPR) it pursued. However, in June 2020 the claimant provided evidence to

83.5.b) of the RGPD. " FOURTH: THAT for the purposes provided for in art. 64.2 b) of Law 39/2015, of 1/10, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public

Common Administrative Procedure of the Administrations Public (hereinafter, LPACAP) the director of the Council agreed to the accumulation and processing joint

OPENBANK, with in accordance with the provisions of articles 63 and 64 of the LPACAP, for the alleged infringement of Article 25 of the RGPD, typified in

grants each au- control authority and as established in articles 47, 48.1, 64.2 and 68.1 of the Law Organic 3/2018, of December 5, Protection of Personal

proceedings against the respondent, with in accordance with Articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015 of 1 October on the Common Administrative Procedure for Public

sedeagpd.gob.es 7/9 And later, in Annex f) it defines the concept of commercial communication of the Following way: "F) Commercial communication": any form

applicableindicated in article 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the ProcedureCommon Administrative of Public Administrations, which in its section f)establishes that

preparation of the record. That the analysis therefore focused on sections e) and f) of art. 6.1. 4. That it was not possible to determine precisely whether the

president nor C / Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es Page 64 64/136 of the principal. Therefore, for the third party it is optional to ask

with Articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015 of 1 October on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (‘the LPACAP’), for the alleged infringement

procedure for the exercise of rights. Secondly, you comment that article 64.5.f) authorizes you to issue a previous report. In this case, I regret to inform

absorption between CaixaBank Payments, E.F.C., E.P., S.A.U., the absorbed company, and CaixaBank Consumer Finance, E.F.C., S.A.U., absorbing company; both wholly

provisions of articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (LPACAP), for the following reasons:

Data andguarantee of digital rights and for the purposes provided in article 64.2, theDirector of the Spanish Agency for Data Protection agreed to admit theclaim

article 72.1.e) of the LOPDGDD. “ "For the purposes specified in the art. 64.2 b) of Law 39/2015, of 1/10, on Procedure Common Administrative Law of Public

with article 83.4 a) of the RGPD. " "For the purposes specified in the art. 64.2 b) of Law 39/2015, of 1/10, of the Administrative Procedure Common Administrative

Constitution (SSTC 11/1981, of April 8, F. 7; 196/1987, of December 11 [RTC 1987, 196], F. 6; and regarding art. 18, STC 110/1984, F. 5). Those limits or may be direct

accordance with the provisions of Article 56(2) in relation to Article 57(1)(f), both of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council

Procedure. C / Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es Page 64 64/141 It should be noted that any sanctioning procedure and, where appropriate

and article 73.t) of the LOPDGDD” "For the purposes specified in the art. 64.2 b) of Law 39/2015, of 1/10, on Procedure Common Administrative Law of Public

supervisory authority of another Member State of the European Union, form article 64.3 of this organic law. " Although the specific date of the agreement to process

specified in the art. 64.2 b) of Law 39/2015, of 1/10, on Procedure Common Administrative System of Public Administrations (LPACAP, hereinafter), the sanction