Search results

Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 76 GDPR, p. 1111-1112 (Oxford University Press 2020). Docksey, in Kuner et al., The

same time, personal data as well (see Recital 163 GDPR). Tosoni in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 98 GDPR, p. 1315

International Company, Decision 01/2020 (available here). Hijmans, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 65 GDPR, p. 1021

GDPR, margin number 40 (Beck 2019) (accessed 3 September 2021). Hornung et al, in Simitis, Hornung, Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 1 GDPR

Facebook Ireland, margin number 59 (available here). Georgieva in Kuner et al, The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary, p. 1030 (Oxford

margin numbers 6-7 (C.H. Beck 2018, 2nd edition). Wiese Svanberg, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 90 GDPR, p. 1255

2020). Hijmans, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 56, p. 92 Hijmans, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection

find all related decisions in Category:Article 81 GDPR Kotschy, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 81 GDPR, p. 1154

management of an employee database)." Alvarez Rigaudias, Spinas, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 37 GDPR, p. 692

related decisions in Category:Article 63 GDPR Van Eecke, Simkus, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 63 GDPR, p. 998-999

find all related decisions in Category:Article 71 GDPR Docksey, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 71 GDPR, p. 1086

DS-GVO/BDSG, Article 52 GDPR, margin number 6 (Nomos 2022). Zerdick, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 52 GDPR, p. 879

Article 31 GDPR, margin number 10 (Beck 2022, 3rd edition). Kotschy, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 31 GDPR, p. 628

(available here and here). ECJ, Judgement of 4 July 2023, Meta Platforms Inc. et al. v. Bundeskartellamt, C‑252/21, ECLI:EU:C:2023:537, paragraph 76 and the case

Regulation 2016/679, 8 October 2020 (available here). Tosoni, in Kuner et al, The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary, p. 969 (Oxford

GDPR, margin number 11 (C.H. Beck 2019). See for example Fuster in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 80 GDPR, p. 1148

on the Functioning of the European Union. Van Eecke and Šimkus, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 68 GDPR, p. 1234

Regulation 2016/679’, 25 May 2018, pp. 15-16 (available here). Kuner, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 49 GDPR, p. 854

Regulation (GDPR): A Practical Guide, p. 157 (Springer 2017), citing Laue et al., Datenschutzrecht, Rechte der betroffenen Person (2016), margin number 41

authority has adopted under Article 28(8)". See, Millard, Kamarinou, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 28 GDPR, p. 606

DSGVO BDSG, Article 6 DSGVO, margin number 3, (Otto Schmidt 2018). Roßnagel et al., in Zeitschrift für Datenschutz (2015) pp. 455-456. Lex posterior derogat

the right of erasure and/or the right to object, in relation to the “derecho al olvido” (the “right to be forgotten”), the following question is asked: must

On 29 November 2018, the Garante adopted the Regole deontologiche relative al trattamento di dati personali nell’esercizio dell’attività giornalistica.

should be named; with three or more only the first author's name plus "et al." need be given. Do not use footnotes in your word draft. It will be easier

[applicants] et al; - the official report of the oral hearing of November 18, 2020. 2.2 The court has set a date for the decision. 2.3 [Applicants] et al. request

The French Council of State (Conseil d' Etat) issued 13 decisions on the right to be forgotten, in the light of the CJEU's judgment in C-136/17 CNIL against

complaints that CSR et al. cannot be received in their claim. CSR et al.'s appeal will first be discussed. This appeal by CSR et al. fails on the basis of

ambos, de acceso al centro comercial MERCADONA sito en la calle Frederic Mompou s/n de San Boi de Llobregat por tiempo de dos años, así como al abono de la

la oposición al mismo de 3 JURISPRUDENCIA entenderse que sus conclusiones (salvo las referidas a la sanción de la infracción imputada al demandado) estánamparadas

court received a petition on behalf of [petitioner sub 1] et al. In it, [applicant sub 1] et al. Requests - in short - that Google be ordered by decision

Articles 5, paragraph 1 to 1. c) and article 5, paragraph 1 al. f) with article83, paragraph 5, al. a), the General Data Protection Regulation (Regulation679/2016

Ziggo et al. pointed out that the damage that DFW suffers as a result of the individual downloader is very small, since according to Ziggo et al. the Film

uitmaakt van de litigieuze klacht. Het betreft hier o.a. de vraag naar het al dan niet van toepassing zijn van de voornoemde aanbeveling. 4. De verweerder

version of the Privacy Ordinance, legal commentary», December 2019, Skullerud et al. Objective personal information is, for example, the data subject's age, address

Anwara Sp. z o.o., with its registered office in Warsaw at Al. Jerozolimskie 81 (formerly: Al. Solidarności 117/207), hereinafter referred to as the "Company"

necessary to achieve these goals (2019. judgment of 24 September GC et al. GC et al. [Delete links to special data], C‑136/17, EU:C:2019:773, paragraph 74)

inadmissible his claim against Arrow and dismissed the claims against ING et al., ordering [the appellant] to pay the costs of the proceedings and the follow-up

Personal Data Act and the Privacy Ordinance - Commentary edition», Skullerud et al. (2019). Article 29 Working Party Opinion 06/2014 on the concept of legitimate

Seitlinger et al, C-293/12 and C-594/12, EU:C:2014:238, nos. 35, 47 and 54 et seq.; Constitutional Court of Austria, decision of 27 June 2014, G 47/12 et al, AT:VFGH:2014:G47

ricezione dello stesso, a comunicare quali iniziative siano state intraprese al fine di dare attuazione a quanto prescritto e di fornire ogni elemento ritenuto

condotta per i sistemi informativi gestiti da soggetti privati in tema di crediti al consumo, affidabilità e puntualità nei pagamenti” – was not expired yet, the

DatenschutzR/Stender-Vorwachs, Ed. 28, Article 85 marginal no. 20; Frey, in: Schwartmann et al, DSGVO/BDSG, 2018, Art. 85 para. 25; further probably Schiedermair, in: Ehmann/Selmayr

C-136/17, GC et al. (31) The judgment of the European Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) on 24 September 2019 in case C136/17, GC et al. is a continuation

DatenschutzR/Stender-Vorwachs, Ed. 28, Article 85 marginal no. 20; Frey, in: Schwartmann et al, DSGVO/BDSG, 2018, Art. 85 para. 25; further probably Schiedermair, in: Ehmann/Selmayr

decline of regulatory offences in particular and video surveillance (Gill et al., Assessing the impact of CCTV, the South City Case Study, Home Office Online

37/2020. In their short commentary on the decision, linked below, Craddock et al. also highlight the fact that part of the infringement, as well as at least

question now with due consideration ( of the evidence provided by Proximus al-dan-not in support of the need for the requested suspension, { of the balancing

websites is usually covered by the journalist exemption, see Wille Johansen et al., Personal Data Act commentary edition, Universitetsforlaget 2001, page 92

cases of Vnukovo Airlines (V.A.) and Others v. v. Vnukovo Airlines (V.A.) et al. Attorney General (2001) A.A.D. 969 and Kyriakides v. Republic (2013) 3 A

obligations under Article 6, §2, al. 5 and Article 9 of the Camera Act 1 2. there is a serious indication that article 6, § 2, al. 4 of the aforementioned law