Search results
From GDPRhub
- December 1990 (BGBl. 1990) Decided: 19.10.2016 Parties: Patrick Breyer Case Number/Name: C-582/14 Patrick Breyer European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2016:7799 KB (1,113 words) - 13:10, 1 June 2023
- Language(s): Dutch Original Source: Rechtspraak.nl (in Dutch) Initial Contributor: Patrick Schreurs12 KB (1,818 words) - 11:25, 9 December 2020
- Language(s): Dutch Original Source: de Rechtspraak (in Dutch) Initial Contributor: Patrick Schreurs30 KB (4,849 words) - 13:41, 13 November 2020
- Language(s): Dutch Original Source: Rechtspraak.nl (in Dutch) Initial Contributor: Patrick Schreurs36 KB (5,873 words) - 11:21, 17 August 2022
- ECLI:EU:C:2017:994, para. 35. 55 CJEU Judgment C-582/14 of 19 October 2016, Patrick Breyer v. Bundesrepublik Deutschland, ECLI:EU:C:2016:779, para. 43; CJEU171 KB (24,826 words) - 15:55, 18 June 2022
- to Fifth Defendants rely on the witness statement of their solicitor, Mr Patrick Doris, dated 30th November 2020. I will be referring to the deponents without108 KB (18,178 words) - 11:57, 29 November 2021
- inganaturalperson. See also CJEU Judgment C-582/14 of 19 October 2016, Patrick Breyer t. Bundesrepublik Deutschland, ECLI:EU:C:2016:779, para. 46, and429 KB (58,279 words) - 09:12, 2 November 2022
- Rechtshaffen. The defendants relied on a witness statement of their solicitor, Patrick Doris. Paragraph 1 of the Particulars of Claim said this: 122 KB (20,830 words) - 10:42, 12 January 2022
- concept of personal data, in the STJUE of 10/19/2016, in case C- 582/14, Patrick Breyer and Bundesrepublik Deutschland, when asserting that IP is data of313 KB (53,033 words) - 10:20, 7 June 2023