Search results

|Party_Link_5= <!--Information about a possible appeal--> |Appeal_From_Body=none, first instance |Appeal_From_Case_Number_Name= |Appeal_From_Status= |Appeal_From_Link=

|Party_Link_5= <!--Information about a possible appeal--> |Appeal_From_Body=none, first instance |Appeal_From_Case_Number_Name= |Appeal_From_Status= |Appeal_From_Link=

procedure referred to in paragraph 4 within a period of two weeks. 6. Where none of the other supervisory authorities concerned has objected to the draft

the court first seized may stay its proceedings or may, on request of one of the parties, decline jurisdiction in favour of the court first seized if that

The High Court rejected the data subject’s appeal on both grounds. On the first point, it held that Articles 57, 77 and 78 of the UK GDPR result in a primary

check whether the principle of transparency was respected. The court of first instance rejected the claim. Therefore, the applicant appealed the decision before

administrative instance) be legitimised for reasons of public interest and transparency? Firstly, the AEPD considered that the administrative instance presented

national ID, when this document had not been asked for in the first place. In this instance, the controller had no reason to doubt the identity of the data

they claimed in their defence that, that procedure was the result, in first instance of the good faith, of the ignorance and the lack of attention to the

However, the company managing the FLIS system (Kombit A/S), which in this instance was acting as processor, mistakenly forgot to limit the access to the data

during the contractual relationship under Article 15 GDPR. The court of first instance, the Regional Court of Aachen (Landgericht Aachen – LG Aachen), ruled

cases an appellate body, so it cannot be involved in the proceedings at first instance, which in this case means that the IP cannot (in the case of You can

because of the applications submitted in the first instance, reference is made to the facts of the first instance judgment (eGA I-534 ff.) and to the following

the file on 27 December 2019. SECOND: On 6 March 2020, the Court of First Instance ruled in favor of replacement RR/00124/2020, brought by A.A.A., B.B

consultation (to the Subdelegate of the Government of Cuenca) in the Court and First Instance of ***LOCALIDAD.1 as proof of the complaints I have against A.A.A."

agreement of 29-01-2009 had been published in the books of the Court of First Instance [region] X of the disputed general partnership 5 (while the above change

confidentiality. The number of potential affected persons detected in the first instance amounted to around 2.6 million, which was the maximum number of records

inadmissible (first, second, fourth and sixth (first limb) of the APD's pleas) 14.1. These of the ODA According to the APD, in its first plea, "since the

of the First Defendant, and the latter's registered address is the home address of his parents. PD informs the Court, at para 19, that the First Defendant

BF first raised a violation of Article 14 of the GDPR in the present appeal, which is why it could not have been the subject of the first-instance proceedings