Search results

reposicion" to ask the AEPD to reconsider its decision or 2) an appeal directly with the Superior Administrative Court. Recurso: You have one month to file. The

to ensure the complete independence of their SAs. In Commission v Germany the Court specified that the notion of “complete independence” must be given

appeal against these decisions are possible at the federal administrative court. (→ Judiciary of Germany in WIkipedia, Law of Germany § Public law in Wikipedia

by the Court in Commission v Germany, which interpreted the phrase “complete independence” in the context of Directive 95/46/EC. Here, the Court emphasised

fine is brought to the police who present the case in court. As such, appeals will go through the court system. Datatilsynet post the focus of their planned

own motion. Appeals against decisions by the Italian Garante can be taken by the parties concerned before the civil court (Article 152 of the Code, which

section! The Court of Appeal of Brussels is competent for the appeals against the decision of the litigation chamber. All other decisions can be appealed

legislation. Mrs Lindqvist appealed that decision, and in the context of these proceedings, the national court referred several questions to the CJEU. One

highest administrative court (Conseil d'État). This applies to sanctions, guidelines or any decision of the authority. Decisions by the Conseil d'État are

change parts of or their whole decision. The DPA will then send the recipient the final decision, who may now appeal the decision if they still object to the

data protection impact assessment where employees are subject to automated decision-making, surveillance and monitoring activities. More targeted rules are

seems to be no formal decision that can be appealed. Any party can file an appeal against any DSB decision (or in the case of non-decision within 6 months)

who prepared the opinion. Decisions in inspection procedures include information on the staff member, who issued the decision on the Information Commissioner’s

legally binding decision may appeal against the decision with in 28 days. Further appeals on a point of law to the Hight Court or Appeals Court are possible

the NAIH decision shall be submitted to the authority itself within thirty days of its communication. Only attorney at law can act at the court on behalf

will have to go before a court to claim compensation. Typically, this claim will first take place before the Small Claims Court. The EWCA in Open Rights

Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG]) is possible. The Federal Constitutional Court ruled in 1986 (As-long-as-2-decision) As long as the

Any third party that is affected by the Court decision and did not intervene in the proceedings nor was the decision lawfully notified to him prior to the

set out in paragraph 2. 6. Court proceedings for exercising the right to receive compensation shall be brought before the courts competent under the law of

submission to the Director of the DVI. Furthermore, the decision issued by Director may be appealed to a court in accordance with the Law on Administrative Liability