Search results

|Party_Link_5= <!--Information about a possible appeal--> |Appeal_From_Body=none, first instance |Appeal_From_Case_Number_Name= |Appeal_From_Status= |Appeal_From_Link=

|Party_Link_5= <!--Information about a possible appeal--> |Appeal_From_Body=none, first instance |Appeal_From_Case_Number_Name= |Appeal_From_Status= |Appeal_From_Link=

procedure referred to in paragraph 4 within a period of two weeks. 6. Where none of the other supervisory authorities concerned has objected to the draft

the court first seized may stay its proceedings or may, on request of one of the parties, decline jurisdiction in favour of the court first seized if that

The High Court rejected the data subject’s appeal on both grounds. On the first point, it held that Articles 57, 77 and 78 of the UK GDPR result in a primary

check whether the principle of transparency was respected. The court of first instance rejected the claim. Therefore, the applicant appealed the decision before

administrative instance) be legitimised for reasons of public interest and transparency? Firstly, the AEPD considered that the administrative instance presented

national ID, when this document had not been asked for in the first place. In this instance, the controller had no reason to doubt the identity of the data

they claimed in their defence that, that procedure was the result, in first instance of the good faith, of the ignorance and the lack of attention to the

However, the company managing the FLIS system (Kombit A/S), which in this instance was acting as processor, mistakenly forgot to limit the access to the data

during the contractual relationship under Article 15 GDPR. The court of first instance, the Regional Court of Aachen (Landgericht Aachen – LG Aachen), ruled

cases an appellate body, so it cannot be involved in the proceedings at first instance, which in this case means that the IP cannot (in the case of You can

because of the applications submitted in the first instance, reference is made to the facts of the first instance judgment (eGA I-534 ff.) and to the following

the file on 27 December 2019. SECOND: On 6 March 2020, the Court of First Instance ruled in favor of replacement RR/00124/2020, brought by A.A.A., B.B

consultation (to the Subdelegate of the Government of Cuenca) in the Court and First Instance of ***LOCALIDAD.1 as proof of the complaints I have against A.A.A."

agreement of 29-01-2009 had been published in the books of the Court of First Instance [region] X of the disputed general partnership 5 (while the above change

confidentiality. The number of potential affected persons detected in the first instance amounted to around 2.6 million, which was the maximum number of records

inadmissible (first, second, fourth and sixth (first limb) of the APD's pleas) 14.1. These of the ODA According to the APD, in its first plea, "since the

of the First Defendant, and the latter's registered address is the home address of his parents. PD informs the Court, at para 19, that the First Defendant

BF first raised a violation of Article 14 of the GDPR in the present appeal, which is why it could not have been the subject of the first-instance proceedings

little, with reference to the debate in the first instance, as explained as follows: “6.6 At first instance, [plaintiff] only submitted one A-4 sheet (excel

company, the first controller, carried out work in the warehouse of the data subject. In order to show the results of its work, the first controller uploaded

container for shredding was not set up, which was also followed up in the first instance. Due to internal misunderstandings, a plastic container for ordinary

against a decision of a judge of the judicial order rendered in the first instance is submitted and this on the basis of the jurisdiction of this appellate

however, during the The Commission, in its submissions to the Court of First Instance, has that Agency which, having re-examined the request of the complainant

accordance with Article 100 of the Act of 8 August 1983, the Court of First Instance, in conjunction with Articles 5 § 1(b) and (f) of the GDPR, is satisfied

concerned students who had already graduated in the first semester. If students graduate in the first semester, their ability to access to certain internal

part of the second At the first stage, it must be checked whether one of the requirements of Art. 45 – 49 GDPR is met. The first in According to Art. 45

maintenance and specialist assistance on the application", specifying that "none of the aforementioned companies has been designated sub-processor that AiComply

maintenance and specialist assistance on the application", specifying that "none of the aforementioned companies has been designated sub-processor that AiComply

hundred) as reimbursement of the costs of proceedings before the Court of first instance. Justification The Provincial Administrative Court in Warsaw by the

conviction of the appellant. The district court, if another the court of first instance does not review the matter from the beginning, but assesses the legality

Page 51: "... It is argued that, although there is an acquittal in the first instance, The proven facts (folio 17) relate the material making of the recordings

resolution when it contains a precise statement of liability The Court of First Instance shall give its decision. FIFTH: Of the proceedings carried out in the

that the Court of First Instance was entitled to assess whether the exception of Article 17(3)(e) GDPR took place without having to first assess the lawfulness

The Rotterdam Court of First Instance ruled that the Directorate of Legal Affairs of the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs was wrong in rejecting a DSAR

information necessary to ensure correct and transparent treatment. In fact, in none of the phases of registration for the competition and online compilation

138/2014 of 2 October 2017. More specifically, the first instance administrative body should first determine what they are the legitimate interests of

Spanish Agency for Data Protection and based on to the following BACKGROUND FIRST: On September 6, 2019, you entered this Agency Española de Protección de

judicial information files procedures processed by the Courts of First Instance, First Instance and Instruction (excluding in any case the trials of misdemeanors)

Court has confirmed the correctness of the position of the court of first instance that the consent may cover various purposes of personal data processing

rightly points out that the task of the First-line service on receipt of a request consists in the first instance of mediating to perform. Since the complainant

changed the design of its cookie banners. The plaintiff requested in the first instance 1. the defendant to sentence it while avoiding a trial by the court

which refers to the letter submitted in the first instance, AS. I 35, reference is made. In the first instance, the plaintiff essentially stated that her

The Court of First Instance of the Central Netherlands (Rechtbank Midden-Nederland) ruled on when the Dutch Data Protection Act or the GDPR applies. The

imposition of infringement fines. It is the supervisory authority that in the first instance decides which corrective measure is appropriate, when the supervisory

agreed initiate disciplinary proceedings against the institute, in the first instance, for an alleged infringement provided for in Article 83.5.a), in relation

protection and must be resolved and resolved in the corresponding instance. FOUNDATIONS OF LAW FIRST: The Director of the Spanish Agency for Data Protection, in

container. Collection, transfer and conversion are done in real time and none public IP addresses are stored. 1.3.11 Own checks on transfers affected by

plaintiff objected to this decision first internally at the defendant authority, then in court. The court of first instance determined that the information