Article 24 GDPR: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:54, 15 February 2022

← Article 24 - Responsibility of the controller →

Chapter 1: General provisions Article 1: Subject-matter and objectives Article 2: Material scope Article 3: Territorial scope Article 4: Definitions Chapter 2: Principles Article 5: Principles relating to processing of personal data Article 6: Lawfulness of processing Article 7: Conditions for consent Article 8: Conditions applicable to child’s consent in relation to information society services Article 9: Processing of special categories of personal data Article 10: Processing of personal data relating to criminal convictions and offences Article 11: Processing which does not require identification Chapter 3: Rights of the data subject Article 12: Transparent information, communication and modalities for the exercise of the rights of the data subject Article 13: Information to be provided where personal data are collected from the data subject Article 14: Information to be provided where personal data have not been obtained from the data subject Article 15: Right of access by the data subject Article 16: Right to rectification Article 17: Right to erasure (‘right to be forgotten’) Article 18: Right to restriction of processing Article 19: Notification obligation regarding rectification or erasure of personal data or restriction of processing Article 20: Right to data portability Article 21: Right to object Article 22: Automated individual decision-making, including profiling Article 23: Restrictions Chapter 4: Controller and processor Article 24: Responsibility of the controller Article 25: Data protection by design and by default Article 26: Joint controllers Article 27: Representatives of controllers or processors not established in the Union Article 28: Processor Article 29: Processing under the authority of the controller or processor Article 30: Records of processing activities Article 31: Cooperation with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article 34: Communication of a personal data breach to the data subject Article 35: Data protection impact assessment Article 36: Prior consultation Article 37: Designation of the data protection officer Article 38: Position of the data protection officer Article 39: Tasks of the data protection officer Article 40: Codes of conduct Article 41: Monitoring of approved codes of conduct Article 42: Certification Article 43: Certification bodies Chapter 5: Transfers of personal data Article 44: General principle for transfers Article 45: Transfers on the basis of an adequacy decision Article 46: Transfers subject to appropriate safeguards Article 47: Binding corporate rules Article 48: Transfers or disclosures not authorised by Union law Article 49: Derogations for specific situations Article 50: International cooperation for the protection of personal data Chapter 6: Supervisory authorities Article 51: Supervisory authority Article 52: Independence Article 53: General conditions for the members of the supervisory authority Article 54: Rules on the establishment of the supervisory authority Article 55: Competence Article 56: Competence of the lead supervisory authority Article 57: Tasks Article 58: Powers Article 59: Activity reports Chapter 7: Cooperation and consistency Article 60: Cooperation between the lead supervisory authority and the other supervisory authorities concerned Article 61: Mutual assistance Article 62: Joint operations of supervisory authorities Article 63: Consistency mechanism Article 64: Opinion of the Board Article 65: Dispute resolution by the Board Article 66: Urgency procedure Article 67: Exchange of information Article 68: European Data Protection Board Article 69: Independence Article 70: Tasks of the Board Article 71: Reports Article 72: Procedure Article 73: Chair Article 74: Tasks of the Chair Article 75: Secretariat Article 76: Confidentiality Chapter 8: Remedies, liability and penalties Article 77: Right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority Article 78: Right to an effective judicial remedy against a supervisory authority Article 79: Right to an effective judicial remedy against a controller or processor Article 80: Representation of data subjects Article 81: Suspension of proceedings Article 82: Right to compensation and liability Article 83: General conditions for imposing administrative fines Article 84: Penalties Chapter 9: Specific processing situations Article 85: Processing and freedom of expression and information Article 86: Processing and public access to official documents Article 87: Processing of the national identification number Article 88: Processing in the context of employment Article 89: Safeguards and derogations relating to processing for archiving purposes in the public interest, scientific or historical research purposes or statistical purposes Article 90: Obligations of secrecy Article 91: Existing data protection rules of churches and religious associations Chapter 10: Delegated and implementing acts Article 92: Exercise of the delegation Article 93: Committee procedure Chapter 11: Final provisions Article 94: Repeal of Directive 95: /46: /EC Article 95: Relationship with Directive 20: 02: /58: /EC Article 96: Relationship with previously concluded Agreements Article 97: Commission reports Article 98: Review of other Union legal acts on data protection Article 99: Entry into force and application

Legal Text

Article 24 - Responsibility of the controller

1. Taking into account the nature, scope, context and purposes of processing as well as the risks of varying likelihood and severity for the rights and freedoms of natural persons, the controller shall implement appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure and to be able to demonstrate that processing is performed in accordance with this Regulation. Those measures shall be reviewed and updated where necessary.

2. Where proportionate in relation to processing activities, the measures referred to in paragraph 1 shall include the implementation of appropriate data protection policies by the controller.

3. Adherence to approved codes of conduct as referred to in Article 40 or approved certification mechanisms as referred to in Article 42 may be used as an element by which to demonstrate compliance with the obligations of the controller.

Relevant Recitals

Recital 74: Controller Responsibility and Liability

The responsibility and liability of the controller for any processing of personal data carried out by the controller or on the controller's behalf should be established. In particular, the controller should be obliged to implement appropriate and effective measures and be able to demonstrate the compliance of processing activities with this Regulation, including the effectiveness of the measures. Those measures should take into account the nature, scope, context and purposes of the processing and the risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons.

Recital 75: Risks to the Rights and Freedoms of Natural Persons

The risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons, of varying likelihood and severity, may result from personal data processing which could lead to physical, material or non-material damage, in particular: where the processing may give rise to discrimination, identity theft or fraud, financial loss, damage to the reputation, loss of confidentiality of personal data protected by professional secrecy, unauthorised reversal of pseudonymisation, or any other significant economic or social disadvantage; where data subjects might be deprived of their rights and freedoms or prevented from exercising control over their personal data; where personal data are processed which reveal racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religion or philosophical beliefs, trade union membership, and the processing of genetic data, data concerning health or data concerning sex life or criminal convictions and offences or related security measures; where personal aspects are evaluated, in particular analysing or predicting aspects concerning performance at work, economic situation, health, personal preferences or interests, reliability or behaviour, location or movements, in order to create or use personal profiles; where personal data of vulnerable natural persons, in particular of children, are processed; or where processing involves a large amount of personal data and affects a large number of data subjects.

Recital 76: Evaluating the Risks to Natural Persons

The likelihood and severity of the risk to the rights and freedoms of the data subject should be determined by reference to the nature, scope, context and purposes of the processing. Risk should be evaluated on the basis of an objective assessment, by which it is established whether data processing operations involve a risk or a high risk.

Recital 77: Guidance on Evaluating Risks

Guidance on the implementation of appropriate measures and on the demonstration of compliance by the controller or the processor, especially as regards the identification of the risk related to the processing, their assessment in terms of origin, nature, likelihood and severity, and the identification of best practices to mitigate the risk, could be provided in particular by means of approved codes of conduct, approved certifications, guidelines provided by the Board or indications provided by a data protection officer. The Board may also issue guidelines on processing operations that are considered to be unlikely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons and indicate what measures may be sufficient in such cases to address such risk.

Recital 78: Appropriate Technical and Organisational Measures

The protection of the rights and freedoms of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data require that appropriate technical and organisational measures be taken to ensure that the requirements of this Regulation are met. In order to be able to demonstrate compliance with this Regulation, the controller should adopt internal policies and implement measures which meet in particular the principles of data protection by design and data protection by default. Such measures could consist, inter alia, of minimising the processing of personal data, pseudonymising personal data as soon as possible, transparency with regard to the functions and processing of personal data, enabling the data subject to monitor the data processing, enabling the controller to create and improve security features. When developing, designing, selecting and using applications, services and products that are based on the processing of personal data or process personal data to fulfil their task, producers of the products, services and applications should be encouraged to take into account the right to data protection when developing and designing such products, services and applications and, with due regard to the state of the art, to make sure that controllers and processors are able to fulfil their data protection obligations. The principles of data protection by design and by default should also be taken into consideration in the context of public tenders.

Commentary on Article 24

This provision opens Chapter 4’s Section 1, which is dedicated to the “General obligations” of the controller and processor. It provides an overview of the controller’s essential responsibility as the first addressee for compliance with the provisions of the GDPR.^[1] Since it provides an overview, the actual obligations that follow from the controller’s responsibility are described more specifically in other provisions, such as Article 25 GDPR or Article 32 GDPR.^[2] However, according to Plath, this does not mean that the provision is merely declaratory: it also establishes directly applicable obligations.^[3]

Although the provision speaks of “responsibility”, it imposes accountability on the controller, next to Article 5(2) GDPR.^[4] According to Docksey, this principle is one of the GDPR’s most innovative aspects,^[5] since meaning has developed from ‘passive’ responsibility to a concept of ‘proactive’ and demonstrable compliance.^[6] Hence, the controller’s processing operations must be known (“taking into account”), controlled (through “appropriate technical and organisational measures”) and regularly reviewed (“updated where necessary”), so that controller must do so to “ensure” compliance with the Regulation.

(1) Appropriate Technical and Organisational Measures

The controller must implement effective technical and organisational measures to ensure compliance with the entire GDPR, including respect of data protection principles (Article 5 GDPR), data subject’s rights (amongst others, Articles 12 to 22 GDPR) and controller’s obligations.

Measures

The term "measure" must be understood broadly since it refers to all actions that are appropriate in serving the purpose of achieving compliance of the processing with the GDPR.^[7] As the provision explains, this can be done through technical and organisational means. Technical measures are measures of which its technical effect lies in the functionality of the technique, for example by securing the access (password protection) or transfer (encryption).^[8] Of course, these technical measures would not mean a lot if there were no organisational measures that secure compliance with these technical measures. One can think of the implementation of sampling routines, the duty to log activities, or training of employees by the DPO.^[9] Other examples of "measures" are given in Recital 78, which lists pseudonymisation, data minimisation, and "transparency with regard to the functions and processing of personal data". It must be noted, however, that it is not always clear to distinct between technical and organisational measures, since these can overlap. However, as Hartung mentions, this is not really a problem since the GDPR does not differentiate in terms of legal requirements.^[10]

Risk-based approach - elements

To know which measures should be implemented, the controller must perform an assessment to select the most appropriate ones among the different options available. The provision lists several elements that the controller must take into account when assessing the risk. First, there are the nature of the processing (manual or automated), the scope of the processing (amount of data subjects affected, amount of data collected, bulk or individual processing, sensitivity of the data), the context of the processing (how many parties are involved, which systems are used, etc.), and the purposes of the processing.^[11] Second, the controller must assess the severity of the risk for the rights and freedoms of natural persons, and the likelihood that this risk materialises. Whereas Article 17 of the Data Protection Directive (DPD) merely mentioned the latter element, the controller must now also consider the likelihood of the materialisation.^[12] Recital 75 gives useful guidance to determine what this risk actually entails. Besides making clear that the damage can be physical, material, or immaterial, it lists a long list of examples of damages, such as discrimination, identity theft or fraud. However, it also mentions "loss of confidentiality of personal data protected by professional secrecy". Moreover, it is important to note that, although this is not mentioned in the provision, it follows from Article 52(1) Chapter of Fundamental Rights, that the principle of proportionality plays an important part in determining whether or not a measure is appropriate. Hence, the cost-effectiveness of a measure can play an important part in the assessment.^[13] Lastly, although GDPR prescribes that the controller must determine the risk, it does not provide procedural steps on how to perform this assessment.^[14] However, many DPA's, as well as the EDPB, provide guidelines for controllers to rely on.

Demonstrating

Controllers not only have to ensure compliance, they also have to demonstrate it by providing evidence.^[15] This comprehensiveness of this evidence must be proportionate to the risk of the processing operation: the more risky a processing operation is, the more comprehensive the evidence must be. Conversely, with a low risk, a witness statement might already suffice, instead of physical documentation.^[16] Like other elements of the provision, this requirement is further specified in other provisions, like the maintaining of records of processing activities in Article 30(1), or the documenting of any personal data breaches in Article 33(5) GDPR. ^[17] The fact that de controller has to demonstrate compliance, however, does not necessarily imply that the burden of proof lies with the controller in case of a claim under civil law. If a data subject asserts a claim for damages under Article 82 GDPR, then they have to prove the violation of data protection law, their damages, and the causality.^[18]

(2) Data Protection Policies

This paragraph expands on paragraph 1 since it emphasises measures that are primarily oriented towards procedures, rather than result.^[19]

(3) Codes of Conduct as Evidence of Compliance

You can help us fill this section!

Decisions

→ You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 24 GDPR

References

↑ Hartung, in Kühling & Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Art. 24, para 1 (C.H.Beck 2020).
↑ Hartung, in Kühling & Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Art. 24, para 11 (C.H.Beck 2020).
↑ Hartung, in Kühling & Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Art. 24, para 11 (C.H.Beck 2020) referring to Plath, in Plath Art. 24, para 2.
↑ Docksey, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 24 GDPR, p. 557 (Oxford University Press 2020).
↑ Docksey, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 24 GDPR, p. 557 (Oxford University Press 2020).
↑ Docksey, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 24 GDPR, p. 561 (Oxford University Press 2020).
↑ Martini, in Paal & Pauly, DS-GVO Art. 24, para 20a (C.H.Beck 2021).
↑ Martini, in Paal & Pauly, DS-GVO Art. 24, para 21 (C.H.Beck 2021).
↑ Martini, in Paal & Pauly, DS-GVO Art. 24, para 22 (C.H.Beck 2021).
↑ Hartung, in Kühling & Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Art. 24, para 11 (C.H.Beck 2020) referring to Plath, in Plath Art. 24, para 17.
↑ Hartung, in Kühling & Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Art. 24, para 14 (C.H.Beck 2020).
↑ Docksey, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 24 GDPR, p. 564 (Oxford University Press 2020).
↑ Martini, in Paal & Pauly, DS-GVO Art. 24, para 24 (C.H.Beck 2021).
↑ Martini, in Paal & Pauly, DS-GVO Art. 24, para 36 (C.H.Beck 2021).
↑ Martini, in Paal & Pauly, DS-GVO Art. 24, para 25 (C.H.Beck 2021).
↑ Martini, in Paal & Pauly, DS-GVO Art. 24, para 25a, 25b (C.H.Beck 2021).
↑ Martini, in Paal & Pauly, DS-GVO Art. 24, para 25a (C.H.Beck 2021).
↑ Martini, in Paal & Pauly, DS-GVO Art. 24, para 25d (C.H.Beck 2021).
↑ Martini, in Paal & Pauly, DS-GVO Art. 24, para 39 (C.H.Beck 2021).

[1] Hartung, in Kühling & Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Art. 24, para 1 (C.H.Beck 2020).

[2] Hartung, in Kühling & Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Art. 24, para 11 (C.H.Beck 2020).

[3] Hartung, in Kühling & Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Art. 24, para 11 (C.H.Beck 2020) referring to Plath, in Plath Art. 24, para 2.

[4] Docksey, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 24 GDPR, p. 557 (Oxford University Press 2020).

[5] Docksey, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 24 GDPR, p. 557 (Oxford University Press 2020).

[6] Docksey, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 24 GDPR, p. 561 (Oxford University Press 2020).

[7] Martini, in Paal & Pauly, DS-GVO Art. 24, para 20a (C.H.Beck 2021).

[8] Martini, in Paal & Pauly, DS-GVO Art. 24, para 21 (C.H.Beck 2021).

[9] Martini, in Paal & Pauly, DS-GVO Art. 24, para 22 (C.H.Beck 2021).

[10] Hartung, in Kühling & Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Art. 24, para 11 (C.H.Beck 2020) referring to Plath, in Plath Art. 24, para 17.

[11] Hartung, in Kühling & Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Art. 24, para 14 (C.H.Beck 2020).

[12] Docksey, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 24 GDPR, p. 564 (Oxford University Press 2020).

[13] Martini, in Paal & Pauly, DS-GVO Art. 24, para 24 (C.H.Beck 2021).

[14] Martini, in Paal & Pauly, DS-GVO Art. 24, para 36 (C.H.Beck 2021).

[15] Martini, in Paal & Pauly, DS-GVO Art. 24, para 25 (C.H.Beck 2021).

[16] Martini, in Paal & Pauly, DS-GVO Art. 24, para 25a, 25b (C.H.Beck 2021).

[17] Martini, in Paal & Pauly, DS-GVO Art. 24, para 25a (C.H.Beck 2021).

[18] Martini, in Paal & Pauly, DS-GVO Art. 24, para 25d (C.H.Beck 2021).

[19] Martini, in Paal & Pauly, DS-GVO Art. 24, para 39 (C.H.Beck 2021).

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

@@ Line 210: / Line 210: @@
 ''Risk-based approach - elements''
-To know which measures should be implemented, the controller must perform an assessment to select the most appropriate ones among the different options available. The provision lists several elements that the controller must take into account when assessing the risk. First, there are the ''nature'' of the processing (manual or automated), the ''scope'' of the processing (amount of data subjects affected, amount of data collected, bulk or individual processing, sensitivity of the data), the ''context'' of the processing (how many parties are involved, which systems are used, etc.), and the ''purposes'' of the processing.<ref>''Hartung'', in Kühling & Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Art. 24, para 14 (C.H.Beck 2020).</ref> Second, the controller must assess the severity of the risk for the rights and freedoms of natural persons, ''and'' the likelihood that this risk materialises. Whereas Article 17 of the Data Protection Directive (DPD) merely mentioned the latter element, the controller must now also consider the likelihood of the materialisation.<ref>''Docksey'', in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 24 GDPR, p. 564 (Oxford University Press 2020).</ref> Recital 75 gives useful guidance to determine what this risk actually entails. Besides making clear that the damage can be physical, material, or immaterial, it lists a long list of examples of damages, such as discrimination, identity theft or fraud. However, it also mentions "''loss of confidentiality of personal data protected by professional secrecy''". Lastly, it is important to note that, although this is not mentioned in the provision, it follows from Article 52(1) Chapter of Fundamental Rights, that the principle of proportionality plays an important part in determining whether or not a measure is appropriate. Hence, the cost-effectiveness of a measure can play an important part in the assessment.<ref>''Martini'', in Paal & Pauly, DS-GVO Art. 24, para 24 (C.H.Beck 2021).</ref>
+To know which measures should be implemented, the controller must perform an assessment to select the most appropriate ones among the different options available. The provision lists several elements that the controller must take into account when assessing the risk. First, there are the ''nature'' of the processing (manual or automated), the ''scope'' of the processing (amount of data subjects affected, amount of data collected, bulk or individual processing, sensitivity of the data), the ''context'' of the processing (how many parties are involved, which systems are used, etc.), and the ''purposes'' of the processing.<ref>''Hartung'', in Kühling & Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Art. 24, para 14 (C.H.Beck 2020).</ref> Second, the controller must assess the severity of the risk for the rights and freedoms of natural persons, ''and'' the likelihood that this risk materialises. Whereas Article 17 of the Data Protection Directive (DPD) merely mentioned the latter element, the controller must now also consider the likelihood of the materialisation.<ref>''Docksey'', in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 24 GDPR, p. 564 (Oxford University Press 2020).</ref> Recital 75 gives useful guidance to determine what this risk actually entails. Besides making clear that the damage can be physical, material, or immaterial, it lists a long list of examples of damages, such as discrimination, identity theft or fraud. However, it also mentions "''loss of confidentiality of personal data protected by professional secrecy''". Moreover, it is important to note that, although this is not mentioned in the provision, it follows from Article 52(1) Chapter of Fundamental Rights, that the principle of proportionality plays an important part in determining whether or not a measure is appropriate. Hence, the cost-effectiveness of a measure can play an important part in the assessment.<ref>''Martini'', in Paal & Pauly, DS-GVO Art. 24, para 24 (C.H.Beck 2021).</ref> Lastly, although GDPR prescribes that the controller must determine the risk, it does not provide procedural steps on ''how'' to perform this assessment.<ref>''Martini'', in Paal & Pauly, DS-GVO Art. 24, para 36 (C.H.Beck 2021).</ref> However, many DPA's, as well as the EDPB, provide guidelines for controllers to rely on.
 ''Demonstrating''