Search results

are incompatible with Art 2 (1) in conjunction with Art 1 (1) and Art 10 (1) of the German constitution (Basic Law – Grundgesetz – GG) for lack of consideration

the Basic Law (GG), from Article 103(2) GG, from the general freedom of action in Article 2(1) GG and from human dignity in Article 1(1) GG. Without a link

general right of personality, Article 2 Paragraph 1 GG in conjunction with Article 1 Paragraph 1 GG, or from Section 823 Paragraph 2 BGB in connection

2020, 11 LA 104/19, ECLI:DE:OVGNI:2020:0722.11LA104.19.00 Article 1 (1) GG, Article 2 (1) GG, § 7aF DSG ND, § 43 VwGO Proceedings VG Osnabrück, 30 January

DSGVO Art. 4 No. 1, No. 2, Art. 6 para. 1 sentence 1 lit. c, para. 3 sentence 1, Art. 86 GKG § 47 (1), § 52 (2), § 53 (2) no. 2, § 63 (3) sentence 1 no.

August 2019 (Annex K 1), which did not merely contain a non-binding assessment of the defendant. Finally, the applications No. 1 a dd to gg were inadmissible

the parties to the 08.1.2020 plenary sitting and subsequently a deadline for the submission of statements. At the hearing held in 08.1.2020, the Director

Art. 13 Para. 4, Art. 14 Para. 5 a, Art. 15, Art. 23 para. 1 e and i FGO § 32a Paragraph 1 No. 1, Paragraph 2, § 32c Paragraph 1 No. 1§ 33, § 90 a, § 115

customers from Art. 2 Para. 1 in conjunction with Art. 1 Para. 1 GG.42 III. The decision on costs is a mixed cost decision (Section 155 (1) Sentence 1 VwGO) on

third-party action (1.). On the complainant's side, his general right of personality (Article 2.1 in conjunction with Article 1.1 of the Basic Law) in

connection with Art. 2 para. 1, Art. 1 para. 1 GG, Art. 17 para. 1 lit. d) DSGVO, because her personal data is stored according to Art. 6 para. 1 lit. f. DSGVO

constitutional complaint is therefore obviously well-founded, § 93c.1 sentence 1 BVerfGG. 1. The Local Court violated the complainant's right to the lawful

protection of private life and his data (Art. 2 para. 1, Art. 1 para. 1 of the Basic Law, Art. 8 para. 1 ECHR, Art. 7 f. GrCh) and the right of the defendants

in conjunction with Article 34 of the German Constitution (GG). Art. 34 GG. The claim under Art. 82 GDPR is advantageous for the data subject because of

over whether he implements them. 13th 9 10gl. on § 9 BDSG and Art. 2 Paragraph 1 in conjunction with 1 Paragraph 1 GG: Lotz / Wendler, CR 2016, 31, 34. Martini

§1004 para. 1 sentence 1 BGB analogous i. V. m. § 823 para. 1 BGB i. V. m. the general right of personality from Art. 2 Para. 1, Art. Para. 1 GG. 51a) With

according to: Ad. I.:Ad. Roman one: Art. 5 Para. 1 lit. a and c as well as Art. 6 Para. 1 in conjunction with Art. 83 Para. 1 and 5 lit. Paragraph one, letter

2 GDPR Art EWG_GDPR Article 6 GDPR Art EWG_DSGVO Article 88 GG Art GG Article 1 GG Art GG Article 2 Paragraph GG Article 2 Paragraph 1 GG Art GG Article

(application 1 a) from § 1004 para. 1 sentence 2, § 823 para. 1 BGB, Art. 1 para 1, Article 2 Paragraph 1 GG and § 12 sentence 2 BGB negative. 74 1. The Court

self-determination from Art. 2 Para. 1 in conjunction with 1 sec. 1 GG; however, this interference is constitutionally justified. (1) The publication of the