Search results
From GDPRhub
Did you mean: opinion of the ag of the cjeu
- CJEU - C-757/22 - Meta Platforms (category Opinions of the AG of the CJEU)so, and where the actual processing of the personal data is yet to take place. The AG further opines that Article 80(2) GDPR must be interpreted in this4 KB (376 words) - 09:23, 23 February 2024
- subjects, the amount of processed data, the duration and the geographical extend of the data processing. The context of the processing refers to the specific30 KB (3,458 words) - 10:31, 25 April 2024
- CJEU - C-300/21 - Österreichische Post AG (category CJEU)Therefore, the CJEU held that national rules apply to the extent of financial compensation for the purposes of determining the amount of damages payable5 KB (683 words) - 12:50, 28 June 2023
- relevant to this issue is the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) on the interpretation of the provisions of the European Convention on33 KB (3,748 words) - 14:25, 7 November 2023
- Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, including the obligations on the controller and the rights of natural persons. In order15 KB (943 words) - 09:58, 8 November 2023
- should be given of the provisions of the GDPR. Therefore, the Bundesgerichtshof referred the case to the CJEU as a preliminary reference with the following questions:10 KB (1,478 words) - 11:17, 2 November 2023
- CJEU - C-184/20 - Vyriausioji Tarnybinės Etikos Komisija (category CJEU)The CJEU held that the mandatory disclosure, in the context of an online transparency publication, of personal information concerning a public officer6 KB (522 words) - 13:15, 1 June 2023
- examination within the meaning of the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 20 December 2017, C-434/16, ECLI:EU:C:2017:994) and the transparency51 KB (8,592 words) - 07:03, 2 November 2021
- 000 sA, in the proceedings on the appeal of the plaintiff against the judgment of the Vienna Higher Regional Court as the court of appeal of 9 December 202027 KB (4,090 words) - 09:54, 10 September 2021
- difference between the collection of “personal data” and other data. The Court referenced the earlier opinion of the AG, noting that the AG correctly interpreted6 KB (893 words) - 15:22, 24 March 2022
- electronic message to the Personnel Department of DEWA X, the President and the Secretariat of the Board of Directors of DEWA X, the Director of Administration61 KB (10,257 words) - 10:15, 1 November 2023
- pursuant to Article 15 of the Data Protection Regulation, in the proceedings on the appeal of the plaintiff against the judgment of the Oberlandesgericht Wien22 KB (3,310 words) - 07:44, 5 October 2021
- OGH - 6Ob35/21x (request for preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU) (section Preliminary questions referred to the CJEU)on the grounds of EUR 1.000 sA, in the proceedings on the appeal of the plaintiff against the judgment of the Vienna Higher Regional Court as the court23 KB (3,551 words) - 09:54, 10 September 2021
- must bear the costs of the legal dispute. By law! Facts of the case The parties dispute the validity of the plaintiff's appeal on January 1 the defendant's40 KB (6,019 words) - 14:13, 28 November 2023
- according to the code of conduct should apply. The VG Wiesbaden doubted the HBDI’s line of argument and referred the following questions to the CJEU under Article15 KB (2,180 words) - 08:23, 13 December 2023
- 18 GDPR. The Court also made reference to Recital 10 GDPR and Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Right of the EU. From the objectives of the GDPR, which8 KB (992 words) - 17:03, 4 February 2023
- CJEU - C‑340/21 - Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite (category CJEU) (section Advocate General Opinion)limited to the existence of measures in place. The third question concerned how to allocate the burden of proof concerning the suitability of the security13 KB (1,963 words) - 11:04, 5 January 2024
- CJEU - C-175/20 - SIA ‘SS’ (Opinion of AG Bobek) (category CJEU)In the opinion of AG Bobek, the central question is therefore to assess what would be the legal basis of such processing operations. AG Bobek first analyses8 KB (1,081 words) - 13:13, 1 June 2023
- things, the judgments of the CJEU on Satamedia 2 and Buidvids 3 and the judgment of the ECtHR on Satamedia. 4It follows from those judgments that the journalistic36 KB (5,873 words) - 11:21, 17 August 2022
- unless the member objects to this. 1.6. The outcome of the investigation was the reason for the defendant to impose a fine of € 525,000 on the plaintiff30 KB (4,796 words) - 07:05, 4 October 2022