Search results

trends and can be found on dsb.gv.at. DSB - Annual Report 2022, Page 8 - https://www.dsb.gv.at/dam/jcr:ee7b155a-0a1f-4d00-98e9-902314c7022d/Datenschutzbericht%202022

428451, 25 November 2020, (available here). Datenschutzbehörde, DSB-D124.1177/0006-DSB/2019, 22 January 2021 (available here). Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten

specifying the facts and legal considerations for, e.g., rejecting the complaint or dismissing the complaint, i.e., not investigating it further, with a view

Article 14(1)(d) GDPR. Similar to the ex-ante information in Article 13(1)(e) and 14(1)(e) GDPR, Article 15(1)(c) GDPR requires the controller to disclose information

LLC, the DSB held that Chapter V. of the GPPR only imposes legal duties on the data exporter but not on the data recipient. Consequently, the DSB dismissed

(Rhineland-Palatinate) ULD (Schleswig-Holstein) Datenschutzzentrum (Saarland) DSB (Saxony) LfD (Saxony-Anhalt) TLfDI (Thuringia) You can help us fill this section

Direct marketing and data broking On 23 October 2019, GZ: DSB-D550.148/0017-DSB/2019, the DSB imposed a fine of € 18,000,000.00 on Österreichische Post

alone, but always in the context of their processing, i.e. as part of a whole document (such as an e-mail) or an extract from a database that goes beyond

Business number DSB-D124.1177 / 0006-DSB / 2019 Appeal at the BVwG / VwGH / VfGH This decision is final. text GZ: DSB-D124.1177 / 0006-DSB / 2019 of January

Authority (Datenschutzbehörde - DSB) started an ex-officio investigation against the Austrian Postal Service. The DSB investigated i.a the records of processing

(effective November 1, 2017). 1.7. On May 13, 2019, the BF sent the following e-mail to the MP with the subject “Business suspended, data protection”: "Dear

Subsequently, the data subject filed a complaint before the Austrian DPA (DSB). The DSB decided that the right to be forgotten was not infringed and rejected

the Austrian DPA (Datenschutzbehörde, DSB) claiming a violation of his right to access under Article 15 GDPR. The DSB partially upheld the complaint of the

number W245 2252208-1/36E W245 2252221-1/30E Written copy of the verbal decision announced on March 31, 2023 I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal

2019 Case number DSB-D130.073/0008-DSB/2019 Contestation before the BVwG/VwGH/VfGH This decision is final. Text GZ: DSB-D130.073/0008-DSB/2019 of 9.10.2019

judgments. in line with the DSB's stRsp on physician evaluation platforms (cf. the decision of 15 January 2019, GZ DSB-D123. 527/0004-DSB/2018 mwN), it was also

Identifier (ECLI) ECLI:AT:DSB:2019:DSB.D122.970.0004.DSB.2019 Last updated on 09.01.2020 Document number DSBT_20191108_DSB_E122_970_0004_DSB_2019_00 To the top

Identifier (ECLI) ECLI:AT:DSB:2019:DSB.D123.768.0004.DSB.2019 Last updated on 17.03.2020 Document number DSBT_20191218_DSB_D123_768_0004_DSB_2019_00

until the end of the proceedings before the DSB also applies on violations of Article 13 (and 14) GDPR. The DSB held that § 24(6) DSG also applies on violations

details. DSB-D122.844/0006-DSB/2018 dated 21.6.2018 Note Processor: Names and companies, legal forms and product names, addresses (incl. URLs, IP and e-mail