Search results

are incompatible with Art 2 (1) in conjunction with Art 1 (1) and Art 10 (1) of the German constitution (Basic Law – Grundgesetz – GG) for lack of consideration

the Basic Law (GG), from Article 103(2) GG, from the general freedom of action in Article 2(1) GG and from human dignity in Article 1(1) GG. Without a link

general right of personality, Article 2 Paragraph 1 GG in conjunction with Article 1 Paragraph 1 GG, or from Section 823 Paragraph 2 BGB in connection

2020, 11 LA 104/19, ECLI:DE:OVGNI:2020:0722.11LA104.19.00 Article 1 (1) GG, Article 2 (1) GG, § 7aF DSG ND, § 43 VwGO Proceedings VG Osnabrück, 30 January

DSGVO Art. 4 No. 1, No. 2, Art. 6 para. 1 sentence 1 lit. c, para. 3 sentence 1, Art. 86 GKG § 47 (1), § 52 (2), § 53 (2) no. 2, § 63 (3) sentence 1 no.

August 2019 (Annex K 1), which did not merely contain a non-binding assessment of the defendant. Finally, the applications No. 1 a dd to gg were inadmissible

the parties to the 08.1.2020 plenary sitting and subsequently a deadline for the submission of statements. At the hearing held in 08.1.2020, the Director

Art. 13 Para. 4, Art. 14 Para. 5 a, Art. 15, Art. 23 para. 1 e and i FGO § 32a Paragraph 1 No. 1, Paragraph 2, § 32c Paragraph 1 No. 1§ 33, § 90 a, § 115

customers from Art. 2 Para. 1 in conjunction with Art. 1 Para. 1 GG.42 III. The decision on costs is a mixed cost decision (Section 155 (1) Sentence 1 VwGO) on

third-party action (1.). On the complainant's side, his general right of personality (Article 2.1 in conjunction with Article 1.1 of the Basic Law) in

connection with Art. 2 para. 1, Art. 1 para. 1 GG, Art. 17 para. 1 lit. d) DSGVO, because her personal data is stored according to Art. 6 para. 1 lit. f. DSGVO

constitutional complaint is therefore obviously well-founded, § 93c.1 sentence 1 BVerfGG. 1. The Local Court violated the complainant's right to the lawful

protection of private life and his data (Art. 2 para. 1, Art. 1 para. 1 of the Basic Law, Art. 8 para. 1 ECHR, Art. 7 f. GrCh) and the right of the defendants

in conjunction with Article 34 of the German Constitution (GG). Art. 34 GG. The claim under Art. 82 GDPR is advantageous for the data subject because of

over whether he implements them. 13th 9 10gl. on § 9 BDSG and Art. 2 Paragraph 1 in conjunction with 1 Paragraph 1 GG: Lotz / Wendler, CR 2016, 31, 34. Martini

§1004 para. 1 sentence 1 BGB analogous i. V. m. § 823 para. 1 BGB i. V. m. the general right of personality from Art. 2 Para. 1, Art. Para. 1 GG. 51a) With

according to: Ad. I.:Ad. Roman one: Art. 5 Para. 1 lit. a and c as well as Art. 6 Para. 1 in conjunction with Art. 83 Para. 1 and 5 lit. Paragraph one, letter

2 GDPR Art EWG_GDPR Article 6 GDPR Art EWG_DSGVO Article 88 GG Art GG Article 1 GG Art GG Article 2 Paragraph GG Article 2 Paragraph 1 GG Art GG Article

(application 1 a) from § 1004 para. 1 sentence 2, § 823 para. 1 BGB, Art. 1 para 1, Article 2 Paragraph 1 GG and § 12 sentence 2 BGB negative. 74 1. The Court

self-determination from Art. 2 Para. 1 in conjunction with 1 sec. 1 GG; however, this interference is constitutionally justified. (1) The publication of the

EU-GRC Art. 8 Para. 1, Para. 2 Sentence 1 TFEU Article 16 GG Art. 2 Para. 1 and Art. 1 Para. 1 BGB § 1004 paragraph 1 sentence 2 analogous GDPR Art. 2 Para

self-determination (Art. 2 Para. 1 in connection with Art. 1 Para. 1 GG), possibly even interference with the inviolability of the home (Art. 13 Para. 1 GG). The right

chains: GDPR Art. 2, Art. 12, Art. 21, Art. 77 para. 1, Art. 78 para. 1 Bavarian Data Protection Act (Bayerisches Datenschutzgestz – BayDSG) Art. 2, 20, 24

chains: GDPR Art. 5 Para. 1 lit. a and lit. f, Art. 6 Para. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 17, Art. 25 Para BGB § 823 paragraph 2, § 1004 paragraph 1 sentence 2

standards: GG Art. 1 Para. 1 GG Art. 2 Para. 1, Para. 2 Sentence 1 GG Art. 3 Para. 1 GG Art. 13 Para. 7 GDPR Art. 4 GDPR Art. 5 Para. 1 GDPR Art. 6 Para. 1, Para

VIG § 2 (1) p. 1 no. 1, § 5 (4) p. 1, § 6 (1) p. 1, p. 3, (3) p. 2, (4) p. 2 LFGB § 40 (1a) VwGO § 80a (3), § 146 (4) p. 3, § 152 (1GG) Art. 5 (1) GPDR Art

self-determination from Article 2(1) in conjunction with Article 1(1) GG, the negative freedom of belief from Article 4(1) GG and the duty of the state comment

informational self-determination according to Article 1 (1) in conjunction with Article 2 (1) GG. The defendant was not able to eliminate the risk of repetition

pursuant to Section 823 (1) or Section 839 BGB in conjunction with Art. 34 GG in conjunction with Art. 1 (1), Art . 2 para. 1 GG denied, since there was

self-determination under Article 1(1) in conjunction with Article 2(1) of the German Constitution (Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland - GG). The court also

free development of personality according to Art. 2 Para. 1 GG and human dignity according to Art. 1 Para. 1 GG of the indicators of assemblies, which guarantee

Defendant; 2.10 has interfered with the plaintiff's fundamental right of informational self-determination (Art. 1 GG in conjunction with Art. 2 GG, Art. 8 GRCh

to the general principle of equality (Art. 3 (1) GG) and the rule of law (Art. 20 (3), Art. 28 (1) sentence 1 GG) (judgment of the Federal Constitutional

type: Judgment Source: Hesse Standards: § 823 BGB, § 1004 BGB, art. 1 GG, art. 2 GG, art. 12 GG ... more Document tab Short textLong text No "free shot" for

56). The defendant has the authorization in Art. 24 Para. 4 Sentence 1 GO (cf. Art. 26 Para. 1 Sentence 1 KommZG) by issuing the amendment to the water

Data Protection Act (BDSG) or from § 823.1, § 1004 of the Civil Code in conjunction with Article 1.1, Article 2.1 of the Basic Law. 8 a) The complainant's

rights (Article 2 (1) in conjunction with Article 1 (1) GG) of the applicant and violates Article 9 (1) GDPR. Voluntary consent (Art. 9 Para. 2 Letter a

self-determination (from Article 2.1 of the Basic Law in conjunction with Article 2.1 of the Basic Law). Art. 1 para. 1 GG, cf. OVG BBbg, decision of 27 May

of the more restrictive par. to § 823 para. 1 BGB in conjunction with Art. 1 para. 1, Art. 2 para. 1 GG) . ee) To compensate for this non-material damage

ECLI:DE:OLGCE:2022:0120.13U84.19.00 § 242 BGB, § 249 Abs 1 BGB, § 280 Abs 1 S 1 BGB, Art 16 EUV 2016/679, Art 82 Abs 2 S 1 EUV 2016/679, § 256 ZPO PROCEDURE Proceeding

sentences 2 to 4, use under paragraph 1 sentence 1 number 1 alternative 1 and the stay in accordance with paragraph 1 sentence 1 points 2 to 7 are prohibited.

longer covered by § 1 Para. 1 Sentence 1 IFG (cf. BVerwG, judgment of November 27, 2014 - BVerwG 7 C 20/12 - BVerwGE 151, 1 para. 37). 1. Insofar as the information

meaning of Art. 23 para. 1 no. 1 KUG requires a weighing of the rights of the person depicted under Art. 1 para. 1, 2 para. 1 GG, 8 para. 1 ECHR on the

) has been opened. 10 2. The applicability of Art. 17 DS-GVO does not conflict with Art. 38 Para. 1 BayDSG in conjunction with Art. 85 Para. 2 DS-GVO (so-called

chains: GO Art. 24 Paragraph 4 GG Art. 1 Paragraph 1; Article 2 paragraph 1 GDPR Art. 6 Paragraph 1 Sentence 1 Letter e; Article 18 paragraph 1 letter d;

bases - Art. 3 (1) sentences 1, 3 and 5 ZwEWG, Section 12 (1) sentence 1 half 1, sentence 2 and sentence 4 ZeS - have the following wording:3Art. 3 (1) ZwEWG4

Sections 823 (1), 249, 253 BGB, Art 1 and 2 GG, a those of Art. 82 GG not required (cf. (BeckOK DatenschutzR/Quaas, 38th Ed. 1.11.2021, DS-GVO Art.82 Rn. 32;

right to informational self-determination (Art. 2 Para. 1 in conjunction with Art. 1 Para. 1 Basic Law - GG - ). This legal institution conveys the authority

meaning of Art. 23 para. 1 no. 1 KUG requires a weighing of the rights of the person depicted under Art. 1 para. 1, 2 para. 1 GG, 8 para. 1 ECHR on the

Art. 13 Para. 4, Art. 14 Para. 5 a, Art. 15, Art. 23 para. 1 e and i FGO § 32a Paragraph 1 No. 1, Paragraph 2, § 32c Paragraph 1 No. 1§ 33, § 90 a, § 115

of the right to informational self-determination under Art. 2 (1) in conjunction with Art. 1 (1) GG . 60 This guarantees the authority of the individual

entitled to extended information in accordance with Art. 15 (1) half-sentence 2 GDPR. According to Art. 4 No. 2 GDPR, processing also includes in particular

Section 823 Paragraph 1 of the German Civil Code (BGB) in conjunction with. Art. 2 Para. 1 in conjunction with Art. 1 Para. 1 GG owes monetary compensation

right to information (1) Restrictions of the GDPR and the AO 72 According to Art. 15 Para. 1 GDPR, the person concerned (Art. 4 No. 1 GDPR) has a right to

action according to Art. 2 Para. 1 GG and its right to the established and exercised commercial enterprise according to Art. 14 Para. 1 GG. The storage period

conditions of Art. 6 Para. 1 DS-GVO is fulfilled. (1) The disputed data processing by the plaintiff was lawful according to Art. 6 Para. 1 Sentence 1 Letter f

right to informational self-determination from Art. 1 Paragraph 1 in conjunction with Article 2 Paragraph 1 of the Basic Law, these interests (see (c)).

taking into account the provisions of Art. 7 and Art. 8 GRCh or Art. 2 para. 1 in conjunction with 1 Para. 1 GG, there is scope and relevance for the preliminary

the provisions of Articles 1 (3) and 15 (1) of the said Directive No. 2002/58 , which provide for the following: Article 1 3 - This Directive does not

paragraph 1 and Article 1 paragraph 1 GG (general right of personality) or from § 823 paragraph 2 BGB i. In conjunction with Art. 2 (1) and Art. 1 (1) GG (right

Regulation Art. 3 para. 1 BGB § 307 para. 1, para. 2, para. 3 TMG § 3 para. 2 p. 1, § 13 As. 4 p. 1 GDPR Art. 99 para. 2 Guiding principles: (1) The operator

claim under Article 82 (1) GDPR, which he could also base on Article 823 (1) BGB in conjunction with Article 2 (1) and Article 1 (1) GG. The defendant had seriously

autonomy protected in Art. 2 para. 1 of the German Constitution (GG) that, for participation in the blocking system pursuant to § 6 para. 1 sentence 2 Hess.

pursuant to § 1.5 sentence 1 BDSG in conjunction with Art. 4.1 lit. A of Directive 95/46/EC, because in a Directive-compliant interpretation of § 1.5 sentence

chains: BayPrG Art. 4 para. 1 VwGO § 123 (1) sentence 2, § 146, § 152, § 154 (2) ZPO § 920 Basic Law Article 5(1) GKG § 47, § 52 (2), § 53 (2) No. 1 Keywords:

standard B-VG Art 130 Paragraph 2a B-VG Art 133 Paragraph 4 B-VG Art87 Paragraph 2 BVwGG §24a BVwGG §3 GDPR Art55 Paragraph 3 GOG §84 GOG §85 B-VG Art. 130 today

pursuant to Sections 1, 3 (1) No. 1 UKlaG i. V. m. § 307 paragraph 1, 2 no. 2 BGB i. In conjunction with Art. 5 Para. 1 lit a) and Art. 6 Para. 1 GDPR therefore

privacy guaranteed by Article 2 sentence 1 in conjunction with Article 2 sentence 1 of the Basic Law. Art. 1 sentence 1 of the Basic Constitutional Law. b.

Article 5 Paragraph 1 Letter a Var. 1, Art. 6 paragraph 1 subpara. 1 lit. a, Art. 7, Art. 2 Para. 1 in conjunction with Art. 4 No. 1 GDPR. 83The defendant

the applicant to 2), in accordance with sections 1626 (1), 1629 (1) sentence 1 and sentence 2 ms. 1 BGB as its legal representative. 13 To the extent permitted

authority according to Art. 77, 57 Para. 1 lit. 22 cf. on the dispute: Administrative Court (VGH) Baden-Württemberg, judgment of 1 S 3001/19, juris Rn. 51

monetary compensation under Article 2.1 in conjunction with Article 1 of the Basic Law nor to non-material damages. Article 1 of the Basic Law, nor to non-material

by the intervention in Article 2 Paragraph 1 in conjunction with Article 1 Paragraph 1 of the Basic Law - GG. The lawsuit was also received in good time

511 ; Gola/Pitz in Gola, GDPR Art. 82 Rn. 13 mwN the more restrictive case on § 823 1 BGB in conjunction with Art. 1 I, 2 1 GG). 76 Contrary to the defendant's

information from Art. 15 GDPR on the basis of Art. 23 (1) GDPR. § 32c paragraph 1 no. 2 AO refers to the opening clause of Art. 23 paragraph 1 letter j GDPR

claim - contrary to the plaintiff's view - does not follow from Art. 82 (1) GDPR. Art. 82 (1) GDPR would probably be directly applicable in national law.

not entitled to damages against the plaintiff pursuant to Art. 81(1) GDPR (correctly: Art. 82(1) GDPR). The plaintiff had indeed violated an obligation under

contributions is obvious (§ 10 sentence 1 no. 2 TMG ; Section 4 (1) no. 2 in conjunction with Section 3 (1) sentence 1, (2) sentence 1 nos. 2 and 3 NetzDG; BGHZ

defendant. This claim is based on Art. 82 Para. 1, Para. 2 Sentence 1, Para. 3 GDPR. According to Art. 82 (1) GDPR, any person who has suffered material or

relevant court act and are undisputed. 3. Legal Assessment 3.1. To I to A) 3.1.1. Legal situation: Art. 12 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament

concerns of freedom of expression from Art. 5 Para. 1 Sentence 1 GG (BVerfG, decision of December 19, 2021 - 1 BvR 1073 /20 -, juris para. 26 with further

public area, it must be ensured that 1. the minimum distance of 1.5 metres required in accordance with Article 1 paragraph 1 sentence 2 can be maintained by

Section 50 (1) BMG, Section 49 BWahlG, Section 6 (1) S 1e EUV 2016/679, Section 17 HKG ND, Section 85a HKG ND, Section 85a (1) S 1 HKG ND, Section 5 (1) S 2 DSG

Therefore, according to Art. 15 Para. 3 Sentence 1 i. V. Art. 15 Para. 1 GDPR no right to release the test questions.2. The right to have the test questions provided

Article 5(1)(f) GDPR. On 1 January 2024, the investigator for the Catalan DPA proposed a fine of € 3000 for the controller’s infringement of Article 5(1)(f)

17 (1) and (3) KSchG, as well as Article 1 (1) (a) subparagraph i of Directive 98/59 EC, the implementation of which is aimed at § 17 paragraph 1 sentence

interested parties (see art. 4, paragraph 1, no. 4 articles 13, paragraph 1, letter f); 14, par. 2, lit. g), 15, para. 1, lit. h) art. 21, par. 1 and 35, paragraph

III of the GDPR, cf. Art. 12 (1) sentence 2, (3) sentence 1, Art. 15 (1) to (3) GDPR (cf. Nguyen in: Gola, DS-GVO, 2nd ed. 2018, Art. 58 para. 18). In the

violates Art. 16 Sentence 1 GDPR, Section 2 Para. 1 BMG and Art. 3 Para. 1 GG. He, the plaintiff, is entitled to a right to correction under Art. 16 Sentence

parties within the meaning of Art. 6(1)(f) of the GDPR (see also Schantz in Simitis, Hornung, Spiecker, Datenschutzrecht, Art. 6(1) Rz 133 f, 137). Thus, it

standard B-VG Art 133 Paragraph 4 DSG §24 DSG §4 GDPR Art 12 GDPR Art 15 GDPR Art 15 Paragraph 1 litc GDPR Art77 UWG §26b paragraph 1 B-VG Art. 133 today

'party affinities': 3.2.1 On the relevant legal provisions: Art 4 DSGVO, entitled "Definitions", reads as follows in no. 1 "1) "personal data" shall mean

under US law - 16 - be without a doubt not with Art. 5 Para. 1 lit. f GDPR, Art. 5 Para. 1 lit. a GDPR and Art compatible. I.16. After being asked to comment

Paragraph 1 Sentence 1 BGB, would contradict Section 307 Paragraph 1 Sentence 1, Paragraph 2 No. 1 BGB in conjunction with Article 5 Paragraph 1 Letter a)

seront communiquées [... ] "). In contrast to Art 15 GDPR, Art 13 Paragraph 1 lit e and Art 14 Paragraph 1 lit e GDPR does not state the data subject's

dismissed as unfounded. Legal bases: Art. 3, Art. 4, Art. 5, Art. 17, Art. 51 Para. 1, Art. 57 Para. 1 lit. f and Art. 77 Para. 1 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (

Paragraph 24(1) and (1) and (2) of the B-VG. 5 DSG as amended, with the provisos that part 1. of the ruling concerning the data protection complaint of 1 February

Section 1 (1) DSG can therefore not be assumed (RS0130870). 3.2.1. On the legality of the publication of the BF's data in the app Art 6 para 1 GDPR contains

HmbKrebsRG Article 9 (1) GDPR, Article 6 (1) GDPR, Article 5 (1) in conjunction with Articles 12, 13 and/or Article 14 GDPR and/or Article 5 (1) (in particular

Administrative Court considered: 1. Findings: 1.1. On the one hand, the decision is based on the facts presented under point I. 1.2. In addition, it is found:

sentence 1 VwGO). 53 The claim of the plaintiff is based on Art. 15 para. 3 sentence 1, Art. 12 para. 5 sentence 1 DSGVO in conjunction with Art. 5 para

Article 6 (1) (c) GDPR to fulfill the employer's legal obligation and to safeguard the client's legitimate interests in accordance with Art 6 Paragraph 1 lit

to To 1): € 1.200,00 To 2): € 300,00 To 3): € 300,00 . . . In total: € 1.800 To 1): 3 days To 2): 1 day To 3): 1 day ... In total: 5 days Ad 1): Art. 83

4/1945 B-VG Art. 133 valid from 01/03/1930 to 06/30/1934 BVwGG § 10 today BVwGG § 10 valid from 01/01/2014 DSG Art. 1 § 1 today DSG Art. 1 § 1 valid from

to object is dismissed. Legal basis: Art. 15, Art. 17, Art. 21, Art. 51 (1), Art. 57 (1) lit. f, Art. 77 (1) and Art. 91 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 ( General

15 Paragraph 2 AGG, Section 61b Paragraph 1 ArbGG, Section 242 BGB, Art 15 EUV 2016/679, Art 82 Paragraph 1 EUV 2016/679 ... more Claim for compensation

October 12, 2023, Zl. W256 2275675-1/4E, regarding the suspension of proceedings in a data protection matter (Parties involved: 1. S P in W, and 2. Labor Market

guaranteed by Art. 1 and Art. 2 GG. Personal rights are treated as other rights i.S. protected from objectively unlawful interventions by Section 823 (1) of the

system. 10 As of August 1, 2018, only the working times determined by time recording would be valid. It was also announced that from September 1, 2018,

to Art. 82 Para. 1 DS-GVO in case of violation of the duty to provide information according to Art. 15 Para. 1 DS-GVO chain of standards: GDPR Art. 15

according to To 1): Art 5 Paragraph 1, Art 9 in conjunction with Art 83 Paragraph 5 lit a GDPR To 2): Art 5 para 1, Art 6 para 1 in conjunction with Art 83 para

first party involved for expenses of EUR 1,106.40 within 14 days, otherwise execution. Reason I. Roman one. 1 1. By decision of the data protection authority

applying the provisions of Section 1 (1) and (2) DSG, Art. 4 Z 7 Previous search term GDPR Next search term and Art. 6 Section 1 lit constitutionally guaranteed

preliminary ruling: "1. Is Art. 83 (4) to (6) GDPR to be interpreted in such a way that it incorporates the functional company concept assigned to Art. 101 and 102

to 06/30/1934 DSG Art. 1 § 1 today DSG Art. 1 § 1 valid from 01.01.2014 last changed by Federal Law Gazette I No. 51/2012 DSG Art. 1 § 1 valid from 01.01

paragraph 1 AVG §73 paragraph 1 B-VG Art 133 Paragraph 4 DSG §24 Paragraph 1 DSG §24 Paragraph 10 GDPR Art4 GDPR Art51 GDPR Art56 GDPR Art60 GDPR Art65 GDPR

attorney is admissible (§ 68, Subsection 1, Sentence 1, GKG); it was filed in due form and time (§ 68, Subsection 1, Sentence 3 in conjunction with § 63,

is not only secondary law (Art. 51 para. 1 and Art. 52 GDPR), but also explicitly by Art.8 Para.1 GRC (as well as Art.16 Para.1 TFEU). is protected, speaks

instructions, Art. 38 Para. 3 DS-GVO. According to Art. 39 DS-GVO, he is primarily responsible for information, advice and monitoring tasks. According to Art. 4 No

date 09/06/2023 standard B-VG Art 133 Paragraph 4 DSG §24 GDPR Art58 B-VG Art. 133 today B-VG Art. 133 valid from January 1st, 2019 to May 24th, 2018 last

elimination of point 1 of the preliminary appeal decision of December 11, 2019 without replacement. There is no reimbursement of expenses. Reason 1 1. The contested

parties to the proceedings. -4- 3. Legal assessment 3.1. Re point A): 3.1. Pursuant to Art. 130 para. 1 z 1 B-VG, the administrative courts shall rule on appeals

considered: 1. Findings: 1. The procedure outlined under point I is used as a basis for the findings. 1.1. The complainant is XXXX and XXXX " XXXX ". 1.2. The

2023 standard B-VG Art 133 Paragraph 4 DSG §24 Paragraph 1 DSG §24 Paragraph 5 DSG §24 Paragraph 6 GDPR Art 17 B-VG Art. 133 today B-VG Art. 133 valid from

decision date 06/12/2023 standard B-VG Art133 Para.4 DSG §24 paragraph 4 GDPR Art58 GDPR Art77 B-VG Art. 133 today B-VG Art. 133 valid from 01.01.2019 to 24

last amended by StGBl. No. 4/1945 B-VG Art. 133 valid from 01/03/1930 to 06/30/1934 DSG Art. 1 § 1 today DSG Art. 1 § 1 valid from 01.01.2014 last changed

Adequacy Regulation). This The regulation is based on Art. 135 Para. 1, Art. 171 Para. 2 and Art. 180 Para. 1 lit. f in conjunction with recital 42, the use of

bases: Art. 4 Z 1 and Z 2, Art. 5 Para. 1 lit. c, Art. 6 Para. 1 lit. f, Art. 12 Para. 3, Art. 20 Para. 1, Art. 51 Para. 1, Article 57 Paragraph 1 Letter

III. 70 1. The decision on costs is based on Section 97 (1) ZPO. 71 2. The appeal was to be allowed for the defendant according to § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 ArbGG

applicant on the origin of the data pursuant to Art. 15 (1)(g) and on the purposes of processing pursuant to Art. 15 (1)(a) GDPR was sufficient. However, the Federal

written evidence on 10% of a monthly salary (= € 313.04) and the provision of information and a copy of performance data also on 10% of a monthly salary

standard B-VG Art 130 Paragraph 1 Z1 B-VG Art 133 Paragraph 4 GDPR Art4 GDPR Art51 GDPR Art56 GDPR Art60 GDPR Art65 GDPR Art77 VwGVG §28 Paragraph 1 VwGVG §31

Phone: +43 1 601 49-0 Fax+43 1 711 23-889 15 41 Email: einlaufstelle@bvwg.gv.at www.bvwg.gv.at DVR: 0939579 DECISIONS D A T U M 0 7 . 1 2 . 2 0 2 1 BUSINESS

- 16 Sa 380/20, juris Rn. 126 ff.). And Art. 6 Para. 1 b) and f) GDPR as well as Art. 5 Para. 1 c GDPR and Art. 9 GDPR do not impose any lower requirements

to 06/30/1934 DSG Art. 1 § 1 today DSG Art. 1 § 1 valid from 01.01.2014 last changed by Federal Law Gazette I No. 51/2012 DSG Art. 1 § 1 valid from 01.01

(Wikex) (formatting not 1:1): 1.4. The BF provided excerpts of the following information on the RiskIndicator (formatting not 1:1): 1.5. The BF provided excerpts

concerned (Art. 4 Z 1 DSGVO) cannot rely on the rights of Art 12 to 22 and Art 119 of May 4th, 2016 p. 1 (hereinafter: GDPR), as well as § 1 Para. 3 DSG

matter: 3.2.2.1. Legal situation: 3.2.2.1.1. Art. 4 GDPR reads in part: - 10 - “Definitions For the purposes of this Regulation, the term means: 1."personal

restriction, deletion or destruction. According to Art. 6 Para. 1 UA 1 S. 1 f) in conjunction with Art. 9 DS-GVO, data processing is lawful if the processing

pursuant to Art. 9 Para. 2 DSGVO. The administrative offense would affect Art. 5 Para. 1 lit. a, b and c and Art. 9 Para. 1 in conjunction with Art. 83 Para

decision are therefore established. 3. Legal assessment: 3.1. According to Art. 130 Para. 1 Z 1 B-VG, the administrative courts rule on complaints against

pursuant to Art. 13 et seq. GDPR and the right to information pursuant to Art. 15 GDPR was complete, incorrect and untimely. According to Art. 57 Para. 4

01/20/2022 standard B-VG Art133 Para.4 DSG §1 DSG §24 paragraph 1 DSG §24 paragraph 5 GDPR Art17 GDPR Art4 GDPR Art5 GDPR Art58 GDPR Art6 VwGVG §28 paragraph

3.3.1 Legal situation The authority concerned based its decision on the following legal bases: Art. 4(1), (2) and (7), Art. 12(3), Art. 17 and Art. 77

standard B-VG Art 133 Paragraph 4 GDPR Art 15 GDPR Art 22 GDPR Art4 GewO 1994 §151 B-VG Art. 133 today B-VG Art. 133 valid from January 1st, 2019 to May

The court held that under § 73(1) German Asylum Act (AsylG), Article 11(1)(e) and (f) Directive 2011/95/EU and Article 1 C Geneva Convention Relating to

October 12, 2023 standard AVG §38 B-VG Art 133 Paragraph 4 GDPR Art 12 GDPR Art 16 AVG § 38 today AVG § 38 valid from March 1st, 2013 last changed by Federal

(Article 15 Paragraph 1 Clause 1 GDPR) to the "How" (Article 15 Paragraph 1 Clause 2 lit. a-h, Paragraph 2 GDPR) to the "What" ( Art 15 para. 1 clause 2, para

Paragraph 36b(2), second sentence, No, Paragraph 365p(1)(1)(a) of the GewO1 1994, Paragraph 6(2)(1) of the Financial Market Money Laundering Law, Paragraph

(BVwG 30.10.2019, W258 2218465-1; 30.10.2019, W258 2216873-1; BVwG 29.04. 2020, W274 2224945-1; 21.10.2020, W274 2232028-1; 26.02.2021, W258 2224155-1; 24.03

"legitimate interest" according to Art 6 Para 1 lit f GDPR. The data processing can but in any case not based on Art. 6 Para. 1 lit f GDPR, because relevant

to the procedure. 3. Legal Assessment 3.1. To dismiss the complaint 3.1.1.1. According to Art. 130 Para. 1 Z 1 B-VG, the administrative courts recognize

of Section 1 or Article 2 1st main item. As can be seen from Section 1 of the DPA (in accordance with Art. 1 (EU) 2016/679), OJ L 2016/119, 1 (hereinafter:

free Google Maps web application. 2. Assessment of evidence: 2.1. The findings on 1.1. – 1.5. arise from the administrative act submitted and the court file

Sections 1 (1) and (2), 9 (1) and 24 (1) and (5) of the Data Protection Act – DSG, Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999 as amended; Articles 4, 5, 6, 57(1)(f)

submitted by the co-involved party. 3. legal assessment: 3.1 According to Art. 130 (1) line 1 B-VG, the administrative courts recognise complaints against

without consulting her. II. the Federal Administrative Court considered: 1. findings: 1.1 The complainant operates a property management company which has been

separately, e.g. according to Section 7 Para. 1 Z 2 DSG or according to Article 5 Para. 1 lit. b in connection with Art 6 Para. 4 GDPR would have to be assessed

formulations in Art. 15 para. 4 (s Art. 15 margin no. 49), Art. 20 para. 4 (see Art. 20 margin no. 28), Art. 21 para. 1 (see Art. 21 margin no. 42) and Art. 23 para

determinacy (Art. 18 B-VG), the GDPR framework legislation (Art. 5, 6, 9, 12 and 23 GDPR), the constitutional provision of § 1 para. 2 GDPR, Art. 7 and 8 CFR

facts of Art. 6 Para. 1 DSGVO. This follows both from Article 21 Paragraph 1 Sentence 1 Hs. 2 DS-GVO, which refers to Article 6 Paragraph 1 UA 1 lit. e and

Section 1 of the GDPR in conformity with EU law is required (Lachmayer in Knyrim, DatKomm Art 1 DSGVO Rz 70 (as of 1.12.2018, rdb.at)), which is why Art. 6

personal data and processing, Art. 4(1) and (2) of the GDPR and Art. 4(1) of the DPA, as well as on the processing principles, Art. 5(1)(c) and (e) of the GDPR

according to Art. 133 Para. 4 B-VG. text REASONS FOR DECISION: I. Procedure: 1. The complainant submitted a request for information in accordance with Art. 15 by

could not be derived from Art. 77(1) DPA or Art. 24(1) and (5) DPA, and that the principle of official channels pursuant to Art. 25(1) VStG applied. Therefore

basis: Art. 4 Z 4 and 11, Art. 5 Paragraph 1 lit. a. Article 6 (1) (a), Article 7 (1) and (2), Article 12 (1), Article 13 (1) (c), Article 57 (1) (a) and

to 06/30/1934 DSG Art. 1 § 1 today DSG Art. 1 § 1 valid from 01.01.2014 last changed by Federal Law Gazette I No. 51/2012 DSG Art. 1 § 1 valid from 01.01

DSGVO/ BDSGÇ, Art 9 DS-GVO margin 41 and Schiff in Ehmann/Selmayr, DS-GVOÇ, Art 9 margin 59). However, it follows from Art 6(1)(e) and Art 9(2)(g) GDPR

obligation to do so can be derived. 3. Legal assessment: Section 1 Paragraph 1 and 2 DSG read: Ҥ 1. (1) Everyone has, especially with regard to respect for their

requirements for the legal basis in Art. 9 GDPR are not specified in more detail. Art. 9 Para. 2 lit. g GDPR, like Art. 6 Para. 1 lit. e leg. cit. as a justification

accordance with Art. 57 Para. 1 lit. h in conjunction with Art. 58 Para. 1 lit. b and Para. 2 lit. a GDPR in conjunction with Section 22 Paragraph 1 DSG was notified