Search results

controller's behalf should be established. In particular, the controller should be obliged to implement appropriate and effective measures and be able to demonstrate

consent must be distinguishable from other matters in any written declaration, can be withdrawn at any time and the provision of a contract may not be made conditional

this will usually be printed. There is no duty to provide the information in a format that can be kept by the data subject, it must only be "provided". It

subject be concise, easily accessible and easy to understand, and that clear and plain language and, additionally, where appropriate, visualisation be used

pseudonymisation, which could be attributed to a natural person by the use of additional information should be considered to be information on an identifiable

the data subject should be determined by reference to the nature, scope, context and purposes of the processing. Risk should be evaluated on the basis of

it can be assumed that the SAs may be given additional powers, but that the existing powers may not be restricted. A contrary view cannot be derived from

processing to be carried out. The description of personal data used should be as precise as possible, while still being concise. Usually this can be achieved

criteria should be used. According to Voigt and von dem Bussche, “the former should be the case, as otherwise the obligation would be too much of a burden

the infringement to be punished is to this code of conduct, the less this criterion may be taken into account. Otherwise, there would be a violation of the

Interest of a Natural Person The processing of personal data should also be regarded to be lawful where it is necessary to protect an interest which is essential

referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be explicitly brought to the attention of the data subject and shall be presented clearly and separately from any

order to be effective, data protection must be implemented ex ante. Hence, the controller must define the privacy requirements that need to be taken into

controller's behalf should be established. In particular, the controller should be obliged to implement appropriate and effective measures and be able to demonstrate

circumstances of the case. Where personal data can be legitimately disclosed to another recipient, the data subject should be informed when the personal data are first

consent should be given for all of them. If the data subject's consent is to be given following a request by electronic means, the request must be clear, concise

their agreement must be the same as those of the SCCs. The SCCs will often leave some blank spaces to be filled in or options to be selected by the parties

information can be obtained; (c) describe the likely consequences of the personal data breach; (d) describe the measures taken or proposed to be taken by the

involved in processing shall be liable for the damage caused by processing which infringes this Regulation. A processor shall be liable for the damage caused

nnees.be/introduire-une-requete-une-plainte In Dutch: https://www.gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit.be/verzoek-klacht-indienen The complaint can be sent by

may be relevant. The fact that personal data is publicly available may be considered as a factor in the assessment if the data was expected to be further

Each legally binding measure of the supervisory authority should be in writing, be clear and unambiguous, indicate the supervisory authority which has

the supervisory authorities concerned shall be deemed to be in agreement with that draft decision and shall be bound by it. 7. The lead supervisory authority

individual and may be influenced by practicality or efficiency aspects, in addition to legal considerations. Some of these aspects may be, legal costs, procedural

personal data shall be adapted to the principles and rules of this Regulation in accordance with Article 98. 4. This Regulation shall be without prejudice

subjects should be directly notified of the relevant breach. When communicating a breach to data subjects, dedicated messages should be utilized, separate

other establishment should be considered to be the main establishment. The main establishment of a controller in the Union should be determined according to

communications, including by e-mail, fax or telephone. The complaint shall be signed by the data subject or, on his or her behalf, by a third sector body

Although there does not seem to be a specific requirement for the decision to be formalised in a particular way, it should at least be distinguishable from other

also be assessed. In particular, following the EDPB reading, a proposed restriction should be supported by evidence describing the problem to be addressed

should be verifiable by means of its records. Thus, in order for the keeping of records to be meaningful, it will be necessary for the controller to be able

it should be pointed out that the safeguards mentioned in the provision constitute an alternative system of data transfer and can therefore be additional

health data in order to be able to effectively provide healthcare. In this instance, the processing of data should be considered to be part of a hospital’s

Principles of Data Processing Any processing of personal data should be lawful and fair. It should be transparent to natural persons that personal data concerning

operations are designed. In any case, the DPO shall be involved at a stage when fundamental decisions can still be taken. Among others, the early involvement is

Member State concerned shall be competent. In such cases Article 56 does not apply. 3. Supervisory authorities shall not be competent to supervise processing

risk. The outcome of the assessment should be taken into account when determining the appropriate measures to be taken in order to demonstrate that the processing

public hearing. Under specific conditions the hearing may be secret. For an administrative fine to be issued, a prior invitation of the defendant (or his representative

principle be ensured by technical means in such a manner that the personal data are not subject to further processing operations and cannot be changed.

scientific or historical research purposes or statistical purposes should be considered to be compatible lawful processing operations. The legal basis provided

determine whether a processing activity can be considered to monitor the behaviour of data subjects, it should be ascertained whether natural persons are tracked

mentioned above, derogations from Article 49 GDPR may be used. Additionally, Article 44 GDPR must be also be complied with, meaning that any transfer based on

shall be brought before the courts of the Member State where the controller or processor has an establishment. Alternatively, such proceedings may be brought

requirements for 85(1) to be fulfilled. While not outlined, the academic commentary agrees that Article 85(1) should not be read as requiring member states

pursued need to be demonstrated; (iii) the processing has to be subject to independent oversight; and (iv) effective remedies need to be available to the

subject be concise, easily accessible and easy to understand, and that clear and plain language and, additionally, where appropriate, visualisation be used

the controller or the processor and may be addressed by any supervisory authority. The representative should be explicitly designated by a written mandate

as well as any other person which would be adversely affected by the decision, must be afforded the right to be heard in relation to the subject matter

supervisory authority should be brought before the courts of the Member State where the supervisory authority is established and should be conducted in accordance

they may be developed to “calibrate the obligations of controllers and processors” according to Recital 98 GDPR. As such, codes are intended to be an additional