Search results

24, 1946 last amended by StGBl. No. 4/1945 B-VG Art. 133 valid from 01/03/1930 to 06/30/1934 DSG Art. 1 § 1 today DSG Art. 1 § 1 valid from 01.01.2014 last

more details. decision date 06/30/2023 standard B-VG Art133 Para.4 DSG §1 DSG §24 GDPR Art4 GDPR Art44 GDPR Art5 GDPR Art6 VwGVG §28 paragraph 2 B-VG Art

For example, § 62 of the Austrian Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz - DSG) sets a penalty of €50,000 for, inter alia, (1) intentionally obtaining illegal

it is not necessary. Paragraph 4 2. If the examination of the reasons presented in accordance with Section 146 Paragraph 4 Sentence 6 VwGO shows, as here

details. decision date 01.12.2021 standard B-VG Art133 Para.4 DSG §1 DSG §24 DSG §9 GDPR Art4 GDPR Art5 GDPR Art57 GDPR Art6 GDPR Art77 GDPR Art85 GRC Art11

Germany Head: Bettina Gayk Deputy: Roul Tiaden Address: Kavalleriestraße 2-4 40213 Düsseldorf Germany Webpage: https://www.ldi.nrw.de Email: poststelle@ldi

nert/Riedl, DSG § 4, K8 (as of 12.6.2018, rdb.at)). These considerations do not overlook the fact that the explanatory notes to Section 4(1) of the Data

date August 24, 2023 standard B-VG Art 133 Paragraph 4 DSG §1 DSG §9 GDPR Art4 Z1 GDPR Art4 Z2 GDPR Art4 Z7 GDPR Art5 Paragraph 1 GDPR Art6 Paragraph 1 B-VG

the MB. 4. From this it follows legally: 4.1. The relevant legal provisions are excerpted as follows: 4.1.1. According to Section 1 Paragraph 1 DSG, everyone

more details. decision date 09.12.2021 standard AVG §74 B-VG Art133 Para.4 DSG §1 DSG §24 GDPR Art12 GDPR Art14 GDPR Art32 GDPR Art5 GDPR Art57 GDPR Art58

the enG) possible. Since § 9 DSG is a simple statutory provision of the DSG, which, according to the clear wording of § 4 DSG, is not limited to legal persons

website controller qualifies as controller (Article 4(7) GDPR) and Google LLC as processor (Article 4(8) GDPR) for data processing in connection with Google

numbering then follows the GDPRhub logic. Example: § 6 Abs 4 Lit c) of an Austrian law becomes § 6(4)(c) on GDPRhub. Example: Section 1 para 1(c) of an Irish

meaning of Art. 4 nos. 1 and 2 GDPR if the video recordings allow the identification of the person concerned (Ehmann/Selmayr, loc.cit., Art. 4 marginal 7)

intelligibility of the content of the decision. The right of confidentiality (§ 1 DSG) and confidentiality interests of the respondent, a legal person whose lawful

that even pseudonymised data (Art. 4 Para. 5 GDPR) from the term personal data are recorded in accordance with Art. 4 Para. 1 GDPR. It is undeniable that

protection (BVerwG, Bv 25.2.2015 - 4 VR 5.14 et al - ZfBR 2015, 381 - juris para. 12; approving OVG NW, Bv 25.4.2019 - 4 B 480/19.NE - NVwZ-RR 2019, 993 -

Regulation, hereinafter: GDPR), OJ No. L 119 of 4 May 2016 p. 1; Section 4 (1) of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999 as amended;

the Austrian Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz - DSG). Due to the derogations in § 9(1) DSG, the DSB would hence not be competent to handle the complaint

was maintained by the media employees of the N*** party. § 9 DSG is applicable. Both the DSG and the GDPR restrict their scope of application to the wholly

judgment of 25.02.2020, 5 Sa 108/19 § 18aF DSG MV, § 19aF DSG MV, § 20aF DSG MV, § 21aF DSG MV, § 22aF DSG MV, § 6 Abs 4 BDSG, § 37 EUV 2016/679, § 39 EUV 2016/679

Regulation - DSGVO), OJ No. L 119 of 4.5.2016; Article 1(1) and (2) and Article 24(1) and (5) of the Data Protection Act - DSG, Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999

meaning of Paragraph 4(2) of the DSG 2000. Accordingly, the permissibility of the processing is governed exclusively by Paragraph 9 of the DSG 2000. Under Section

to Section 1 (1) DSG must be checked and restrictions on this right may result from Section 1 (2) DSG. 14. According to Section 1 (2) DSG, restrictions on

has been rectified under § 24(6) DSG by the information given in that reply. The data subject replied that § 24(6) DSG does not apply on violations of Article

5 lit a GDPR Re 3) + 4): Art 35 in conjunction with Art 83 Para 4 lit a GDPR Re 5 + 6): Art 30 in conjunction with Art 83 Para 4 lit a GDPR To 7): Art

according to Art 133 Abs 4 B-VG. This statement must be justified briefly. The revision is not permissible according to Art. 133 para 4 B-VG, because the decision

within a period of four weeks. Legal basis: Art. 4 Z 1, Z 2 and Z 11, Art. 6 Para. 1 lit. c, Art. 7 Para. 4, Art. 9, Art. 51 Para. 1, Art. 57 Para. f, Art

accordance with § 4 para. 3 DSG or if express consent has been given. (5) Unless the data subjects have given their consent pursuant to Art. 4 No. 11 DSGVO

hereinafter: GDPR), OJ No. L 119 of 4.5.2016 p. 1; §§ 18 para. 1 as well as 24 para. 1 and para. 5 of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No.

attention of its representative within 14 days the amount of EUR 2.500,-- plus 4% interest since 2.3.2019 is hereby rejected. 2. the plaintiff is obliged to

DSGVO), OJ L 207, 30.12.2009, p. 1. No. L 119 of 4.5.2016, p. 1; section 29 Data Protection Act - DSG, Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999 as amended; section

Austria Relevant Law: Article 4(1) GDPR Article 4(2) GDPR Article 5 GDPR Article 6(1)(f) GDPR Article 17 GDPR § 152 GewO 1994 § 1 DSG Decided: 21.04.2021 Published:

Protection Regulation - GDPR), ABl. No. L 119 of 4.5.2016, p. 1; § 18 Paragraph 1 of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999 as amended;

the StVO. 2 DSG and Art. 8 para. 2 ECHR and justify such an intervention.§ 98a para. 2 first sentence StVO 1960 therefore violates § 1 DSG and Art. 8 ECHR

the BVwG/VwGH/VfGH This decision is final. Standard DSG §24 Abs5 DSGVO Art4 Z1 DSGVO Art4 Z2 DSGVO Art4 Z5 DSGVO Art11 Abs1 DSGVO Art11 Abs2 DSGVO Art12 Abs2

within the meaning of Section 1 DSG. In addition, it is an unlawful further processing of data according to Art 6 Para 4 GDPR. With regard to the verification

General Data Protection Regulation, Art. 4 marginal number 22). 4. Since in the demonstrative (arg. "How") list of Art. 4 Z 2 GDPR, the word "storage" is also

which want to address consumers. 4. may your data also be passed on to another country (including outside the EU)? 4.1 Yes, if an adequate level of data

GDPR), OJ No. L 119, 4.5.2016 p. 1; §§ 1 para. 1 and para. 2 as well as 24 para. 1 and para. 5 of the Data Protection Act (hereinafter: DSG), Federal Law Gazette

|GDPR_Article_Link_2= |GDPR_Article_3= |GDPR_Article_Link_3= |GDPR_Article_4= |GDPR_Article_Link_4= |GDPR_Article_5= |GDPR_Article_Link_5= |GDPR_Article_6= |GDPR_Article_Link_6=

|GDPR_Article_Link_2= |GDPR_Article_3= |GDPR_Article_Link_3= |GDPR_Article_4= |GDPR_Article_Link_4= |GDPR_Article_5= |GDPR_Article_Link_5= |GDPR_Article_6= |GDPR_Article_Link_6=

ECHR (Wittwer in Schwimann, ABGB-Takom4 § 1328a Rz 3; Danzl in KBB5 § 1328a ABGB Rz 3; RV 173 BlgNR 22nd GP 17). 1.4 'Personal rights' are absolute rights

period of 4 weeks, failing which the complainant is to be executed. 3. For the rest, the appeal is dismissed as unfounded. Legal basis: Art. 3, Art. 4 line

of Article 4(1) of the GDPR and additional information specifically defined in paragraph 2. Since the concept of personal data under Art 4(1) DPA is multifaceted

paragraph 7, DSG. From the facts established, it follows that the requirements of Section 7 Paragraph 1 DSG Paragraph 7, Paragraph One, DSG (publicly accessible

accordance with § 62 DSG. If profit or damage intent In addition, a violation of § 1 DSG is even threatened with criminal penalties (§ 63 DSG). Ultimately, the

protection according to the GDPR and the DSG 2018 [2019] 53 ff; see also Mayr in Rechberger / Klicka, ZPO5 JN § 28 Rz 4). [8] 4.2. In the well-founded decision

at DECISIONS D A T U M 2 2 . 1 2 . 2 0 2 1 BUSINESS NUMBER W 2 7 4 2 2 4 6 1 6 6 - 1/4 E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal Administrative

hereinafter: GDPR), OJ No. L 119 of 4.5.2016 p. 1; §§ 1, 18 Paragraph 1 and 24 Paragraph 1 and Paragraph 5 of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I