Search results
From GDPRhub
- blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. We7 KB (810 words) - 14:22, 15 May 2024
- blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. Title:43 KB (7,102 words) - 16:14, 23 March 2022
- informed decision to voluntarily share their phone number on the site. The court rejected the request for damages under Article 82 GDPR. The court held that37 KB (5,986 words) - 14:50, 9 May 2023
- LAG Berlin-Brandenburg - 10 Sa 2130/19 (category German) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. Biometric50 KB (8,194 words) - 12:05, 3 March 2022
- ArbG Kaiserslautern - 4 Ca 488/21 (category German) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. 1.29 KB (4,573 words) - 07:59, 14 September 2022
- BVwG - W256 2235360-1 (part 2) (category German) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. Court Federal Administrative14 KB (1,771 words) - 12:01, 10 September 2021
- VG Ansbach - AN 14 K 20.00083 (category German) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. tenor36 KB (5,858 words) - 13:51, 16 May 2022
- but they are not binding for the court (Federal Court of Justice, decision of 08.10.2012 - X ZR 110/11). The court can proceed to determine the relevant66 KB (11,183 words) - 09:28, 12 July 2023
- The Higher Regional Court of Celle overturned the decision of a lower court, holding that the motivation of a data subject's Article 15 GDPR access request62 KB (10,852 words) - 14:08, 7 January 2023
- Federal Administrative Court of Germany issued a request for a preliminary ruling in the context of a dispute between an ISP and the German government regarding6 KB (735 words) - 09:34, 11 October 2021
- VGH München - BeckRS 2021, 36742 (category German) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. 33 KB (5,353 words) - 12:40, 26 January 2022
- articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. decision date 06/28/202217 KB (2,442 words) - 14:33, 19 August 2022
- proportionality Lower court: VG Regensburg, court decision of 06.08.2020 - RN 9 K 19.1061 Source: BeckRS 2023, 12517 tenor I. The court decision of the Bavarian61 KB (10,218 words) - 12:31, 13 June 2023
- articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. decision date 12/17/202114 KB (2,100 words) - 16:37, 7 March 2022
- 23(1)(e)&(j) GDPR and Paragraph 32 German Tax Code. D.-H.T successfully challenged this refusal at the German Administrative Court. The data controller lodged5 KB (573 words) - 11:16, 4 October 2023
- VG Schwerin - 1 A 1343/19 SN (category German) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)against this decision. The court ruled that the data subject had a claim against the plaintiff under Article 15(3) GDPR. The Administrative Court of Schwerin61 KB (10,071 words) - 14:28, 14 July 2021
- appealed this decision to the Supreme Administrative Court. The Supreme Administrative Court ruled that the Federal Administrative Court decided correctly22 KB (3,209 words) - 08:55, 10 January 2024
- Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 9860461 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)the ordinary judicial authority, with an appeal lodged with the ordinary court of the place where the data controller has his residence, within the term16 KB (2,409 words) - 15:44, 6 December 2023
- part of the decision. If the appeal has been received in time, send The Integrity Protection Authority forwards it to the Administrative Court in Stockholm17 KB (1,940 words) - 15:23, 6 December 2023
- articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. decision date 02/27/202328 KB (4,409 words) - 09:54, 25 April 2023
- blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. Title:26 KB (4,101 words) - 10:24, 13 March 2024
- blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. NOTICE24 KB (3,831 words) - 16:21, 23 March 2022
- Innsbruck Higher Regional Court as court of appeal of 22 August 2019, GZ 2 R 96/19p-36, thus reversing the judgment of the Regional Court Feldkirch of 9 April24 KB (3,888 words) - 13:22, 8 September 2021
- Reporting on the decision by Datenanfragen.de (German) The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original13 KB (1,811 words) - 09:06, 12 November 2021
- appealed this decision before the Austrian Federal Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht – BVwG) for violation of Article 77 GDPR. The court clarified21 KB (3,361 words) - 09:58, 13 July 2023
- articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. decision date 01/26/202323 KB (3,639 words) - 08:38, 10 March 2023
- blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. Page11 KB (1,495 words) - 15:09, 25 October 2023
- FG Berlin-Brandenburg - 16 K 2059/21 (category German) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)and referred to the Administrative Court C.... The court did not allow an appeal against the referral order. The court had before it the defendant's administrative117 KB (19,778 words) - 14:27, 13 April 2022
- articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. decision date 04/11/202225 KB (3,742 words) - 07:49, 9 June 2022
- the Higher Regional Court Vienna as appellate court of 4 April 2019, GZ 133 R 31/19k-17, confirming the order of the Commercial Court Vienna of 13 February27 KB (4,141 words) - 14:14, 2 May 2023
- Administrative Court considered: Roman II. The Federal Administrative Court considered: 1. Findings 1.1. The Federal Administrative Court bases its decision on the27 KB (4,362 words) - 14:08, 5 July 2023
- articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. court Federal Administrative27 KB (4,375 words) - 12:17, 21 January 2022
- DSB (Austria) - 2021-0.187.619 (category German) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)The complainant is a court-certified expert and can be found as such in the publicly accessible database of court experts and court interpreters of the25 KB (3,905 words) - 14:45, 11 May 2022
- judgment Schrems II, the European Court of Justice did not reject standard contract clauses which transfer tool. However, the court found that they are not binding131 KB (14,752 words) - 08:36, 5 July 2023
- articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. decision date 15.12.202131 KB (4,965 words) - 15:00, 2 March 2022
- translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. Decision date 01/11/2024 standard B-VG Art 133 Paragraph 4 GDPR Art27 KB (4,315 words) - 09:28, 23 February 2024
- below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. decision date 02/27/2023 standard B-VG Art13331 KB (4,916 words) - 14:35, 25 April 2023
- DSB (Austria) - 2022-0.560.569 (category German) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. NOTICE7 KB (900 words) - 16:20, 15 November 2022
- competent Court, as reasons why the decision should be annulled. 2.20.3 It reserves its rights to appeal the prima facie decision to the competent Court due74 KB (12,375 words) - 10:07, 4 October 2023
- machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. Reasons for the decision: I. Process: 1. In her complaint29 KB (4,759 words) - 15:06, 20 October 2023
- BlnBDI (Berlin) - 631.457.4 521.14765.10 (category Germany) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)(QES) - or with the clerk of the court within one month of notification of this decision at the Berlin Administrative Court, Kirchstraße 7, 10557 Berlin.13 KB (1,865 words) - 08:45, 16 February 2023
- The controller appealed the decision. The Austrian Federal Administrative Court managed the case. The Court upheld the decision of the DPA to deny the controller's32 KB (4,943 words) - 06:09, 23 August 2022
- blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. W21127 KB (4,186 words) - 13:22, 15 September 2021
- DSB (Austria) - 2021-0.285.169 (category German) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. Decisive31 KB (4,887 words) - 14:21, 21 July 2021
- articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. Court Federal Administrative38 KB (5,801 words) - 10:08, 10 September 2021
- cases to come to similar decisions in the EEA. Further decisions are expected soon. For details see here and here. Some decisions have already been published44 KB (6,642 words) - 10:34, 13 December 2023
- articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. decision date 06/12/202337 KB (5,924 words) - 08:42, 2 August 2023
- filing a complaint with the Provincial Administrative Court, or from the date of the administrative court ruling becoming final and binding, to the bank account58 KB (9,357 words) - 10:02, 17 November 2023
- VG Gelsenkirchen - 20 K 6392/18 (category German) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the original. Please refer to the German original for more details. According98 KB (16,595 words) - 15:50, 17 March 2022
- blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. W21139 KB (6,244 words) - 11:47, 19 January 2021
- machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. The subject-matter of the complaint in the main proceedings3 KB (394 words) - 15:07, 20 August 2020
- blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. IN39 KB (6,439 words) - 10:08, 10 September 2021
- BlnBDI (Berlin) - 521.14877.15 (category German) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. Berlin46 KB (6,937 words) - 15:56, 26 September 2023
- blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. Saying43 KB (7,062 words) - 19:38, 18 January 2021
- BlnBDI (Berlin) - 521.14730 / 631.410 (category Germany) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)closed.” Appeal Notice Against this decision a lawsuit before the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin (administrative court of Berlin), Kirchstraße 7, 10557 Berlin14 KB (1,856 words) - 16:48, 19 October 2022
- here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. REASONS FOR DECISION: With51 KB (8,406 words) - 16:39, 14 December 2022
- DSB (Austria) - 2021-0.518.795 (category German) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. Decisive29 KB (4,581 words) - 10:13, 10 March 2022
- Administrative Court has through the presiding Senate President Dr. Kleiser, Councilor Dr. Mayr, court councilor Mag. Hainz-Sator and the court councilors74 KB (10,458 words) - 14:49, 27 March 2024
- ?ref=rec The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. court Federal Administrative51 KB (8,327 words) - 14:04, 14 December 2023
- articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. court Federal Administrative43 KB (7,315 words) - 08:29, 29 September 2021
- the Federal Administrative Court. II. The Federal Administrative Court considered: Roman II. The Federal Administrative Court considered: 1. Findings: The52 KB (8,464 words) - 11:50, 26 July 2023
- (Federal Union of German Consumer Organizations, Germany) succesfully brought a representative action under Article 80(2) GDPR at the Regional Court, Berlin seeking4 KB (376 words) - 09:23, 23 February 2024
- translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. IN THE NAME OF THE REPUBLIC! The Federal Administrative Court, by Judge51 KB (8,570 words) - 13:17, 28 July 2021
- Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden (Administrative Court of Wiesbaden, Germany) challenging this decision. While considering that German law did not grant the right to access9 KB (1,276 words) - 12:35, 15 June 2023
- DSB (Austria) - 2021-0.410.237 (category German) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. GZ:18 KB (2,660 words) - 16:05, 20 April 2022
- LfD (Lower Saxony) - 4.2 05475-02-0301/21 (category German) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. - 335 KB (5,593 words) - 08:56, 9 January 2024
- DSB (Austria) - DSB-D130.217 (category German) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. text77 KB (12,447 words) - 08:22, 4 April 2024
- DSB (Austria) - 2021-0.568.642 (category German) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. Decisive33 KB (5,128 words) - 09:43, 2 December 2021
- DSB (Austria) - 2023-0.137.735 (category German) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. text10 KB (1,463 words) - 15:29, 7 August 2023
- DSB (Austria) - 2020-0.829.566 (category German) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. text41 KB (6,603 words) - 07:12, 1 August 2023
- articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. decision date 12/21/202263 KB (10,263 words) - 09:09, 16 February 2023
- service. The Estonian DPA consulted the German DPA, with regard to storage periods. The German DPA considered several German provisions, but determined that none42 KB (5,644 words) - 14:35, 30 November 2022
- BVwG - W256 2234976-1 and W256 2234976-2 (category German) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. Postal65 KB (10,586 words) - 15:06, 18 January 2024
- DSB (Austria) - 2023-0.227.168 (category German) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. text39 KB (6,150 words) - 14:23, 29 August 2023
- DSB (Austria) - 2023-0.420.407 (category German) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. text35 KB (5,572 words) - 14:56, 27 March 2024
- requests a substantive decision by the Administrative Court with regard to point A)II. Since a decision of the Administrative Court based on Section 42 para92 KB (15,328 words) - 09:18, 14 May 2024
- Supreme Court - C.20.0323.N (category Supreme Court (Belgium)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)contested the legality of such a decision before the Supreme Court of Belgium. The Supreme Court annulled the decision of the Court of Appeal of Brussels because43 KB (6,749 words) - 07:07, 28 October 2021
- upheld. The court outlined when a fine could be considered criminal in nature in relation to unfair commercial practices. While the court does not directly5 KB (547 words) - 11:21, 4 October 2023
- the German authorities, citing a legal obligation under Article 6(1)(e) GDPR. As a result, the data subject has paid the fine imposed by the German authorities36 KB (5,922 words) - 08:02, 18 April 2024
- release (para 76). The General Court therefore, disregarded the actual identification of the complainant by the German journalist. It argued that this5 KB (642 words) - 14:40, 9 January 2024
- appeal must be brought before the administrative court and must be lodged through a lawyer at the Court of one of the Bar Associations. of lawyers.69 KB (11,315 words) - 13:30, 19 January 2022
- Telekom challenged this decision before the Verwaltungsgericht Köln (Administrative Court, Cologne). On 14 February 2008, the Court dismissed the action.6 KB (614 words) - 17:17, 24 October 2023
- clarified which German DPA transferred the decision to the Swedish DPA. Looking at the code used in the registration number for this decision (LDA-1085.1-1399/20-F)20 KB (2,207 words) - 13:45, 9 January 2023
- DSB (Austria) - DPA 2021-0.415.529 (category German) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. Text28 KB (4,424 words) - 09:15, 29 May 2024
- DSB (Austria) - 2021-0.119.956 (category German) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. text50 KB (8,021 words) - 15:40, 18 January 2024
- DSB (Austria) - 2021-0.432.224 (category German) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. GZ:33 KB (5,026 words) - 12:07, 2 March 2022
- DSB (Austria) - DSB-D213.1759 (category German) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. Text72 KB (11,993 words) - 14:21, 10 April 2024
- DSB (Austria) - DSB-D130.1174 (category German) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. Text86 KB (14,497 words) - 13:42, 3 April 2024
- complaint at a German DPA (not specified which German DPA). On another unspecified date, this German DPA then transferred the decision to the Swedish DPA54 KB (6,188 words) - 14:20, 1 March 2023
- line with that viewpoint, in a decision of 30 March 2012 (BR ‑ Drucksache (Bundesrat document) 52/12 [decision]), the German Bundesrat (Upper Chamber of the5 KB (720 words) - 09:07, 30 January 2024
- the claim. FOURTH: On December 30, 2019, without receiving a letter from German tions of the aforementioned Ministry, the Spanish Agency for Data Protection25 KB (3,876 words) - 13:48, 13 December 2023
- Personvernnemnda (Norway) - 2021-17 (20/02389) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)access to court decisions is something other than the question of deleting search results from a search engine. The public's right of access to a court decision45 KB (7,396 words) - 18:49, 5 March 2022
- continuously note which ones points in the final decision that deviate from the notification of decision. 1. Decision on infringement fines Based on the information49 KB (7,646 words) - 07:56, 7 March 2022
- High Court judge. (3) If a claimant starts such a claim in the High Court and the court decides that it should have been started in the County Court, the61 KB (8,986 words) - 08:40, 22 February 2022
- Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 9825667 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)with the ordinary court of the place where the owner of the processing of personal data has his residence, or, alternatively, with the court of the place of131 KB (21,176 words) - 12:52, 20 December 2022
- where such storage was not necessary. DW appealed this decision to Berlin's Regional Court. The court stated that the imposition of a fine on a legal person10 KB (1,543 words) - 13:53, 8 December 2023
- articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. Decision date June 23137 KB (21,991 words) - 12:01, 20 September 2023
- DSB (Austria) - 2022-0.585.764 (category German) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. text77 KB (13,004 words) - 14:44, 9 May 2023
- 1 See, for example, decisions 03/2020,41/2020, and 139/2021 of the Disputes Chamber, available on the website of the GBA, Decision on the merits 104/202239 KB (5,774 words) - 15:31, 29 June 2022
- expression and information shall be applicable. The Court had to go through this balancing exercise. The Court noted that, although it follows from the case37 KB (6,086 words) - 16:12, 10 March 2022
- (Higher Regional Court Cologne). This appeal was also dismissed. TU and RE appealed this second decision with the Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Court) which referred4 KB (471 words) - 15:27, 12 May 2023
- individuals, the Court considered that the level of protection in this context could not be regarded as manifestly inadequate. The Court therefore considered26 KB (3,744 words) - 16:36, 10 August 2021
- blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. Page18 KB (2,823 words) - 13:18, 9 December 2021
- received a request for information from the supervisory authority competent German (Bayerisches Landesamtfúr Datenschutzaufsicht— BayLDA -), in which you were40 KB (6,381 words) - 10:12, 7 December 2021
- UKSC (UK) - Bloomberg LP (Appellant) v ZXC (Respondent) (2022) UKSC 5 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)process of the court has been engaged”. 99. In R (Rai) v Crown Court at Winchester [2021] EWHC 339 (Admin); [2021] ACD 70 the Divisional Court (Stuart-Smith137 KB (20,826 words) - 14:03, 23 February 2022
- equivalent to degree of guilt according to the Judgment of the National Court of 11/12/07 relapse to Appeal no. 351/2006, corresponding to the entity denounced45 KB (6,853 words) - 14:29, 13 December 2023
- See Holding for questions referred. Facts pending decision. Question referred: Does the obligation to take fingerprints and store them in identity cards2 KB (126 words) - 09:15, 5 January 2024
- See Holding for questions referred. Facts pending full decision. The District Court of Hagen referred the following questions to the CJEU for a preliminary4 KB (402 words) - 12:21, 21 January 2022
- July 2019. On the same day, the data subject submitted a complaint to the German data protection authority, which relayed it to the AEPD, the Spanish data46 KB (7,141 words) - 13:00, 18 January 2024
- See Holding for questions referred. Facts pending decision. Questions referred: 1. In the light of recital 85 and the third sentence of recital 146 of2 KB (216 words) - 09:59, 27 April 2022
- higher-ranking law (see order of the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden (Administrative Court, Wiesbaden) of 13 May 2020, reference 6 K 805/19.WI) and is therefore applicable:5 KB (691 words) - 09:21, 6 December 2021
- addition to the German data protection authority data from Bavaria, the authorities of the Netherlands, Portugal and the authorities Germans from North Rhine-Westphalia240 KB (38,122 words) - 13:54, 28 February 2024
- Basic Law ) in decision No. 7 of 1996, which precedes the adoption of the LPPD and the case-law of the court, the Constitutional Court outlines the scope91 KB (14,896 words) - 17:02, 7 March 2022
- the case law of the Court ofJustice of the European Union (hereinafter referred to as the "Court of Justice") and the European Court ofhuman rights ".4381 KB (13,211 words) - 16:59, 12 December 2023
- that person. In the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Valsts ieņēmumu dienests, the Court held that the information requested by42 KB (4,784 words) - 08:22, 20 October 2022
- user's webcam, microphone, internet traffic and inputs. The court had to give a preliminary decision on whether the processing is legal. Defendant has a public39 KB (5,852 words) - 10:21, 10 September 2021
- Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 9885177 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Netherlands; HAVING REGARD TO the draft decision ("Draft Decision"), as well as the revised draft decision ("Revised Draft Decision") transmitted by the Dutch authority25 KB (3,824 words) - 07:04, 31 May 2023
- ("policy") through a hyperlink attached as Annex I Cookies Policy in Spanish and German. The following is a screenshot of the "Cookies Settings" screen that you44 KB (7,020 words) - 15:53, 14 March 2023
- reasons for decisions taken following an infringement. In particular, where an infringement has not been reported, the justification for that decision should55 KB (8,810 words) - 16:55, 12 December 2023
- Inspectorate or -appeal to the administrative court in accordance with the Code of Administrative Court Procedures (in the case of the case in question42 KB (6,456 words) - 11:36, 22 March 2023
- See Holding for questions referred. Facts pending decision. Questions referred: 1. In the light of its objective and the need for clarity and proportionality7 KB (1,037 words) - 09:20, 6 December 2021
- damage from that person before the courts, is a legitimate interest is". 81. On the basis of the case law of the Court of Justice and the guidelines of the84 KB (14,035 words) - 16:56, 12 December 2023
- request for a judicial review of the decision at the City Court of Prague. The City Court of Prague set aside the decision and remitted the matter back to the14 KB (2,229 words) - 14:36, 30 March 2022
- dispute in front of the court was whether the decision to reject the investigation for the three issues was sufficiently grounded. The court assessed each of19 KB (2,970 words) - 16:16, 10 March 2022
- in a clear manner and separately from other information. 4 Cfr. Judgment Court of Appeal Brussels (Marktenhof), 2 September 2020, no. 2020/5460, 18., Judgment31 KB (4,547 words) - 15:54, 3 May 2022
- Procedure Act or - an appeal to the administrative court in accordance with the Code of Administrative Court Procedures (in the case of a case in point to review18 KB (2,603 words) - 08:56, 21 May 2024
- there are parties involved, by letter recommended to the court clerk or filed with the court office. 13Cf. Title 4 – What can I do if my complaint is dismissed25 KB (3,628 words) - 16:09, 9 November 2022
- basis. Given that it’s a family matter, the Court did not order the Defendants to pay a penalty. The Court ordered the Defendants to refrain from sharing26 KB (3,882 words) - 08:30, 27 May 2021
- the decision. If the appeal has been received at the right time, the Authority for Privacy Protection will forward it to the Administrative Court in Stockholm18 KB (2,020 words) - 12:13, 12 October 2022
- LCA, an appeal against this decision may be lodged, within thirty days of its notification, to the Court of Markets (court d'appel de Bruxelles), with31 KB (4,549 words) - 11:50, 10 August 2023
- the decision. If the appeal has been received at the right time, the Authority for Privacy Protection will forward it to the Administrative Court in Stockholm57 KB (6,743 words) - 13:54, 1 February 2023
- Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 9899914 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)be lodged against this provision, with an appeal lodged with the ordinary court of the place identified in the same art. 10, within the term of thirty days52 KB (8,442 words) - 10:31, 27 June 2023
- Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Finland) - 9970/163/2019 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Administrative Court requested a preliminary ruling from the Court of Justice in 2007. In its judgment CJ 2009: 82 on the basis of the Court's preliminary104 KB (16,725 words) - 10:38, 29 February 2024
- not even aware of a decision in the current case. Additionally, in the case at hand the data subject who lodged a complaint in German with the Austrian DPA31 KB (4,748 words) - 15:41, 27 March 2024
- defendant. 1 Judgment of the Brussels Court of Appeal (Chamber 19 A, Marktenhof) of 19 February 2020, 2019 / AR / 1600. Decision on the merits 04/2021 - 15/46113 KB (18,732 words) - 16:50, 12 December 2023
- As this decision has been adopted pursuant to Article 56 and Chapter VII GDPR, the present decision may be appealed before Oslo District Court (“Oslo tingrett”)69 KB (10,520 words) - 07:55, 10 August 2023
- process is concluded and the final decision issued. 91. The CNPD's duty to act is supported by the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union49 KB (7,923 words) - 14:36, 3 April 2024
- Amsterdam District Court (Rechtbank Amsterdam). In their submissions to the Court, the data subject made three requests: (i) that the Court order Criteo to47 KB (7,636 words) - 13:42, 6 November 2023
- Circuit Court - 2019/04546 (category Circuit Court (Ireland)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)them. Based on the above, the Court awarded a compensation of €2,000 for non-material damages. Simillarly, a German court recently held that “mere annoyance”60 KB (9,004 words) - 09:39, 15 February 2024
- the way that Article 23 GDPR does. Share blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the Danish original. Please refer to31 KB (4,887 words) - 13:45, 14 July 2022
- Datatilsynet (Norway) - 20/02875-10 & 20/02875-11 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Supreme Court. However, it has been up in the Court of Appeal and the District Court in cases related to imposition of additional tax. Gulating Court of Appeal56 KB (8,530 words) - 08:07, 8 June 2022
- the EU Court of Justice application of Articles 101 and 102 of the TFEU (see recital 150 i data protection regulation). It appears from the court's practice103 KB (15,684 words) - 07:17, 12 July 2023
- establishment has the power to have such decisions implemented, in which case the establishment having taken such decisions is to be considered to be the main162 KB (24,007 words) - 19:41, 15 February 2023
- judgments, one issued by the Supreme Court- STS 91/2017, of February 15 - and another by the Constitutional Court - STC 27/2020, of February 24-, in which54 KB (8,747 words) - 08:36, 30 August 2023
- National High Court in this Judgment stating that the The same was issued by the Social Chamber, which is not competent to review the decisions of this Agency208 KB (33,882 words) - 14:25, 24 November 2022
- by the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court. In this regard, it is worth mentioning the Judgment of the Supreme Court no. 188/2022 (Contentious Chamber, Section62 KB (9,829 words) - 14:09, 14 March 2023
- Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 9988614 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)parties. The data processed for research purposes cannot be used to take decisions or measures relating to the interested party, nor for data processing for115 KB (18,087 words) - 14:11, 17 April 2024
- order of the Constitutional Court 3/1993, of January 14, and 72/1993, of March 1; as well as the judgment of the Court Supreme Court, Third Chamber, of May107 KB (17,195 words) - 09:00, 27 January 2023
- the day you received the decision. If the appeal has been received In due course, IMY forwards it to the Administrative Court in Stockholm for consideration65 KB (7,759 words) - 10:10, 30 April 2024
- period of thirty days from the notice against this decision, an appeal may be lodged with the Marktenhof (court of profession Brussels), with the Data Protection89 KB (13,017 words) - 15:07, 2 November 2022
- the decision was announced. If the appeal has been received in time, send The Integrity Protection Authority forwards it to the Administrative Court in85 KB (9,808 words) - 12:01, 15 September 2021
- recalls that in its Planet49 judgment of 1 October 2019 (case C-673/19), the Court of Justice of the European Union indicated that a consent collected by means59 KB (8,323 words) - 11:51, 31 August 2022
- the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union (hereinafter: Court of Justice) and the ECHR. The European Court of the Rights of de Mens105 KB (15,883 words) - 15:05, 8 March 2023
- State. Therefore, the court's decisions in the operative part do not concern any claim of the FNV. 6.18. In so far as the court refers to NJCM et al. below128 KB (21,722 words) - 16:14, 10 March 2022
- Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 9870014 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)with the ordinary court of the place where the owner of the processing of personal data has his residence, or, alternatively, with the court of the place of169 KB (27,985 words) - 14:51, 25 April 2023
- SAs in Germany. 5 Draft Decision, paragraphs 1.1-1.2. 6 Draft Decision, paragraph 1.9. 7 Draft Decision, paragraphs 2.7 and 4.7. 8 Draft Decision, paragraph183 KB (30,819 words) - 09:50, 20 January 2023
- submitting. COURT ORDERS Google shares with Lumen copies of court takedown orders it receives, both from U.S. domestic and foreign courts. As described390 KB (63,154 words) - 07:08, 9 June 2022
- was stated in the Judgment of the Court Supreme Court of February 18, 2021, previously partially transcribed. The Court declares Supreme in its fourth foundation373 KB (61,959 words) - 14:17, 9 March 2022