Search results

From GDPRhub
  • OVG Berlin - OVG 3 S 24/20 (category OVG Berlin (Germany))
    translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. Court: Higher Administrative Court Berlin-Brandenburg 3rd Senate
    13 KB (1,972 words) - 12:25, 15 September 2021
  • (Oberverwaltungsgericht [OVG], Verwaltungsgerichtshof [VGH] in Baden-Württemberg, Bavaria and Hesse; Berlin and Bandenburg share one OVG). In some cases appeal
    18 KB (1,831 words) - 13:49, 3 November 2022
  • VGH Baden-Württemberg - 1 S 397/19 (category VGH Baden-Württemberg (Germany))
    BVerwGE 145, 153; OVG Bln.-Brbg. 12.07.2017 - OVG 11 B 5.16 - juris; OVG NRW, judgment of 14.07.2016 - 19 A 2/14 - FamRZ 2016, 2130; NdsOVG, judgment of 29
    112 KB (19,310 words) - 08:08, 23 June 2022
  • VGH München – 11 ZB 19.991 (category VGH München (Germany))
    (see OVG NW, B.v. 12 January 2010 - 18 E 1195/09 - DÖV 2010, 572 = juris para. 3; NdsOVG, B.v. 6 November 2009 - 11 PA 290/09 - juris para. 3; OVG Berlin-Bbg
    31 KB (5,184 words) - 17:19, 15 April 2023
  • VG Mainz - 1 K 584/19.MZ (category VG Mainz (Germany))
    limit on fixed dates determined by calendar (cf. OVG Berlin-Brandenburg, judgement of 22 April 2010 - OVG 11 B 9.09 -, juris, marginal no. 16 f.). The threat
    58 KB (9,665 words) - 08:51, 25 November 2020
  • OVG Lüneburg - 2 ME 426/20 (category OVG Lüneburg (Germany))
    The Superior Administrative Court of Lüneburg (OVG Lüneburg) found that Article 9(2)(e) GDPR allows for the processing of personal data that the data subject
    26 KB (4,032 words) - 11:53, 10 September 2021
  • VG Berlin - 1 K 391/20 (category VG Berlin (Germany))
    rejected (cf. VG Berlin, judgment of April 20, 2021 - VG 16 K 3/21, p. 13, n.v.; OVG Berlin-Brandenburg, decision of July 2, 2020 - OVG 12 N 48/20, p of
    36 KB (5,768 words) - 14:17, 18 May 2022
  • VG Berlin - 2 K 182.19 (category VG Berlin (Germany))
    Förderung der Informationsfreiheit im Land Berlin (Freedom of Information Act for the State of Berlin - IFG Berlin). According to this law, every person has
    16 KB (2,338 words) - 15:49, 17 March 2022
  • OVG Bautzen - 3 B 357/20 (category OVG Bautzen (Germany))
    para. 24; SächsOVG, decision of 29 April 2020, recital 21; OVG NRW, decision of 6. April 2020 - 13 B 398/20.NE -, juris recital 44; OVG Berlin Brandenburg
    111 KB (18,198 words) - 11:22, 27 November 2023
  • VG Berlin - VG 3L 1028.19 (category VG Berlin (Germany))
    of the GKG in school law urgent proceedings (see OVG Berlin-Brandenburg, decision of April 18, 2013 - OVG 3 S 17.13 - mwN).
    30 KB (4,986 words) - 15:50, 17 March 2022
  • VG Köln - 6 K 3228/19 (category VG Köln (Germany))
    confidentiality interests of the data subject. 80Cf. OVG Berlin Brandenburg, judgment of March 20, 2012 - OVG 12 B 27.11 -, juris, para. 25. 81 Based on this
    68 KB (11,146 words) - 17:16, 9 March 2022
  • VG Potsdam - 11 K 4526/16 (category VG Potsdam (Germany))
    an assessment should originally have been made OVG Berlin-Brandenburg, decision of 22 November 2018 - OVG 4 N 54.16 -, e.A. page 3 et seq.) In addition
    33 KB (5,306 words) - 15:12, 22 March 2022
  • VGH Kassel - 10 E 1898/22 (category VGH Kassel (Germany))
    the district court of Oranienburg, alternatively to the district court of Berlin-Mitte. In justification, the plaintiff essentially argues that he would
    10 KB (1,302 words) - 16:28, 24 January 2023
  • OVG Hamburg - 5 Bs 152/20 (category OVG Hamburg (Germany))
    Superior Administrative Court Hamburg (OVG Hamburg) upheld the position of the Court of First Instance that "processing" pursuant to Article 4(2) GDPR
    45 KB (7,219 words) - 13:48, 24 January 2022
  • FG Berlin-Brandenburg - 16 K 5148/20 (category FG Berlin-Brandenburg (Germany))
    printed out and sent again. The Finance Court Berlin-Brandenburg (Finanzgericht Berlin-Brandenburg - FG Berlin-Brandenburg) fully rejected the data subject's
    45 KB (7,420 words) - 18:15, 12 March 2024
  • VG Berlin - 2 K 98/20 (category VG Berlin (Germany))
    exercises a right to which everyone is entitled (cf. OVG Berlin-Brandenburg, decision of April 13, 2018 - OVG 12 S 13/18 - juris marginal number 5). 2. As far
    44 KB (7,148 words) - 14:45, 16 November 2022
  • VGH München - BeckRS 2021, 36742 (category VGH München (Germany))
    Article 9 (2) (h) GDPR SächsOVG, Bv 9 April 2021 - 3 B 114/21 - juris marginal number 15; OVG Berlin-Bbg, Bv 23 April 2021 - OVG 11 S 56/21 - juris paragraph
    33 KB (5,353 words) - 12:40, 26 January 2022
  • BVerwG - 6 C 7.20 (category BVerwG (Germany))
    entered the Federal Republic of Germany and gave "01.01.1958" as the date of birth. Since then he has been resident in Germany. In response to the plaintiff's
    64 KB (10,816 words) - 15:44, 22 June 2022
  • FG Berlin-Brandenburg - 16 K 2059/21 (category FG Berlin-Brandenburg (Germany))
    The Financial Court of Berlin-Brandenburg held that data subjects must specify the data requested under Article 15(1) GDPR when the controller processes
    117 KB (19,778 words) - 14:27, 13 April 2022
  • VG Cottbus - VG 4 K 1191/19 (category VG Cottbus (Germany))
    on connection fees and/or or to finance fees, OVG Berlin-Brandenburg, judgment of January 26, 2011 - OVG 9 N 62.11 - quoted from juris, para. 33; for the
    75 KB (12,396 words) - 12:11, 30 March 2022
View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)