Search results

for interim relief with the Administrative Court of München (Verwaltungsgericht München - VG München) on 10 February 2022 to order the school to stop storing

Administrative Court even concludes that the substances must come from a plant; also VG Braunschweig, Uv 12/12/2012 - 2 A 1033/12 - juris). The crater at issue here

complainant appealed with the VG München, requesting to prohibit the respondent from publishing the information. Does the German Consumer Information Act

here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. VGH Munich, decision of 20

fulfilment of official tasks, principle of purpose limitation Lower court: VG Regensburg, judgment of 17.04.2019 - RN 3 K 19.267 Place where it was found:

contractual partner and thus to secure legal and credit transactions in Germany as a whole, especially since lenders are obliged to comply with the relevant

rights in Germany Share blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original

offences and criminal offences (cf. VG Göttingen, judgement of 31 May 2017 - 1 A 170/16 -, juris, marginal nos. 46 f.; LG München I, judgement of 21 October 2011

Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany. It also did not violate the provisions of the GDPR. For these reasons, the VG dismissed the case. Consequently

12 May 2021 with the Administrative Court Bayreuth VG Bayreuth. The data subjects also requested the VG Bayreuth to grant a preliminary injunction. According

administrative district communities since the outbreak of the infection in Germany, as requested by the applicant, does not justify a far-reaching public interest

right to removal and destruction, requirement for repayment Lower court: VG Regensburg, judgment of January 25, 2023 – RO 1 K 21,716 Location: BeckRS

regards to German law: The VGH München held that the term "non-permissible deviation" within the meaning of § 2 (1) sentence 1 no. 1 German Consumer Information

before the Superior Administrative Court of Munich (Verwaltungsgerichtshof München). At the outset, the court clarified that the protection of public property

under Article 15(1) GDPR. The Tax Court of Munich (Finanzgericht München - FG München) held that by handing over the additional copies of its databases

own would outweigh the controller's. The Financial Court of Munich (FG München) had to decide whether the data subject had a claim under Article 15 GDPR

244/19; LG München, 3 O 17493/20, https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=LG_M%C3%BCnchen_-_3_O_17493/20). The VG Regensburg (RN 9 K 19.1061 - VG Regensburg

plaintiff under Article 15(3) GDPR. The Administrative Court of Schwerin (VG Schwerin) first finds that the expert opinion is personal data under Article

Medienrecht, 4th ed. 2018, ch. 11, marginal no. 40; cf. on an F-page also VG München, judgement of 10 September 2018, para. 3111, marginal no. 15 with further