Search results

Senate jurisdiction for legal protection reasons in accordance with Section 27 DSG. This is particularly because the question of the qualification of the data

federal or Land laws provide for a decision by senates. Pursuant to Section 27 (1) DSG, the Federal Administrative Court decides through the Senate on appeals

details. decision date 02/27/2023 standard B-VG Art133 Para.4 DSG §18 paragraph 1 DSG §24 paragraph 1 DSG §24 paragraph 5 DSG §24 paragraph 8 GDPR Art51

the German original for more details. decision date 02/27/2023 standard B-VG Art133 Para.4 DSG §1 DSG §24 GDPR Art17 GDPR Art5 DSGVO Art6 Abs1 litf GDPR Art9

44 GDPR. This matter is covered by Senate decisions in accordance with § 27 DSG. The procedure of the administrative courts with the exception of the Federal

in accordance with § 44 DSG." Although § 44 DSG does grant data subjects a right to access, according to its chapter in the DSG, it only applies to the

representative power of attorney to exercise their rights under Sections 24 to 27 DSG before the data protection authority and the BVwG. The 1st MB is a company

For example, § 62 of the Austrian Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz - DSG) sets a penalty of €50,000 for, inter alia, (1) intentionally obtaining illegal

17 GDPR. This matter is covered by Senate decisions in accordance with § 27 DSG. The procedure of the administrative courts, with the exception of the Federal

more details. decision date 07/28/2022 standard B-VG Art133 Para.4 DSG §24 paragraph 1 DSG §24 paragraph 5 GDPR Art12 GDPR Art15 GDPR Art4 VwGVG §28 paragraph

laws provide for the decision to be made by senates. Pursuant to Section 27 (1) DSG, the Federal Administrative Court decides through the Senate on complaints

details. decision date 01/20/2022 standard B-VG Art133 Para.4 DSG §1 DSG §24 paragraph 1 DSG §24 paragraph 5 GDPR Art17 GDPR Art4 GDPR Art5 GDPR Art58 GDPR

decision date 01/16/2023 standard B-VG Art133 Para.4 DSG §1 DSG §24 DSG §24 paragraph 1 DSG §24 paragraph 5 DSG §7 GDPR Art4 GDPR Art5 GDPR Art6 VwGVG §28 paragraph

01/03/1930 to 06/30/1934 DSG Art. 1 § 1 today DSG Art. 1 § 1 valid from 01.01.2014 last changed by Federal Law Gazette I No. 51/2012 DSG Art. 1 § 1 valid from

the German original for more details. decision date 04/27/2022 standard B-VG Art133 Para.4 DSG §4 GDPR Art15 saying W176 2244407-1/18E In the name of the

para. 2, item 7 DSG 2000 in conjunction with Art. 69, para. 5 DSG Ad 2b): Art. 62, para. 1, item 4 DSG Ad 3a): Art. 52, para. 2, item 4 DSG 2000 in conjunction

intelligibility of the content of the decision. The right of confidentiality (§ 1 DSG) and confidentiality interests of the respondent, a legal person whose lawful

more details. decision date 05/17/2022 standard AVG §38 B-VG Art133 Para.4 DSG §24 GDPR Art12 GDPR Art15 DSGVO Art15 Abs1 litc GDPR Art77 VwGVG §17 saying

judgment of 25.02.2020, 5 Sa 108/19 § 18aF DSG MV, § 19aF DSG MV, § 20aF DSG MV, § 21aF DSG MV, § 22aF DSG MV, § 6 Abs 4 BDSG, § 37 EUV 2016/679, § 39

Article 27 GDPR and sent a reply to the data subject's complaint stating that any violation of Article 13 GDPR has been rectified under § 24(6) DSG by the

1934 DSG Art. 2 § 24 today DSG Art. 2 § 24 valid from May 25th, 2018 last changed by Federal Law Gazette I No. 120/2017 DSG Art No. 133/2009 DSG Art. 2

Section 1 DSG goes beyond that of Art. 8 EU-GRC, so that Section 1 (1) DSG does not apply at all. But even if one were to see an application of § 1 DSG, the

the Austrian Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz - DSG). Due to the derogations in § 9(1) DSG, the DSB would hence not be competent to handle the complaint

to Section 1 (1) DSG must be checked and restrictions on this right may result from Section 1 (2) DSG. 14. According to Section 1 (2) DSG, restrictions on

act, with a written statement dated October 16, 2020, received on October 27, 2020, and applied for the complaint to be dismissed with reference to the

proceedings. Pursuant to Article 69 (4) of the DSG, proceedings pending before the ordinary courts under the DSG 2000 at the time of entry into force of this

the StVO. 2 DSG and Art. 8 para. 2 ECHR and justify such an intervention.§ 98a para. 2 first sentence StVO 1960 therefore violates § 1 DSG and Art. 8 ECHR

2009, p. 1. No. L 119 of 4.5.2016, p. 1; section 29 Data Protection Act - DSG, Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999 as amended; section 17 General Administrative

with the documents submitted in them (ruling of the Regional Court of Wels of 27.12.2019; ruling of the Regional Court of Karlsruhe of 2.8.2019; decision of

application of Section 1 (1) DSG requires, among other things, that the data is personal. According to Section 1 (2) DSG, restrictions on the right to

held that the disclosure of data under § 1 Austrian Data Protection Act (DSG) was lawful. In particular, Austrian law allowed for parties to be represented

Council of 27 June 2016/679 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the competent authorities of 27 April 2016

an entry according to § 24 DSG and is therefore not covered by the fee and tax exemption clause of § 69 Paragraph 6 DSG. 27. This sum is to be paid into

2016; §§ 4 Paragraph 6, 24 Paragraph 1 and 5 of the Data Protection Act - DSG, Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999 as amended; Sections 2, 3, 80 of the Federal

apply § 12 and § 13 of the Austrian Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz - DSG) that specifically deal with the processing of pictures (including videos)

represented by Dr. Josef B***, lawyer in ****, of 22 October 2020 (ha. received on 27 October 2020) against N*** Ärztezentrum - Dr. U*** & Co GmbH (respondent)

providers could not be derived from § 4 DSG 2000. The clause therefore complied with the provisions of the DSG and was not intransparent. The court of

eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32002L0058 National_Law_Name_1=§ 29 DSG National_Law_Link_1=https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/eli/bgbl/i/1999/165/A2P29/NOR40195925

eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32002L0058 National_Law_Name_1=§ 29 DSG National_Law_Link_1=https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/eli/bgbl/i/1999/165/A2P29/NOR40195925

Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing

paragraph 34, paragraph one, DSG 2000 as well as Bresich, Dopplinger, Dörnhöfer, Kunnert, Riedl, DSG, p. 190 to § 24 DSG), which must be taken into account

1934 DSG Art. 2 § 24 today DSG Art. 2 § 24 valid from May 25th, 2018 last changed by Federal Law Gazette I No. 120/2017 DSG Art No. 133/2009 DSG Art. 2

paragraph 2, item 6, DSG 2000 in conjunction with Article 69, paragraph 5, DSG and Article 62, paragraph 1, item 4, DSG. 2 item 4 DSG 2000 in conjunction

to data protection of § 1 DSG in the scope of § 9 para. 1 DSG is effectively undermined, since due to the in § 9 para. 1 DSG standardized exclusion of

1934 DSG Art. 2 § 24 today DSG Art. 2 § 24 valid from May 25th, 2018 last changed by Federal Law Gazette I No. 120/2017 DSG Art No. 133/2009 DSG Art. 2

DSGVO or DSG. In the attachment, the BF sent the application dated to the MB (by e-mail). 01/31/2020: "Re: Data information according to DSG/DSGVO about

transitional provision of Section 69 (4) DSG - with reference to the transitional provision of Section 69, Section 4, DSG - first stated that in the present

§ 24 Paragraph 1 DSG, which according to § 34 Paragraph 5 DSG is to be applied accordingly in the scope of the 3rd main part of the DSG, every person concerned

the Data Protection Act (DSG), § 22 DSG, paragraph 8)., Practical commentary on the Data Protection Act (DSG), paragraph 22, DSG, paragraph 8 ). Since the

Section 1 Paragraph 2 DSG, the complaint turned out to be unfounded, which is why it was filed in accordance with Section 24 Paragraph. 5 DSG Since the respondent