Search results

breaches of Article 14. 1-2 combined with Articles 12.3 and 12.1 of the GDPR, in Article 15. 1 of the GDPR (combined with Article 12.3 and Article 12.2. Of

Since these operations are explicitly and unconditional in Article 2(b) of Directive 95/46, must be regarded as treatment within the meaning of that provision

as by Article 28(2) and (3) The obligation to adopt technical and organizational measures to ensure the security of the processing as by Article 32. The

violation of Article 5, Article 6, and Article 25 GDPR. It ordered the controller to comply with the data subject's erasure request pursuant to Article 17(1)(d)

information or to preserve authority (Article 3, paragraph 3 of the Media Act). Also, the Law on Media in Article 7 paragraph 3 stipulates that a person who statements

in Article 9 of Directive 95/46 / EC are not applicable to the former Article 9 of Directive 95/46 / EC - the counterpart provision of now Article 85 GDPR

such data, and o repealing Directive 95/46/EC (hereinafter: General Data Protection Regulation) SL EU 119, Article 40 and Article 96 of the Law on General

processing of personal data, on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation, OJ 2016 L 119/1, p. 1; hereinafter

of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (hereinafter: GDPR) , that his personal data will be erased which

persons the free movement of such data and Directive 95/46 / EC Regulation (EU) 2016/679 repealing Directive (hereinafter referred to as General alleged

which also refers to Article 34 (1) of the Data Protection Regulation. 3 (b). The Data Inspectorate should note that Article 34 (2) does. 3, points to the data

the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) Article 2(1) This Regulation shall apply to the processing

previous European Directive on personal data protection: “In this context, there are three cumulative in Article 7 (f) of Directive 95/46 conditions that

movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC 1The guidelines concerning DPOs were adopted by the “Article 29” working group on 13 December 2016

of such data and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation), hereinafter GDPR; In view of the law of 3 December 2017 establishing

such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), hereinafter GDPR; Having regard to the law of 3 December 2017 establishing

with Article 7 and Article 60 of the Act of 10 May 2018 on personal data protection (Journal of Laws of 2019, item 1781) and pursuant to Article 31 and

envisaged as follows. 17. In paragraph 3.3. Legal Protection' of the AVG Implementation Act, Article 34 reads as follows: Article 34. Applicability of the General

Appeal Brussels - 2020/AR/1160 -p. 3 3. Legal framework for the restricted debate. 3.1. Article 108 of the Law of 3 December 2017 establishing the Data

collects saidrequirements.28 In this regard, article 7, letter f), of Directive 95/46 - (current article 6.1.f) of the RGPD) - fixesthree cumulative requirements

data and until revocation of Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation screening) (hereinafter: GDPR);  Article 288, paragraph 2 of the Convention

also met. 3.3. In the matter 3.3.1. Legal situation: Article 12 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the CouncilArticle 12, of Regulation

repeal of Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation) OJ EU 119. The General Data Protection Regulation stipulates in Article 4 (1) (1) that

free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General Regulation on data protection). Article 2, paragraph This Regulation shall apply

Disputes Chamber was arrested in accordance with Article 92, 1 ° WOG and hasdecided on the basis of Article 94, 3 ° WOG to handle the complaint without theTo

violation of Article 6, paragraph 1, letter c) and e), paragraph 2 and paragraph 3, letter b), of the Regulation and Article 19, paragraph 3, of the Code

personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation ) (Journal of Laws UE L 119

of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (general Data Protection Regulation), hereinafter GDPR; In view of the law of 3 December 2017 establishing

powers under Article 58(2) GDPR and impose on the respondent the responsibility to restore the fulfilment of Article 5(1)(a) GDPR and of Article 5(1)(b-f)

envisaged as follows. 22. In paragraph 3.3. Legal Protection' of the AVG Implementation Act, Article 34 reads as follows: Article 34. Applicability of the General

such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (general Data Protection Regulation), hereinafter GDPR; Having regard to the law of 3 December 2017 establishing

the file (Article 95, §2, 3 ° WOG) 7. On 7 August 2019, a copy of the file will be sent to the defendants. Page 3 Substance decision 35/2020 - 3/11 8. On

such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), hereinafter AVG; Having regard to the Act of 3 December 2017 establishing

such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), hereinafter DPA; Having regard to the Law of 3 December 2017 establishing

came into force on 25 May 2018. The previously applicable Privacy Directive (Directive 95/46/EC) and the Personal Data Protection Act (Wbp) based in part on

requirements of Article 6(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7 GDPR, which cannot be superseded by relying on Article 6(1)(b) GDPR? Is Article 5(1)(c) GDPR

of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation; AVG). This concerns the measure

processing of personal data, on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC, hereinafter: GDPR), a claim for damages requires that a natural

the Processing of personal data, free movement of data and repeal of Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation - GDPR). The defendant has a

the Data Protection Act 1998 sought to implement Article 23 of the (old) Data Protection Directive (95/46/EC) which provided:
 
 "Member States shall

for more details. Article 2: Material scope Article 2.2.c: Exclusively personal or domestic activity Article 3: Territorial scope Article 4.1: Personal data

applicable (cf. Article 99(1) and (3) AVG). As of that date, the AVG is binding and directly applicable in every Member State (Article 99(3) AVG), i.e.: irrespective

of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC, "General Data Protection Regulation" (hereinafter, "Regulation");F

data, as well as the free circulation of such data and which repeals Directive 95/46 / EC, "General Data Protection Regulation" (hereinafter the "Regulation");

and which repeals Directive 95/46 / EC ", OJ no. 205 of 4.09.2018. by reason of the "Principle of legality", referred to in Article 1 of Law 689/1981,

apply from 25 May 2018 and repealed the Privacy Directive (Directive 95/46/EC) on the same date (see Article 94 GDPR). That the initiating petition in this

and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Regulation on the data protection), hereinafter “the GDPR”; Having regard to the Law of December 3, 2017 establishing

that a life insurance company had breached Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, Article 5(1)(c) GDPR, Article 9 GDPR and Article 25(2) GDPR as its as its practice was to

or her data. The 3rd main section of the DSG implements Directive (EU) 2016/680. In accordance with Article 2(2) thereof, this Directive applies to the processing

the GDPR, in particular Article 5 (1) GDPR, article 24 and article 28 GDPR, all this based on article 58.2, d) GDPR and article 100, §1, 9 ° WOG, within

subject to the derogations and exceptions provided for in Art. 9 of Directive 95/46 (see ECJ 01.06.2017, C-345/17, Rz 58 [Sergejs Buivids and Datu valsts

such data and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation), hereinafter GDPR; Having regard to the Law of 3 December 2017 establishing

connection with Article 31, Article 58(1)(e) and (f) in connection with Article 83(1-3) and Article 83(5)(e) of Regulation 2016/679 of the European Parliament

such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (hereinafter the "DGPS");Considering the law of 3 December 2017 establishing

more details. Article 2: Substantive scope Article 2.2.c: Exclusively personal or domestic activity Article 3: Territorial scope Article 4.1: Personal

of Justice of the European Union at paragraph 99: "Article 12(b) and Article 14(a) of Directive 95/46 must be interpreted as meaning that, when analysing

such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (hereinafter the "DGPS");Considering the law of 3 December 2017 establishing

processing special categories of data, cf. Article 32(1)(b) GDPR, Article 32(1)(d), Article 24 and Article 35, cf. Article 5. In May 2019, a municipality reported

to the description requirement in Article 33, para. 3. 3.3. Article 34 of the Data Protection Regulation and Article 5 (1) 1, letter a. Assessment of the

of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulations) (OJ EU L 119, 04.05.2016, p

accordance with Article 38.3 of the AVG 5. On 5 October 2021, the Disputes Chamber decided on the basis of article 95, §1, 1°and article 98 of the CPC that

would also be subject to the provisions of Article 6.1(e) DSGVO in conjunction with Article 6.1(b) DSGVO. Article 2, 28.2 no. 2 BayDSG without the consent

00 Repeal of Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Integrity Protection Authority Record number: DI-2020-10538 2 (3) Date: 2021-01-22

Klarna violate Article 15 of the GDPR? The DPA considered that Klarna failed to process the request within the timeframe required by Article 12(3) and without

processing of personal data, on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC [the General Data Protection Regulation]) require, in addition to

ofcontroller (article 4.7 of the GDPR), the scope of the GDPR (article3.1 of the GDPR), the right to erasure (article 17 of the GDPR) and its powers (article 58.2of

data, as well as on the free movement of such data and which repeals Directive 95/46 / EC, "General data protection regulation" (hereinafter "Regulation");

for violating Article 5(1)(f) GDPR, Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, Article 5(2) GDPR, Article 12 GDPR, Article 13 GDPR, Article 14 GDPR, Article 24(1) GDPR, and

such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), hereinafter GDPR; Having regard to the Act of 3 December 2017 establishing

pursuant to Article 100, §1, 5° WOG, to order a disqualification for the violation of Article 5.1, a), Article 5.2, Article 6, Article 12.1, Article 14.1 a)

of such data and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation), hereinafter GDPR; In view of the law of 3 December 2017 establishing

movement of such data and Directive 95/46 / EC (hereinafter: the General Decree), point 7 of the first paragraph of Article 49 of the Personal Data Protection

violation of article 21 of the LSSICE, classified as serious in article 38.3.d) and c) of said rule, for the alleged infringement of article 48.1.b) of the

paragraph c) of paragraph 1 of article 4 of Directive EC/95/46, of October 24, 1995, as well as aa fnea c) of paragraph 3 of article 4 of Law 67/98, of 26 October

authority or the data protection delegate in accordance with Article 20 of Directive 95/46/EC and which are carried out in a way that has not changed since

repeal of Directive 95/46 / EC (GDPR), Art. 51, 52, 53.1, 53.3, 53.4 and 54.1 (a) - (e) The Self-Government Act for Åland, section 1, section 3, subsection

for example, Article 5, Paragraph 1, Subsections c–e, Article 6 and 12–22 of the Data Protection Regulation article. According to subsection 3 of the same

on the basis of the notification, Article 57 (1) f) of the General Data Protection Regulation and Article 38. § Article 1Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the

of personal data and the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (known as "RGPD"), relating to the excessive nature of the data

company was not compliant with Article 13 GDPR. The CNPD held that the controller infringed Article 5(1)(c) GDPR and Article 13 GDPR and decided to: - impose

and the repeal of Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) Article 5, paragraph 1, subparagraph c, Article 25, Article 58, paragraph 2, subparagraph

incorrect applies Article 12.3 of the AVG. However, this is not correct. 33. Article 12.3 of the GDPR reads (in its relevant parts): ''Art. 12.3 The controller

and on the free movement of such data and on 08-657 61 00 Repeal of Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Integrity Protection Authority

data, Directive 95/46 / EC (hereinafter referred to as the General Data Protection Regulation or Decree), point 7 of the first paragraph of Article 49 of

CJEU makes the following considerations, for what interests us here: "Directive 95/46 is not limited to providing that its provisions will not apply to the

of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC, 'General Data Protection Regulation' (hereinafter 'the Regulation');

personal data. 3. Justification for the Authority's decision 3.1. Basis of processing Processing of personal data shall be in accordance with Article 6 (2) of

of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation, hereinafter 'the Regulation');

the Data Protection Working Group established on the basis of Article 29 of Directive 95/46/EC, a Guidelines on transparency facilitating the application

follows that the consent of Article 2 (f) and Article 5 (3) of Directive 2002/58, read in conjunction with Article 4 (11) and Article 6 (1) (a) of Regulation

processing of personal data and on the movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC EC (General Data Protection Regulation, GDPR) for violation of

under article 7 of the Directive 95/46 / CE ”, dated 04/09/2014. Although Opinion 6/2014 was issued for favor a uniform interpretation of Directive 95/46

decision. [The equivalent GDPR Article to Article 48(3)(a) EU GDPR is Article 46(3)(a) GDPR, and Article 50(1)(d) EU GDPR is Article 49(1)(d) GDPR.] Share blogs

of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (basic data protection regulation) - DSGVO. With regard to Camera

such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), hereinafter AVG; Having regard to the Act of 3 December 2017 establishing

personal data and on the free movement of such information and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (general data protection regulation).

companies in both Belgium and the UK, violated Article 15(1) GDPR, Article 15(3) GDPR and Article 12(3) GDPR GDPR for deleting data instead of providing

57(1)(a) and Article 58(2)(b) in connection with Article 5(1)(f), Article 24(1), Article 25(1), Article 32(1) and (2) of 2 of Regulation EU 2016/679 of the European

of Justice directly clarify the understanding of the EU Privacy Directive (Directive 95/46), the judgments are relevant for the interpretation of the new

processing carried out is in violation of Article 5(1)(f) GDPR, Article 25(1) GDPR, Article 32 GDPR and Article 35 GDPR. Especially, the controller cannot

personal data and on the free movement of such data and on repealing Directive 95/46 EC (General Data Protection Regulation) and Articles 34 and 36 of the

movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC 1The guidelines concerning DPOs were adopted by the “Article 29” working group on 13 December 2016

CJEU states that "the manifestation of will referred to in Article 2(h) of Directive 95/46 must, in particular, be "specific", in the sense that it must

these operations are explicitly listed and unconditional in Article 2(b) of Directive 95/46, must be qualified as treatment in the sense of said provision

subject, violated Article 12 of the Decree. Article 15 (4), Article 15 (1) and Article 18 (1) (c) respectively. The Obliged - a III.2. and III.3. infringed Article

rules in the Data Protection Regulation [1], cf. Article 6 (1). Article 17 (1) (e) and Article 17 (1) 3, letter b. However, the Danish Data Protection Agency

personal data and on the free movement of this data and the repeal of Directive 95/46/EC (hereinafter the Data Protection Regulation), the data subject has

in the workplace, the Working Group for Data Protection from Article 29 of Directive 95/46/EC (currently the European Data Protection Board) expresses the

such data and revocation of Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), hereinafter GDPR; In view of the law of 3 December 2017 establishing

In the application of Article 5(3) and Article 2(f) of Directive 2002/58/EC in conjunction with Article 2(h) of Directive 95/46/EC, does it make any difference

with Article 9(2)(a) GDPR and Article 6(1)(a) GDPR. Thus, the Danish DPA held that the processing was also not following the principles of Article 5(1)

Justice directly clarify the understanding of the EU Personal Data Directive (Directive 95/46), the judgments are also relevant for the interpretation of the

of access under Article 15 of the Data Protection Regulation. 3.2. It follows from the Data Protection Act [2] § 22, para. 1, that Article 15 of the Regulation

of such data and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation), hereinafter GDPR; In view of the law of 3 December 2017 establishing

additional submissions regarding Article 83(3) GDPR (“Meta IE Submissions on Article 83(3) GDPR”). December 2021 On3December2021,theIESAshareditsDraftDecisionwiththeCSAs

question in the Directive is not broader in this respect than Article 12 (a). of Directive 95/46 / EC, which the first paragraph of Art. Article 8 of Regulation

concept of legitimate interests of the data controller under Article 7 of Directive 95/46 / EC, WP217, p. 24. 5No complain personally, her sole proprietorship

had fulfilled its obligation to provide information pursuant to Article 12(3) and Article 4(7) of the Basic Law (Voriger SuchbegriffDSGVONächster Suchbegriff)

processing of personal data, on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (Basic Data Protection Regulation, OJ L 119 of 04.05.2016, p. 1,

reactivated according to plan. It follows from Article 28 (1) of the Data Protection Regulation Article 3 (3) (f) requires the data controller to assist the

data, as well as the free circulation of such data and which repeals Directive 95/46 / CE, "General Data Protection Regulation" (hereinafter, "Regulation");

permission in Article 6 (1) (c) GDPR and argues that it is the Viennese in accordance with Article 5 (3) of the EpiG in conjunction with Article 1 (2) (e)

data, as well as the free circulation of such data and which repeals Directive 95/46 / EC, "General Data Protection Regulation" (hereinafter the "Regulation");

information to the public, violating Article 24 GDPR. The decision discusses as well, the relationship between directive 95/46/EC and GDPR. The DPA highlighted

specific categories of information in Article 8 (1) and (5) of Directive 95/46 or in Article 9 (1), Article 10 (1) and Article 10 of Regulation 2016/679, the

violating Article 5(1) GDPR Article 6 (1) GDPR Article 6(4) GDPR Article 9 GDPR Article 14 GDPR Article 30 GDPR Article 35 GDPR and Article 36 GDPR. The

Protection Agency's decision It follows from Article 28 (1) of the Data Protection Regulation Article 3 (3) (f) requires the data controller to assist the

be covered by Article 13(1)(d) or (f) of that directive? 3) The referring courts ask whether Article 12(a) of Directive 95/46 and Article 8(2) of the Charter

data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC, 'General Data Protection Regulation' (hereinafter referred to as 'GPSD'); HAVING REGARD TO Article 154(1)(g) of the

request under Article 15 and with the one month deadline under Article 12(3). Was Google Ireland Ltd in breach of its obligations under GDPR Article 15(1) and

personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (general regulation on data protection ) (Journal of Laws UE L

personal data and on the free movement of such information and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (general data protection regulation). [2] See preamble recital

then enter a password before gaining access to the computer. 3.3.3 Control of logging 3.3.3.1 Facts The OLVG information security & privacy policy states

of these data and which repeals Directive 95/46/EC (General Regulation of data protection, GDPR) defines in its article 4.14 the biometric data as “personal

data, as well as the free circulation of such data and which repeals Directive 95/46 / CE, "General Data Protection Regulation" (hereinafter the "Regulation");

of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC, GDPR, of which the company was informed on the same day. During

market participants. Specifically, these are Sections 17(3), 3(5) ApBetrO, 43 AMG, 11(1) sentence 1 no. 3, no. 7 and no. 11 HWG, and Section 14(2) no. 1 BerufsO

(2), Article 60, Article 101, Article 101a and Article 103 of the Act of 10 May 2018 on personal data protection (Journal of Laws of 2019, item 1781) and

norm therefore by article 19 of the LOPD as business data. We consider relevant the legal basis by which, according to the article Article 65 of the LOPD

personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing the Directive 95/46/EC (GDPR); Having regard to law no. 78-17 of January 6, 1978, as amended

with Article 5 (2). 1 (c). The Data Inspectorate also refers to the Article 29 Group's guidelines on the right to data portability WP242 rev.01 [3], page

such data and repealing directive 95/46/EC (general data protection regulation), hereinafter AVG; Having regard to the law of 3 December 2017 establishing

sentence nullity regime provided for in article 615 of the CPC is applicable to orders - paragraph 3 of article 613 of the CPC. Regarding the defendant

of personal data and the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC; Having regard to the law of 1 August 2018 on the organization

repealing Directive 95/46/EC (as regards (hereinafter GPRD), an offense under Article 83(5)(a) of the GPRD and described as very serious in article 72.1. a)

which also refers to Article 34 (1) of the Data Protection Regulation. 3 (b). The Data Inspectorate should note that Article 34 (2) does. 3, points to the data

processing was therefore in breach of Article 5(1)(a) and Article 6(1)(c) of the GDPR. The DPA also ruled out Article 6(1)(f) on the grounds of domestic law:

under Article 6 of the Data Protection Directive, as well as having a legitimate "criteria" for processing data under Article 7 of that same Directive. It

such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC, 'General Data Protection Regulation' (hereinafter 'GPSD'); Having regard to Article 154(1)(g) of the Personal

Data Protection Regulation (2016/679) Article 12 (4), Article 17 (3), Article 21 (2) and (3), Article 25 (2), Article 58 (2) (b) Section 2 of the Health Care

this Directive, Directive 95/46/EC remains unaffected. According to Article 94, paragraph 2, GDPR, references to Directive 95/46/EC are considered references

of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC, "General Data Protection Regulation" (hereinafter Regulation); HAVING

European Union, pursuant to Article 44 of this text: - adequacy decisions (Article 45); - the appropriate guarantees (Article 46); In the absence of an equivalent

security are reported in a timely manner in future. 4.3. Article 34 of the Data Protection Regulation Article 34 (1) of the Data Protection Regulation 1, it appears

infringement of Article 5.1 b) in conjunction with Article 6.4. AVG, on article 5.1 a) in conjunction with article 6.1. AVG and on article 5.1 c) GDPR has

provision of Article 267.3 TFEU. 267 (3) TFEU, which determines the statutory judge in the dispute (see BVerfGE 128, 157 <188>; BVerfG, Order of the 3rd Chamber

general data protectionArticle 5 (1) (a), Article 5 (2), Article 12 (1) and (4) ofArticle 14, Article 15 and Article 21 (4).1.3. The Authority condemns

one hand, with the principles of data quality set out in Article 6 of Directive 95/46 or Article 5 of Regulation 2016/679 and, on the other , to the basic

accountability (Article 5 (2) and 24 (1), (2) GDPR), privacy by design (Article 25 (1) GDPR) and as controller towards its data processors (Article 28 GDPR).

case law formulated with regard to Article 7(e) of Directive 95/46/EC remains relevant today even though Directive 95/46 has been repealed, since this condition

meaning of Article 77 (1) GDPR had not been raised by the plaintiff, it was a "submission" within the meaning of Article 28 (4) of Directive 95/46/EC of the

this instance, the controller sought to rely upon Article 6(1)(e) GDPR and Article 9(2)(j) GDPR. Article 6(1)(e) GDPR establishes a lawful basis for the

data, as well as on the free movement of such data and which repeals Directive 95/46 / CE (General data protection regulation, hereinafter "Regulation");

the processing is based on Article 6(1)(a) or on Article 9, (c) where the processing is based on Article 6(1)(a) or Article 9(2)(a), the existence of the

Regulation (EU) 2016/679 repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (a hereinafter referred to as the "General Data Protection Regulation") Article 15 (1) (a) and (c) to (d);

processing of personal data, on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/ 46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation, OJ L 119 of May 4, 2016, p

found a violation of Article 12(3) in relation to Article 15 GDPR. The Garante hence applied an administrative fine as per Article 83(5) GDPR. The amount

processing had to be disclosed as part of the information (cf. Art. 12 Directive 95/46 / EC). In the judgment of May 7, 2009 already quoted, the ECJ stated

(2016/679) Article 5 (1) (a), Article 12 (1), (2) and (6) , Article 13, Article 15 (1) (h), (3) and (4), Article 58 (2) (c) and (d) subparagraphs Article 34 (1)

of Articles 12(3): The DPA held that the controller had breached Article 12(3) by failing to provide information pursuant to an Article 15 access request

the previous regime of Directive 95/46/EU. The DPA found that taking into account the interpretation of Article 12 Directive 95/46/EU by the CJEU, a on-the-spot

criteria provided for in paragraphs 2 and 3 of article 3 of this regulation.10. Paragraph 1 of Article 4 of Directive 95/46/EC provided that: "Each Member State

these operations are explicitly stated and unconditional in Article 2 (b) of Directive 95/46, must be classified as treatment within the meaning of said

such data and repealing directive 95/46/EC (general data protection regulation), hereinafter AVG; Having regard to the law of 3 December 2017 establishing

personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation).Privacy Protection Authority

accordance with Article 5 (1) of the Regulation. And Article 24 (2). The list must be drawn up in order to demonstrate compliance with the Regulation [3] and must

of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General data protection regulation). [2] Case C-673/17, Bundesverband

data, as well as the free circulation of such data and which repeals Directive 95/46 / EC, "General Data Protection Regulation" (hereinafter "RGPD"); GIVEN

that the controller had violated Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, Article 12 GDPR, Article 13 GDPR, Article 15 GDPR and Article 25(1) GDPR. As a result, the DPA issued

matter "Fashion ID" that on the legitimate interest of article 7, letter f) of the directive 95/46, establishes three cumulative requirements for a data

which regulates the processing, pursuant to the requirements of Article 6(3) GDPR. Article 10 of Act No. 2023-380 provides that for the processing to be

connection with Article 5 paragraph 1 point a, Article 5 paragraph 2, Article 6 paragraph 1, Article 7 paragraph 3, Article 12 paragraph 2, Article 17 paragraph

15 GDPR can be used. Paragraph 46 In the decision of the ECJ on Art. 12 of Directive 95/46/EC (Data Protection Directive) (judgment of July 17, 2014, related

personal data. (Recital 7). Finally, the European legislator regrets that Directive 95/46/EC has not avoided the widespread public perception that significant

principles of Directive 95/46 / EC are maintained. Also comes the content of the definitions of 'controller',as included in Article 2 (d) of Directive 95/46 / EC

movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General data protection regulation). [2] See also Article 29 Working Party Guidelines on Consent

Facebook page is responsible processor within the meaning of Article 2 point d of Directive 95/46. d) It is clearly stated in IKÜM that a statement from the

personal data and the free circulation of these data and repealing Directive 95/46 / CE (hereinafter, “General Regulation of data protection "or" RGPD

the notion of legitimate interests of the data controller under Article 7 of Directive 95/46 / EC, pages 24 and 25. 4The Privacy Board has elaborated on the

protection regulation's article 5, subsection 2, cf. Article 5, subsection 1, letter a, Article 24, cf. Article 28, subsection 1, Article 35, subsection 1, as

the treatment is based on consent in accordance with Directive 95/46 / EC, it is not necessary 3 Page 4 JURISPRUDENCE that the interested party give his

of the proceedings. 3.2. [applicant sub 1] et al bases the removal requests on Article 17 paragraph 1, under a, c and d, and Article 21 paragraph 1 of the

data, as well as the free circulation of such data and which repeals Directive 95/46 / EC, "General Data Protection Regulation" (hereinafter the Regulation);

compliance of the provision in Article 25h, paragraph 2 of the LPPD with Article 10 ECHR, Article 19 of the UDHR and Article 19 of the ICCPR . Considers,

contrary, Directive 95/46/EC regulated the matter. However, the legal reasoning developed by the court substantially follows the structure of Article 17 GDPR

executed. Legal basis: Article 4 lines 1, 2 and 5, Article 11 paragraphs 1 and 2, Article 12 paragraph 2, Article 17 paragraph 1 and Article 58 paragraph 2 lit

freely given in accordance with Article 4(11) GDPR and fulfilled the condition for withdrawal of consent set out in Article 7(3) GDPR. The Finnish DPA received

not constitute a complaint under Article 77 GDPR, but a "submission" within the meaning of Article 28(4) of Directive 95/46/EC. In the present case the data

of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (hereinafter referred to as the General Data Protection Regulation

of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC, "General Data Protection Regulation" (hereinafter referred to as

repealing Directive 95/46 / EC, which is, in accordance with its article 99 (2), “applicable from 25 May 2018”. It also follows from Article 96 GDPR that

of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC, "General Data Protection Regulation" (hereinafter RGPD); HAVING

processed on the basis of consent. 3. Justification for the Danish Data Protection Agency's decision 3.1. It follows from Article 14 (1) of the Data Protection

Question 4: Are Articles 2(f) and 5(3) of Directive 2002/58EC, read in conjunction with Article 4(11), Article 95 and Recital 4 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679

such media are used solely for transit purposes." This article transposes article 4 of Directive 95/46/EC, which literally states: “Applicable national law

in the need for a confirmation of acceptance and identification (points 3.3 and 3.5.2 of the General Terms and Conditions for letters nationally and point

defendant is Article 159(2)(4) of the Polish Telecommunications Law, in conjunction with Article 30, Article 32(2), Article 42(1) and Article 45(1) of the

data, as well as the free circulation of such data and which repeals Directive 95/46 / EC (hereinafter the "Regulations"); GIVEN the legislative decree 30

pursuant to Article 58, paragraph 2, of the Regulation, with this measure. Pursuant to Article 78 of the Regulation, Article 152 of the Code and Article 10 of

charge follows from Article 15 para. 3 sentence 1 in conjunction with Article 15 para. 3 sentence 2 in conjunction with Article 15 para. 3 sentence 2 in conjunction

processed in accordance with Article 32 (2) of the Regulation. 2nd 3.3. Article 33 (1) of the Data Protection Regulation 1 and Article 34 (1). 1 The Data Inspectorate

personal data and on the free movement of such data and on the repeal of Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation). 2The Act (2018: 218) with

by the data controller data within the meaning of article 7 of directive 95/46/EC, p. 21. 8 “Article 29” Working Party, Opinion 06/2014 on the notion of

such data and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC, which is to be applied directly, c) the first paragraph of Article 6 replaces Article 8 of ZVOP-1. The provision

Preamble to the AVG that the objectives and principles of Directive 95/46/EC remain valid, (...). Article 12 of the AVG, on the transparent information, communication

applies regardless of any signage pursuant to sections 3 and 3 a of the Act. to the requirements of Article 14 of the Data Protection Regulation. Based on the

data, on the free movement of data and on the repeal of Directive 95/46/EC ( Data protectionArticle 15, paragraph one, letter c of Regulation (EU) 2016/679

(1)-(3), Article 83 (5)(e) in connection with Article 31, Article 58 (1)(e), Article 58 (2)(i) of Regulation EU 2016/679 of the European Parliament and

free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation): (1) Is Article 83(4) to (6) of the GDPR to be interpreted

other legal basis for processing under Article 6 GDPR, the controller had violated Article 5(1)(a) and Article 6(1) GDPR. Taking into account the low income

such data and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC, which is to be applied directly, c) the first paragraph of Article 6 replaces Article 8 of ZVOP-1. The provision

damages by the plaintiff pursuant to Article 82(1) GDPR, since there have been violations of Article 6(1)(a) GDPR and Article 34 GDPR. The defendant also breached

Regulation (GDPR). (2) The EDPB succeeds the Article 29 Working party set up under Article 29 of Directive 95/46/EC. It is composed of the Member States data

and the protection of such data and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC the right of rectification under Article 16 of the Regulation (hereinafter referred to

connection with Article 31, Article 58(1)(e) in connection with Article 83(1-3) and Article 83(5)(e) of Regulation 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of

personal data, as well as the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/ CE, “General Data Protection Regulation” (hereinafter, “Regulation”);

meaning of the term “filing system” in Article 2(1) GDPR. In doing so it took Recitals 15 and 27 of the 95/46 directive into account as well as the CJEU decision

cross-border data processing [...]. The Court of Justice’s case-law on Directive 95/46/EC and Article 100a TEC to date has not adopted such a narrow understanding

which was issued in compliance with Directive 95/46/EC, is understood as a reference to the GDPR (see also article 94 par. 1 GDPR) . Therefore, for every

implementation in national law of the provisions then in force of Article 24 of Directive 95/46/EC of 24 October 1995, which left it up to the Member States

complainant's request for access in accordance with Article 12 (2) of the Data Protection Regulation. 3, cf. Article 15. 3. TDC A / S 'processing of position data

24 sec. 1, art. 25 sec. 1, art. 28 sec. 1 and 3 and article. 32 sec. 1 and 2, as well as art. 83 sec. 1 - 3, art. 83 sec. 4 lit. a) and art. 83 sec. 5 lit

free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation - GDPR), are: Article 2 Material scope of application 1. This

expressed in Article 5 (1 ) (a)) f, and reflected in the obligations set out in Article 24 (1), Article 25 (1), Article 32 (1 ) (b ) and (d) and Article 32 (2)

the obligations resulting from article 82 of this law, transposing the objectives of paragraph 3 of Article 5 of Directive 2002/58/EC. 9. The applicant companies

1781) in connection with Article 31, Article 58(1)(a) in connection with Article 83(1)-(3) and Article 83(5)(e) of Regulation EU 2016/679 of the European

personal data and the free circulation of these data and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General Regulation for the protection of data)." Along with the

right: Article 39(3) as well as Article 37(2) and 39(1) of the LERGPD 18. The Defendant disputes that the CNPD can dismiss the application of article 39.

breached Article 28(3) GDPR where it had tried to retroactively amend one of its data processor agreements to include all requirements of this Article. The

movement of such data, and repeating Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) as follows: Article 80 Representation of data subjects 1.

elements according to Article 83 GDPR, the DPA imposed a fine in the amount of €18,000 for a violation of Article 5, 9, 32 GPDR and Article 157 of the Italian

previous EU law data protection regime that applied under Directive 95/46/EC ("Data Protection Directive") 1 . The GDPR seeks to harmonise the protection of

such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), hereinafter AVG; Having regard to the Act of 3 December 2017 establishing

authority. The court stated that Article 82 of the Law Informatique et Libertés was a transposition of article 5(3) of the Directive 2002/58/CE into French Law

Fashion ID, 6 in which the CJEU explains Article 7 (f) of Directive 95/46, 7that is substantively equal to Article 6, first paragraph, opening lines and under

LOPD. This resolution warns about the provisions of article 95.3 of the On the other part, article 95.3 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure

data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), hereinafter “GDPR”; 14See article 100 WOG. 15See section 6.3.2. and articles 94-97

Litigation Chamber st 2 pursuant to Article 62, § 1 of the LCA. 4. Pursuant to article 95 § 2, 3° of the LCA as well as article 47 of the rules of order inside

such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), hereinafter AVG; Having regard to the Act of 3 December 2017 establishing

controller within the meaning of Article 7 of Directive 95/46 / EC ", adopted on April 9, 2014, p. 20. 13 Audit report of April 3, 2019 p. 5. Beslissing on the