Search results

The District Court of Amsterdam held that a data subject’s right to be forgotten under Article 17 GDPR overrode the interests of a credit ranking agency

websites (para. 3), five of which are in detail (viata.nl, brandfield.nl, otto.nl, jaap.nl and kookwinkel.nl). In par. 3 include the following: “During the loading

controller's refusals, the data subject filed a claim with the District Court of Amsterdam, requesting that his negative registration be removed (erasure request)

subject's name, links to certain websites (www.zwartelijstartsen.nl and www.drimble.nl) appeared between the search results. These links referred to articles

Locations Rechtspraak.nl Enhanced pronunciation Share pronunciation print Save as PDF Copy link Pronunciation order COURT OF AMSTERDAM Private Law Department

Data Protection Regulation), OJEU 2016, L 119/1. 2 Amsterdam District Court 21 January 2021, ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2021:174. 3 Directive 95/46/EC of the European

Krediet Registratie (BKR) of an Amsterdam client removed. Locations Rechtspraak.nl Enriched pronunciation Ruling COURT IN AMSTERDAM Private law department Case

Ekker in Amsterdam, against the private company with limited liability UBER BV , Located in Amsterdam, defendant, lawyer mr. GH Potjewijd in Amsterdam. The

may be made 'at any time' and the decision of the Amsterdam Court of Appeal of 5 November 2019, ECLI: NL: GHAMS: 3966, in which it was held that it is indeed

the municipality. By decision of 10 February 2020, the District Court of Amsterdam dismissed the appellant’s appeal against that decision as unfounded. The

General Data Protection Regulation. Sites Rechtspraak.nl Enriched pronunciation Ruling COURT IN AMSTERDAM Department of Civil and Tax Law, Team I Case number :

[plaintiff] at [place] , plaintiff, Lawyer M.A.C. de Vilder-van Overmeire in Amsterdam, against: the State of the Netherlands, Ministry of Security and Justice

been complied with. Locations Jurisprudence.nl JAR 2019/234 Enriched pronunciation Pronunciation AMSTERDAM COURT OF APPEAL civil and tax law department

AVG; art. 6 paragraph 1 under c AVG; art. 21.1 AVG. Rb and court reject request. Sites Rechtspraak.nl Enriched pronunciation Pronunciation COURT OF APPEAL

conjunction with Article 7.3.9(1) of the Youth Act is granted. Locations Rechtspraak.nl Enhanced pronunciation Share pronunciation Print Save as PDF Copy link Statement

UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM, 2. FACULTY STUDENT COUNCIL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM FACULTY OF ECONOMY AND BUSINESS, both established in Amsterdam, 3. [appellant

Den Haag) rejected an appeal and upheld the District Court of the Hague's (Rb. Den Haag) decision. There it was decided that the interest in keeping a data

decide on it. Allocation of subsidiary removal request. Locations Rechtspraak.nl Enhanced pronunciation Share pronunciation print Save as PDF Copy link Pronunciation

anonymised utterance from www.rechtspraak.nl. Sites Rechtspraak.nl Enriched pronunciation Ruling available at COURT IN AMSTERDAM Private law department Case number

sin-nl.org and www.drimble.nl. She pointed out that the website www.sin-nl.org is closely intertwined with the website www.zwartelijstenartsen.nl, the

2020, lawyer mr. RH Bouwman in Amsterdam, against the legal person under Swedish law HOIST FINANCE AB , Located in Amsterdam, defendant, attorney mr. HAP

FOUNDATION YOUTH PROTECTION REGION AMSTERDAM , Located in Amsterdam, defendant, lawyer mr. JK van den Heuvel in Amsterdam, 2. [interested party] , residing

Locations Rechtspraak.nl Enhanced pronunciation Share pronunciation print Save as PDF Copy link Pronunciation order COURT OF AMSTERDAM Department of private

lawyer mr. AH Ekker in Amsterdam, against the private company with limited liability OLA NETHERLANDS BV , Located in Amsterdam, defendant, attorney mr

Locations Rechtspraak.nl Enhanced pronunciation Share pronunciation print Save as PDF Copy link Pronunciation COURT OF AMSTERDAM Administrative law case

processed of the plaintiff." Locations Rechtspraak.nl Enriched pronunciation Pronunciation COURT OF AMSTERDAM Administrative law case number: AMS 22/4916 ruling

unfounded. Locations Rechtspraak.nl Enriched pronunciation Share pronunciation Print Save as PDF Copy link Statement COURT AMSTERDAM Administrative lawsuit number:

Locations Rechtspraak.nl Enhanced pronunciation Share pronunciation print Save as PDF Copy link Pronunciation police report COURT OF AMSTERDAM Private Law Department

proceedings of 11 October 2022 in the case of Brain Foundation which is based in Amsterdam, who has lodged an appeal and who acted as plaintiff before the court,

different judgment issued 2 weeks later by the same Court on 11 March 2021, Rb. Amsterdam - C/13/692003/HA RK 20-302, which partially found in Uber's favour on

municipality of Amsterdam. The defendant mandated this jurisdiction to Kredietbank Amsterdam. In the exercise of this power, Kredietbank Amsterdam therefore

The District Court of Amsterdam upheld the Dutch DPA’s decision not to handle a data subject’s complaint regarding an access request based on the low societal

limited liability company ING BANK N.V., Based in Amsterdam, defendant, lawyer mr. D.J. Posthuma in Amsterdam. The parties will hereinafter be referred to as

sikkom.nl/tag [internet address] 2. https://www.sikkom.nl [internet address] 3. https://www.sikkom.nl [internet address] 4. https://www.sikkom.nl [internet

Locations Rechtspraak.nl Enhanced pronunciation Share pronunciation print Save as PDF Copy link Statement decision COURT OF AMSTERDAM Private Law Department

2007, ECLI: NL: HR: 2007: AZ4663, ECLI: NL: HR: 2007: AZ4664 and ECLI: NL: HR: 2007: BA3529. 7 A.o. Amsterdam Court of Appeal 5 July 2011 ECLI: NL: GHAMS:

appeal with the District Court of Amsterdam against the defendant's refusal to make a (correct) decision. The Court of Amsterdam registered this appeal under

Appeal unfounded. Locations Rechtspraak.nl Enriched pronunciation Share pronunciation Pronunciation COURT OF AMSTERDAM Administrative law case number: AMS

preliminary relief judge of the Amsterdam District Court referred preliminary questions about this to the Supreme Court (ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2021:174). The Advocate

advertisers has been granted. Locations Rechtspraak.nl Enriched pronunciation Ruling judgment COURT IN AMSTERDAM Private law division, civil judge in preliminary

The Dutch District Court of Amsterdam referred preliminary questions to the CJEU about the scope of legitimate interest. In particular, whether a commercial

participation council CENTRAL STUDENT COUNCIL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM, Based in Amsterdam, 2. the participation council FACULTY STUDENT COUNCIL OF THE

they collected his personal data from the website https://www.enqueteloket.nl on 28 January 2021. The data subject then brought the issue before Court,

safety and quality of healthcare. Defendant sub 1] is chairman of SIN-NL. 2.2. SIN-NL publishes on the internet a "black list of doctors" and a "black list

The District Court of Central Netherlands (Rb. Midden-Nederland) held in a preliminary ruling that AVROTROS can broadcast an episode of the television

G.H. Potty-wide in Amsterdam, in case 706680 / HA ZA 21-789 of the foundation FOUNDATION TAKE BACK YOUR PRIVACY, Based in Amsterdam, plaintiff on the basis

BW? Application HR 25 November 2005 (ECLI: NL: HR: 2005: AU4019) and art. 6 GDPR. Locations Rechtspraak.nl Enriched pronunciation Share pronunciation Print

19. In ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2020:7536, the Amsterdam District Court, with reference to the judgment of the Court of Appeal of The Hague (ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2015:2332)

example concerns Rb. Groningen 24 June 2010, ECLI:NL:RBGRO:2010:BN9168, para. 4.6 (ambulance transport). 42 See for example Rb. Amsterdam September 1, 2017

2020: 674. 4 ECLI: NL: RVS: 2020: 898, ECLI: NL: RVS: 2020: 900 and ECLI: NL: RVS: 2020: 901. 5 Order of 9 September 2011, ECLI: NL: HR: 2011: BQ8097.