Search results

(Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto in Finnish or Dataombudsmannens byrå in Swedish) is the national Data Protection Authority for Finland. It resides in Helsinki and

protection-compliant usage should not be employed. Case-law: The Finnish DPA held that four cities in Finland had, among others, unlawfully transferred personal data

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

(Datainspektionen på Åland, in Swedish) is the regional Data Protection Authority for Finland's autonomous region of Åland. It is in charge of enforcing the GDPR in the

provisions of the Finnish Data Protection Act cannot be extended to a data subject applying for insurance. Therefore, Section 6(1)(1) of the Finnish Data Protection

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Processing of personal data

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. HELSINKI ADMINISTRATIVE COURT

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. The sanctioning panel of the

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. HELSINKI ADMINISTRATIVE COURT

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. HELSINKI ADMINISTRATIVE COURT

is the national data protection authority for Finland. → Details see Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Finland) You can help us fill this section! You can

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

provisions of the Finnish Data Protection Act cannot be extended to a data subject applying for insurance. Therefore, Section 6(1)(1) of the Finnish Data Protection

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. DECISION OF THE DEPUTY DATA

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Entry of default information

the GDPR. The Finnish DPA issued similar decisions against two other insurance companies in cases 4680/182/18 and 3216/452/17 (in Finnish). Share blogs

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Entry of default information

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Entry of default information

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Decisions of the Deputy Data

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. 6 March 2024 TSV/26/2020 Decisions

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. HELSINKI ADMINISTRATIVE COURT

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

time by several royal decrees. Similar laws have been adopted in Austria, Finland, France, the Netherlands, or Portugal (to name a few). Such provisions establish

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

information on private individuals was not covered by the Finnish Personal Data Act. The Finnish Administrative Court stated, among other things: «The term“

of Data Protection Directive 95/46. Following a request from the Finnish DPA, the Finnish Data Protection Board adopted a decision prohibiting a religious

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details.

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details.

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details.

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details.

Article 3 and 5 of the Finnish Act on the Protection of Privacy in Working Life and Article 5(1)(a) and (c), 6(1) and 9(1) GDPR? The Finnish DPA held that the

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details.

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details.

as PDF Yle (Finnish national brodcasting company) news telling the controller name The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details.

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Customer's request for deletion

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Decision of the Deputy Data

GDPR. Finnish DPA also holds that withdrawing and refusing consent should be as easy as giving consent. Data subject filed a complaint with the Finnish DPA

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. THING Applicant 's claims

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Marking the personal identity

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Decision of the Deputy Data

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Retention periods of personal

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Decision of the Deputy Data

decision below is a machine translation of the original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. FACTS The applicant has stated that OP Financial

000 on the Finnish Motor Insurers' Centre for processing and requesting unnecessary patient information from healthcare providers. The Finnish DPA was notified

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. The applicant has filed a

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. The decision of the Data Protection

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. The decision of the Deputy

decision below is a machine translation of the original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. FACTS The security breach has been due to the

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Decision of the Deputy Data

Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Finland) - Authority: Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Finland) Jurisdiction: Finland Relevant Law: Article 5(1)(c) GDPR

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Decision of the Deputy Data

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Thing The right to have job

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Decision of the Assistant

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Thing Sending personal ID

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Decision of the Deputy Data

Article 6(1)(c) GDPR. The controller claimed that the Finnish Social Welfare Act and the Finnish Child Welfare Act oblige and entitle it to extensively

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. ewogICJzcGVjdHJ1bS5zaG93Q

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Ensuring adequate measures

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Correction of information

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Thing The Office of the Data

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. ADMINISTRATIVE COURT OF HÄMENLINNA

contained in Article 91 GDPR. For example, the Jehovah Witnesses community of Finland did not have its own specific set of data protection rules in place prior

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Decision of the Deputy Data

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Keywords: processing of personal

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Thing Security of processing

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. The public version of the

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. KHO:2024:34 Data protection

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. The decision of the Data Protection

by a text messaging system.. Following complainta from individuals, the Finnish DPA investigated the activity of Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia

The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court annulled the decision to end the mandate of the head of the regional Ålandic DPA because it did not comply with

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Decisions of the Assistant

number to Danske Bank’s customers in Finland resulted in the 132 invoices being searchable and visible to 14.511 Finnish business customers in the period be-

out, after authorization from the competent authorities, using Danish, Finnish, Norwegian and Hungarian data, in order to compare the aggregated results

publication was not considered to be covered by the journalist exemption. In the Finnish judgment, which the EMD endorsed, a distinction was made between the collection

Swedish« Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev », Danish« Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev », Finnish« Mihail Sergeyevich Gorbachev », German« Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev »

The Finnish DPA found that the Finnish police had unlawfully relied on the facial recognition software Clearview AI in 2020. It ordered the Finnish Police

Referring to the wording of that Article, as well as to both Finnish and EU case-law, the Finnish DPA concluded that the voice of an individual must be considered

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Transferring customers 'personal

with the Finnish DPA, asking whether these data should have not been provided to him free of charge on the basis of Article 15(3) GDPR. The Finnish DPA requested

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Exercising the registrant's

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Processing of patient data

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Decision of the Data Protection

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Collection of corona infection

the Finnish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (the controller) noticed and investigated a data breach in respect of personal data of seconded Finnish staff

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. The data subject's right to

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Personal identification number

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Decision of the Data Protection

5.2023 available (in Finnish) here. Share blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Use location information on

providers. The Finnish Motor Insurers' Centre (the controller) had asked the Administrative Court of Helsinki (the Court) to overturn the Finnish DPA's decision

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. The right to transfer data

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. 3/3/2022 Legality of data

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Minimize data in the event

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. The data protection officer's

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Failure to comply with a supervisory

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. The data subject's right to

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Agreement on the processing

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. The emergence of automated

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. The registrant's right to

(English) The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Processing of personal data

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Visibility of students' personal

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Processing of patient data

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Informing early childhood

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Use of a registered inspection

on 16 December 2019 the data subjecy filed a complaint with the Finnish DPA. The Finnish DPA requested a statement from the data controller on 11 February

The Finnish DPA held that the publication of personal tax information by media outlets for journalistic purposes is protected by Finnish data protection

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Minimizing data, limiting

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Visibility of students' personal

September 2022, the Office of the Finnish Data Protection Ombudsman (DPA) received numerous complaints concerning the Finnish Business Register, a business

Lithuanian Hungarian Maltese Dutch Polish Portuguese Romanian Slovak Slovenian Finnish Swedish Croatian ECLI:EU:C:2022:805 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (first panel)

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. The processing of the employee's

in due time the data breaches to the Finnish DPA and to the data subjects, respectively. Furthermore, the Finnish DPA found that Article 5(1)(f) GDPR had

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Implementing registered rights

customer account. Complaint 3 (Finland with national diary number 2648/182/2018) On 31 May 2018, the complainant contacted the Finnish data protection authority

subject then applied to the Finnish DPA for an order that the controller should provide him with the information requested. The Finnish DPA sided with the controller

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Court of Human Rights of 27 June 2017 in case no. 931/13 which concerned Finnish companies' publication of information on the income of one third of the

mechanism, it appears that the German, Austrian, Belgian, Danish, Spanish, Finnish, Greek, Irish, Italian, Dutch, Norwegian and Polish authorities , Portuguese

Estonia AKI (Estonia) - 2.1.-X/XX/XXXX European Union Finland Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Finland) - number of the case France CNIL (France) - SAN-year-XXX

this information. The data subject therefore lodged a complaint with the Finnish DPA. Another data subject, in Denmark, contacted the same controller, also

July 2008, I. c. Finland, req. n °20511/03, in which the Court finds unanimously that there has been a violation of Article 8 by the Finnish authorities,on

Denmark, the Netherlands, Spain, Latvia, Sweden, Luxembourg, France, Norway, Finland, Slovakia and Slovenia. Share blogs or news articles here! The decision

Decision to address the infringement of Article 6(1) GDPR. Most notably, the Finnish DPA stated that the DPC should use its corrective powers to at least order

Endemol Shine Finland brought an appeal against the judgement before the Itä-Suomen hovioikeus (Court of Appeal, Eastern Finland, Finland). The latter stayed

it appears that the German, Austrian, Belgian, Cypriot, Danish, Spanish, Finnish, Greek, Irish, Italian, Luxembourg and Dutch authorities , Norwegian, Polish

ECHR of 27 June 2017, Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. Finland, CE:ECHR:2017:0627JUD000093113, section 165)”. In such a way, that for a

explains why the Swedish and Finnish data protection authorities This approach also explains why the Swedish and Finnish Data Protection Authorities have

authorities concerned have been the data protection authorities in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Estonia. 1Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament

Denmark, Norway and Finland. The complaints The complainants have mainly stated the following. Complaint 1 (Complaint from Finland with national registration

protection of the private sector. For example, in Flinkkila and Others v. Finland, it pointed out that when a photograph of a person who is not a public actor

The concerned supervisory authorities were located in Norway, Denmark and Finland. The DPA held that any processing of personal data must comply with the

Authorities) were located in Germany, Denmark, Austria, Italy, Poland and Finland. The controller stated that it did not have the obligation to provide access

Luxembourg, France, Sweden, Thuringia, Hesse, Norway, Berlin, Hungary, Finland, Saarland, Slovenia, North Rhine-Westphalia, Portugal, Slovakia, Greece

supervisory authorities in Germany, Norway, Estonia, Denmark, Portugal, Spain, Finland and Austria. 1.2 What is stated in the complaint The complaint essentially

Authorities included Germany, Slovenia, France, Denmark. Spain, Norway, Italy, Finland, Poland, Belgium, Portugal, Cyprus, Estonia and the Netherlands. Due to

supervisory authority, cooperated with other European DPAs (in Germany, Finland, France etc.) to investigate cross-border processing pursuant to Article

decision. The concerned supervisory authorities were the DPA's of Denmark, Finland, Germany, France, Norway and the Netherlands. The Swedish DPA started an

controller—than the one imposed in the present case. For instance, the Finnish supervisory authority imposed a fine of 145 600 EUR for an infringement

decision. The concerned authorities were the DPA's of Norway, Denmark, Finland and Germany. In this complaint, the data subject stated that the controller

protection authorities in Germany, Denmark, Austria, Italy, Poland, and Finland. The complaint Postal address: The complainant has mainly stated she requested

application an extra urgent character. By letter of 18 April 2020, sent from Finland, [the applicant] stated that he was prevented from attending the hearing

data protection authorities in the Czech Republic, Denmark, Ger- many, Finland, Norway and Poland. The complaint The complaint states the following. On

France, Italy, Lower Saxony (Germany), Bavaria- Private Sector (Germany), Finland and Denmark. All of them under article 4.22.b) of the GDPR, given that the

-Westfalen”),hereinafter referred to collectively as the “DE SAs”; the Finnish supervisory authority (“Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto”), hereinafter the

No 84/2015, B.11Korkein hallinto-oikeus [Supreme Administrative Court of Finland], decision of 15 August 2017, No 3736/3/15, FI:KHO:2017:T3872; High Court

the names and addresses of residents by members of Jehovah's witnesses in Finland, and subsequently the dissemination of that date with other members on the

Spain, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Slovakia, Denmark, Poland, Sweden, Finland, Belgium, the Czech Republic and Hungary as well as the United Kingdom.

that one cookie and several tracks to servers (sic) located in Germany, Finland and USA were present on the webpage at issue. As [the complainants] referenced

guarantees the proper functioning justice (social foundation). In Z. v. Finland, the Eur. D.H. addresses, for the first time, at least 12 directly, the

sedeagpd.gob.es 3/29 Germany, Austria, Czechia, Denmark, Spain, France, Finland, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Sweden

without the consent of the person concerned (see, mutatis mutandis, Z v. Finland, cited above, section 96).” (59) The Convention States’ margin of appreciation

examined by the ECtHR { Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy andSatamedia Oy v Finland [Grand Chamber], 931/13. s. case, 27 June 2017}, whichrecalled in its decision

Judgment of 27 June 2017 in Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. Finland , pp . 931/13 , para. .137 ) . When the ECtHR recognizes that personal data

the competent data protection authorities of Belgium, the Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, France, United Kingdom"

supervisory authorities concerned were the authorities of Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Norway and Germany. Share blogs or news articles here! The decision below

ECtHR of 27 June 2017, Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. Finland, CE:ECHR:2017:0627JUD000093113, paragraph 165). In such a way that for a

The European Court of Human Rights is in the same direction in case I. v. Finland 13 examining an action on the basis of whether o processor managed to "guarantee"

services. It has its headquarters in Norway and is also active in Denmark, Finland and Sweden. The company has over 270 clubs, about 9,000 employees and more

respective country-specific domain endings (e.g. Greece, Sweden, Spain, Finland, Denmark and Austria) within the European Union. Via wikipedia.eu you will

the requirements of this Article’ . • The Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Finnish supervisory authority - hereinafter the ‘FI SA’) shared its views on 15

64 ; see also ruling “Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. Finland”, “application no. 931/13”, 27 June 2017, paras. 129-131) The considerations

Sweden, Slovenia, Norway, Hungary, Poland, Portugal, Denmark, France, Finland, Greece, Spain, Luxemburg, Czech Republic, Austria, Croatia, Cyprus, and

publication of alphabetical lists in regional newspapers of data obtained from Finnish tax authorities. These comprised of the names of data subjects and their

22009/93, ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0225JUD002200993, NJ 1999/516 m.nt. G. Knigge (Z/Finland), point 95, ECtHR 10 October 2006, 7508/02, ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1010JUD000750802

authorities), the Netherlands, Austria, Spain, the United Kingdom, France, Finland and Poland, in circumstances where those authorities were acting as concerned