Search results

20/01868 (PVN-2020-15) (Available here). Court of Appeal of Brussels - 2019/AR/1006 (available here). HBDI (Hesse) - 62334 (available here). Worms, in Wolff

use of personal data, many may reconsider if certain processing operations ar really necessary. Data subjects can (at least theoretically) make informed

FOO Public Health t. GBA, 2019/AR/1234, 24. Brussels (Sectie Marktenhof) 23 October 2019, ING Be/gie NV t. GBA, 2019/AR/1006, 19. I PAGE 01-00001582885-0025-0033-01-01-�

2020/4778 Date pronouncement ep on 16 September20 € BUR BUR BUR Role number 2020/AR/1160 Not to be offered to the Recipient Interim opening practicability H o

refer to the French original for more details. Brussels Court of Appeal -2022/AR/549 p. 2 BECAUSE OF: Y, [...]; petitioner advised by My Fabienne Raepsaet

refer to the Dutch original for more details. Court of Appeal Brussels- 2021/AR/74- p. 2 ON: 1. AUSLOOS Jefc/o, [...], but choosing residence with his advisers

Hof van Beroep - 2021/AR/1044 Court: Court of Appeal of Brussels (Belgium) Jurisdiction: Belgium Relevant Law: Article 66 GDPR Article 78(1) GDPR Article

Hof van Beroep - 2019/AR/1234 Court: Court of Appeal of Brussels (Belgium) Jurisdiction: Belgium Relevant Law: Article 12 GDPR Article 15 GDPR Decided:

refer to the French original for more details. Brussels Court of Appeal -2022/AR/953 -p. 2 IN QUESTION: SA Rossel et Cie (hereafter “Rosse!”), BCE 0403.537

Hof van Beroep - Tussenarrest 2022/AR/292 Court: Court of Appeal of Brussels (Belgium) Jurisdiction: Belgium Relevant Law: Article 5(1)(f) GDPR Article

refer to the Dutch original for more details. Brussels Court of Appeal - 2022/AR/723 - p. 2 The SA under public law NATIONALE MAATSCHAPPIJ DERBELGISCHE RAILWAYS

refer to the French original for more details. Court of Appeal Brussels-2023/AR/801-p. 2 BECAUSE OF: 1. THE BELGIAN STATE, MINISTER OF FINANCE, BCE 0308.357

decision considers: Whereas the Marktenhof in its rulings 2020/AR/813 of 18 November 2020 and 2021/AR/1159 of 24 February 2021 pointed out the importance of keeping

Date of ruling up up up March 1, 2023 € € € BUR BUR BUR | roll number 2022/AR/1085 N° [X1 Unregisterable Court of Appeal Brussels Section Marktenhof 19

refer to the French original for more details. Court of Appeal Brussels-2020 / AR / 1111 p. 2GOOGLE BELGIUM SA, BCE 0878.065.378 represented by Me VANDENDRIESSCHE

refer to the Dutch original for more details. Court of Appeal Brussels -2020/AR/329 -p. 2 ON: X, [...] applicant, represented by Mr HEUSE Rika, lawyer, with

June 12, 2019, 2019 AR 113. r PAGE □ 1- □ valid fares 1942 □ 78- □ valid 14-0025-05- □ 1-� L _J Brussels-2020 Court of Appeal / AR / 1333 p. 15 This handling

refer to the Dutch original for more details. Court of Appeal Brussels - 2019/AR/1006 -p. 2 ON: 1. The Bank X. [...] applicant , represented [...] against

Joi. [...] " 1Comp. Cour des marches February 19, 2020, 2019 AR 1600. 13 Brussels-2021 / AR / 163 Court of Appeal p. 17 judicial order, he considers it

also issued on 4 April 2022 and appealed at the Market Court (2022/AR/560 & 2022/AR/564). Both the decision of the DPA and the decision of the Market Court

refer to the Dutch original for more details. ,Brussels Court of Appeal -2020/AR/813 - p. 2 ON: X. [...], requesting party, represented by [...] and [...]

llllllllllllllllllilJC-129/21 - 1 Page 3 Court of Appeal Brussels - 202ol AR/!160 - p. 2ONPROXIMUS NV, public limited company of public law, ON 0202.239

roll no. 2020/AR/329. 12T he tenth plea of both parties. 13 Marktenhof, 28 October 2020, roll no. 2020/AR/721.Hof van beroep Brussel -2021/AR/205 -p. 38 2

(47/2022), also issued on 4 April 2022 and appealed at the Market Court (2022/AR/556). Both the decision of the DPA and the decision of the Market Court are

(19th ch. A), December 7, 2022, 2022/AR/560 and 2022/AR/564; Market Court (19th ch. A), December 7 2022, 2022/AR/556). Decision on merits 149/2023 — 6/36

Appeal on 19 February 2020, in the judgement Hof van beroep Brussels - 2019/AR/1600. IAPP talked about the DPA decision and the Court of Appeal judgement

Article 1 of the AR and is further described in Article 32 of the AR. The court is of the opinion that with the elaboration in Article 6 of the AR, in combination

participant in the CKI and as a participant bound to the AR, which has been established by the BKR. The AR mentions the aim of the credit registration to promote

bound by the CKI General Regulations adopted by BKR (hereinafter: AR). The purpose of the AR is to promote socially responsible financial services. Specifically

Section, 2021/AR/320, 7 July 2021, p. 38. 56Ibidem. 57 Among others, judgments of 19 February 2020 (2019/AR/1600), of 24 January 2021 (2020/AR/1333) and of

mogelijk te maken ”, Market Court, 2019 / AR / 741, 12 juni 2019, p1013 Cour des marchés, September 2, 2020, 2020 / AR / 329. Page 9 Decision on the merits

Brussels, Section Market Chamber A, Chamber for Market Affairs, judgment 2020/AR/329, 2 September 2020, p. 18. 2 In this regard, the Disputes Chamber refers

refer to the Dutch original for more details. Court of Appeal Brussels -2021/AR/320- p. 4 In this context, various companies that offer products and services

September 2020, roll number 2020/AR/1160, p. 4. r PAGE 01-00001785144-0023-0024-02-01-� L _JCourt of appeal Brussels -2020/AR/582- p. 24 Orders the Data Protection

refer to the Dutch original for more details. ,Court of appeal Brussels-2019/AR/741-p. 2 Y, [...], applicant, appearing in person, against a decision of the

Section Marktenhof, 19th Chamber A, Market Affairs Chamber, Judgment 2020/AR/329, 2 September 2020, p. 18. Decision 42/2022 - 3/5 there is insufficient

of the Court (See KG Berlin 3. Senat für Bußgeldsachen - 3 Ws 250/21 - 161 AR 64/21, para 9 for the full list). In short, due to the primacy of EU Law,

Section e Marktenhof (19 Chamber A) of the Court of Appeal in Brussels (2019/AR/1600). APPLICATION 3 FIRST SUBMISSION OF CASSATION Violated legal provisions

the judgment of the Market Court of October 26, 2022, with roll number 2022/AR/457. 2. This decision should be read in conjunction with decision 31/2022

paragraph 4 of the AR - that it has sent written prior information notices and has thus complied with the relevant obligations from the AR. It was neither

of Appeal for the Belgian DPA) decided in two separate cases (2020/AR/813 and 2021/AR/1159 ) that it is essential to inform the relevant parties of the

prejudice to the corrective powers of the supervisory authorities under the ar- in accordance with Article 58(2), each Member State may lay down rules as

company in the course of these actions of investigation, between her, RAT and AR of the two affected treatments, analysis on the need to carry out Impact Assessments

Norwegian Original Source: Personvernnemnda (in Norwegian) Initial Contributor: ar

which contains a risk analysis (AR) associated with the data processing that manages. However, there is no update of the AR and EIDP in the modifications

In accordance with Article 24 of the General Regulations CKI (hereinafter: AR), Hoist Finance should have placed a code of 1 in the BKR. If Hoist Finance

implements the judgment of the Markets Court dated November 18, 2020, number 2020/AR/990. The Markets Court approved appeal of Article 5(1)(a), Article 12(1),

2689/1992)". The Supreme Court also points out in its Judgment of July 20, 1990, Ar. 6163, that, as can be seen, the conduct described does not have any intention

Original Source: Autorité de protection des données (in FR) Initial Contributor: ar

interested parties have enforceable rights and effective legal actions. The ar- The following article regulates the binding corporate rules and article 49