Search results
From GDPRhub
Did you mean: irish court decision
- Article 58 GDPR (section Decisions)the set time limit. Both decisions are under appeal. The ban was extended to the whole EU/EEA by a EDPB Urgent Binding Decision adopted under Article 6646 KB (5,825 words) - 11:12, 7 November 2023
- below € 75,000 the appel has to be brought in the Circuit Court, otherwise at the Irish High Court. Under Section 150(1) DPA 2018 a controller or processor8 KB (1,034 words) - 14:13, 20 August 2021
- Article 65 GDPR (section Decisions)annulment of decisions of the Board before the Court of Justice under the conditions provided for in Article 263 TFEU. As addressees of such decisions, the supervisory33 KB (4,185 words) - 16:09, 2 November 2023
- controller takes the decisions on the purposes and means for the relevant processing operations and has the power to have these decisions implemented. When55 KB (7,446 words) - 22:28, 1 April 2024
- account, the Court declared the Privacy Shield Decision to therefore be invalid. The Court also clarified that in the absence of an adequacy decision, the competent43 KB (5,641 words) - 14:58, 28 April 2022
- Article 88 GDPR (section Decisions)broad reading. Case law: In Hauptpersonalrat der Lehrerinnen und Lehrer, the Court acknowledged that as the GDPR does not define the terms ‘employees’ and ‘employment’32 KB (3,228 words) - 13:32, 30 November 2023
- Article 14 GDPR (section Decisions)all related decisions in Category:Article 14 GDPR EDPB, ‘Binding decision 1/2021 on the dispute arisen on the draft decision of the Irish Supervisory Authority47 KB (5,644 words) - 17:49, 5 March 2024
- CJEU - C-311/18 - Schrems II (redirect from CJEU - C-311/18 - Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Limited and Maximillian Schrems) (category Featured decisions)account, the Court declared the Privacy Shield Decision to therefore be invalid. The Court also clarified that in the absence of an adequacy decision, the competent12 KB (1,780 words) - 17:22, 10 March 2022
- establishment has the power to have such decisions implemented, in which case the establishment having taken such decisions is to be considered to be the main125 KB (16,328 words) - 16:01, 8 March 2024
- How to add a new decision (section Authority or Court)the form: One for DPA Decisions (Data Protection Authorities) One for Court or Tribunal* Decisions One for CJEU Decisions (Court of Justice of the European17 KB (2,638 words) - 11:18, 19 February 2024
- 17/EN WP260 rev.01, 11 April 2018, p. 29 (available here). EDPB, DPA, Court decisions --> name of the authority, case + case number, name, date, parties,17 KB (2,510 words) - 13:56, 24 April 2023
- AEPD (Spain) (section Decision Database)announcing your intention to appeal. The Court will then request the file from the AEPD. The Court will contact you to submit your arguments. It may take4 KB (386 words) - 15:29, 3 September 2021
- appeals against decisions of the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights). Appeals against decisions of the Upper Tribunal are heard in the Court of Appeal.18 KB (2,488 words) - 15:22, 14 December 2021
- confirms that the decision is not based on the EDPB guidelines, but on the GDPR. The reference to the grace period given by the Irish DPC is rejected by18 KB (2,375 words) - 16:17, 6 December 2023
- Delo, R (On the Application Of) v The Information Commissioner - 2023 EWCA Civ 1141 (redirect from Court Of Appeal (Civil Division) - 2023 EWCA Civ 1141) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)conclusive determination of the data subject’s complaint. The Court of Appeal agreed with the High Court that the Commissioner had complied with all the obligations9 KB (1,191 words) - 08:44, 23 January 2024
- Datatilsynet (Denmark) (section Decision Database)fine is brought to the police who present the case in court. As such, appeals will go through the court system. Datatilsynet post the focus of their planned6 KB (605 words) - 14:08, 27 April 2021
- own motion. Appeals against decisions by the Italian Garante can be taken by the parties concerned before the civil court (Article 152 of the Code, which7 KB (808 words) - 08:17, 16 February 2023
- APD/GBA (Belgium) (section Decision Database)Council of State. For decisions given in French For decisions given in Dutch If you want to have a complete overview of the decisions given by the Belgian9 KB (993 words) - 07:10, 28 July 2022
- CNIL (France) (section Decision Database)highest administrative court (Conseil d'État). This applies to sanctions, guidelines or any decision of the authority. Decisions by the Conseil d'État are8 KB (824 words) - 22:52, 27 February 2024
- Actions against decisions of the European Data Protection Supervisor, including decisions under Article 63(3), shall be brought before the Court of Justice8 KB (1,078 words) - 12:58, 10 May 2024
- Datatilsynet (Norway) (section Court)overturn decisions issued by the DPA, in part or in full. Their decisions are final under the administrative procedure, but can be appealed to the courts. Decisions10 KB (1,078 words) - 06:40, 26 March 2023
- Article 70 GDPR (section Decisions)(Article 64(2) GDPR); binding decisions under the dispute resolution procedure (Article 65 GDPR); and binding decisions where a supervisory authority has27 KB (3,038 words) - 12:19, 11 October 2023
- DSB (Austria) (section Decision Database)than 1.600 of their decisions in the Austrian decision database RIS.bka.gv.at since 1994. Not all decisions are published, only decisions that are novel or11 KB (1,468 words) - 13:27, 14 May 2023
- NAIH (Hungary) (section Decision Database)the NAIH decision shall be submitted to the authority itself within thirty days of its communication. Only attorney at law can act at the court on behalf7 KB (821 words) - 14:16, 7 March 2024
- LSA can refer a case to a national Court under certain circumstances. The Belgian DPA brought an action before Court of First Instance of Brussels, Belgium10 KB (1,311 words) - 15:26, 13 June 2023
- establishment has the power to enforce those decisions, in which case the establishment having taken such decisions shall be considered as the principal establishment42 KB (6,800 words) - 09:50, 10 September 2021
- IP (Slovenia) (section Decision Database)(ZVOP-1) are still valid and in use, which was confirmed also by some late court decisions. These are of course parts of 2007 ZVOP-1 which are not in contradiction10 KB (1,242 words) - 10:51, 6 February 2024
- HDPA (Greece) (section Decision Database)appeals/complaints were processed Fines: With 51 decisions fines of 30,060,00 euros were imposed Decisions: 67 Opinions: 5 Breach incidents: 175 were announced23 KB (2,039 words) - 08:15, 25 April 2024
- EDPB - Binding Decision 3/2022 - 'Meta (Facebook)' (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)the Binding Decision. Please note: When describing Issues 1-3, it is necessary to explain the proposals in the Irish DPA’s Draft Decision, in order to53 KB (8,413 words) - 14:10, 30 January 2023
- DVI (Latvia) (section Decision Database)submission to the Director of the DVI. Furthermore, the decision issued by Director may be appealed to a court in accordance with the Law on Administrative Liability6 KB (544 words) - 04:39, 11 October 2022
- CNPD (Luxembourg) (section Decision Database)in this section! Decision and Opinions can be found on the CNPD's website here : https://cnpd.public.lu/en/decisions-avis.html. Decisions summarized on the10 KB (1,199 words) - 10:14, 19 October 2022
- Appeals against decisions are possible in the German administrative jurisdiction. Court of first instance is the district administration court (Verwaltungsgericht)4 KB (372 words) - 10:45, 22 September 2021
- UOOU (Czech Republic) (section Decision Database)section! The completed investigations can be found here. Decisions by the DPA can be found here. Decisions by the Head of the DPA can be found here. You can help5 KB (441 words) - 09:34, 17 September 2022
- responsible had his main place of business in Ireland, in accordance with Article 4 of the PGN. However, the Irish authority denied its competence, arguing11 KB (1,680 words) - 13:41, 13 December 2023
- applies to the decisions taken by the restricted committee, which are decisions of an administrative nature since they are sanction decisions which contribute120 KB (19,650 words) - 09:00, 6 April 2022
- the Irish Data Protection Commission (hereinafter “IE SA”) issued Decisions IN-18-5-5 and IN-18-5-7 (hereinafter “IE Decisions”). The IE Decisions found99 KB (14,431 words) - 16:20, 6 December 2023
- Article 55 GDPR (section Decisions)independence of their members or to weigh on their decisions. → You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 55 GDPR Hijmans, in Kuner, Bygrave35 KB (3,971 words) - 21:34, 1 April 2024
- Article 78 GDPR (section Decisions)annulment of decisions of the Board before the Court of Justice under the conditions provided for in Article 263 TFEU. As addressees of such decisions, the supervisory30 KB (3,874 words) - 10:46, 7 December 2023
- UOOU (Slovakia) (section Decision Database)make public issued decisions. There is no such obligation to do so in Slovak national law. If you want to access Slovak DPA decisions, you can consult the9 KB (1,006 words) - 07:13, 7 July 2021
- This question is the subject of case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union. The European Court of Justice (hereinafter CJEU) is well known, in131 KB (22,429 words) - 16:57, 12 December 2023
- Court of Appeal of Brussels - 2020/AR/1111 (category Court of Appeal of Brussels (Belgium)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)X to lead to dereferencing.References to case-law decisions of the Court of Justice (which the Court ofmarkets does not question), justify the theory,37 KB (5,919 words) - 08:54, 20 August 2021
- UKUT (AAC) - Leave.EU and Eldon v Information Commissioner (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)was not satisfied; the decision to issue the assessment notices was lawful. These were grouped into four broad headings by the court, which in turn assessed11 KB (1,457 words) - 16:05, 3 December 2021
- establishment has the power to enforce those decisions, in which case the establishment which has taken such decisions shall be regarded as the principal establishment90 KB (14,556 words) - 17:08, 6 December 2023
- act as Concerned Supervisory Authorities (CSA) next to the Slovak DPA: Ireland (Irish Data Protection Commissioner -DPC), Sweden (Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten17 KB (2,189 words) - 12:34, 3 August 2022
- that this articulation was confirmed by the Court of Justice of the European Union in its PLANET49 decision of 1 October 2019 (C-613/17). In doing so, the93 KB (14,936 words) - 17:09, 6 December 2023
- DSB’s communications as decisions, this would mean that the BVwG would have to decide on the legality of a decision by the Irish DPC. In this context the67 KB (10,619 words) - 10:40, 22 January 2024
- --Information about the Court--> |Jurisdiction= |Court-BG-Color= |Courtlogo= |Court_Abbrevation= |Court_With_Country= <!--Information about the decision--> |Case_Number_Name=32 KB (6,006 words) - 16:33, 7 July 2021
- --Information about the Court--> |Jurisdiction= |Court-BG-Color= |Courtlogo= |Court_Abbrevation= |Court_With_Country= <!--Information about the decision--> |Case_Number_Name=34 KB (5,924 words) - 18:14, 20 April 2021
- EDPB - Binding Decision 4/2022 - 'Meta (Instagram)' (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)the Binding Decision. Please note: When describing Issues 1-3, it is necessary to explain the proposals in the Irish DPA’s Draft Decision, in order to468 KB (51,340 words) - 14:10, 30 January 2023
- form of a common decision taken by two or more entities or result from converging decisions by two or more entities, where the decisions complement each127 KB (21,484 words) - 17:01, 12 December 2023