Search results

processing pursuant to Article 21, Paragraph 1 and there is no justified reason for the processing. According to Article 21, paragraph 1 of the Data Protection

referred to in Article 33(1) of the AVG.15 15 File note 1, Notification of personal data breach 7-2-2019. P 5. 3.4.3 Assessment Article 33(1) of the AVG provides

categories of information in Article 8 (1) and (5) of Directive 95/46 or in Article 9 (1), Article 10 (1) and Article 10 of Regulation 2016/679, the infringement

35 (1) 9) of the PSA, but in refusing to comply with a request for information, § 35 (1) 5 ) and Point 10 of because § 35 section 1 subsection 5 1 added

show_context_help(h) { newWindow = window.open(h,"Help", "menubar=1,toolbar=1,scrollbars=1,resizable=1,width=700, height=500"); } </SCRIPT><NOSCRIPT></NOSCRIPT><STYLE

self-determination of the respective purchaser from Article 2, Paragraph 1 in conjunction with Article 1, Paragraph 1 of the Basic Law, which conflicts with interest

code, in particular its articles L. 251-1 to L. 255-1, L. 242-1 to L. 242-8, L. 722-1; Considering article 10 of Law No. 2023-380 of May 19, 2023 relating

the infringement of Article 5.1 c) AVG has been proven. f)Transparent information (Article 5.1(a); Article 12.1. and Article 13.1. and 13.2. AVG) 43.The

processing conditions of Article 6 (1) of the GDPR. This follows both from Article 21(1)(1)(2) of the GDPR, which refers to Article 6(1)(1)(e) and (f) of the

Regulation as an independent processor (Article 28 par. 10 GDPR). Furthermore, in accordance with the provisions of Article 29 of the GDPR, the processor should

for violation of article 5.1.f) of the RGPD. IV Classification of the violation of article 5.1.f) of the RGPD The violation of article 5.1.f) of the RGPD

interest). […] 10. Data transfers 10.1 Data storage and processing facilities. The Client accepts that Google, without prejudice to Section 10.2 (Data Transfers)

claimed 3 legal bases for the processing: Article 6(1)(c) legal obligation, Article 6(1)(b) contract, and Article 6(1)(f) legitimate interests. The Court rejected

finepublic, as indicated in article 77.1. c) and 2. 4. 5. and 6. of the LOPDDGG: “ 1. Theregime established in this article will be applicable to the treatments

October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (in hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged infringement of article 5.1.f) of

was an infringement of article 5, paragraph 1, a), b) and c) and paragraph 2, article 6, paragraph 1, f) and article 24 paragraph 1 of the GDPR. 15JudgmentAsociación

infringement of Article 32 GDPR in conjunction with Article 5(1)(f) GDPR? The Romanian DPA (ANSPDCP) found that the controller violated Article 32 GDPR as they

Regulation no. 1/2000; REPORTER Dr. Antonello Soro; PROVIDED THAT 1. The complaint against the company and the investigative activity. 1.1. With a complaint

Agency's decision 3.1. Authorization to record telephone conversations 3.1.1. Pursuant to Article 9 (1) of the Data Protection Regulation 1, there is in principle

§ 56 subsection 1, subsection 2 point 8, § 58 subsection 1, § 10 of the Personal Data Protection Act (IKS) and Article 58 paragraph 1 point d and paragraph

with the provisions of article 58.2.i) of the GDPR, for the alleged infringement of article 6.1 of the GDPR, typified in article 83.5.b) of the GDPR. SECOND:

restaurant owner lawful in line of Article 5(1)(a) GDPR? The Spanish DPA concluded that there has been a breach of Article 5(1)(a) GDPR because the uploading

authorities an infringement of Article 5 (1) (d) GDPR? The AEPD agreed to impose a penalty for infringement of Article 5 (1) (d) for lack of accuracy in

ofcombined provisions of Articles 5, paragraph 1 to 1. c) and article 5, paragraph 1 al. f) with article83, paragraph 5, al. a), the General Data Protection

the infraction has not been accredited, in accordance with article 90.1 of Law 39/2015, of 1/10, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations

typified in article 83.5.e) of the RGPD, which considers as such: “no facilitate access in breach of article 58, paragraph 1 ”. The same article establishes

Supervision Authority of 05.11.2019 No 2.1-3/19/3612 and reopen the complaint lodged by the applicant of the complaint of 10.10.2019 and refer the matter to another

A 9/10 - With regard to the violation of article 38.6 of the GDPR, the restricted committee notes that a new DPO has been appointed, as of April 1, 2021

privacy policy, contravene Articles 13(1), 6(1)(a) and 8 GDPR? The AEPD found that GRUP BC S.L violated Article 13(1), 6(1)(a) and 8 GDPR. Share your comments

on the merits in accordance with Article 98 et seq. WOG, to: - on the basis of Article 58.2.c) GDPR and Article 95, §1, 5° WOG to the controller order that

prohibited by article 21.1 of the LSSI? In this case, there was no dispute. BUBO MEDIA acknowledged that their actions were not in line with article 21.1 LSSI,

Moreover, the information provided as per Article 13 GDPR were not compliant with the requirements of Article 12 GDPR in light of the fact that TikTok services

Law §1 para 1 Data Protection Law §1 para 2 Data Protection Law §9 para 1 Media Law §1 no 6 Media Law §1 no 7 Media Law §1 Z8 lit c Law of Parties §1 para

processing of personal data, cf. the Privacy Ordinance Article 4 No. 2 and the Personal Data Act § 1. Article 6 (1) of the Privacy Regulation requires that the data

included in the crime of fraud of the Article 248.1 of the current CP. Crime with the aggravation of article 250.1.6º of the CP. What has been seen so far

for the claimed party, for the alleged infringement of article 32.1 of the RGPD, typified in article 83.4.a) of the aforementioned Regulation, and considered

03/31/2020, a written letter is sent to the respondent, *** ADDRESS.1, *** LOCALITY.1 (*** PROVINCE.1), address of the Mer- cantil, giving result "Returned to Origin

registered on the Robinson List in breach of Article 48(1)(b) LGT and Article 21 GDPR in conjunction with Article 23(4) LOPDGDD. Avilon Center SL made an voluntary

turn, article 72. 1 h) of the LOPDGDD, under the heading "Infringements considered very serious provides: “1 Based on the provisions of article 83.5 of

to Article 15 of the Garante Regulation No 1/2000; Rapporteur: Dr Antonello Soro; PROVIDED THAT The Council of State requested, pursuant to Article 4 of

In an Article 60 GDPR procedure, the Danish DPA reprimanded Danske bank for a violation of Article 32(1) GDPR. A technical error resulted in the unauthorised

FIRST: IMPOSE A.A.A., with NIF *** NIF.1,  For an infringement of article 5.1.c) of the RGPD, typified in article 83.5 of the mentioned rule, a fine of

www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es Page 10 10/10 In accordance with the provisions of article 50 of the LOPDPGDD, this Resolution will be made

***NIF.1, for a violation of Article 6.1 and another of article 13 of the RGPD, typified in Article 83.5 letters a) and b) of the RGPD, a fine of €1,500 (€1

relation to the Article 5 of the LOPDGDD, typified in article 83.5 a) of the RGPD. C / Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 2/10 FOURTH: Once

art. 47 and 48.1 of LOPDGDD. II Article 6.1 of the RGPD establishes the assumptions that allow the legal processing of personal data. Article 14 of the RGPD

processing in dispute, in the limits set in Article 13. With regards to substance, the Court stated, first, that Article 10 sets out what information must be provided

and urban streets ”- following census permanent- (Article 1, paragraph 227, letter a)); Given the art. 1, paragraph 228, of the budget law under which “permanent

Spanish DPA recalled the conditions for valid consent under Article 4(11) GDPR and Article 6(1) LOPDGDD (National data protection law aimed at the implementation

this resolution, in accordance with the provisions of article 98.1.b) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of the Ad- Public

§ 166 para. 1 p. 1 ZPO § 114 para. 1 p. 1, § 121 para. 1 StVZO § 31a paragraph 1 p. 1, paragraph 3 Regulation (EU) 2016/679 Art. 5 para. 1 lit. d, Art

***NIF.1, for an infringement of Article 5.1.f) of the RGPD, typified in Article 83.5 of the RGPD, in relation to Article 72(1)(a) a fine of EUR 10 000 (TEN

of article Article 24.1, and in relation to the obligations referred to in the previous section, The information obligation provided for in Article 5 of

infringement of article 5.1(b), as defined in Article 83(5)(a) and considered for the purposes of the statute of limitations in Article 72(1)(a), a fine of

The fact that the processing of the controller relied on Article (6)(1)(b) GDPR and Article 6(1)(c) GDPR as legal basis affects the holding of the DPA since

procedure for the one claimed by the allegedinfringement of article 6.1.a), typified in article 83.5.a) of the RGPD.FIFTH: Notified the initiation agreement

ascertained, that pursuant to Article 166, paragraph 7, of the Code and Article 16, paragraph 1, of the Regulation of the Guarantor no. 1/2019, this measure should

granted to supervisory authorities in Article 57.1 of Regulation (EU)2016/679 (RGPD). Thus, with dates of 10/16/18, and 10/31/18, an information request is

for in article 15.1 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 that are not be included in the remote access system. 3. For the purposes established in article 12.5 of

in paragraph 1 of the same article, which include legality, objectivity and transparency of processing in accordance with article 5 par. 1 item a' - i.e

section 1, subsection 1, section 14, subsections 1–2, section 15, subsections 1 and 3. and subsection 4, 3 points, section 16, subsection 1, section 18

       The requests of 10 July 2018 and 3 September 2018 referred to in this judgment were based on the Wob and Article 15 of the GDPR. 2.1. In the part of the

C/EX/6429-1/07-10-2020 for providing its views, in which the Authority replied to the letter No. C/EX/6429-1/07-10-2020. C/EIS/6905/09-10-2020, it stated

compliance with paragraph 1 ("accountability") ". 8.1. Based on the Data Minimization Principle established by Article 5 (1) (c) of the GIP, Defendant

Aalmoes and 1 1 2 others v the Netherlands admissibility of 25- 1 1 -2004. , See Press Release C / EX / 1728 / 0 1 .3.20 1 8 regarding the granting ofno

the article 43.1 of said Law. C / Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es Page 12 12/12 II Article 85 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of

highest amount of € 10,000,000 […] in Annex 1 Classified in Category I, Category II or Category III. In Annex 1 is the violation of Article 33, first member

art. 16, paragraph 1, of the Guarantor Regulation n. 1/20129, and believes that the conditions pursuant to art. 17 of Regulation no. 1/2019. Pursuant to

details. Injunction order against UniCredit SpA - June 10, 2020 Register of measures n. 99 of 10 June 2020 GUARANTOR FOR THE PROTECTION OF PERSONAL DATA

period ”. In this sense, article 77.1 c) and 2, 4 and 5 of the LOPGDD, indicates: 1. "The regime established in this article shall apply to the treatment

in its database. The request for erasure under Article 17(1) GDPR is not applicable, because under Article 17(3)(e) GDPR, the processing was necessary for

personal data in violation of Article 5(1)(c) GDPR and Article 15(1) GDPR. Firstly, the DPA found a violation of Article 5(1)(c) GDPR, as the controller

Section 1 (1) DSG can therefore not be assumed (RS0130870). 3.2.1. On the legality of the publication of the BF's data in the app Art 6 para 1 GDPR contains

referred to as ABN AMRO. 1.2 1.2 [Appellants] lodged an appeal with the Court of Appeal on 1 May 2019, received at the Court Registry on 1 May 2019, against the

written procedure, Article 17 (10) of Law 2190/1994, as replaced by Article 13 (1) of Law 3801/2009 and paragraph 11 of that article, provides that the

by the alleged violation of Article 32 of the RGPD, Article 5.1.f) of the RGPD, Article 25 of the RGPD, typified in Article 83.5 of the RGPD. FOURTH: On

Complaint no. Γ/ΕΙΣ/7103/16-10-2020, Γ/ΕΙΣ/7255/22-10-2020, Γ/ΕΙΣ/7299/23-10- 2020, G/EIS/7300/23-10-2020 and G/EIS/7301/23-10-2020 notifications of breaches

for violating Article 5(1)(f) GDPR, Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, Article 5(2) GDPR, Article 12 GDPR, Article 13 GDPR, Article 14 GDPR, Article 24(1) GDPR, and Article

commerce (hereinafter LSSI), as provided in article 43.1 of said Law. II Article 85 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure Common of Public

basis of the processing, taking into account article 11 par. 1 and 2 of Law 3471/2006, may be article 6 par. 1 f of the GDPR ("the processing is necessary

the Guarantor pursuant to Article 166, paragraph 7, of the Code "(Article 16, paragraph 1, of the Guarantor Regulation no. 1/2019). The aforementioned

decided the following: Article 66 GDPR gives the possibility for a procedure of urgency and from this article (and Article 66 and Article 62 GDPR), the European

right to data portability ; (c) where the processing is based on Article 6(1)(a) or Article 9(2)(a), the existence of the right to withdraw consent at any

Sentence 1, Section 102 Paragraph 1 BetrVG, Section 17 Paragraph 2 Sentence 1 KSchG) on the consultation (e.g. Section 90 Paragraph 2 Sentence 1, Section

Juan, 6www.aepd.es28001 - Madridsedeagpd.gob.es Page 10 10/10In accordance with the provisions of article 50 of the LOPDPGDD, this Re-solution will be made

the processing is based on Article 6(1)(a) or on Article 9, (c) where the processing is based on Article 6(1)(a) or Article 9(2)(a), the existence of the

under Article 14 GDPR result in the general unlawfulness of the processing and the obligation for the controller to delete the data under Article 17(1)(d)

provision(s): Regarding 1) - Article 5(1)(a) and (c) and Article 6(1) of the Data Protection Basic Regulation - DSGVO, OJ No L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1. Re 2) (a) Section

privacy. Health data are special categories of data covered by Article 9 GDPR. According to Article 137 of the Italian Data Protection Code, health data can

right to privacy. Health data are sensitive data covered by Article 9 GDPR. According to Article 137 of the Italian Data Protection Code, health data can

right to privacy. Health data are sensitive data covered by Article 9 GDPR. According to Article 137 of the Italian Data Protection Code, health data can

under Article 28 of the GDPR and the responsibilities arising from failure to comply with them. In fact, on the one hand, Article 28, paragraph 1, of the

imposed by sections 24.1., 28.1. and 30.1. of the DGPS ; -On 11 June 2019, the Disputes Chamber decides, pursuant to Article 95, § 1, 1° and 98 of the ICA

"Principles of Data Protection", article 4.1 of the LOPDGDD determines: "4. Data accuracy. 1. In accordance with article 5.1.d) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679

same article 83. 40. Article 83 of the GDPR provides: 1. Each supervisory authority shall ensure that administrative fines imposed under this Article for

found violations of Articles 5(1)(c) and 6 GDPR and Article 29(1) of Law 125(I)/2018. Concerning the violation of Article 29(1) of Law 125(I)/2018, the DPA

with the provisions of article 64 of the LOPDGDD.Finally, it is pointed out that in accordance with the provisions of article 112.1 of theLPACAP, there is

the controller was in breach of Article 38(1) GDPR at the time of the investigation. Regarding the breach of Article 39(1)(b) GDPR, the CNPD concurred with

commerce (hereinafter LSSI), as provided in article 43.1 of said Law. II Article 85 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure Common of Public

07.2020, 11 LA 104/19, ECLI:DE:OVGNI:2020:0722.11LA104.19.00 Article 1 (1) GG, Article 2 (1) GG, § 7aF DSG ND, § 43 VwGO Proceedings VG Osnabrück, 30 January

theIESAstates that“InrelationtoprocessingforwhichArticle6(1)(b)GDPRisreliedon,Articles 5(1)(a), 12(1)and13(1)(c) GDPR have beeninfringed”. TheIE SAconsidered

complaint under Article 77 GDPR was very clear and limited in scope. However, the DSB went on to assert a violation of Article 12 GDPR and Article 15(1)(h) GDPR

Behavioural Advertising based on Article 6(1)(b) or 6(1)(f) GDPR in the context of the Services. In line with Article 66(1), the order applies with respect

that the article’s publication was in violation of Article 5(1)(c) GDPR, Article 6(1)(f) GDPR, when read in line with Article 85 GDPR. Article 5(1)(c) outlines

available article at https: //verein-n***.at/presse/news/201*/berichteneu*3*1*8*.php from May 11, 2017 reads as follows (formatting not 1: 1 reproduced

for in Article 6 (1) GPA, as well as to be able to demonstrate in the context of internal compliance compliance with the principles of Article 5 1 1 GPA,

Constitution. It therefore went on to say that, Article 57 of the Law, read in combination with Article 60 of the same Law, provide that procedures must

Manifestation of the general right of personality, Article 2 Paragraph 1 GG in conjunction with Article 1 Paragraph 1 GG, or from Section 823 Paragraph 2 BGB in

Ticketmaster had failed to comply with its obligations under Article 5(1)(f) and Article 32 of GDPR. Article 5 (1) : Ticketmaster has failed to comply with the requirements

obligation for the DPA to process the case pursuant to Article 77. It follows from Article 57(1)(a) GDPR that the Data Protection Authority shall, "supervise

the Strijp-S housing complex in Eindhoven. It's agreed 1 Facts 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 that [plaintiff] directly to PME Investment Services

imposed by sections 24.1., 28.1. and 30.1. of the DGPS ; -On 11 June 2019, the Disputes Chamber decides, pursuant to Article 95, § 1, 1° and 98 of the ICA

2504). According with article 2 par. 1-2 of the said 6632/2021 C.Y.A.: "For the hotels of sub-para. aa' of para. a' of par. 2 of article 1 of Law 4276/2014

the Guarantor n. 1/2000; Rapporteur dr. Antonello Soro; WHEREAS 1. The complaint against the company and the preliminary activity. 1.1. With a complaint

would be based 5. 1, a) GDPR, Article 6, Article 12.1 GDPR and Article 14.1 a) GDPR. 67. Moreover, a controller, in this case defendant 1, cannot suffice

the provisions of Act no. 33/2013 on consumer loans, ie. Article 5 (now k) Article 5 and Article 10. which stipulate that the consumer's credit rating is

union membership is in principle prohibited. Article 24.1 of the GDMP also states that that : 10 "ARTICLE 29" Working Party on Data Protection, "Opinion

Regulation) Article 1, paragraph 2, Article 5, Article 6, paragraph 1, subparagraph f, Article 17(1)(a), (c) and (d), Article 17(3)(a), Article 21(1) Judgments

par. 1, lit. a) and 13 of the Regulation. The data controller must process the data "lawfully, correctly and transparently" (Article 5, paragraph 1, letter

EUROPA LINEAS AÉREAS SA, with CIF *** CIF.1 , for an infringement of article 32.1 of the RGPD, typified in Article 83.4.a) of the RGPD, a fine of € 500,000

requests it. ". 26. Article D. 213-1 of the same code provides that "[t]he amount mentioned in article L. 213-1 is set at 120 euros" and article D. 213-2 provides

processing carried out is in violation of Article 5(1)(f) GDPR, Article 25(1) GDPR, Article 32 GDPR and Article 35 GDPR. Especially, the controller cannot

otherwise makes it impossible to exercise the information function" (Article 2, paragraph 1, of the Deontological Rules) and that the existence of this requirement

parties are hereinafter referred to as the applicant and Microsoft. 1 The procedure 1.1. The course of the procedure is apparent from: - the application with

the scope of the obligations and rights provided for in Articles 6 (1), 10, 11 (1), 12 and 21 when such a restriction constitutes a necessary measures

purpose limitation under Article 5(1)(a) of the GDPR. 1(b) and the obligation (principle) of accountability under Article 5(1)(b). 2 of the GDPR, that

Ordinance Article 6 and Article 5 No. 1 letter a. The background and reasons for the decision follow below. 2. Details of the facts of the case On 10 April

euros, for the above violations of article 17 in combination with article 21 par. 3 of the GCP and article 25 par. 1 of the GCPD. The Deputy Chairman The

violation of the general right of personality under Article 1.1, Article 2.1 of the Basic Law (Article 7, Article 8 of the Basic Law) was to be taken into account

obligation (Article 4:32 § 1 Wft). Therefore, Article 6(1)(c) GDPR was relevant. However, the Court highlighted that the phrase "at least on" in Article 6(1) GDPR

claimed, by thealleged violation of Article 5.1.c) of the RGPD, typified in Article 83.5 of theRGPD.FIFTH: On 07/10/20 this Agency receives a written allegations

the alleged violation of article 21 of theLSSI, classified as minor infractions according to article 39.1.c) of said textlegal.1. APPOINT RRR as an instructor

additional information may be requested, as follows from Article 12, sixth paragraph, of the GDPR . 5.1. By default, the Commission asks people who submit a

on January 29, 2020, pursuant to Art. 10, para. 1 of the Personal Data Protection Act, respectively Art. 57, § 1 (f) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the

violation of article 6.1. RGPD, typified in article 83.5.a), and article 31, in relation to article 58.1.e), both of the RGPD, typified in article 83.5.e) of

Article 58(1)(e) in conjunction with Article 83(1) to (3) and Article 83(5)(e) of Regulation 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27

connection with Article 5 paragraph 1 point c, Article 9 paragraph 1, Article 58 paragraph 2 point f, point g and point i and with Article 83 paragraph 2

subject pursuant to Article 82(1) GDPR, for a theft of their personal identity and financial data, because it violated Article 32(1) GDPR which led to a

infringement of Article 5.1 b) in conjunction with Article 6.4. AVG, on article 5.1 a) in conjunction with article 6.1. AVG and on article 5.1 c) GDPR has

violates Article 17.1(c) AVG. 3.2. With regard to the infringement of Article 6.1 and Article 21.4 of the AVG 29. In its statement of defence of 10 October

connection with Article 31, Article 58(1)(e) in connection with Article 83(1-3) and Article 83(5)(e) of Regulation 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the

personal images, in violation of Article 5(1)(a) GDPR? The Spanish DPA (AEPD) found that the defendant's conduct violated Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, as a broader principle

(1)-(3), Article 83 (5)(e) in connection with Article 31, Article 58 (1)(e), Article 58 (2)(i) of Regulation EU 2016/679 of the European Parliament and

limit mandated by Article 33(1). Did the secretariat of the DPA breach its data security obligations under Articles 32(1), 33(1), and 34(1)? The Datatilsynet

1781) in connection with Article 31, Article 58(1)(a) in connection with Article 83(1)-(3) and Article 83(5)(e) of Regulation EU 2016/679 of the European

necessity is maintained under Article 6.1 b) to f) of the GDPR and therefore in Article 6.1.c) invoked in the species. Article 6.1 of the GDPR in fact reproduces

personal data pursuant to Article 33 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679". Article 70.1 of the LOPDGDD indicates the subjects responsible. "1. They are subject to the

Paragraph 1 Clause 1 DSG M-V a. F.). The official data protection officer is responsible in accordance with Section 19 Paragraph 2 Sentence 1 DSG M-V a

data portability; c) when the treatment is based on article 6, paragraph 1, letter a), or the Article 9, paragraph 2, letter a), the existence of the right

the time of the audit, there had been a breach of Article 37(7) GDPR. Regarding the breach of Article 38(1) GDPR, the DPA considered that the DPO had not

alleged infringement of Article 37.1 b) of the RGPD, in relation to Article 34.1 ñ) of the LOPDGDD, typified in accordance with article 83.4 of the RGPD. FIFTH:

submits that Article 77 AVG 2, interpreted in the light of Articles 1, 51(1) and 57 AVG, recitals 7, 10 and 141 AVG, Article 8 Charter and Article 16 TFEU,

assessment on the wording of Article 85 GDPR, The Norwegian Constitution § 100, The European Convention of Human Rights Article 10, and the International Covenant

merits 37/2021 - 10/15 condition of necessity is maintained under Article 6.1 b) to f) of the GDPR. The article 6.1 of the GDPR replaces Article 7 of the Directive

and to handle complaints in that regard in accordance with Article 10/1, §1, and Article 10/7, §4, of the Decree of 18 July 2008 on the electronic administrative

aanvullende bepalingen verwerking persoonsgegevens in de zorg'). Section 10.1.1 and 13.2.1 of the NEN 7510 highlight that healthcare providers should develop

Articles 5(1)(a) and (c), 6(1)(b) and (c) and 9(1)(b) of the Regulation. Therefore, having regard to the remedial powers granted by Article 58(2) of the

TELEPHONE. 1 that appears on the website corresponds to C.C.C., with DNI *** NIF.1 and installation address on the street *** ADDRESS.1, *** LOCALITY. 1.  After

provided for in Article 83.5.b) in relation to Article 13; and third, an infringement provided for in Article 83.4.a) in relation to Article 28 all of them

violation of Article 6(1)(e) and 6(1) GDPR - The lack of information on the identity of the controller and the DPO amounts to a violation of Article 13(1)(a) and

regulated in article 6 of the GDPR. The assumptions that allow the processing of personal data to be considered lawful listed in article 6.1 of the GDPR: 1. Treatment

connection with Article 31, Article 58(1)(e) and (f) in connection with Article 83(1-3) and Article 83(5)(e) of Regulation 2016/679 of the European Parliament and

the fine forfeited by Menzis. 2. Text of the offence and charge section 1 2.1 Text of the infringement The breach of the order subject to periodic penalty

court referred to Article 43(1),(2) Law N. 158 (I)/1999, which is the Cypriot Law on General Principles of Administrative Law. Article 43(1) Law N. 158 (I)/1999

without complying with the requirements of § 96 para. 1 no. 3 of the Labor Constitution Act or § 10 para. 1 of the AVRAG. In its appeal, the defendant requests

Articles 5(1)(a), 12(1) and 13(1)(c) GDPR within three months, to refer not only to information provided on data processed pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) GDPR

refers to the Privacy Ordinance Article 6 No. 1 letter f as the relevant valid basis for processing, as well as Article 21 No. 1 on the data subject's right

(Datenschutzbehörde - DSB) held that the doctor had violated Article 5(1)(a) GDPR and Article 9(1) and (2) GDPR as the patients had not given their ecplicit

*** COMPANY.1., With NIF *** NIF.1, for a violation of the article 5.1.f) of the RGPD, typified in article 83.5. a) of the RGPD, a fine of € 10,000 (ten thousand

for the alleged violation of Article 5.1.f) of the RGPD, in relation to article 5 of the LOPDGDD, as indicated in article 83.5 a) of the RGPD. FIFTH: Once

Guarantor pursuant to Article 166(7) of the Code" (Article 16(1) of the Regulation of the EDPS). 16(1) of the Garante's Regulation No. 1/2019). In this regard

expression under Article 10 ECHR. Lastly, whether a member state can provide more extensive protection for personal data than that provided under Article 13 Directive

prevent a data breach (Article 32 GDPR). Does the plaintiff have a right to compensation according to Article 82(1) GDPR and does Article 82(3) GDPR stipulate

approved appeal of Article 5(1)(a), Article 12(1), Article 13(1) and Article 13(2). The appeal for Article 5(1)(c), Article 6(1) and Article 8 GDPR was not

Management Page on 06/10/2019 and on 20/10/2019 that were observed by the Inspection Service on the website on 17/10/2019 and on 20/10/2019 respectively,

the same date (see Article 94 GDPR). That the initiating petition in this case dates from 22 May 2018 and that Article 48, paragraph 10 of the (Dutch) Implementation

[The equivalent GDPR Article to Article 48(3)(a) EU GDPR is Article 46(3)(a) GDPR, and Article 50(1)(d) EU GDPR is Article 49(1)(d) GDPR.] Share blogs

measures 1. Principles 52. In accordance with Article 12 of the Law of 1 August 2018, the National Commission has the powers provided for in Article 58.2 of

meaning of article 4, opening words under 1, 2 and 15, of the AVG, article 10 of the AVG and article 1, preamble below and b, of the Wb and article 16 of the

BVWG: 2021: W211.2230221.1.00 In RIS since 10/01/2021 Last updated on 10/01/2021 Document number BVWGT_20210903_W211_2230221_1_00

discontinued. Pursuant to Article 28(2) of the VwGVG, the Administrative Court must decide on complaints under Article 130(1)(1) of the Federal Constitution

of a finding under article 15 of the GDR instead of the provisions of article 15 of the GDR. 36, § 4 and § 5 as well as Article 38, § 1 of the Law of 30

(see “1.2.4- As regards the complaint according to which the defendant hadless time than the complainant to prepare his arguments ”).1.1.1. Place1.1.1.1.-

processing under Article 6(1), and failing to comply with the obligation to provide information under Article 13 GDPR. On the topic of Article 6(1) GDPR the Norwegian

Commission, or in the case of transfers referred to in Article 46 or 47, or the second subparagraph of Article 49(1), reference to the appropriate or suitable safeguards

Articles 2.1, 4 2), 5.1 c) and 57.1 a), f) and h) GDPR, to the extent necessary read in conjunction with Article 288(2) TFEU and Articles 4 § 1, 63, 72 and

artikel 100, §1, 2° WOG de buitenvervolgingstelling bevelen, of de klacht seponeren overeenkomstig artikel 95, §1, 1° of artikel 100, §1, 1° WOG (naargelang

the defendant on the basis of Article 100.1, 5 ° LCA given the breach noted in Article 6 of the GDPR combined with Article 5.1.a) of GDPR; - To dismiss the

protection regulation article 6 no. 1 letter f, for failure to assess protests, cf. article 21 and for missing information, cf. Article 13. X AS has also complained

presented under Article L. 761-1 of the Code of administrative justice must, therefore, be rejected. DECIDES: -------------- Article 1: The request of

municipality €409,768 (NOK 4,000,000) for breaches of Article 5(1)(f) GDPR, Article 24 GDPR and Article 32 GDPR after a serious ransomware attack led to highly

infringement of article 21.1 of the LSSI, typified in Article 38.4.d) of theLSSI, a sanction of warning.B) For an infringement of article 13 of the RGPD

investigation conferred on the supervisory authorities in Article 57 (1) of the GDPR.Thus, on 31/10/18, an information injunction was sent to the entity in

described violates article 6.1. of the RGPD and is subsumable in the sanctioning type of the article 83.5.a, of the RGPD. IV Article 72.1.b) of the LOPDGDD

DSB cites Articles 5(1)(b) and (e), 9(2)(j), 89(1) GDPR and Section 7(1)(1) and (2)(1) GDPR. In particular, it follows from Article 9(2)(j) GDPR that the

the Guarantor pursuant to Article 166, paragraph 7, of the Code "(Article 16, paragraph 1, of the Guarantor Regulation no. 1/2019). The aforementioned

Clause 1 of the Liability Law, 9 Article 156, the second and third paragraphs of Article 157, the first paragraph of Article 166, Article 168, Article 262

Agency sanction to D. A.A.A., with NIF ***NIF.1, for a violation of Article 5.1.c) of the RGPD, typified in Article 83.5 of the RGPD, with a fine of €300 (three

court asked whether the joint control of data in accordance with Article 4(7) and Article 26(1) GDPR must be interpreted 'exclusively' as involving deliberately

Guarantor n. 1/2000; RAPPORTEUR Dr. Agostino Ghiglia; WHEREAS 1. The complaint against the Company and the preliminary investigation. 1.1. With a complaint

decision, or, in the case of transfers pursuant to Article 46 or 47 or the second subparagraph of Article 49(1), reference to adequate or appropriate safeguards

too sick to work. 1 2See, among other things, article 4 paragraph 1 SUWI and the ZBO register of the Dutch central government. See article 2 paragraph 2 SUWI

the Guarantor pursuant to Article 166, paragraph 7, of the Code "(Article 16, paragraph 1, of the Guarantor Regulation no. 1/2019). In this regard, taking

transparency (Article 5.1 a) GDPR in conjunction with Article 12.1 GDPR) because not only the privacy statement was updated on September 1, 2019 adapted

functions assigned to the control authorities in the article 57.1 and the powers granted in article 58.1 of the Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection

intention to infringe either article 5(1)( c) or article 34(1) of the GDPR. Legal framework 8.1. Pursuant to Article 5(1)(c) of the GDPR “Personal Data

in which the municipality could check whether Article 6 information, Article 9 information and Article 10 information are processed in connection with the

particular the purpose limitation principle (Article 5.1 b) GDPR) and the principle of minimum data processing (Article 5.1 c) GDPR). This follows from both provisions

right to informational self-determination according to Article 1 (1) in conjunction with Article 2 (1) GG. The defendant was not able to eliminate the risk

with Art. 2 para. 1, Art. 1 para. 1 GG, Art. 17 para. 1 lit. d) DSGVO, because her personal data is stored according to Art. 6 para. 1 lit. f. DSGVO had

the Guarantor pursuant to Article 166, paragraph 7, of the Code "(Article 16, paragraph 1, of the Guarantor Regulation no. 1/2019). The aforementioned

complies with Article 5 (1) (a) and Article 6 (1) (f) GDPR. Thus, the controller failed to comply with the accountability principle under Article 5 (2) GDPR

over whether he implements them. 13th 9 10gl. on § 9 BDSG and Art. 2 Paragraph 1 in conjunction with 1 Paragraph 1 GG: Lotz / Wendler, CR 2016, 31, 34. Martini

they should. The Commissioner held that CYTA violated articles 5 (1), 24 (1) and (2), 25 (1) and (2) and 32 of the GDPR and instructed CYTA to establish such

for infringement of Article 32 (1) lit. a DSGVO [German Penal Code]. (Storage of unhashed passwords) here: Fine notice Enclosure: 1 transfer form, cash

on the merits in accordance with Article 1 98 ff WOG , to: - on the basis of Article 58.2, c) AVG and Article 95, §1, 5° WOG to order the defendant that

based on Article 6(1)(c) GDPR. In particular, the appellant argued that pursuant to Article 6(3) GDPR, a public interest task under Article 6(1)(c) GDPR

Service and transferred to the Disputes Chamber pursuant to article 62, § 1 j° article 92, 1° WOG. 10. On 7 February 2020, the Disputes Chamber invites the parties

C/EX/7280-1/02-10-2018 document called the complainant to provide explanations regarding the complaint. With the under no. prot. C/EIS/8285/18-10-2018 in

entitled to information under Article 15(1) GDPR is also, independently, entitled to receive copies pursuant to Article 15(3) GDPR. Both paragraphs concern

the Personal Data Act § 23 and the Privacy Ordinance Article 58 no. 1. Pursuant to Article 58 no. 1 letter a, the Authority has the competence to: "Instruct

207 of August 1 , 2016, p. 1-112.) To a specific ADEQ uaatheidsregeling for the US in the life called within the meaning of Article 45.1 AVG. 12. The Court

infringement of the article 5.1.f) of the RGPD, infringement typified in its article 83.5.a) of the aforementioned regulation. IV. Article 83.5 a) of the GDPR

by the DPA under Article 100 § 1, 6, 10 and 12 of the LCA. The complainant y also denounces a breach of Article 5.1. c) and Article 5.1. e) of the GDPR

II. 1. On the reasons for the decision A. On the breach related to the obligation of transparency 1. On the principles 10. According to Article 12.1 of

controller The matter has been clarified by the registrar on 16.11.2020, 7.1.2021 and 21.1.2021. According to the report received from the registrar on 16 November

appropriate measures and breached the storage limitation principle enshrined in Article 5(1)(e) GDPR, and also failed to fulfill its obligation under Articles 25

" *** DIRECCION.2 *** *** LOCALIDAD.1 CCAA.1 " . In section“ NIF ” the *** NIF.1. And in the section " Telephone 1" the mobile number*** PHONE . 2. The

Österreichische Post AG Status: May 2018 1. who is fiJr responsible for handling your data? 1.1 Austrian Post AG, Rochusplatz 1, 1030 Vienna ("Post", "we", "us")

having knowledge of the following: 1.1 In general, marketing actions can be classified attending to several criteria. 1.1.1. Campaigns managed directly by

that the disclosure lacked legal basis, and was in violation of Article 6(1) and Article 5(1)(a) of the GDPR. The recordings had already been handed over

pursuant to Article 17.1 GDPR , and that the data controller subsequently confirmed the deletion of her account, as required by Article 12(3) and (4) 1 1. The

what exactly he does with the recorded images” (folio nº 1). SECOND: In accordance with article 65.4 of Organic Law 3/2018, of 5 December, of Protection

hereinafter: GDPR), OJ No. L 119 of 4.5.2016 p. 1; § 1 paragraph 1 and 2, § 18 paragraph 1 and § 24 paragraph 1 and paragraph 5 of the Data Protection Act (DSG)

particular in Art. 5 Para. 1 lit. f, Art. 24 Para. 1 sentence 1, Art. 25 Para. 1 and Para. 2 sentence 1, Art. 28 Para. 1 and Art. 89 Para. 1 sentence 2 (...). The

breach of the obligations under article 5 (1) (c) of the Regulation. Failure to inform individuals of the following Article 13 of the Regulation requires

violation of the provisions of Article 5(1)(a), Article 6(1), Article 7(3), Article 12(2), Article 17(1)(b) and Article 24(1) of Regulation 2016/679 imposes

(LOPDGDD) in its article 72, under the heading "Infractions considered very serious ”provides: "1. Based on what is established in article 83.5 of the Regulation

address by the defendant under Article 6(1) GDPR? Did the controller infringe the data minimisation principle under Article 5(1)(c) GDPR? Did the controller

company 1&1 Internet España, S.L. (hereinafter 1&1) with whom you have a contract as a processor. The attack was carried out by the Group ***GROUP.1 as published

services (hereinafter LSSI), in accordance with article 43.1 of said Law. II Article 85 of Law 39/2015, of 1 October, on the Common Administrative Procedure

GDPR (Article 57, 1., a) GDPR), and the performance of all other related tasks with the protection of personal data (Article 57, 1., v) GDPR). 10 49. In

and the DPA determined that the legal grounds of Article 6(1)(b), 6(1)(c), Article 6(1)(d) and Article 6(1)(e) GDPR were not applicable in this case. It also

32 mgrd 4 11 3 18 so.h 5 8 3 10 INKG 6 8 5 7 teresa.lopez 7 6 4 5 Martin Baumann 8 6 4 5 nikolaos.konstantis 9 6 2 6 nho23 10 5 2 5 Bernhard Granadia 11

European Union for a preliminary ruling pursuant to Article 267 TFEU: (1) Does the award of damages under Article 82 of the GDPR (Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the

the provisions of Article 5(1)(a), 5(1)(f), and Article 6(1)(a) GDPR) and €50 (for violating Article 58(1)(a), 58(1)(e) and Article 83(5)(e) GDPR). Thus

information duty included in Article 13 GDPR. Is this a violation of Article 13 GDPR? The AEPD held that there had been a violation of Article 13. According to the

client system is covered by the Law Enforcement Act, cf. section 1 (1) of the Act. 1. The Data Inspectorate has in particular emphasized that the Swedish

Dispute Resolution Chamber validly found a breach of Article 21.1 AVG and Article 12.3 AVG - If Article 21.1 AVG imposes an obligation on the controller to make

the basis of Article 58, paragraph 2, point b) GDPR and Article 100, §1, 5 ° WOG to be reprimanded for the infringement of Article 25 (1) GDPR; b. on the