Search results

§ 8(1) GenDG (German Genetic Diagnostics Act). § 5(6) and (9) PAuswG (German Passport and Identity Card Act). § 7 and § 14 TPG (German Organ Transplant

establishment has the power to have such decisions implemented, in which case the establishment having taken such decisions is to be considered to be the main

set out in paragraph 2. 6. Court proceedings for exercising the right to receive compensation shall be brought before the courts competent under the law of

accordance with the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (the ‘Court of Justice’) and the European Court of Human Rights. Recital 42: Proof

Appeals against decisions are possible in the German administrative jurisdiction. Court of first instance is the district administration court (Verwaltungsgericht)

than 1.600 of their decisions in the Austrian decision database RIS.bka.gv.at since 1994. Not all decisions are published, only decisions that are novel or

annulment of decisions of the Board before the Court of Justice under the conditions provided for in Article 263 TFEU. As addressees of such decisions, the supervisory

legislation. Mrs Lindqvist appealed that decision, and in the context of these proceedings, the national court referred several questions to the CJEU. One

broad reading. Case law: In Hauptpersonalrat der Lehrerinnen und Lehrer, the Court acknowledged that as the GDPR does not define the terms ‘employees’ and ‘employment’

damages on its own behalf and forward any compensations received through the court proceedings to the data subject. The Collective Redress Directive (Directive

The German DPAs regularly do not publish their decisions in full text. The higher German courts regularly publish their decisions. If a decision by German

usually allows to manipulate individual decision making, no matter if this concerns individual purchase decisions, decisions by others about work, life and love

to ensure the complete independence of their SAs. In Commission v Germany the Court specified that the notion of “complete independence” must be given

sufficient. The Court emphasized that inaction is insufficient to establish whether the consent is a “freely given and informed decision”. The Court concludes

Example: The German "Oberlandesgericht Köln" becomes the "High Regional Court Cologne (Oberlandesgericht Köln - OLG Köln)". Example: The German "Oberlandesgericht

appealed to the Court of Appeal. The court granted the injunction but only in part. The court ordered the Federal Republic of Germany to refrain from storing

publication of these decisions on the debt discharges in the German insolvency register was erased after 6 months. SCHUFA Holding AG (SCHUFA), a German credit information

cases to come to similar decisions in the EEA. Further decisions are expected soon. For details see here and here. Another decision was published by the French

articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. Court Federal Administrative

announcing your intention to appeal. The Court will then request the file from the AEPD. The Court will contact you to submit your arguments. It may take