Article 16 GDPR: Difference between revisions
Line 195: | Line 195: | ||
The provision, titled "Right to rectification", actually introduces two distinct rights. The first is the right to rectify inaccurate data, while the second is the right to complete incomplete data. Despite the differences between the two, the common factor is the individual's right to avoid a false representation of themselves within a given society.<ref>This right is another expression of the control that the GDPR gives data subjects over their personal data, as remarked by Recital 7 GDPR. Along with the rights to erasure, restriction, and objection, it can be considered a second-stage of the exercise of rights, in which control of personal data is effectively exerted. The first stage would be the right of access (Article 15) by which data subject can collect the necessary information about their personal data and how they are being processed. See, ''Kamann, Braun'', in Ehmann, Selmayr, Datenschutz-Grundverordnung, Article 16 GDPR, margin number 6 (C.H. Beck 2018, 2nd Edition). n this respect, the right of rectification represents another angle of the right to a correct representation of the facts concerning the individual. ''Belisario'', in Riccio, Scorza, Belisario, GDPR e normativa privacy - Commentario, Article 16 GDPR, p. 176 (Wolters Kluwer 2018).</ref> | The provision, titled "Right to rectification", actually introduces two distinct rights. The first is the right to rectify inaccurate data, while the second is the right to complete incomplete data. Despite the differences between the two, the common factor is the individual's right to avoid a false representation of themselves within a given society.<ref>This right is another expression of the control that the GDPR gives data subjects over their personal data, as remarked by Recital 7 GDPR. Along with the rights to erasure, restriction, and objection, it can be considered a second-stage of the exercise of rights, in which control of personal data is effectively exerted. The first stage would be the right of access (Article 15) by which data subject can collect the necessary information about their personal data and how they are being processed. See, ''Kamann, Braun'', in Ehmann, Selmayr, Datenschutz-Grundverordnung, Article 16 GDPR, margin number 6 (C.H. Beck 2018, 2nd Edition). n this respect, the right of rectification represents another angle of the right to a correct representation of the facts concerning the individual. ''Belisario'', in Riccio, Scorza, Belisario, GDPR e normativa privacy - Commentario, Article 16 GDPR, p. 176 (Wolters Kluwer 2018).</ref> | ||
===Right to Rectification=== | ===Right to Rectification=== | ||
The | The processing of incorrect or incomplete data can lead to possibly severe disadvantages for the data subject.<ref>''Meents, Hinzpeter'' in Taeger, Gabel, DSGVO – BDSG, Article 16 GDPR, margin number 2 (Deutscher Fachverlag, 4th Edition).</ref> The storage of incorrect creditworthiness data can lead to the rejection of a required loan, causing the applicant to be cut off from essential services. | ||
==== | ==== Rectification of inaccurate Data ==== | ||
The first sentence of Article 16 concerns the right to rectify inaccurate data. The GDPR does not | The first sentence of Article 16 concerns the right to rectify inaccurate data. The GDPR does not provide a more detailed definition of what constitutes inaccuracy. In everyday language, terms such as "inaccurate", "incorrect", "wrong", or "inexact" are often used interchangeably to refer to something - ''rectius,'' a fact - that is not correct.<ref>Only ''facts'' can be true or false, hence accurate or inaccurate. Therefore, the right to rectification does not cover value judgements.</ref> This means that the personal data being processed by the controller does not reflect reality, such as an incorrect date of birth or an outdated address. Additionally, legal classifications, like describing someone as "single" when they are actually in a registered partnership, also fall under the scope of inaccuracy.<ref>''Haidinger'', in Knyrim, DatKomm, Article 16 GDPR, margin number 22 (Manz 2021).</ref> | ||
This right could be used, however, to examine whether scripts were mixed up in such a way that the answers of another candidate were ascribed to the candidate concerned, or whether some of the cover sheets containing the answers of that candidate were lost.<ref>CJEU, Case C-434/16, ''Nowak'', 20 December 2017, margin numbers 52-54 (available [https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=198059&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=6547096 here]).</ref> Correspondingly, it is not possible to rectify value judgements ("''Subject B is smart''"). However, this does not apply to value judgements based on incorrect facts, in which case there is an obligation to rectify the facts on which they were based.<ref>''Meents, Hinzpeter'' in Taeger, Gabel, DSGVO – BDSG, Article 16 GDPR, margin number 8 (Deutscher Fachverlag, 4th Edition).</ref> | |||
The right to rectification cannot be used as a means to correct data subjects’ exams answers, since according to the CJEU the assessment of whether personal data is accurate and complete must be made in the light of the purpose for which that data was collected. In such a case, the purpose is to be able to evaluate the level of knowledge and competence of that candidate at the time of the examination. That level is revealed precisely by any errors in those answers. Consequently, such errors do not represent inaccuracy. This right could be used, however, to examine whether scripts were mixed up in such a way that the answers of another candidate were ascribed to the candidate concerned, or whether some of the cover sheets containing the answers of that candidate were lost.<ref>CJEU, Case C-434/16, ''Nowak'', 20 December 2017, margin numbers 52-54 (available [https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=198059&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=6547096 here]).</ref> | |||
Correspondingly, it is not possible to rectify value judgements ("''Subject B is smart''"). However, this does not apply to value judgements based on incorrect facts, in which case there is an obligation to rectify the facts on which they were based.<ref>''Meents, Hinzpeter'' in Taeger, Gabel, DSGVO – BDSG, Article 16 GDPR, margin number 8 (Deutscher Fachverlag, 4th Edition).</ref> | |||
It is irrelevant '''why''' the data is incorrect, for example whether the data subject himself or herself originally provided incorrect information or whether the person responsible is the author of the inaccuracy.<blockquote><u>Case-law</u>: </blockquote> | |||
==== Right to Complete Incomplete Data ==== | ==== Right to Complete Incomplete Data ==== |
Revision as of 14:54, 27 April 2023
Legal Text
The data subject shall have the right to obtain from the controller without undue delay the rectification of inaccurate personal data concerning him or her. Taking into account the purposes of the processing, the data subject shall have the right to have incomplete personal data completed, including by means of providing a supplementary statement.
Relevant Recitals
Commentary
The provision, titled "Right to rectification", actually introduces two distinct rights. The first is the right to rectify inaccurate data, while the second is the right to complete incomplete data. Despite the differences between the two, the common factor is the individual's right to avoid a false representation of themselves within a given society.[1]
Right to Rectification
The processing of incorrect or incomplete data can lead to possibly severe disadvantages for the data subject.[2] The storage of incorrect creditworthiness data can lead to the rejection of a required loan, causing the applicant to be cut off from essential services.
Rectification of inaccurate Data
The first sentence of Article 16 concerns the right to rectify inaccurate data. The GDPR does not provide a more detailed definition of what constitutes inaccuracy. In everyday language, terms such as "inaccurate", "incorrect", "wrong", or "inexact" are often used interchangeably to refer to something - rectius, a fact - that is not correct.[3] This means that the personal data being processed by the controller does not reflect reality, such as an incorrect date of birth or an outdated address. Additionally, legal classifications, like describing someone as "single" when they are actually in a registered partnership, also fall under the scope of inaccuracy.[4]
The right to rectification cannot be used as a means to correct data subjects’ exams answers, since according to the CJEU the assessment of whether personal data is accurate and complete must be made in the light of the purpose for which that data was collected. In such a case, the purpose is to be able to evaluate the level of knowledge and competence of that candidate at the time of the examination. That level is revealed precisely by any errors in those answers. Consequently, such errors do not represent inaccuracy. This right could be used, however, to examine whether scripts were mixed up in such a way that the answers of another candidate were ascribed to the candidate concerned, or whether some of the cover sheets containing the answers of that candidate were lost.[5]
Correspondingly, it is not possible to rectify value judgements ("Subject B is smart"). However, this does not apply to value judgements based on incorrect facts, in which case there is an obligation to rectify the facts on which they were based.[6]
It is irrelevant why the data is incorrect, for example whether the data subject himself or herself originally provided incorrect information or whether the person responsible is the author of the inaccuracy.
Case-law:
Right to Complete Incomplete Data
Article 16 also gives data subjects the right to have complete incomplete personal data sets. However, the concept of completeness should be understood in relative terms as data sets are never complete.[7] Certain data could be considered complete in one processing context, while the same data could be seen as incomplete in another. This also suggests that the right to rectification does not oblige controllers to rectify personal data when the inaccuracy is not relevant for the purposes of the processing.
For example, the Norwegian Privacy Appeals Board has decided in a case that a controller was not obliged to rectify a single letter of a name since it does not entail danger of mis-identification and is related to differences between countries in spelling names, especially given the burden that it will impose on the controller to modify it in all their records.[8] Further, a controller running a parcel delivery service lacks some important address information so that parcels cannot be delivered. The data subject has a right to have their address data completed so that the purpose of the data processing can be fulfilled.
The right to rectification may therefore become a right to add missing elements rather than to correct existing data. In this respect, the act of completing personal data can be executed by providing a supplementary statement (e.g. mentioning the data subject's acquittal and the discontinuation of criminal proceedings).[9]
Procedural aspects
Pursuant to Article 12(2) GDPR, the controller shall facilitate the data subject's exercise of their right to rectification.[10] In accordance with Article 12(3) GDPR, the controller has to answer the rectification request "without undue delay and in any event within one month of receipt of the request". This deadline may be extended by two months where necessary, taking into account the complexity and number of the requests. Under Article 12(4) GDPR, any extension of the deadline must be communicated to the data subject alongside the reason behind it. The rectification request does not have to be justified, and the data subject neither needs a reason to exercise it nor prove the existence of damage.[11]
Relation to Article 18 GDPR
Article 18 GDPR allows the data processing to be restricted when the accuracy of the data is contested. Thus, in addition to a rectification request the data subject may also exercise their right to restrict the processing whilst the request is carried out. For further information, please refer to Article 18 GDPR.
Relation to Article 19 GDPR
Article 19 GDPR requires controllers to notify data subjects that the rectification of their data has been carried out, in order to ensure that they are informed about the correct exercise of their right to rectification. For further information, please refer to Article 19 GDPR.
Decisions
→ You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 16 GDPR
References
- ↑ This right is another expression of the control that the GDPR gives data subjects over their personal data, as remarked by Recital 7 GDPR. Along with the rights to erasure, restriction, and objection, it can be considered a second-stage of the exercise of rights, in which control of personal data is effectively exerted. The first stage would be the right of access (Article 15) by which data subject can collect the necessary information about their personal data and how they are being processed. See, Kamann, Braun, in Ehmann, Selmayr, Datenschutz-Grundverordnung, Article 16 GDPR, margin number 6 (C.H. Beck 2018, 2nd Edition). n this respect, the right of rectification represents another angle of the right to a correct representation of the facts concerning the individual. Belisario, in Riccio, Scorza, Belisario, GDPR e normativa privacy - Commentario, Article 16 GDPR, p. 176 (Wolters Kluwer 2018).
- ↑ Meents, Hinzpeter in Taeger, Gabel, DSGVO – BDSG, Article 16 GDPR, margin number 2 (Deutscher Fachverlag, 4th Edition).
- ↑ Only facts can be true or false, hence accurate or inaccurate. Therefore, the right to rectification does not cover value judgements.
- ↑ Haidinger, in Knyrim, DatKomm, Article 16 GDPR, margin number 22 (Manz 2021).
- ↑ CJEU, Case C-434/16, Nowak, 20 December 2017, margin numbers 52-54 (available here).
- ↑ Meents, Hinzpeter in Taeger, Gabel, DSGVO – BDSG, Article 16 GDPR, margin number 8 (Deutscher Fachverlag, 4th Edition).
- ↑ Worms, in Wolff, Brink, BeckOK Datenschutzrecht, Article 16 GDPR, margin number 58 (C.H. Beck 2020, 38th Edition).
- ↑ Personvernrådet, 10 November 2020, 20/01868 (PVN-2020-15) (available here).
- ↑ de Terwangne, Bygrave, in Kuner, Bygrave, Docksey, The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary, Article 16 GDPR, p. 473 (Oxford University Press 2020).
- ↑ This may be done, partially, by providing the possibility of making a rectification request via electronic means, as recommended by Article 15(3) GDPR and Recital 64 GDPR when dealing with access requests.
- ↑ Kamann, Braun, in Ehmann, Selmayr, Datenschutz-Grundverordnung, Article 16 GDPR, margin number 18 (C.H. Beck 2018, 2nd Edition).