Search results

transmission may be restricted by trade secrets, business secrets, or copyrights, such as those pertaining to software, if there is a specific risk of

software that is protected by copyright. However, if information is already protected against use by others under copyright law, it seems that additional

The processing of data subjects' pictures is 'unlawful' under applicable copyright law, but not under the GDPR. However, there are also views that the violation

including trade secrets or intellectual property and in particular the copyright protecting the software. However, the result of those considerations should

reference to the provision of Article 15(4) GDPR as well as business secrets, copyrights and professional secrets (according to the Act on the Profession of Chartered

including trade secrets or intellectual property and in particular the copyright protecting the software. However, the result of those considerations should

rightholders. By making the e-books accessible via the open directory, copyrights are infringed. 2.4. On September 20, 2021, BREIN informed Ziggo by e-mail

the data subject being denied information. In the opinion of the court, copyrights were not opposed in the present case for two reasons: Firstly, the court

certain works would result from certain copyrights (??) (see supra - it concerns not initially about the copyrights or rights of Y2 as publisher/publisher

many other measures, one of the ways in which Brein tries to maintain the copyrights of its affiliated (legal) persons. Despite the measures taken by Brein

expert), (ii) the report was confidential, (iii) the report was protected by copyright and (iv) the report contained personal data of others. In reaction to this

data are to be disclosed." The client's intellectual property rights, copyrights or company or trade secrets are not seen as affected; possibly this applies

Instance, stating that a copyright watchdog could not force an Internet Service Provider to forward warning letters to alleged copyright infringers, because

best placed to bring measures to stop these copyright infringements. First, it sought a declaration that copyright infringements had occurred through the use

to communicate personal data in order to ensure effective protection of copyright in civil proceedings, nor does it oblige them to impose such an obligation

injunction proceedings under Article 87(1) of the Law of 30 June 1994 on copyright and related rights. It requested that Netlog be ordered immediately to

article, who uploaded a work onto the platform without the consent of the copyright holder. Directive 2004/48 does not define the meaning and scope of the

in order to identify a particular subscriber, to be ordered to give a copyright holder or its representative information on the subscriber to whom the

reproduction of copyright-protected works (step 1 of the Decision); 2) with the purpose of tracing BitTorrent users suspected of copyright infringement after

knowledge, relevant? (2) (a) Can a person who is the contractual holder of the copyright (or related rights), but does not himself exploit those rights and merely