Article 1 GDPR: Difference between revisions
Line 211: | Line 211: | ||
==== Natural persons ==== | ==== Natural persons ==== | ||
Article 1(1) also clarifies that the GDPR applies to the processing of personal data concerning ''natural'' persons. It follows that the Regulation does not apply to the processing of data belonging to companies or other legal entities. | Article 1(1) also clarifies that the GDPR applies to the processing of personal data concerning ''natural'' persons. It follows that the Regulation does not apply to the processing of data belonging to companies or other legal entities. Non-EU citizens can rely on the GDPR as its application is independent of nationality or place of residence. | ||
===(2) | ===(2) Protection of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms === | ||
Article 1(2) | The wording of Article 1(2) offers interesting insights into the protective scope of the GDPR. Indeed, according to this provision, the Regulation protects – in general – the fundamental rights and freedoms of the individual as well as – “''in particular''” - the right to the protection of personal data. Therefore, the provisions of the GDPR on the protection of personal data seem to have two objectives. | ||
On the one side, they “simply” protect protect personal data, as it happens, for instance, in Article 35, which lays down the obligation to conduct a Data Protection Impact Assessment, or in Article 32 which stipulates the obligation to implement adequate technical and organizational safeguards regarding the processing. At the same time, though, the very same rules seem to be aimed at protecting other “''fundamental rights and freedoms''”.<ref>''Hornung and Spiecker'' in Simitis, Hornung, Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 1 GDPR, margin number 36 (Beck 2019) (accessed 2 September 2021).</ref> | |||
The | The list of fundamental rights and freedoms protected by the GDPR is not defined. | ||
The impact of the Charter on the drafting of the GDPR can be observed from the changes made to the draft version of | Certainly, reference can be made to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (“the Charter”). The Charter, which is EU primary law, provides in Article 8(1) for “''the right to the protection of personal data''” of a natural person. Some requirements to the processing of this data follow from Article 8(2) of the Charter, which explicitly mentions the principles of fairness and purpose limitation,<ref>The impact of the Charter on the drafting of the GDPR can be observed from the changes made to the draft version of Article 6(4) GDPR following criticism from the Working Party 29. The Council had proposed that a controller could further process data, even if the purpose of the processing was incompatible with the original purpose, as long as the controller had an overriding interest – something the Working Party 29 objected to by pointing out that the principle of purpose limitation is part of primary law. See, Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, "Press release on Chapter II of the draft regulation for the March JHA Council", ''Press Release'', 17 March 2015 (available [https://ec.europa.eu/justice/article-29/press-material/press-release/art29_press_material/2015/20150317__wp29_press_release_on_on_chapter_ii_of_the_draft_regulation_for_the_march_jha_council.pdf here])</ref> as well as states that processing must be pursuant to a lawful basis such as consent. Another essential reference seems to be Article 7 of the Charter, which concerns the right to respect for “''private and family life''” and “''communications''”. | ||
However, the fundamental rights and freedoms enshrined in Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter do not appear to be the only interests protected by the GDPR. Indeed, processing operations are able to impact on other fundamental rights such as the right right of personality, freedom of expression, freedom of information, freedom of communication, the right of assembly, freedom of religion and other anti-discrimination rights.<ref>''Hornung and Spiecker'' in Simitis, Hornung, Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 1 GDPR, margin number 40 (Beck 2019) (accessed 3 September 2021).</ref> | |||
===(3) Free Movement of Personal Data=== | ===(3) Free Movement of Personal Data=== |
Revision as of 09:27, 3 September 2021
Legal Text
Article 1: Subject-matter and objectives
1. This Regulation lays down rules relating to the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and rules relating to the free movement of personal data.
2. This Regulation protects fundamental rights and freedoms of natural persons and in particular their right to the protection of personal data.
3. The free movement of personal data within the Union shall be neither restricted nor prohibited for reasons connected with the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data.
Relevant Recitals
Commentary
Article 1 GDPR draws a first general framework regarding the processing of personal data in Europe. Paragraph 1 defines the two main objectives of the Regulation which are, on the one hand, the protection of the individual's personal data and, on the other, the facilitation of the principle of the free movement of such data. Paragraph 2 enshrines the protection of the individual's fundamental rights and freedoms, especially if connected to their personal data. Finally, Paragraph 3 clarifies that the free movement of personal data may not be prohibited or restricted for reasons relating to the protection of personal data.
(1) Subject-Matter
Article 1(1) establishes the GDPR's two main aims. From one side, it aims at protecting natural persons with regard to the processing of their personal data. On the other side, it recognizes the EU internal market interest in the free movement of such data.
Data protection or free flow of data?
It seems clear that, at least on some occasions, the right to the protection of personal data may conflict with other freedoms, not only individual freedoms, such as the free movement of personal data. Although there is no uniformity of views,[1] we feel we must adhere to the approach that gives the right to data protection prevalence over other interests that are also legally relevant.[2]
In this regard, it has been convincingly noted that the fundamental rights of privacy, personality and data protection are to be classified as the backbone of the fundamental rights and freedoms of a free legal system and that there can be no freedom where the individual is not in control of their data, i.e. feels observed, tracked and continuously assessed.[3] After all, Recital 4 itself clearly states that “The processing of personal data should be designed to serve mankind.”
These aims can function as guiding principles to interpreting the GDPR, together with the data processing principles established in Article 5.[4]
Natural persons
Article 1(1) also clarifies that the GDPR applies to the processing of personal data concerning natural persons. It follows that the Regulation does not apply to the processing of data belonging to companies or other legal entities. Non-EU citizens can rely on the GDPR as its application is independent of nationality or place of residence.
(2) Protection of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms
The wording of Article 1(2) offers interesting insights into the protective scope of the GDPR. Indeed, according to this provision, the Regulation protects – in general – the fundamental rights and freedoms of the individual as well as – “in particular” - the right to the protection of personal data. Therefore, the provisions of the GDPR on the protection of personal data seem to have two objectives.
On the one side, they “simply” protect protect personal data, as it happens, for instance, in Article 35, which lays down the obligation to conduct a Data Protection Impact Assessment, or in Article 32 which stipulates the obligation to implement adequate technical and organizational safeguards regarding the processing. At the same time, though, the very same rules seem to be aimed at protecting other “fundamental rights and freedoms”.[5]
The list of fundamental rights and freedoms protected by the GDPR is not defined.
Certainly, reference can be made to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (“the Charter”). The Charter, which is EU primary law, provides in Article 8(1) for “the right to the protection of personal data” of a natural person. Some requirements to the processing of this data follow from Article 8(2) of the Charter, which explicitly mentions the principles of fairness and purpose limitation,[6] as well as states that processing must be pursuant to a lawful basis such as consent. Another essential reference seems to be Article 7 of the Charter, which concerns the right to respect for “private and family life” and “communications”.
However, the fundamental rights and freedoms enshrined in Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter do not appear to be the only interests protected by the GDPR. Indeed, processing operations are able to impact on other fundamental rights such as the right right of personality, freedom of expression, freedom of information, freedom of communication, the right of assembly, freedom of religion and other anti-discrimination rights.[7]
(3) Free Movement of Personal Data
The requirement for the free movement of personal data within the EU reflects the aim of European integration. Article 1(3) recognizes that personal data is part of the European single market and that personal data is a good that can be traded. It aims to facilitate the trading of personal data in the European single market, and is thus in line with the free movement of goods, capital, services and labour within the EU.
Article 1(3) also facilitates the harmonization of data protection across EU, as well as Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway as part of the European Economic Area (EEA). Restrictions to transfers to non-EU/EEA countries (third countries) follow from Chapter V GDPR.
Decisions
→ You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 1 GDPR
References
- ↑ Scorza, in Riccio, Scorza, Belisario, GDPR e normativa privacy - Commentario, Article 62 GDPR (Wolters Kluwer 2018).
- ↑ Hornung et al, in Simitis, Hornung, Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 1 GDPR, margin number 28 (Beck 2019) (accessed 2 September 2021).
- ↑ Hornung et al, in Simitis, Hornung, Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 1 GDPR, margin number 29 (Beck 2019) (accessed 2 September 2021).
- ↑ Hornung and Spiecker in Simitis, Hornung, Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 1 GDPR, margin number 1 (Beck 2019) (accessed 2 September 2021).
- ↑ Hornung and Spiecker in Simitis, Hornung, Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 1 GDPR, margin number 36 (Beck 2019) (accessed 2 September 2021).
- ↑ The impact of the Charter on the drafting of the GDPR can be observed from the changes made to the draft version of Article 6(4) GDPR following criticism from the Working Party 29. The Council had proposed that a controller could further process data, even if the purpose of the processing was incompatible with the original purpose, as long as the controller had an overriding interest – something the Working Party 29 objected to by pointing out that the principle of purpose limitation is part of primary law. See, Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, "Press release on Chapter II of the draft regulation for the March JHA Council", Press Release, 17 March 2015 (available here)
- ↑ Hornung and Spiecker in Simitis, Hornung, Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 1 GDPR, margin number 40 (Beck 2019) (accessed 3 September 2021).