Search results

established in article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679. (…)” V Penalty for violation of article 5.1.f) of the RGPD According to article 83.2 of the RGPD “Administrative

provisions of article 68 of the LOPDGDD and article 64.2 of the LPACAP (in this case, of the different corrective powers provided for in article 58.2 of the RGPD

could fit into the exception of article 9.2.a). - On the other hand, the club recognizes that the exceptions of 9.2.b) and 9.2.g) (compliance with legal obligation

contemplated in article 83.2 of the RGPD and the Article 76.2 of the LOPDGDD, with respect to the infraction committed by violating the established in article 5.1

enough. ” 2.2.- In relation to the 2nd proven fact: At this point it is necessary to make express reference to the provisions of section 2 of Article 32 of

provided for article 77.1 of the LOPDGDD, results from the application of the general sanctioning regime provided for in article 83 of the RGPD. Article 83.5 of

costumers constituted the processing of personal data pursuant to Article 4(1) and Article 4(2) GDPR. Second, the data controller's hidden image and sound recording

as established in article 2.2 of the RGPD and article 2.2.a) of the LO- PDGDD, the following should be noted: it says to article 2.2 of the RGPD: "two

through the offense. " In relation to section k) of article 83.2 of the RGPD, the LOPDGDD, article 76, "Sanctions and corrective measures", provides: "two

what is established in the articles 47, 48.1, 64.2 and 68.1 of the LOPDGDD, While article 63.2 of the LOPDGDD determines that: "The procedures processed by

legislator has considered including in article 76 of the LOPDGDD that: “2. In accordance with the provisions of article 83.2.k) of the Regulations (EU) 2016/679

legislator has considered including in article 76 of the LOPDGDD that: “2. In accordance with the provisions of article 83.2.k) of the Regulations (EU) 2016/679

violations: 1. Breach of article 6.1 of the RGPD, in relation to article 10 of the RGPD and of article 10 of the LOPDGDD, typified in article 83.5 of the RGPD

could fit into the exception of article 9.2.a). - On the other hand, the club recognizes that the exceptions of 9.2.b) and 9.2.g) (compliance with legal obligation

criteria established in the section 2 of the aforementioned article. 2. In accordance with the provisions of article 83.2.k) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, also

according to Article 58(2)(d) GDPR. First, the AEPD established that the GDPR was applicable under Article 3(1) GPDR or, if not, at least Article 3(2)(a) GDPR

violation of Article 35 of the GDPR, Article 32 of the GDPR and Article 13 of the GDPR, typified in Articles 83.5 of the RGPD and Article 83.4 of the RGPD

infringement of Article 83.5.b) of the RGPD and Article 74.c) of the LOPDGDD, for breach of the provisions of Article 12, paragraphs 2 and 3, of the RGPD

in section 2 of article 76 “Sanctions and measures “corrective measures” of the LOPDGDD: As aggravating factors: - Article 76.2.b) LOPDGDD. Linking the

of the fact that be the LOPDGDD the special rule regulating the procedure; is that its own LOPDGDD states in its article 63.2 that “[t]he procedures processed

criteria established in the section 2 of the aforementioned article. 2. In accordance with the provisions of article 83.2.k) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, also

In its article 67 LOPDGDD, it indicates in its section 2 that: “2. Previous actions investigation will be subject to the provisions of Section 2 of Chapter

contemplated in article 83.2 of the GDPR and 76.2 LOPDGDD, with respect to the offense committed by violating the provisions of the Article 37.1 GDPR, allows

it adds that, for its part, article 76.2 of the LOPDGDD establishes that, In accordance with the provisions of article 83.2.k) of the RGPD, it will be taken

a bank €2.500 for installing non-strictly necessary cookies in the user's terminal equipment without prior consent in violation of Article 22(2) LSSI. A

RGPD. Regarding the mitigating effect of article 83.2.k) RGDP in relation to article 76.2. and) of the LOPDGDD, considers it irrelevant since its application

violation of Article 5.1.c) of the GDPR, Article 6 of the GDPR, Article 9 of the GDPR, Article 12 of the GDPR, Article 35 of the RGPD, Article 13 of the RGPD

infringement of article 35 of the GDPR, typified in article 83.4.a) of the GDPR and article 73.t) of the LOPDGDD” "For the purposes specified in the art. 64.2 b) of

contemplated in article 83.2 of the RGPD and 76.2 of the LOPDGDD, with respect to the infraction committed by violating the provisions of the article 25 of the

violation of article 58.2 c) of the GDPR, in accordance with article 83.6 of the GDPR, classified as very serious in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, with a

although article 69.2 of Law 39/2015 referred to in the judgment, does not set a specific term for such actions, article 67.2 of the LOPDGDD does, setting