VG Mainz - 1 K 467/19.MZ: Difference between revisions

From GDPRhub
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:


[[Article 6 GDPR#1|Article 6(1)(b) GDPR]]
[[Article 6 GDPR#1|Article 6(1)(b) GDPR]]
[[Article 6 GDPR#1|Article 6(1)(f) GDPR]]
[[Category:Article 6(1)(b) GDPR]]
[[Category:Article 6(1)(b) GDPR]]
[[Article 6 GDPR#1|Article 6(1)(f) GDPR]]
[[Category:Article 6(1)(f) GDPR]]
[[Category:Article 6(1)(f) GDPR]]


Line 41: Line 42:
[[Category:Article 28 GDPR]]
[[Category:Article 28 GDPR]]


§ 20 German Federal Data Protection Act (Bundesdatenschutzgesetz - BDSG)
[https://dsgvo-gesetz.de/bdsg/20-bdsg/ § 20 German Federal Data Protection Act (Bundesdatenschutzgesetz - BDSG)]
|-
|-
|Decided:||10. 03. 2020
|Decided:||10. 03. 2020

Revision as of 16:26, 29 April 2020

VGH Baden-Wüttemberg - 1 S 397/19
Court: VG Mainz (Germany)
Jurisdiction: Germany
Relevant Law: Article 4(15) GDPR

Article 5(1)(a)GDPR

Article 6(1)(a) GDPR

Article 6(1)(b) GDPR

Article 6(1)(f) GDPR

Article 6(4) GDPR

Article 7 GDPR

Article 9(1) GDPR

Article 9(2)(f)( GDPR

Article 9(2)(h)( GDPR

Article 28GDPR

§ 20 German Federal Data Protection Act (Bundesdatenschutzgesetz - BDSG)

Decided: 10. 03. 2020
Published: n/a
Parties: anonymous
National Case Number: 1 S 397/19
European Case Law Identifier: n/a
Appeal from: n/a
Language: German
Original Source: [1]

The Administrative Court of Mainz Wüttemberg ruled that...

English Summary

Facts

Lorem ipsum

Dispute

Lorem ipsum

Holding

The Court held that...

Comment

Share your comment here!

Further Resources

Share blogs or news articles here!

English Machine Translation of the Decision

The decision below is a machine translation of the original. Please refer to the German original for more details.

DECISION