Article 14 GDPR: Difference between revisions
Line 291: | Line 291: | ||
==== (f) Source of Personal Data ==== | ==== (f) Source of Personal Data ==== | ||
In case of indirect collection of personal data, the controllers must inform the data subjects about the ''source'' of such data. In particular, if the data have been obtained from a publicly accessible source, the controller must notify it to the data subjects. | In case of indirect collection of personal data, the controllers must inform the data subjects about the ''source'' of such data. In particular, if the data have been obtained from a publicly accessible source, the controller must notify it to the data subjects. | ||
One of the rationale behind that obligation is to potentially allow the data subjects to object to the processing of personal data not only be the secondary controller, but also by the controller or processor from which the data originates, in particular if it is found that the foregoing processing was in itself unlawful. Following the same logic, a data subject should therefore be able to trace back the origin of the personal data to its original source, and possibly contest or put an end to the processing, where applicable. | |||
====(g) Automated Decision-Making==== | ====(g) Automated Decision-Making==== | ||
Revision as of 08:52, 1 October 2021
Legal Text
1. Where personal data have not been obtained from the data subject, the controller shall provide the data subject with the following information:
- (a) the identity and the contact details of the controller and, where applicable, of the controller's representative;
- (b) the contact details of the data protection officer, where applicable;
- (c) the purposes of the processing for which the personal data are intended as well as the legal basis for the processing;
- (d) the categories of personal data concerned;
- (e) the recipients or categories of recipients of the personal data, if any;
- (f) where applicable, that the controller intends to transfer personal data to a recipient in a third country or international organisation and the existence or absence of an adequacy decision by the Commission, or in the case of transfers referred to in Article 46 or 47, or the second subparagraph of Article 49(1), reference to the appropriate or suitable safeguards and the means to obtain a copy of them or where they have been made available.
2. In addition to the information referred to in paragraph 1, the controller shall provide the data subject with the following information necessary to ensure fair and transparent processing in respect of the data subject:
- (a) the period for which the personal data will be stored, or if that is not possible, the criteria used to determine that period;
- (b) where the processing is based on point (f) of Article 6(1), the legitimate interests pursued by the controller or by a third party;
- (c) the existence of the right to request from the controller access to and rectification or erasure of personal data or restriction of processing concerning the data subject and to object to processing as well as the right to data portability;
- (d) where processing is based on point (a) of Article 6(1) or point (a) of Article 9(2), the existence of the right to withdraw consent at any time, without affecting the lawfulness of processing based on consent before its withdrawal;
- (e) the right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority;
- (f) from which source the personal data originate, and if applicable, whether it came from publicly accessible sources;
- (g) the existence of automated decision-making, including profiling, referred to in Article 22(1) and (4) and, at least in those cases, meaningful information about the logic involved, as well as the significance and the envisaged consequences of such processing for the data subject.
3. The controller shall provide the information referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2:
- (a) within a reasonable period after obtaining the personal data, but at the latest within one month, having regard to the specific circumstances in which the personal data are processed;
- (b) if the personal data are to be used for communication with the data subject, at the latest at the time of the first communication to that data subject; or
- (c) if a disclosure to another recipient is envisaged, at the latest when the personal data are first disclosed.
4. Where the controller intends to further process the personal data for a purpose other than that for which the personal data were obtained, the controller shall provide the data subject prior to that further processing with information on that other purpose and with any relevant further information as referred to in paragraph 2.
5. Paragraphs 1 to 4 shall not apply where and insofar as:
- (a) the data subject already has the information;
- (b) the provision of such information proves impossible or would involve a disproportionate effort, in particular for processing for archiving purposes in the public interest, scientific or historical research purposes or statistical purposes, subject to the conditions and safeguards referred to in Article 89(1) or in so far as the obligation referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article is likely to render impossible or seriously impair the achievement of the objectives of that processing. In such cases the controller shall take appropriate measures to protect the data subject's rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, including making the information publicly available;
- (c) obtaining or disclosure is expressly laid down by Union or Member State law to which the controller is subject and which provides appropriate measures to protect the data subject's legitimate interests; or
- (d) where the personal data must remain confidential subject to an obligation of professional secrecy regulated by Union or Member State law, including a statutory obligation of secrecy.
Relevant Recitals
Commentary on Article 14
(1) Information the Controller Shall Provide When Personal Data Has Not Been Obtained From the Data Subject
As previously mentioned, Articles 13 and 14 GDPR both give expression to the principle of transparency enshrined in Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, by obliging the controllers to provide specific pieces of information to the data subjects either before or shortly after obtaining the data.[1]
While Article 13 GDPR applies in situations where personal data are collected directly from the data subjects (i.e. direct collection), Article 14 GDPR applies in situations where personal data have not been obtained from the data subjects but rather from a third party (i.e. indirect collection).
Since Article 13 GDPR and Article 14 GDPR are almost identical in content, the below Commentary will mostly refer to the corresponding sections of the Commentary on Article 13 GDPR. One substantial difference between those two Articles however is the existence of an additional obligation for controllers when Article 14 GDPR applies : the obligation to reveal "from which source the personal data originates and, if applicable, whether it came from a publicly accessible source" (Article 14(2)(f) GDPR). Another difference in case of indirect collection lies in the modalities for communicating the information to the data subjects, and in particular the timing for providing such information. More specifically, while, in case of direct collection, controllers must inform data subjects at the latest at the moment the data are obtained, in case of indirect collection, controllers can provide the information later (see below, section 3, "How Information on Processing Should Be Provided").
(a) Identity and Contact Details of the Controller
See Commentary on Article 13.
(b) Contact Details of the Data Protection Officer
See Commentary on Article 13.
(c) Purposes and Legal Basis
See Commentary on Article 13.
(d) Categories of Personal Data
See Commentary on Article 13.
(e) Recipients
See Commentary on Article 13.
(f) International Transfers
See Commentary on Article 13.
(2) Obligation to Provide Further Information at the Time When Personal Data are Obtained
(a) Retention Period
See Commentary on Article 13.
(b) Legitimate Interests
See Commentary on Article 13.
(c) Information About Data Subject's Rights
See Commentary on Article 13.
(d) Information About the Right to Withdraw Consent
See Commentary on Article 13.
(e) The Right to Lodge a Complaint
See Commentary on Article 13.
(f) Source of Personal Data
In case of indirect collection of personal data, the controllers must inform the data subjects about the source of such data. In particular, if the data have been obtained from a publicly accessible source, the controller must notify it to the data subjects.
One of the rationale behind that obligation is to potentially allow the data subjects to object to the processing of personal data not only be the secondary controller, but also by the controller or processor from which the data originates, in particular if it is found that the foregoing processing was in itself unlawful. Following the same logic, a data subject should therefore be able to trace back the origin of the personal data to its original source, and possibly contest or put an end to the processing, where applicable.
(g) Automated Decision-Making
See Commentary on Article 13.[2]
(3) How Information on Processing Should be Provided
As mentioned above, the main difference between Article
(4) Information on the Further Processing of Personal Data
You can help us fill this section!
(5) Exceptions to the Obligation on the Information Provision
The controller does not have an obligation to inform when information (i) is impossible to provide, (ii) involves a disproportionate effort, in particular when processing for archiving purposes in the public interest, (iii) is for scientific or historical research purpose or for statistical purposes, or also if such information is likely to seriously impair the achievement of the research-related processing.[3] In such cases, the controller shall take appropriate measures to protect the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests (Article 14(5)(b) GDPR).
The three exceptions are to be explained as follows.
In the first, the controller must demonstrate that it cannot objectively inform the concerned individuals. There must be an objective ground that prevents them from giving information. The mere fact that a database has been compiled by a data controller using more than one source is not enough to raise an impossibility to inform.[4]
In the second, the controller must demonstrate that the provision of information to the data subjects would involve a disproportionate effort, notably because of the number of data subjects, or the age of the data. The disproportionate effort must result from the fact that the personal data has been collected through an intermediary.[5] Furthermore, the controller must carry out a balancing test, which weighs the effort of the controller and the effects on the data subjects. This assessment must be documented and must result in the implementation of appropriate measures. One appropriate measure may be to render the information publicly available on the controller’s website or in a newspaper; other effective measures could be the realization of a Data Protection Impact Assessment, the application of pseudonymisation techniques, or the minimization of the personal data collected.[6] For instance, this scenario would be relevant in the case of data harvesting, because it is often performed on social media or on websites containing information from a lot of people from all around the world, which renders the provision of information costly and more difficult. Of course, it calls for a careful analysis and for a balance of interests as described above.[7]
In the third, if the objectives of the processing are seriously impaired by the provision of information, the controller does not need to inform data subjects. To rely on this exception, the controller has to demonstrate that informing individuals would nullify the objectives of the processing. For instance, a research project where the information of data subjects can create biases that nullify the scientific results.
Decisions
→ You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 14 GDPR
References
- ↑ EDPB, Binding decision 1/2021 on the dispute arisen on the draft decision of the Irish Supervisory Authority regarding WhatsApp Ireland under Article 65(1)(a) GDPR, adopted on 28 July 2021, pt. 190
- ↑ WP29, Guidelines on Transparency under Regulation 2016/679, 11 April 2018, p. 14.
- ↑ WP29, Guidelines on Transparency under Regulation 2016/679, 11 April 2018, p. 28-29.
- ↑ WP29, Guidelines on Transparency under Regulation 2016/679, 11 April 2018, p. 29-30.
- ↑ WP29, Guidelines on Transparency under Regulation 2016/679, 11 April 2018, p. 30.
- ↑ WP29, Guidelines on Transparency under Regulation 2016/679, 11 April 2018, p. 31.
- ↑ Valentin Conrad, 23 May 2019, Web data collection by Swiss actors in a data protection perspective, Jusletter IT.