Search results
From GDPRhub
Did you mean: opinion of the ag of the cjeu
- CJEU - C-757/22 - Meta Platforms (category Opinions of the AG of the CJEU)so, and where the actual processing of the personal data is yet to take place. The AG further opines that Article 80(2) GDPR must be interpreted in this4 KB (376 words) - 09:23, 23 February 2024
- subjects, the amount of processed data, the duration and the geographical extend of the data processing. The context of the processing refers to the specific30 KB (3,458 words) - 10:31, 25 April 2024
- CJEU - C-300/21 - Österreichische Post AG (category CJEU)Therefore, the CJEU held that national rules apply to the extent of financial compensation for the purposes of determining the amount of damages payable5 KB (683 words) - 12:50, 28 June 2023
- relevant to this issue is the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) on the interpretation of the provisions of the European Convention on33 KB (3,748 words) - 14:25, 7 November 2023
- Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, including the obligations on the controller and the rights of natural persons. In order15 KB (943 words) - 09:58, 8 November 2023
- should be given of the provisions of the GDPR. Therefore, the Bundesgerichtshof referred the case to the CJEU as a preliminary reference with the following questions:10 KB (1,478 words) - 11:17, 2 November 2023
- CJEU - C-184/20 - Vyriausioji Tarnybinės Etikos Komisija (category CJEU)The CJEU held that the mandatory disclosure, in the context of an online transparency publication, of personal information concerning a public officer6 KB (522 words) - 13:15, 1 June 2023
- examination within the meaning of the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 20 December 2017, C-434/16, ECLI:EU:C:2017:994) and the transparency51 KB (8,592 words) - 07:03, 2 November 2021
- 000 sA, in the proceedings on the appeal of the plaintiff against the judgment of the Vienna Higher Regional Court as the court of appeal of 9 December 202027 KB (4,090 words) - 09:54, 10 September 2021
- difference between the collection of “personal data” and other data. The Court referenced the earlier opinion of the AG, noting that the AG correctly interpreted6 KB (893 words) - 15:22, 24 March 2022
- electronic message to the Personnel Department of DEWA X, the President and the Secretariat of the Board of Directors of DEWA X, the Director of Administration61 KB (10,257 words) - 10:15, 1 November 2023
- pursuant to Article 15 of the Data Protection Regulation, in the proceedings on the appeal of the plaintiff against the judgment of the Oberlandesgericht Wien22 KB (3,310 words) - 07:44, 5 October 2021
- OGH - 6Ob35/21x (request for preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU) (section Preliminary questions referred to the CJEU)on the grounds of EUR 1.000 sA, in the proceedings on the appeal of the plaintiff against the judgment of the Vienna Higher Regional Court as the court23 KB (3,551 words) - 09:54, 10 September 2021
- must bear the costs of the legal dispute. By law! Facts of the case The parties dispute the validity of the plaintiff's appeal on January 1 the defendant's40 KB (6,019 words) - 14:13, 28 November 2023
- according to the code of conduct should apply. The VG Wiesbaden doubted the HBDI’s line of argument and referred the following questions to the CJEU under Article15 KB (2,180 words) - 08:23, 13 December 2023
- 18 GDPR. The Court also made reference to Recital 10 GDPR and Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Right of the EU. From the objectives of the GDPR, which8 KB (992 words) - 17:03, 4 February 2023
- CJEU - C‑340/21 - Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite (category CJEU) (section Advocate General Opinion)limited to the existence of measures in place. The third question concerned how to allocate the burden of proof concerning the suitability of the security13 KB (1,963 words) - 11:04, 5 January 2024
- CJEU - C-175/20 - SIA ‘SS’ (Opinion of AG Bobek) (category CJEU)In the opinion of AG Bobek, the central question is therefore to assess what would be the legal basis of such processing operations. AG Bobek first analyses8 KB (1,081 words) - 13:13, 1 June 2023
- things, the judgments of the CJEU on Satamedia 2 and Buidvids 3 and the judgment of the ECtHR on Satamedia. 4It follows from those judgments that the journalistic36 KB (5,873 words) - 11:21, 17 August 2022
- unless the member objects to this. 1.6. The outcome of the investigation was the reason for the defendant to impose a fine of € 525,000 on the plaintiff30 KB (4,796 words) - 07:05, 4 October 2022
- Article 15, GDPR, about the appeal of the plaintiff against the judgment of the Vienna Higher Regional Court as a court of appeal of January 18, 2021, GZ33 KB (4,912 words) - 13:56, 10 May 2023
- instance, the the data subject appealed to the Federal Labour Court, who referred the case to the CJEU with the following questions: On the topic of health14 KB (1,916 words) - 16:03, 2 February 2024
- that “irrespective of the outcome of the substantive side of the appeal, if a difference of opinion regarding the implementation of the [GDPR] is actually54 KB (9,028 words) - 11:38, 23 February 2022
- Articles 44 and following GDPR. The court refered to the CJEU ruling in the Schrems II case, in which the CJEU invalidated the Commission's adequacy decision66 KB (9,990 words) - 12:30, 29 January 2024
- CJEU - C-78/18 - Commission v Hungary (Opinion of AG Campos) (category CJEU) (section The opinion of the Advocate General)particular, the right to freedom of association, the financial effects of the legislation at issue may affect the viability and the survival of the organisations11 KB (1,143 words) - 14:06, 11 August 2022
- CJEU - C-264/19 - Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v. YouTube LLC and Google Inc. (Opinion of AG Saugmandsgaard Øe) (category CJEU) (section The opinion of the Advocate General)to favour the interests of holders of intellectual property rights. In conclusion, the Advocate General proposed that the CJEU should answer the questions8 KB (1,020 words) - 13:14, 1 June 2023
- CJEU - C‑634/21 - SCHUFA (category CJEU)detailed account of the logic involved in the determination of their credit score, and the significance and consequences of the processing of their data. Schufa6 KB (783 words) - 16:05, 12 December 2023
- CJEU - C-25/17 - Jehovan todistajat (category CJEU)Regarding the first question, The CJEU stated that the collection of personal data by members of the Jehovah’s Witnesses Community in the course of door-to-door10 KB (1,282 words) - 14:38, 7 June 2023
- CJEU - C-683/21 - Nacionalinis visuomenės sveikatos centras (category CJEU)number. On 10 April 2020, the Minister of Health entrusted the Director of the CNSP with the task of organising the acquisition of the mobile application in9 KB (1,234 words) - 12:48, 25 January 2024
- result of the incorrect transposition of Directive 2002/58 of the European Parliament and of the Council /EC of 12 July 2002 on the processing of personal103 KB (16,947 words) - 08:34, 24 April 2024
- (partial renewal of a res judicata judgement) in the part of the decision of the court of appeals regarding the question if a person which was in the past a “relative55 KB (9,115 words) - 09:22, 7 June 2022
- including the personal data as mentioned in the privacy statement and the accompanying documentation, the purposes of the processing, the categories of personal57 KB (9,498 words) - 20:42, 28 April 2021
- 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal99 KB (15,129 words) - 09:21, 31 May 2023
- CJEU - C-461/10 - Bonnier Audio (category CJEU)expired?’ The CJEU first established that the applicants seek the communication of the name and address of an internet subscriber or user using the IP address5 KB (599 words) - 13:17, 1 June 2023
- b) the judgment of the Goslar Local Court of 27 September 2019 - 28 C 7/19 -. the 2nd Chamber of the First Senate of the Federal Constitutional Court by19 KB (3,209 words) - 13:08, 15 September 2021
- CJEU - C-201/14 - Smaranda Bara (category CJEU)necessary to determine the insurance status of persons to the CNAS, the 2007 Protocol included the transfer of specific data irrelevant to the stated purpose:6 KB (727 words) - 21:38, 19 January 2023
- CJEU - C-507/17 - Google LLC v CNIL (category CJEU)The territorial scope of the right to be forgotten in the context of search engine operators is limited to the versions of the search engines corresponding6 KB (747 words) - 13:42, 11 August 2022
- CJEU - Case C‑264/19 - Constantin Film Verleih (category CJEU)examined the interpretation of the respective term in the context of the purpose of Article 8 of Directive 2004/48 and the general objectives of the Directive7 KB (844 words) - 16:35, 2 February 2024
- and 2 a of the contested decision until the preliminary ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) on the question submitted by the decision47 KB (7,519 words) - 09:28, 13 February 2024
- 25(2) of the Universal Service Directive and Article 12 of the Directive on privacy and electronic communications—the matter was referred to the CJEU for6 KB (614 words) - 17:17, 24 October 2023
- 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal105 KB (15,883 words) - 15:05, 8 March 2023
- determined in CJEU - C‑340/21 - Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite at paras 79 to 86 of that case, that the fear of the potential misuse of the claimant's11 KB (1,606 words) - 09:59, 15 February 2024
- monitoring of the temperature of the passengers. Moreover, the protocol was not precise enough regarding the purposes pursued and the circumstances of the monitoring207 KB (31,357 words) - 14:21, 8 June 2022
- CJEU - C-61/22 - Landeshauptstadt Wiesbaden (category CJEU)European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to2 KB (126 words) - 09:15, 5 January 2024
- requested a preliminary ruling from the CJEU on interpretation of Article 23(1)(j) GDPR. The Advocate General found that the CJEU lacked jurisdiction to give a5 KB (573 words) - 11:16, 4 October 2023
- and the data subject appealed the decision to the LG Baden-Baden. The LG Baden-Baden, making reference to the CJEU Judgment in CJEU - C-579/21 - Pankki29 KB (4,664 words) - 13:48, 20 September 2023
- verification of the basic principles of the GDPR and the e-mail Privacy Policy on the use of cookies and in particular: - the clarity and accessibility of the information171 KB (24,826 words) - 15:55, 18 June 2022
- obligations to the DPA, namely to "inform the complainant of the progress and the outcome of the investigation" (§42 of the Opinion). The Advocate General held9 KB (1,244 words) - 13:31, 23 April 2024
- CJEU - C-511/18 - La Quadrature du Net (category CJEU)read in the light of the [Charter], to be interpreted as meaning that it is a prerequisite for the lawfulness of the procedures for the collection of connection4 KB (445 words) - 12:39, 28 June 2023
- CJEU - C‑27/22 - Volkswagen Group Italia SpA (category CJEU)regarding the interpretation of Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Article 54 of the Convention implementing the Schengen5 KB (547 words) - 11:21, 4 October 2023