Search results

policy of the Disputes Chamber. 4Cf. criterion B.6 in the dismissal policy of the Disputes Chamber. Decision 69/2024 — 4/6 the complainant by an employee

L 74 of March 4, 2021, p. 35), hereinafter referred to as "Regulation 2016/679", after conducting administrative proceedings initiated ex officio to impose

authority has ex officio launched an inspection procedure, which it conducts under the op. no. 06110-418/2022, and against the violator, ex officio, he initiated

inspection of the frames taken from the system's viewing monitor, which through 4 cameras facing the outside, it was verified that the entire width of the street

regulations on the protection of of data) (OJ L 119 of 4.05.2016, p. 1, OJ L 127 of 23.05.2018, p. 2 and OJ L 74 of 4.03.2021, p. 35 ), hereinafter referred to as

disputed this and argued that the Civil Code. 6:23. § (4) limitation may not be taken into account ex officio in judicial or administrative proceedings. In

measures. In 2019, the Austrian Data Protection Authority (DSB) initiated an ex officio investigation against the controller, following media reports about

to in Article 22 (1) and (4) and, the importance and the intended consequences of such processing for the data subject '. 4. Because the processing of

January 28, 2021 (EUR 1 = PLN 4.5479) - an administrative fine in the amount of PLN 18,192 ( which is the equivalent of EUR 4,000), according to the average

All contents In all fields Search for a word, an expression, a reference… Ex.: L. 121-1, CGI, 10-15056, fraud, protected adults to research advanced search

15. In vaststellingen 3 en 4 neemt de Inspectiedienst de kwalificatie als verwerkingsverantwoordelijke, in de zin van art. 4, 7) AVG, van de verweerder

Court of November 24, 2008, reference number II FPS 4 /08, published by ONSAiWSA from 2009, No. 4, item 62). Suspension of the proceedings should also

LOPD), typified in the Article 44.4.b) of the LOPD (LES). C / Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 4/14 FIFTH: On May 6, 2019, proceedings

Protection Regulation. In addition, the General Data Protection Regulation4. Article 4 (4) profiling will also take place as the data generated by the system

consented to receiving such marketing communication. The DPA therefore launched an ex officio investigation on 1 January 2020. The controller claimed that letter

has also been the case here. The applicant has access to legal remedies for ex-post supervision, which, according to Sanoma, have been consistently considered

these databases to convey promotional messages on behalf of its clients. 4.4 Methods of acquiring consent to treatment With regard to the formula for expressing

with NIF B39764691 (hereinafter, the reclaimed). The claimant states that his ex-wife, administrator of the company CEYLLE SOLUTIONS & DEVELOPMENT S.L. of

other authorities according to the above-mentioned § 22b (4) PassG or according to § 22b (4a) PassG, which also provides for such a check, would no longer

terms of content by the MB. 4. From this it follows legally: 4.1. The relevant legal provisions are excerpted as follows: 4.1.1. According to Section 1

proves these allegations, she placed reliance upon Recitals 1, 4 and 7 together of Article 4(11) of GDPR. Whelan J., has stated the evidence indicates that

the provision of Article 25h(4) of the PDPA according to which "The exercise of the powers of the Commission under Article 58(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679

has violated by Process health data of 25 employees. 4.4 Violation of security of processing 4.4.1 Introduction To ensure security and prevent the processing

explained that video surveillance is the processing of personal data (Article 4(2) GDPR) and the operator of video surveillance is responsible for complying

affected and the level of damage the elves suffered (article 83.2.4 of the GDPR) 4.1.4. The Data Protection Authority should have taken into account the

complainant also states that after the departure of an ex-colleague, emails were still sent in the name of this ex-employee. 3. On October 16, 2023, the defendant

General Regulation against the taxpayer… (Hereinafter: the liable party), ex officio the following CONCLUSION 1.The procedure of inspection control over

of professional ethics - insofar as there is any processing under Article 4 No. 2 GDPR - is in any case permissible under Article 6(1)(e) GDPR. The parties

her name: 1. … 2 .… 3. … 4. … 5. … 6.… In view of the above, the Authority with the under no. prot. C/EX/608/08-03-2023 and C/EX/604/08-03-2023 documents

(alleged) change of controllership under Article 4(7) from Google LLC to Google Ireland Limited does not have an ex tunc effect - Google LLC qualifies as controller

not subject to the receipt of a complaint, the DPA can initiate proceedings ex officio on the basis of its own findings. On the alleged violation of the

condition of the contract employment, nor even for the special categories. 4.4.3. Page 4 of the Declaration clearly lists the cases concerning the conditions

Juan 6 www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es Page 4 4/124 by D. DDD (hereinafter claimant 4), against BBVA, noting that, under the pretext If you have

Guarantor for the protection of personal data, approved by resolution no. 98 of 4/4/2019, published in the Official Gazette n. 106 of 8/5/2019 and in www.gpdp

amended in OJ L 127 of 23/05/2018, p. 2, and in OJ L 74 of March 4, 2021, page 35), after ex officio administrative proceedings initiated to impose an administrative

defendant 2, 4 Draft law creating the Data Protection Authority, explanatory memorandum, Doc., Ch., 2016-2017, n°2648/001, 5. 13. 6Art. 4 §4 1° of the organic

official data protection proceedings ex officio. The Akr. On the basis of § 103, paragraph (1) of this law in ex officio proceedings its provisions on

L 119 of 4/05/2016, p. 1, as amended), hereinafter referred to as Regulation 2016/679, after conducting administrative proceedings initiated ex officio

shooting range. 3.4. The parties' contentions are discussed in more detail below, to the extent necessary. 4 The assessment Key points. 4.1. In these proceedings

interests or the fundamental rights and freedoms of the data subject. – 4 – 5 Article 4 of the GDPR, headed “Definitions”, reads, in extract: ... (1) ‘personal

to the Hungarian original for more details. Case number: NAIH-1855-4/2022 Subject: ex officio decision History: NAIH-8855/2021 data protection authority

outweigh those interests, in particular when the person concerned is a child”. 1.4. Inclusion in the EVR takes place when the following conditions are met (for

informative to the claimed party, in accordance with the provisions of article 65.4 of Organic Law 3/2018, of December 5, on the protection of personal and legal

of Laws UE L 119 of May 4, 2016, p. 1, Journal of Laws UE L 127 of May 23, 2018, p. 2 and EU Official Journal L 74 of March 4, 2021, p. 35), hereinafter

23/05/2018, p. 2 and OJ EU L 74 of 4/03/2021, p. 35), following conducting administrative proceedings initiated ex officio regarding the processing of

(transparency), 14 (information obligation) and 35 (impact analysis) of GDPR. 4 More specifically, it asserts that the transfer of personal data to the US

were enough to be considered as processing of personal data under Article 4(2) GDPR, hence making the GDPR applicable. In third place, the DPA recalled

78(1) GDPR, Article 25 of the Norwegian Data Protection Act and Article 4-4(4) of the Norwegian Dispute Act (in Norwegian: tvisteloven). 69 10. Right to

Chamber. 4Cf. decisions 64/2020 and 133/2021. 5Cf. decision 46/2020, legal basis. 29 et seq. and decision 133/2021 para. 56 et seq. Decision 135/2023 — 4/9 of

the controller’s appeal. Pursuant to Article 4(11) GDPR, consent must be freely given. In light of Article 7(4) GDPR, this is clearly not the case when the

data. According to point 4.4.5., The legal basis for processing is the consent according to Article 6 (1) (a) GDPR Point 4.4.6. Consent is voluntary and

and Data Protection Commissioner CDP/COMP/583/2022 vs COMPLAINT 1. On the 22"4 December 2022, es brough her legal counsel (the “complainant” or the “data

.................15 4 Review of individual complaints - Reasons for decisions............................................. ..20 4.1 Complaint 1 (from the

invited to "send a communication" by e-mail. 1.4.4. With reference to the disputes referred to in points 4) and 5), in the initiation of the procedure it

Schrems I and II judgements (C-362/14 and C-311/18), the Irish DPA started an ex office procedure into the issue of Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd. (Meta Ireland)

according to Art. 83 Para. 4 GDPRArticle 83, Paragraph 4, GDPR). Pursuant to Article 83 Paragraph 4Article 83, Paragraph 4, GDPR, in the case of the violations

respect the transparency requirement set out in Articles 5(1)(a), 12, 14 and 21(4) GDPR in the future. Regarding the direct marketing messages by the controller

of the joke.C / Jorge Juan, 6www.aepd.es28001 - Madridsedeagpd.gob.es Page 4 4/615. Regarding the issue of spreading the joke, which is present in theclaims

Guarantor for the protection of personal data, approved by resolution no. 98 of 4/4/2019, published in the Official Gazette n. 106 of 8/5/2019 and in www.gpdp

the liable party… (hereinafter referred to as the taxpayer) represented by…, ex officio the following DECISION The taxpayer… must, due to irregularities found

.....4 A. Previous EDPS decisions..............................................................................................................4 B. Facts

no. 1, § 5 (4) p. 1, § 6 (1) p. 1, p. 3, (3) p. 2, (4) p. 2 LFGB § 40 (1a) VwGO § 80a (3), § 146 (4) p. 3, § 152 (1GG) Art. 5 (1) GPDR Art. 4 No. 1, No.

decision-making' pursuant to Article 22 GDPR, but only 'light profiling' under Article 4(4) GDPR. Therefore, the controller claimed that Article 15(1)(h) GDPR did not

the complainant and herself in the context of their relationship as ex-employee to ex-employer. 18. He also accuses it of violating the principles of minimization

S***strasse 2-4/35 2***L*** The leave compartment is to be set up at: N***stelle 2*** F***gasse 7 2***L*** The incoming shipments are ex Picked up 08/20/2018

(General Data Protection Regulation) (Journal Official Journal L 119 of May 4, 2016, p. 1 and Official Journal L 127 of May 23, 2018, p. 2). In the justification

the 3Article 6.2 GDPR 4 CJEU, Heinz Huber v. Bundesrepublik Deutschland, 16 December 2008, C 524/06, para. 52 Decision 14/2023 – 4/10 processingofperso

purposes without establishing an appropriate legal basis for the processing. An ex-employee of the controller filed a complaint with the Spanish Data Protection

item 1781), as well as Art. 58 sec. 2 lit. i), art. 83 sec. 1-3, art. 83 sec. 4 lit. a) and art. 83 sec. 5 lit. e) in connection with Art. 31 and art. 58 section

with Article 83 of the GDPR), came into force only on 25 May 2018 with effect ex nunc , which means that it could be relevant in the present case only if it

ACCORDING TO THE LAW 1. According to article 1 of KYA 4000/4/32-la/2012, as amended valid with the no. 4000/4/32-n/2017 similar, "in the National Catalog of Undesirable

admission procedure with regard to the requirement of presentation (§ 124a (4) sentence 4 and (5) sentence 2 VwGO), do not justify the assumption that the appeal

legal consideration 4.5. in more detail. The insurance dispute between [applicant] and ASR. 4.4. The (amended) requests five and six. 4.4.1. These requests

from the improper or erroneous treatment thereof (Art 4.3). Therefore, the aforementioned article 4.4 of the Regulation for the exercise of the sanctioning

from the improper or erroneous treatment thereof (Art 4.3) .Therefore, the aforementioned article 4.4 of the Regulation for the exercise of the sanctioning

notified by the IT company C-Planet (the controller), the Maltese DPA opened an ex officio investigation into the a personal data breach of approximately 335

December 2019, page 17. 4See File 11, report of 5 December 2019, page 4. 4See File 25, Transavia's answers, date 26 May 2020. 4See File 38, Replies from

subject: "Leakage of data on the tourism4all.gov.gr platform" was communicated to the e-mail address tourism4all@mintour.gr which was created exclusively

and section 2, art. 83 section 4 lit. a) in connection with Art. 33 section 1 and section 3 and art. 34 section 1, 2 and 4 of Regulation 2016/679 of the

agreement in principle between the IP and the taxpayer (e-mail dated 8/4/2021 and 9/4/2021 - doc. no. 0612-23/2019/18) that the taxpayer's relationship to

the limited operating and recording times of camera 2. 4. the orders relating to cameras 3 and 4 to realign them (point 6 of the decision of 23 November

inspection was carried out at the Company between 4 and 6 April 2023. The latter then sent a note on the following 4 May, dissolving the reservations contained

claims 4. and 5. is dismissed in its entirety. 3. The plaintiff has to bear the costs of the appeal and revision proceedings. The plaintiff bears 4/9 and

to Regulation 2016/679 - WP248rev.01, adopted on 4 April 2017, as last amended and adopted on October 4, 2017). 3. The Authority's assessments 3.1. The

discuss whether the termination of the ex officio examination procedure has the quality of a decision at all. [36] 1.4. It was not alleged that the plaintiff

The data processing in question was profiling within the meaning of Article 4(4) of the GDPR. It is understandable for the average person subject to the law

originally collected, subject to Article 6(4) of the GDPR. The definition of these criteria in Article 6(4) of the GDPR is illustrative and the existence

be admissible under the provision of Article 4(4) of ZOIzk-1, thereby violating the provision of Article 4(4) of ZOIzk-1 on eight occasions (i.e. by accessing

The CJEU clarified that a controller, as defined by Article 4(7) GDPR, can be implicitly determined by national law. Implied controllership under national

subject involved the processing of his personal data, as defined in Articles 4(1) and (2) GDPR. Additionally, the DPA stated that the controller transmitted

3.4. Pursuant to Section 24 (1) VwGVG, the administrative court must hold a public oral hearing upon application or, if it deems it necessary, ex officio

(geoporatl.gov.pl), and even with Art. 36 4 sec. 16 of the Land and Mortgage Register Act and Art. 5a sec. 4 of the Geodetic and Cartographic Law Act,

the specific case it did not aim to damage the rights and interests of its ex-client, on the contrary, the message sent is completely harmless and as a

obtained; 3) description of possible consequences of personal data breach; 4) description of measures taken or proposed by the administrator to remedy the

000, ie five hundred thousand forints order to pay a data protection fine; 4. order the disclosure of the final decision by masking (anonymising) the personal

DPA requested the controller to submit its observations on the matter. On 4 February 2022, the controller provided that because the complainant’s request

data processed there. You must also comply with your justification obligation ex art. 5 para. 2 GDPR.’ After the claimant has given the body default, he appealed

submit specific documents, data and information. More specifically in paragraph 4 of the attached file, it was requested as, until the above date, the Statute

partial rejection having taken place. 4. In view of the involvement of the opposing party, the decision will be served ex officio. This does not affect the

IP then explained what constitutes personal data in accordance with Article 4(1) GDPR. In light of the definition contained therein, photographs may be considered

the administrative procedure should be resume. 4 Judgment of the Marktenhof dated 2 September 2020, 9.4. 5 The judgment of the Marktenhof dated September

allocated in the manner stated in the decision. 4 The decision The preliminary relief judge 4.1. rejects the claims, 4.2. orders [claimant] to pay the costs of

personal data as per Article 4(1) GDPR. Equally so, that processing of such information constitutes profiling under Article 4(4) GDPR. Further, the BVwG considered

The Belgian DPA determined that a controller breached Articles 12(3), 12(4) and 17(1) GDPR by not responding an erasure request. The DPA ordered the controller

Chamber, preferably via the address litigationchamber@apd-gba.be. II. Motivation 4. The complaint concerning the lack of response from the defendant following

leads to the C / Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 4/24 "Cookie policy", verifying that a series of cookies are installed without

Article 62, § 1 WOG transferred to the Disputes Chamber. II. Justification 4. On the basis of the elements in the file that are known to the Disputes Chamber

in particular the necessary and parallel references to specific provisions 4. Article 172.1 of the Telecommunications Law (Journal of Laws of 2014, item

forwarded to the Litigation Chamber pursuant to Article 62, § 1 of the LCA. 4. Pursuant to article 95 § 2, 3° of the LCA as well as article 47 of the rules

to the identified 4 data controllers. After all, the Disputes Chamber has decided to to notify the defendants of dismissal decisions ex officio. See the

personal data, nor did it correlate with the notion of personal data from Art. (4)(1) GDPR on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of

delivered by regular mail. 4 1° to dismiss a complaint; 2° to order the exclusion of prosecution; 3° order the suspension of the judgment; 4° propose a settlement;

the measures stated in Article 100 of the WOG. 4 3Section 3, Subsection 2 of the WOG (Articles 94 to 97). 4 Article 100. § 1. The Disputes Chamber has the

definition of the concept of personal data Article 4, 1) of the GDPR, as explained in Recital 26 of the GDPR, Opinion 4/2007 of the Decision on the merits 71/2020

the Company has taken note for possible modifications (see minutes of 4 May). 1.4. The use of the so-called “soft spam”. With regard to what is indicated

personal data in accordance with Article 4, number one, GDPR. 3.2.4. The GDPR defines the term processing in Art. 4 Z 2 GDPR by listing a number of possible

trees orientation towards public space (Annex I frames 1-4). SECOND: In accordance with article 65.4 of Organic Law 3/2018, of 5 December, of Protection of

allegedly occurring. Late complaints must be rejected.  Art. 4 Z 7 GDPR: Definitions Art. 4. For the purposes of this Regulation, the following terms shall

119 of 4.05.2016, p. 1, OJ L 127 of 23.05.2018, p. 2 and OJ L 74 of 4.03.2021, p. 35 ), after carrying out administrative proceedings initiated ex officio

litigationchamber@apd-gba.be; and 4. in the absence of the timely implementation of the above by the defendant, the case to be dealt with on the merits ex officio in accordance

originally concerned a complaint filed by a (soon-to-be-ex) husband, the data subject, against his (soon-to-be-ex) wife. During divorce proceedings the wife had

opinions of 335,000 voters has been exposed. The Maltese DPA (IDPC) opened an ex officio investigation, and noyb filed a complaint on behalf of several Maltese

GmbH send an e-mail to: [redacted] mailbox@privacy.de Am Hamburger Bahnhof 4 Fingerprint of our 10557 Berlin PGP-Key: D3C9 AEEA B403 7F96 7EF6 C77F B607

a request for access to his personal data to the minister, the claimant's ex-employer. 2. On February 5, 2019, the claimant filed a complaint with the

signatures by providing test data https://alairasgyujtes.online page. I.4. Facts revealed I.4.1. According to the statement of […] Kft., The registration of the

two-month extended deadline, which he said It began on January 4, 2021 and expired on April 4, not exceeded. In this statement, the Applicant further stated

September 2022, October 25, 2022, November 4, 2022, November 9, 2022 and January 10, 2023. Decision 109/2023 – 4/6 14. It is the responsibility of the Respondent

Art. 83 sec. 1 and sec. 2, art. 83 sec. 4 lit. a) in connection with Art. 33 paragraph 1 and art. 34 sec. 1, 2 and 4 of Regulation 2016/679 of the European

the controller, to handle the case on the merits ex officio in accordance with Articles 98 et seq. WOG. 4Due to the extraordinary circumstances due to COVID-19

Guarantor for the protection of personal data, approved with resolution no. 98 of 4/4/2019, published in the Official Gazette. n. 106 of 8/5/2019 and in www.garanteprivacy

officer (hereinafter: the misdemeanor authority) issues an authorized official ex officio on the basis of the second paragraph of Article 51 and Article 46

It was among the selected municipalities that the Danish DPA had chosen (ex officio) to assess its compliance with the GDPR. The DPA focused on access

date 05/25/2022 standard AVG §38 B-VG Art133 Para.4 DSG §30 GDPR Art83 VwGVG §17 saying W176 2249328-1/4Z DECISION The Federal Administrative Court, through

transmitted to the Litigation Chamber in pursuant to Article 62, § 1 of the LCA. 4. Pursuant to article 95 § 2, 3° of the LCA as well as article 47 of the rules

Central Contentious-Administrative Court No. 4, of 07/22/19 (sent. No. 81/2019, issued in ordinary procedure No. 4/2019). It was confirmed in essential because

responding to the erasure request, the controller breached Articles 12(3), 12(4) and 17(1) GDPR. The DPA added that the controller should have appointed a

information concerning him appearing in the decree of July 8, 2015. 2. Under Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of 27 April 2016, "1)" personal data "means any

data related to traffic accidents. In February 2022, the Polish DPA initiated ex officio proceedings in order to investigate the controller's data processing

the claimant also requests compensation pursuant to Article 82 of the AVG. 4. In the contested Decision II, the defendant indicated that the claimant must

€30. Article 96(1)(1) ZVOP 2 (infringements of the provisions of Article 83(4) GDPR) (1) A fine of between EUR 100 and EUR 5 000 shall be imposed on the

2004, ECLI:NL:HR: 2004:AP0424, ow.3.4.2 and the judgment of the HR of 4 November 2016, ECLI:NL:HR:2016:2495,ow.2.4.1. 2For a comprehensive legal framework

pursuant to art. 62, 1 WOG submitted to the Disputes Chamber. II. Justification 4. On the basis of the elements in the file known to the Disputes Chamber, and

Journal EU L 119 of 4/05/2016, p. 1, Official Journal of the EU L 127 of 23/05/2018, p. 2 and Official Journal of the EU L 74 of 4/03/2021, p. 35. ), after

(SSTC 89/1986, of 1 July, FJ 2; 50/1988, of 22 March, FJ 3; 110/1995, of 4 July, FJ 4; 189/1996, of 25 November, FJ 3; and 221/1998, of 24 November, FJ 3)

registered included payment details and the data subject's power of attorney. On 4 July 2023, the data subject submitted a complaint to the Belgian DPA. The Belgian

the social media activities of the controller, the Estonian DPA started an ex officio investigation. During the proceedings, the controller explained that

by means of an inter partes petition 4 must contain statements listed in Article 1034ter of the Judicial Code. It 4The petition states, under penalty of

assessment (hereinafter: GEB) took place around practice and what the results were. 4. In the answer on behalf of the defendant dated July 14, 2023, the Z replied

due to the correct display of the image (image 1) corrected ex officio according to § 62 para. 4 AVG. The present appeal by the complainant is directed against

of EUR 4 170,00,  for the offence of unlawful processing of personal data ... under point II.2.) of this judgment: GLOBA in the amount of EUR 4 170,00

00; iv. by Article 37(1) and (7) of the GDPR, in conjunction with Article 83(4) (a), both of the GDPR, sanctioned with a fine of up to EUR 10,000,000.00;

Article 12 paragraph 1, paragraph 2, paragraph 3 and paragraph 4 and Article 15 GDPR; and 4. Article 12(1) and (2), Article 13(1) and (2), Article 5(2);

provide, until 4 August 2021, information about the processing, and a violation of Articles 5(1)(a) and 12(1) GDPR, for having rendered, after 4 August 2021

of the Data Protection Act is also relevant. Article 4(1), (2) and (7) of the GDPR read: "Article 4 Definitions For the purposes of this Regulation: (1)

Speedy AD on 5.09.2019, despite a timely phone call from the addressee on 4.09.2019 that they not live at the address. It was delivered to an unknown person

the access request (Article 12(3) GDPR) nor any extension under Article 12(4) GDPR had ever been communicated. The DPA deemed the controllers answer to

of a different nature. 4.4. The official finds that the case materials contain the letter of SIA dated February 2, 2023 [..] 4 (hereinafter - Explanations)

request protection from this body”. SECOND: In accordance with article 65.4 of Organic Law 3/2018, of 5 December, Protection of Personal Data and guarantee

present case. 2 of 4 December 21, 2023, 4:48 p.m. Your reference: C044, (partial) final notice LDA-1085.1-10821/21-F - A closer examination ex officio as to

March 2020, a data protection decision of March 2020010738 was decided on (ex 2018020224): I) Proceedings 1. Complaint and facts On 24 January 2018, the

sees no ex officio reason to assume that the plaintiff was unable to sufficiently argue his case at the hearing. The generality of the overview 4.1. The

requirements have been met for this […]” was a violation of his “privacy”. 4. On January 3, 2024, the complaint will be declared admissible by the First

representative [authorized representative] ; - mr. Van Lith on behalf of [the bank] . 2.4. The Court has also taken cognizance of the contents of: - the documents of

in the manual files. Since the counterclaim was served to the controller on 4 February 2021 and thus before the expiry of a standard limitation period of

controller for violations of Article 76(4) ZVOP-2, Article 78(1) ZVOP-2 and Article 80(3) ZVOP-2. Article 76(4) ZVOP-2 'The notification referred to in

did not pay for them - the plaintiff objected to the debit from his account. 4The plaintiff called in a debt collection company to enforce the claim without

request protection from this body”. SECOND: In accordance with article 65.4 of Organic Law 3/2018, of December 5, Protection of Personal Data and guarantee

par. 8.4), public administrations can legitimately process data suitable for revealing the state of health of their employees, to ascertain, also ex officio

based on art. 62, §1 WOG transferred to the Litigation room. II. Motivation 4. The Disputes Chamber determines on the basis of the documents that support

Art. 83 sec. 1 and sec. 2, art. 83 sec. 4 lit. a) in connection with art. 33 sec. 1 and art. 34 sec. 1, 2 and 4 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European

was going to comply with the request (Article 12(3) GDPR) or not (Article 12(4) GDPR). Without addressing a potential breach of the GDPR, the DPA ordered

in under Articles 12.3 and 12.4 of the GDPR. Furthermore, it is relevant to note that the grievances 4According to Article 4, 2) of the GDPR, a "processing"

online publications falls under the definition of "personal data" in Article 4(1) GDPR. The DPA reminded the controller that, as defined in Recital 26 GDPR

data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (Official Journal of the EU L 119 of 4 May 2016, p. 1 and Dz. Urz. UE L 127 of 23 May 2018, p. 2), hereinafter: the

consent was given contrary to Article 9(2)(a), read in the lights of Articles 4 and 7 GDPR. Secondly, the purposes of the processing mentioned in the disputed

The Spanish DPA fined a landlord €4,000 for installing, a camera that affects the tenant's private area, without sufficient legal basis under Article 6

providing access to documents. Further, the payment in the present case is charged ex post facto, and according to § 29(2) of the Finnish Data Protection Act, a

were subject to professional secrecy obligations. The Danish DPA started an ex officio investigation. The DPA clarified that the Region of Zealand was the

3.4. Pursuant to Section 24 (1) VwGVG, the administrative court must hold a public oral hearing upon application or, if it deems it necessary, ex officio

the site requests mechanism. [2.4.] In the letter dated March 31, 2022 (hereinafter – Request No. 1), the Inspectorate 4 invited LocateFamily administration

2013 DSG Art. 2 § 4 today DSG Art. 2 § 4 valid from January 1st, 2020 last changed by Federal Law Gazette I No. 14/2019 DSG Art. 2 § 4 valid from May 25th

of Article 4.1. (second part) of the GDPR. 8. These data were also subject to automated processing by the defendant at the meaning of Article 4.2. of the

received repeated requests for portability of the claimant's line, which are all ex officio shutdowns in systems due to fraud. This is possible because the operator

i), Art. 83 sec. 1-3 and art. 83 sec. 4 it. a) in connection with Art. 33 paragraph 1 and art. 34 sec. 1, 2 and 4 of Regulation 2016/679 of the European

was repeatedly given the opportunity to comply with Articles 12(3) and 12(4) GDPR because they received several requests from the data subject and an order

counter-application will be dealt with separately. 4.3. The District Court will consider the applications as follows. 4.4. 4.4. [name of defendant] rightly argues that

employee was not able to answer the questions regarding this processing. On 4 February 2022, the data subject also filed an access request, to which the

hearing upon application or, if it considers it necessary, ex officio. Pursuant to Section 24(4) of the VwGVG, the Administrative Court may - unless otherwise

p. 2 and EU Official Journal L 74 of 4.03.2021, p. 35) ), after conducting administrative proceedings initiated ex officio on the processing of personal

and Mixpanel) who carry out processing outside the Union European (point 5.4 of the provision); HAVING REGARD, moreover, to provision no. 232 of 26 November

Administrative Court. In addition, Article 4 of the Basic Data Protection Regulation (DSGVO), OJ No. L 119 of 4 May 2016, Article 3(10) to (12) and (19)

retargeting cookies (report of operations carried out on 5 November 2019, pp. 4 and 5); b) with regard to the blackcard.sisley.com site, while presenting a

balanced with other fundamental rights recognized in the Charter (Recital 4). In particular, the Division followed, Article 47 of the Charter, which included

but not biometric data as they do not fulfil the requirements of Article 4(14) GDPR. Secondly, the AZOP ascertained whether the controller had rightfully

considered personal data under Article 4(1) GDPR and the publishing of such data is considered to be processing under Article 4(2) GDPR. Secondly, the APD noted

However, he 4 1° dismiss the complaint without follow-up; 2° order the dismissal; 3° pronouncing the suspension of the pronouncement; 4° to propose a

oral hearing upon application or, if it deems it necessary, ex officio. According to § 24 para. 4 VwGVG - unless otherwise provided by federal or state law

guarantee the confidentiality and integrity of the complainant's personnel file. 4. On October 5, 2022, a colleague of the complainant stated in writing that

processes the data on the basis of, among other things, Article 4:32 paragraph 1 Wft and 4:34 Wft. In addition, the processing of personal data must be assessed

controller also filed a report with the police for fraud and computer hacking. On 4 May 2021, the data subject sent a subject access request to the controller

retention of a driving licence under Article 102(1)(4) of the Act on Driving Drivers may not invoke, either ex officio or at the request of a party, evidence

art. 58 sec. 2 lit. i) in connection with Art. 83 sec. 1-3 and art. 83 sec. 4 lit. a) and art. 83 sec. 5 lit. e) Regulation of the European Parliament and

of the plaintiff within the meaning of Art. 4 No. 1 DSGVO, whereby the processing within the meaning of Art. 4 No. 2 DSGVO takes place in the form of the

DOCUMENT 5.3.4. and among the documentation a list was delivered- of suppliers contracted by ROBOTICS with access to data (it appears in DOCU- MENT 5.1.4.) C/

of the parties are discussed in more detail below, where necessary. 4The assessment 4.1. The request pertains to access to the client file on the basis of

oral hearing upon application or, if it deems it necessary, ex officio. According to § 24 para. 4 VwGVG - unless otherwise provided by federal or state law

concluded that there was no violation of Article 4(7) GDPR, read in conjunction with Articles 12(3), 12(4) and 15(1) GDPR. Share your comments here! Share

the appeal registered under no. 24739/2021 RG proposed by: L.M., domiciled ex lege in Rome, piazza Cavour at Chancellery of the Court of Cassation, represented

adopted child - information protected as such by the law (Law of 4 May 1983, no. 184 of 4 May 1983)- as well as the sexual orientation of the parents; this

The Telecommunications Telemedia Privacy Act, NJW 2021, 2238, paragraph 4). 4. The complaint is admissible in accordance with Section 21 Paragraph 3 Clause

argument did not relieve them of their liability as a controller under Article 4(7) GDPR. The DPA highlighted that the most important characteristic of a controller

already at least was no longer available since 14 January 2019 (see document 4-0 (4) in the file of applicant). 3. The legal framework of the jurisdiction of

in article 83.4.a) of the aforementioned RGPD in the following terms: C / Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 6/16 "4. Violations of

decree on the same issue on July 4, 2023 (Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation N. 1101, issued on July 4, 2023. The decree can be read on

from publishing the portrait in question (order of 29 December 2015, Annex K4, p. 14 et seq., as well as supplements from the Regional Court of Cologne to

visitation cases will thus receive detailed information about all cases where the ex-spouse has come to the attention of the police decades back. There is a risk

there in full and exhaustively. 4. The application for the reinstatement of the contribution (plaintiff's application number 4) is justified. After the plaintiff

meaning of Art. 4 nos. 1 and 2 GDPR if the video recordings allow the identification of the person concerned (Ehmann/Selmayr, loc.cit., Art. 4 marginal 7)

October 28, 2019 and the ex officio search of December 12, 2022 on the websites with the URL https://who.is/whois and www.world4you.com/de. 2. Every user

biometric data within the meaning of art. 4 point 14 of the GDPR. It should be pointed out that pursuant to Art. 4 (14) of the GDPR, "biometric data" means

operative part of this decision and in what manner they have implemented them. 4. No special costs have been incurred by the Authority in this procedure, and

Act in the name of the data subject under in the proceedings held upon GDPR (ex. filing in a complaint at the national DPA), but in procedures which are regulated

banner that appeared on the website of the controller during your own visit. 4. However, the control authority must provide an effective response to the individual

 8 A and I (omissis) 4 L (omissis) 5     6 U 4 Q (omissis) who represents and defends him 9 M 4 I there 

and household sphere are not covered because of § 4(1) DSG in conjunction with Article 2(2)(c) GDPR. § 4(1) DSG provides that the GDPR applies in addition

This is because the controller's duty to "keep electronic records" under § 13(4)(c) of the Law on Data Protection 2000 is nowhere to be found in Article 32

ical program falls under the definition of "profiling" according to Art. 4(4) GDPR in accordance with the case law of the CJEU in C-634/21. The automatied

that even pseudonymised data (Art. 4 Para. 5 GDPR) from the term personal data are recorded in accordance with Art. 4 Para. 1 GDPR. It is undeniable that

Government Decree 2020. from the 4th of November in the declared emergency, as a special legal order, § 46 of the Cat. (4) defined the rules for the exercise

accept about the configure, combined with the color style of the buttons. 4. Withdrawing consent is not as easy as giving it. The complaining party was

of 23/05/2018, p. 2), in connection with Art. 105 paragraph. 4 and art. 105a paragraph. 4 and 5 of the Act of August 29, 1997 Banking Law (Journal of Laws

admissible according to Art. 133 Para. 4 B-VG. The statement must be briefly justified. According to Art. 133 Para. 4 B-VG, the revision is not permissible

personal data of third parties, including those relating to health (Article 4(10)). The DPA held that this constitutes a violation of Article 6(1)(e) and

transferred to the defendant, from in accordance with the provisions of article 65.4 of Organic Law 3/2018, of 5 December, Protection of Personal Data and guarantee

Provinces or by the undersecretary in matters of sport (Article 5, paragraph 4). The guidelines adopted pursuant to art. 1, paragraph 14, d.l. n. 33/2020

effective, proportionate and dissuasive. 4.5. Based on what was assessed in the previous paragraphs. 4.1, 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4 of this provision, it is deemed necessary

of how it plans to bring the processing activities into compliances within 4 weeks. Is consent considered in this case as freely given? Data subjects are

not acknowledge that with the introduction of Title 8.4 in the Awb on the grounds of Article 8:4(1)(f) of the Awb, the possibility to appeal against a

remove the image of the complainant from its databases; GIVEN the note dated 4 August 2022 with which the complainant responded to the observations of R.T

contrary to regulation 21 of PECR. 1 • ICO. InformationCommissioner's ffice 4. Regulation 21 applies to the making of unsolicited calls for direct marketing

§ 3, 4., 6., 11., 12., 13., 16., 17., 21., 23-24. point, paragraph (5) of § 4, § 5 (3)-(5), (7) and (8), § 13, § 2, § 23, § 25, § 25/G. § (3), (4) and

the telecommunications and entertainment sectors. The Latvian DPA started an ex officio investigation into the controller's data processing practices. Specifically

data concerning him are being processed” (art. 4, par. 1, n. 11) of the Regulation). Pursuant to art. 7, par. 4, of the Regulation, "in assessing whether consent

meaning of Article 15 (4) of the General Data Protection Regulation (DS-GVO) by creating the black box mentioned under point 4a)?Are (also) in this case

rejected (paragraph 4). 1.9. The complainant lodged a timely complaint with the Federal Administrative Court against points 3 and 4 of this decision. 1

Guarantor for the protection of personal data, approved with resolution no. 98 of 4/4/2019, published in the Official Gazette. n. 106 of 8/5/2019 and in www.gpdp

protection of personal data, approved with resolution of the Guarantor no. 98 of 4/4/2019, published in the Official Gazette. n. 106 of 8/5/2019 and in www.gpdp

in a certain order using search terms. 2.4. By decisions of 28 October 2014, 22 May 2015, 14 August 2015 and 4 November 2016, the Regional Health Care Disciplinary

of the plaintiff's participation in the test in May 2022 in § 4 and in the appendix to § 4 of the statutes of the defendant university for admissions to

decision of 4 July 2019 - 7 C 31.17 - NVwZ-RR 2019, 1015 marginal number 13). For the modified according to § 32e AO information access claim from § 4 Abs. 1