Search results

processing of personal data, on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation, OJ 2016 L 119/1, p. 1; hereinafter

European Union of dated 13 May 2014, considers in accordance with Article 4(1)(a) of Directive 95/46, in paragraphs 55, 56, 57 and 60, the following: "it should

in Article 9 of Directive 95/46 / EC are not applicable to the former Article 9 of Directive 95/46 / EC - the counterpart provision of now Article 85 GDPR

the right of access under Article 15(4) of the GDPR or section 22 of the DDPA can be invoked. It follows from Article 15 (4), that the right to obtain

data and until revocation of Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation screening) (hereinafter: GDPR);  Article 288, paragraph 2 of the Convention

previous European Directive on personal data protection: “In this context, there are three cumulative in Article 7 (f) of Directive 95/46 conditions that

Protection Officer (DPO) under Section 4 of Chapter 4 of the GDPR (see in particular Article 37 GDPR to Article 39 GDPR). One of these audit proceedings

processing of personal data, including under the (repealed) Privacy Directive (Directive 95/46/EC). However, the Court of Justice has consistently held that

persons the free movement of such data and Directive 95/46 / EC Regulation (EU) 2016/679 repealing Directive (hereinafter referred to as General alleged

of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC, "General Data Protection Regulation" (hereinafter, "Regulation");

decided the following: Article 66 GDPR gives the possibility for a procedure of urgency and from this article (and Article 66 and Article 62 GDPR), the European

obligations under Article 6, §2, al. 5 and Article 9 of the Camera Act 1 2. there is a serious indication that article 6, § 2, al. 4 of the aforementioned

personal data and on the free movement of such data and on the repeal of Directive 95/46/EC(GDPR) to pay G. Atanasova and S. Atanasov the amount of BGN 250 for

the right of access (Article 12(4) GDPR). The DPA held that data concerning the vehicle of the complainant is personal data (Article 4(1) GDPR), since the

collects saidrequirements.28 In this regard, article 7, letter f), of Directive 95/46 - (current article 6.1.f) of the RGPD) - fixesthree cumulative requirements

its invalidation Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) SL EU 119. The General Data Protection Regulation in Article 4, Paragraph 1, Point

permissible in accordance with Article 133, Paragraph 4, B-VG.The revision is permitted in accordance with Article 133, Paragraph 4, B-VG. text Reasons for the

free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General Regulation on data protection). Article 2, paragraph This Regulation shall apply

personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation ) (Journal of Laws UE L 119

the basis of Article62, §1 WOG.4. On 23 August 2019, the Disputes Chamber will decide in accordance with Article 95, §1, 1 ° and Article98 WOG that the

with Article 7 and Article 60 of the Act of 10 May 2018 on personal data protection (Journal of Laws of 2019, item 1781) and pursuant to Article 31 and

Automatic Processing of Personal Data (ETS 108), it is set out in Article 6 § 1 b) of Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October

of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (general Data Protection Regulation), hereinafter GDPR; In view of

as stated in Article 95, §2, as well as those in Article 98 WOG. Also they shall be informed of the deadlines for them pursuant to Article 99 WOG to submit

repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (general data protection regulation). [2] See also the Data Protection Regulation's preamble recital 86 and the Article 29 Working

repeal of Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation) OJ EU 119. The General Data Protection Regulation stipulates in Article 4 (1) (1) that

processing of personal data, including under the (repealed) Privacy Directive (Directive 95/46/EC). However, the Court of Justice has consistently held that

free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation, OJ L 119/1 of 4 May 2016, p. 1; hereinafter "GDPR") preclude

validly obtained if pre-selected boxes are used: "“51. "Article 2(h) of the above-mentioned Directive [95/46] defines 'the data subject's consent' as 'any free

data, as well as the free circulation of such data and which repeals Directive 95/46 / EC, "General Data Protection Regulation" (hereinafter the "Regulation");

came into force on 25 May 2018. The previously applicable Privacy Directive (Directive 95/46/EC) and the Personal Data Protection Act (Wbp) based in part on

the Processing of personal data, free movement of data and repeal of Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation - GDPR). The defendant has a

of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation; AVG). This concerns the measure

The GBA was thus established on the basis of Article 4, §1, first paragraph WOG. It is true that, as Article 4, § 1, second paragraph WOG expressly confirms

requirements of Article 6(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7 GDPR, which cannot be superseded by relying on Article 6(1)(b) GDPR? Is Article 5(1)(c) GDPR

of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC, "General Data Protection Regulation" (hereinafter, "Regulation");F

personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing of Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation). The investigation was launched

(definition) Article 4.1: Data subject (definition) Article 4.2: Processing (definition) Article 4.3: Restriction of processing (definition) Article 4.4 : Profiling

of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC, "General Data Protection Regulation" (hereinafter, "Regulation");

subject to the derogations and exceptions provided for in Art. 9 of Directive 95/46 (see ECJ 01.06.2017, C-345/17, Rz 58 [Sergejs Buivids and Datu valsts

the Data Protection Act 1998 sought to implement Article 23 of the (old) Data Protection Directive (95/46/EC) which provided:
 
 "Member States shall

apply from 25 May 2018 and repealed the Privacy Directive (Directive 95/46/EC) on the same date (see Article 94 GDPR). That the initiating petition in this

(definition) Article 4.1: Data subject (definition) Article 4.2: Processing (definition) Article 4.3: Restriction of processing (definition) Article 4.4: Profileing

serve any purpose. 3.6 The purpose of the Wbp (old) is to implement Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995

connection with Article 31, Article 58(1)(e) and (f) in connection with Article 83(1-3) and Article 83(5)(e) of Regulation 2016/679 of the European Parliament

and which repeals Directive 95/46 / EC ", OJ no. 205 of 4.09.2018. by reason of the "Principle of legality", referred to in Article 1 of Law 689/1981,

processing special categories of data, cf. Article 32(1)(b) GDPR, Article 32(1)(d), Article 24 and Article 35, cf. Article 5. In May 2019, a municipality reported

and Article 66.2 WOG); and • compliance with the transparency obligations (Article 12 GDPR) and the te provide information (Article 13 GDPR). Page 4 Substance

of the provisions as set out in Article 95 § 2 and Article 98 of the ICA. They are also informed, pursuant to Article 99 of the ICA, of the time limits

of the provisions as set out in Article 95 § 2 and Article 98 of the ICA. They are also informed, pursuant to Article 99 of the ICA, of the time limits

the GDPR, in particular Article 5 (1) GDPR, article 24 and article 28 GDPR, all this based on article 58.2, d) GDPR and article 100, §1, 9 ° WOG, within

authority (cf. Article 36 (2) no. 7 lit. a DPA) for the purposes of military self-protection (cf. Article 36 (1) DPA in conjunction with Article 2 (1) no. 2

personal data and to the free movement of these data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Regulation on the data protection), hereinafter “the GDPR”;

free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (Basic Data Protection Regulation - DSGVO; OJ L 119, 4.4.2009, p. 1) will not apply to the processing

Justification . Pursuant to Article 78 paragraph 1, Article 79 paragraph 1 point 1 and Article 84 paragraph 1 point 1-4 of the Act of 10 May 2018 on the

of Justice of the European Union at paragraph 99: "Article 12(b) and Article 14(a) of Directive 95/46 must be interpreted as meaning that, when analysing

three are not fulfilled. The school breaches Article 6(1)(b) in combination with Article 6(4) and Article 6(1) Articles 24 and 25 GDPR Furthermore, as

data, as well as on the free movement of such data and which repeals Directive 95/46 / EC, "General data protection regulation" (hereinafter "Regulation");

accordance with Article 38.3 of the AVG 5. On 5 October 2021, the Disputes Chamber decided on the basis of article 95, §1, 1°and article 98 of the CPC that

movement of such data Directive 95/46 / EC (hereinafter: the General Regulation on Data Protection), point 7 of the first paragraph of Article 49 of the Personal

pursuant to Article 100, §1, 5° WOG, to order a disqualification for the violation of Article 5.1, a), Article 5.2, Article 6, Article 12.1, Article 14.1 a)

processing of personal data, on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC [the General Data Protection Regulation]) require, in addition to

ofcontroller (article 4.7 of the GDPR), the scope of the GDPR (article3.1 of the GDPR), the right to erasure (article 17 of the GDPR) and its powers (article 58.2of

for violating Article 5(1)(f) GDPR, Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, Article 5(2) GDPR, Article 12 GDPR, Article 13 GDPR, Article 14 GDPR, Article 24(1) GDPR, and

alleged violation of article 28 of the RGPD in relation to the Article 24 of the RGPD punishable in accordance with article 83.4 of the RGPD, for the alleged

paragraph c) of paragraph 1 of article 4 of Directive EC/95/46, of October 24, 1995, as well as aa fnea c) of paragraph 3 of article 4 of Law 67/98, of 26 October

not complied with Article 32 (1) of the Data Protection Regulation. 1 and 2, Article 33, para. Article 34 (3) (d) 1 and 2, and Article 5, para. 1, letter

of personal data and the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (known as "RGPD"), relating to the excessive nature of the data

of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC, 'General Data Protection Regulation' (hereinafter 'the Regulation');

authority or the data protection delegate in accordance with Article 20 of Directive 95/46/EC and which are carried out in a way that has not changed since

movement of such data and Directive 95/46 / EC (hereinafter: the General Decree), point 7 of the first paragraph of Article 49 of the Personal Data Protection

and on the free movement of such data and on 08-657 61 00 Repeal of Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Page 1 of 5Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten

increased importance – despite the fact that it was not included in Article 6 of Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October

company was not compliant with Article 13 GDPR. The CNPD held that the controller infringed Article 5(1)(c) GDPR and Article 13 GDPR and decided to: - impose

on the basis of the notification, Article 57 (1) f) of the General Data Protection Regulation and Article 38. § Article 1Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the

free movement of such data and on the repeal of Directive 95/46 / EC (GDPR), Art. 51, 52, 53.1, 53.3, 53.4 and 54.1 (a) - (e) The Self-Government Act for

and the repeal of Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) Article 5, paragraph 1, subparagraph c, Article 25, Article 58, paragraph 2, subparagraph

of the name belongs to this personal data. 5.4.4. The GBA rightly states that in accordance with Article 4.1) of the GDPR "personal data" "all information

16 - Article 5 (2) of the GDPR, - Article 7 (1) of the GDPR, - Paragraphs (1) – (4) of Article 12 of the GDPR and - Article 15 (1) and Article 17 (1)

of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation, hereinafter 'the Regulation');

CJEU states that "the manifestation of will referred to in Article 2(h) of Directive 95/46 must, in particular, be "specific", in the sense that it must

of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (basic data protection regulation) - DSGVO. With regard to Camera

under article 7 of the Directive 95/46 / CE ”, dated 04/09/2014. Although Opinion 6/2014 was issued for favor a uniform interpretation of Directive 95/46

follows that the consent of Article 2 (f) and Article 5 (3) of Directive 2002/58, read in conjunction with Article 4 (11) and Article 6 (1) (a) of Regulation

processing carried out is in violation of Article 5(1)(f) GDPR, Article 25(1) GDPR, Article 32 GDPR and Article 35 GDPR. Especially, the controller cannot

personal data and on the free movement of such data and on repealing Directive 95/46 EC (General Data Protection Regulation) and Articles 34 and 36 of the

decision. [The equivalent GDPR Article to Article 48(3)(a) EU GDPR is Article 46(3)(a) GDPR, and Article 50(1)(d) EU GDPR is Article 49(1)(d) GDPR.] Share blogs

submitted its observations, which, in accordance with Article 54(1)(b), (3) and (4), (4) and (4), (5) and (5), (5) and (5), (5) and (5), (5) and (6). 2

unit also held that the controller violated Article 12(1) GDPR, Article 12(2) GDPR, Article 15(1) GDPR and Article 15(3) GDPR. The controller had deleted the

these operations are explicitly listed and unconditional in Article 2(b) of Directive 95/46, must be qualified as treatment in the sense of said provision

Protection Officer (DPO) under Section 4 of Chapter 4 of the GDPR (see in particular Article 37 GDPR to Article 39 GDPR). One of these audit proceedings

the rights of the data subject, violated Article 12 of the Decree. Article 15 (4), Article 15 (1) and Article 18 (1) (c) respectively. The Obliged - a

of Justice directly clarify the understanding of the EU Privacy Directive (Directive 95/46), the judgments are relevant for the interpretation of the new

CJEU makes the following considerations, for what interests us here: "Directive 95/46 is not limited to providing that its provisions will not apply to the

of personal data and on the free movement of this data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) and the Data Protection Act

that there was a personal data breach pursuant to Article 4(12) GDPR. Moreover, it stated that Article 32(1) GDPR obliges controllers to take appropriate

the Data Protection Regulation[1] Article 9, subsection 2, letter a, and Article 6, subsection 1, letter a, cf. article 4, no. 11. Furthermore, the Danish

states in point 4.7. of the judgment article 6, d) and article 6, e) of the GBA law, but this should be read as article 6.1. d) and Article 6.1. e) of the

relevant objection on the draft decision in accordance with Article 4(24) GDPR and Article 60(4) GDPR and the LSA does not intend to follow the relevant and

in the workplace, the Working Group for Data Protection from Article 29 of Directive 95/46/EC (currently the European Data Protection Board) expresses the

and on the free movement of such data and on 08-657 61 00 Repeal of Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Integrity Protection Authority

data, as well as the free circulation of such data and which repeals Directive 95/46 / EC, "General Data Protection Regulation" (hereinafter the "Regulation");

57(1)(a) and Article 58(2)(b) in connection with Article 5(1)(f), Article 24(1), Article 25(1), Article 32(1) and (2) of 2 of Regulation EU 2016/679 of the European

concept of legitimate interests of the data controller under Article 7 of Directive 95/46 / EC, WP217, p. 24. 5No complain personally, her sole proprietorship

question in the Directive is not broader in this respect than Article 12 (a). of Directive 95/46 / EC, which the first paragraph of Art. Article 8 of Regulation

(2), Article 60, Article 101, Article 101a and Article 103 of the Act of 10 May 2018 on personal data protection (Journal of Laws of 2019, item 1781) and

Ordinance, cf. Article 4 no. 2. The search engine provider is responsible for the processing of personal data this connection, cf. Article 4 no. 7. This is

requirements of Article 2(h) of Directive 95/46/EC nor those of Article 4(11) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679. 31 (2) According to Art. 2(h) of Directive 95/46/EC, consent

can find Yle's news article with the title . Behind the URL search result link 4, on the other hand, you can find Alibi's news article with the title . Such

specific categories of information in Article 8 (1) and (5) of Directive 95/46 or in Article 9 (1), Article 10 (1) and Article 10 of Regulation 2016/679, the

the provisions as stated in Article 95, § 2, as well as of these in Article 98 WOG. Also they are informed, pursuant to Article 99 of the WOG, of the deadlines

into force: "According to Article 16 sentence 1 GDPR, every data subject has the right to request the controller (see Article 4(7) GDPR) to correct incorrect

violating Article 5(1) GDPR Article 6 (1) GDPR Article 6(4) GDPR Article 9 GDPR Article 14 GDPR Article 30 GDPR Article 35 GDPR and Article 36 GDPR. The

municipalities has not complied with Article 28 (1) of the Data Protection Ordinance. Article 32 (3) (f), in accordance with Article 32, as the company has not implemented

Art. 8, Paragraph 1 of Directive 95/46, the judgment of the ECJ of November 6, 2003, C-101/01, margin no. 50). According to Art. 4 No. 15 GDPR in conjunction

data, as well as the free circulation of such data and which repeals Directive 95/46 / CE, "General Data Protection Regulation" (hereinafter the "Regulation");

municipalities has not complied with Article 28 (1) of the Data Protection Regulation. Article 32 (3) (f), cf. Article 32, as the company has not implemented

data, as well as the free circulation of such data and which repeals Directive 95/46 / CE, "General Data Protection Regulation" (hereinafter, "Regulation");

of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC, GDPR, of which the company was informed on the same day. During

had fulfilled its obligation to provide information pursuant to Article 12(3) and Article 4(7) of the Basic Law (Voriger SuchbegriffDSGVONächster Suchbegriff)

personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (general regulation on data protection ) (Journal of Laws UE L

technical and organisational measures' in Article 32 AVG are a continuation of what already applied under Directive 95/46/EC and the Personal Data Protection

personal data and on the free movement of such data and that repealed Directive 95/46 / EC (General Regulation on Data Protection), hereinafter referred to

be covered by Article 13(1)(d) or (f) of that directive? 3) The referring courts ask whether Article 12(a) of Directive 95/46 and Article 8(2) of the Charter

conditions for a valid consent are set out in Article 4 (11) of the Data Protection Regulation. [2] and Article 7. In order to be valid, consent must be voluntary

Protection Officer (DPO) under Section 4 of Chapter 4 of the GDPR (see in particular Article 37 GDPR to Article 39 GDPR). One of these audit proceedings

of these data and which repeals Directive 95/46/EC (General Regulation of data protection, GDPR) defines in its article 4.14 the biometric data as “personal

information to the public, violating Article 24 GDPR. The decision discusses as well, the relationship between directive 95/46/EC and GDPR. The DPA highlighted

Justice to give a preliminary ruling on the following questions: Is Article 2 of Directive 95/46 … to be interpreted as meaning that the record of working time

European Union, pursuant to Article 44 of this text: - adequacy decisions (Article 45); - the appropriate guarantees (Article 46); In the absence of an equivalent

accordance with Article 12 (2) of the Data Protection Regulation. 6 and Article 5 (2). 1 (c). The Data Inspectorate has hereby emphasized that Article 12 (2) of

repealing Directive 95/46/EC (as regards (hereinafter GPRD), an offense under Article 83(5)(a) of the GPRD and described as very serious in article 72.1. a)

infringement of Article 5.1 b) in conjunction with Article 6.4. AVG, on article 5.1 a) in conjunction with article 6.1. AVG and on article 5.1 c) GDPR has

gross turnover per article sold. 35. On March 25, 2019, the plaintiff had his appeal substantiated by another attorney of record: 36. Article 9 of the DSGVO

processing was therefore in breach of Article 5(1)(a) and Article 6(1)(c) of the GDPR. The DPA also ruled out Article 6(1)(f) on the grounds of domestic law:

personal data. (Recital 7). Finally, the European legislator regrets that Directive 95/46/EC has not avoided the widespread public perception that significant

obtained from them, as required under Article 14(1)(a) AVG and Article 14(2)(c)(e) and point (f) AVG; c. article 12 j° article 14 AVG, in view of the defendant

personal data the free movement of such data and Directive 95/46 / EC Regulation (EU) No 2016/679 repealing Directive (hereinafter referred to as General Data

of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General data protection regulation). [2] Act No. 502 of 23 May

norm therefore by article 19 of the LOPD as business data. We consider relevant the legal basis by which, according to the article Article 65 of the LOPD

paper has been disposed of for shredding. 4.1. Article 32 of the Data Protection Regulation Pursuant to Article 32 (1) of the Data Protection Regulation

one hand, with the principles of data quality set out in Article 6 of Directive 95/46 or Article 5 of Regulation 2016/679 and, on the other , to the basic

Data Protection Regulation (2016/679) Article 12 (4), Article 17 (3), Article 21 (2) and (3), Article 25 (2), Article 58 (2) (b) Section 2 of the Health Care

of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General data protection regulation). [2] Case C-673/17, Bundesverband

the general data protectionArticle 5 (1) (a), Article 5 (2), Article 12 (1) and (4) ofArticle 14, Article 15 and Article 21 (4).1.3. The Authority condemns

accountability (Article 5 (2) and 24 (1), (2) GDPR), privacy by design (Article 25 (1) GDPR) and as controller towards its data processors (Article 28 GDPR).

this Directive, Directive 95/46/EC remains unaffected. According to Article 94, paragraph 2, GDPR, references to Directive 95/46/EC are considered references

of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC, "General Data Protection Regulation" (hereinafter Regulation); HAVING

the processing is based on Article 6(1)(a) or on Article 9, (c) where the processing is based on Article 6(1)(a) or Article 9(2)(a), the existence of the

repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (general data protection regulation). [2] See Pre-Template Recital 86 of the Data Protection Regulation and Article 29 of the

personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing the Directive 95/46/EC (GDPR); Having regard to law no. 78-17 of January 6, 1978, as amended

fields in which the municipality could check whether Article 6 information, Article 9 information and Article 10 information are processed in connection with

data, as well as on the free movement of such data and which repeals Directive 95/46 / CE (General data protection regulation, hereinafter "Regulation");

processing had to be disclosed as part of the information (cf. Art. 12 Directive 95/46 / EC). In the judgment of May 7, 2009 already quoted, the ECJ stated

Regulation (EU) 2016/679 repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (a hereinafter referred to as the "General Data Protection Regulation") Article 15 (1) (a) and (c) to (d);

(2016/679) Article 5 (1) (a), Article 12 (1), (2) and (6) , Article 13, Article 15 (1) (h), (3) and (4), Article 58 (2) (c) and (d) subparagraphs Article 34 (1)

case law formulated with regard to Article 7(e) of Directive 95/46/EC remains relevant today even though Directive 95/46 has been repealed, since this condition

personal data, on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC, OJ L 119 of 4 May 2016; hereinafter: GDPR), which provides for appropriate

by the Commission exists; or, in the case of Article 46, Article 47 or the second subparagraph of Article 49(1), which shall include the transfers referred

the previous regime of Directive 95/46/EU. The DPA found that taking into account the interpretation of Article 12 Directive 95/46/EU by the CJEU, a on-the-spot

executed. Legal basis: Article 4 lines 1, 2 and 5, Article 11 paragraphs 1 and 2, Article 12 paragraph 2, Article 17 paragraph 1 and Article 58 paragraph 2 lit

Facebook page is responsible processor within the meaning of Article 2 point d of Directive 95/46. d) It is clearly stated in IKÜM that a statement from the

found a violation of Article 12(3) in relation to Article 15 GDPR. The Garante hence applied an administrative fine as per Article 83(5) GDPR. The amount

matter "Fashion ID" that on the legitimate interest of article 7, letter f) of the directive 95/46, establishes three cumulative requirements for a data

that the controller had violated Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, Article 12 GDPR, Article 13 GDPR, Article 15 GDPR and Article 25(1) GDPR. As a result, the DPA issued

sense of Directive 95/46 or of the GDPR. Being of the opposite view, the APD argues, in substance, that article 12, second paragraph of Directive 2002/58

such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC, 'General Data Protection Regulation' (hereinafter 'GPSD'); Having regard to Article 154(1)(g) of the Personal

these operations are explicitly stated and unconditional in Article 2 (b) of Directive 95/46, must be classified as treatment within the meaning of said

principles of Directive 95/46 / EC are maintained. Also comes the content of the definitions of 'controller',as included in Article 2 (d) of Directive 95/46 / EC

creditworthy. 4Opinion 06/2014 on the notion of legitimate interests of the data controller under Article 7 of Directive 95/46 / EC, pages 24 and 25. 4The Privacy

personal data and the free circulation of these data and repealing Directive 95/46 / CE (hereinafter, “General Regulation of data protection "or" RGPD

free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/ 46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation, OJ L 119 of May 4, 2016, p. 1, hereinafter: GDPR) in conjunction

of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), hereinafter AVG; Having regard

15 GDPR can be used. Paragraph 46 In the decision of the ECJ on Art. 12 of Directive 95/46/EC (Data Protection Directive) (judgment of July 17, 2014, related

of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC, hereinafter: ' GDPR '). In this connection, [applicant under 1]

terms should the weighting provided for in Article 7.f) of Directive 95/46 / EC be carried out -current article 6.1.f) of the General Regulation (EU) - between

data, as well as the free circulation of such data and which repeals Directive 95/46 / EC, "General Data Protection Regulation" (hereinafter "RGPD"); GIVEN

protection regulation's article 5, subsection 2, cf. Article 5, subsection 1, letter a, Article 24, cf. Article 28, subsection 1, Article 35, subsection 1, as

movement of such data and on repeal of Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation) of 27 April 2016 , OJ of 4.5.2016 , L 119/1 , hereinafter Regulation

of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (hereinafter referred to as the General Data Protection Regulation

personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation).Privacy Protection Authority

pursuant to Article 58, paragraph 2, of the Regulation, with this measure. Pursuant to Article 78 of the Regulation, Article 152 of the Code and Article 10 of

data, as well as the free circulation of such data and which repeals Directive 95/46 / EC, "General Data Protection Regulation" (hereinafter the Regulation);

defendant is Article 159(2)(4) of the Polish Telecommunications Law, in conjunction with Article 30, Article 32(2), Article 42(1) and Article 45(1) of the

other legal basis for processing under Article 6 GDPR, the controller had violated Article 5(1)(a) and Article 6(1) GDPR. Taking into account the low income

Parliament and of the Council (General Data Protection Regulation) Article 4(11), Article 7(3) and (4).

protection over the perceived legitimate interest (see with regard to Directive 95/46 / EC the judgment of the ECJ of December 11, 2019, C- 708/18 [TK] margin

of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC, "General Data Protection Regulation" (hereinafter RGPD); HAVING

the treatment is based on consent in accordance with Directive 95/46 / EC, it is not necessary 3 Page 4 JURISPRUDENCE that the interested party give his consent

definition of "personal data" according to Article 2 (a) of Directive 95/46 / EC has been adopted in Article 4 (1) GDPR. A person is clearly identified if

Kühling/Buchner, DS-GVO/BDSG , Article 4 GDPR, paragraph 8; Ernst in Paal/Pauly, GDPR/BDSG, 3rd edition 2021, Article 4, paragraph 14; Cologne Higher Regional

communications under Article 14 GDPR were not legally necessary, as in the present case, Article 23 GDPR restrictions were applicable. Article 23 GDPR establishes

equipment? - Question 4: Are Articles 2(f) and 5(3) of Directive 2002/58EC, read in conjunction with Article 4(11), Article 95 and Recital 4 of Regulation (EU)

contrary, Directive 95/46/EC regulated the matter. However, the legal reasoning developed by the court substantially follows the structure of Article 17 GDPR

connection with Article 5 paragraph 1 point a, Article 5 paragraph 2, Article 6 paragraph 1, Article 7 paragraph 3, Article 12 paragraph 2, Article 17 paragraph

the requirement in Article 13 (1) of the Data Protection Ordinance. Article 12 (2) (b) in conjunction with the requirement of Article 12 (2) of the Regulation

accordance with Article 32 (2) of the Data Protection Regulation. First 3.2. Article 32 (2) of the Data Protection Regulation 2 Article 32 (2) of the Regulation

personal data and on the free movement of such data and on the repeal of Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation). 2The Act (2018: 218) with

to the definition in Art. 4 No. 1 of the GDPR, which now replaces Art. 2(a) of Directive 95/46/EC. 20 According to Article 4(2) of the GDPR, processing

movement of data and on the repeal of Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation, OJ L 119/1 of May 4, 2016, p. 1; hereinafter referred to as

Protection, pursuant to Article 83(3) and Article 83(4)(a) and Article 83(5)(e) of Regulation 2016/679, in conjunction with Article 103 of the Personal Data

Preamble to the AVG that the objectives and principles of Directive 95/46/EC remain valid, (...). Article 12 of the AVG, on the transparent information, communication

such data and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC, which is to be applied directly, c) the first paragraph of Article 6 replaces Article 8 of ZVOP-1. The provision

provided for in Directive 95/46/EC. This interpretation may continue to apply to the definition of character data personnel provided for in Article 4.1. of the

of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC, "General Data Protection Regulation" (hereinafter referred to as

and the protection of such data and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC the right of rectification under Article 16 of the Regulation (hereinafter referred to

free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation): (1) Is Article 83(4) to (6) of the GDPR to be interpreted

Regulation (GDPR). (2) The EDPB succeeds the Article 29 Working party set up under Article 29 of Directive 95/46/EC. It is composed of the Member States data

such data and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC, which is to be applied directly, c) the first paragraph of Article 6 replaces Article 8 of ZVOP-1. The provision

repealing Directive 95/46 / EC, which is, in accordance with its article 99 (2), “applicable from 25 May 2018”. It also follows from Article 96 GDPR that

Protection, pursuant to Article 83(3) and Article 83(4)(a) and Article 83(5)(e) of Regulation 2016/679, in conjunction with Article 103 of the Personal Data

movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General data protection regulation). [2] See also Article 29 Working Party Guidelines on Consent

personal data, as well as the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/ CE, “General Data Protection Regulation” (hereinafter, “Regulation”);

which was issued in compliance with Directive 95/46/EC, is understood as a reference to the GDPR (see also article 94 par. 1 GDPR) . Therefore, for every

meaning of the term “filing system” in Article 2(1) GDPR. In doing so it took Recitals 15 and 27 of the 95/46 directive into account as well as the CJEU decision

free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation - GDPR), are: Article 2 Material scope of application 1. This

violation of Article 5(1)(f) GDPR and a fine of €100,000 for the violation of Article 37 GDPR. The DPA issued a reprimand for the violations of Article 5(1)(e)

elements according to Article 83 GDPR, the DPA imposed a fine in the amount of €18,000 for a violation of Article 5, 9, 32 GPDR and Article 157 of the Italian

expressed in Article 5 (1 ) (a)) f, and reflected in the obligations set out in Article 24 (1), Article 25 (1), Article 32 (1 ) (b ) and (d) and Article 32 (2)

connection with Article 31, Article 58(1)(e) in connection with Article 83(1-3) and Article 83(5)(e) of Regulation 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of

with Article 4 WOG. 17. First, it is clear that the content of the disputed e-mail messages constitute personal data within the meaning of Article 4.1. AVG

83(4) and (5) GDPR) 7.36 The infringement of Article 5(1)(f) GDPR falls within Article 83(5)(a) GDPR, whereas Article 32 falls within Article 83(4)(a)

personal data and on the free movement of such information and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (general data protection regulation). [2] Executive Order No. 715

implementation in national law of the provisions then in force of Article 24 of Directive 95/46/EC of 24 October 1995, which left it up to the Member States

ruling: " 1) Should Articles 1st §2 and 15 bis §4 of Directive 2002/58/EC of July 12, 2002 and Article 56 §1 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of April 27, 2016

personal data and the free circulation of these data and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General Regulation for the protection of data)." Along with the

of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (hereinafter "the General Data Protection Regulation") 2. Pursuant to Article 1 (1) of the General Data

cross-border data processing [...]. The Court of Justice’s case-law on Directive 95/46/EC and Article 100a TEC to date has not adopted such a narrow understanding

requests it. ". 26. Article D. 213-1 of the same code provides that "[t]he amount mentioned in article L. 213-1 is set at 120 euros" and article D. 213-2 provides

LOPD. This resolution warns about the provisions of article 95.3 of the On the other part, article 95.3 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure

the provisions of art. 5, par. 1, of the Code, of art. 4, par. 1, lett. a), of the Directive 95/46/EC, (applicable at the time when the facts occurred),

movement of that data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), hereinafter “GDPR”; 14See article 100 WOG. 15See section 6.3.2.

movement of such data, and repeating Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) as follows: Article 80 Representation of data subjects 1.

Litigation Chamber st 2 pursuant to Article 62, § 1 of the LCA. 4. Pursuant to article 95 § 2, 3° of the LCA as well as article 47 of the rules of order inside

of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), hereinafter “GDPR”; 14See also article 100 of the LCA. 15See section

authority. The court stated that Article 82 of the Law Informatique et Libertés was a transposition of article 5(3) of the Directive 2002/58/CE into French Law

Fashion ID, 6 in which the CJEU explains Article 7 (f) of Directive 95/46, 7that is substantively equal to Article 6, first paragraph, opening lines and under

meaning of Article 2(d) of Directive 95/46”156. Further, the CJEU also stated that “neither the wording of Article 2(d) of Directive 95/46 nor any other

personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (general regulation on data protection) (Journal of Laws UE L 119

constitute personal data. 3.4 The processing constitutes profiling 3.4.1 Applicable regulations Profiling is defined in Article 4.4 of the Data Protection Regulation

of personal data and the free movement of these data, and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General Regulation on the Data Protection), hereinafter GDPR;

personal data and on the free movement of such information and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (general data protection regulation). [2] Act No 502 of 23 May

are not related to Art. 15 GDPR, but to the previous regulation in Directive 95/46/EC are. The assertion of a right to information based on Art. 15 DS-GVO

the meaning of Article 100 of the WOG. The Disputes Chamber has thus decided, on the basis of Article 58.2.a) GDPR and Article 95, § 1, 4° of the WOG, to

personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (Journal of Laws UE L 119

consent referred to in Article 2(f) and Article 5(3) of the Directive 2002/58, read in conjunction with Article 4(11) and Article 6(1), under a), of Regulation

Member States, the concept of necessity as it results from Article 7 (e) of Directive 95/46, which aims to precisely delimit one of the hypotheses in which

and on the free movement of such data and repealing Directive 95/46 / EC - Article 17 Directive 95/46 / EC of the European Parliament and of the Council

personal data and to the free movement of these data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (general regulation on the data protection), hereinafter “GDPR”;

the processing prohibition in Article 58 (2) (f) of the GDPR. Article 58 of the GDPR replaced Article 28(3) of Directive 95/46/EC on the protection of individuals