Article 20 GDPR
Legal Text
1. The data subject shall have the right to receive the personal data concerning him or her, which he or she has provided to a controller, in a structured, commonly used and machine-readable format and have the right to transmit those data to another controller without hindrance from the controller to which the personal data have been provided, where:
- (a) the processing is based on consent pursuant to point (a) of Article 6(1) or point (a) of Article 9(2) or on a contract pursuant to point (b) of Article 6(1); and
- (b) the processing is carried out by automated means.
2. In exercising his or her right to data portability pursuant to paragraph 1, the data subject shall have the right to have the personal data transmitted directly from one controller to another, where technically feasible.
3. The exercise of the right referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be without prejudice to Article 17. That right shall not apply to processing necessary for the performance of a task carried out in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority vested in the controller.
4. The right referred to in paragraph 1 shall not adversely affect the rights and freedoms of others.
Relevant Recitals
Commentary
The purpose of the right to data portability is to give data subjects more control over their personal data by granting them a certain type of "ownership". Regulators’ objective was to increase competition on the market by allowing for the free movement of data between providers. Data portability is especially relevant in cases when one controller offers a higher level of protection of personal data than another within the same industry sector or across sectors.
The right to data portability complements the right of access (Article 15 GDPR) by empowering data subjects to receive a copy of their data in a structured, commonly used, and machine-readable format. They can then decide what they want to do with this data, and either store it on their computer, send it to another controller, or send it to a third party. The recipients of this data are not limited to providers that offer similar or comparable services, as the right to portability can be exercised with any controller data subjects choose within the conditions specified below.
(1) Right to Data Portability
Data subject have the right to request and obtain a copy of any personal data they have provided to the controller. This information must be structured in an accessible and intelligible manner, so that both the data subject themselves and any controllers who may receive it in the future can understand it. Once received, the information can obviously be shared with other data controllers.
Material Scope
Data subjects may request the transmission of data that concerns them (i.e. not anonymous data) and that they provided to the controller. The data "provided" is the data that was actively given to the controller (e.g. photos uploaded to the service) or which was "observed" by a controller (e.g. activity logs, food preferences). This definition also includes data that has been transferred to the controller in the context of the exercise of the right to data portability.[1] According to certain academics, "data collected by a device such as a 'quantified self' application that tracks an individual's movements (exercise, sleep etc.) would be within the scope of the right while any insights gleaned on the basis of that information (for example, about the individual's health status or working patterns) would be excluded from the scope of the right".[2]
Conditions to Exercise Data Portability
The right to data portability only applies if (i) the individual has either consented to the processing or if (ii) the information is processed for the execution of a contract between the data subject and controller[3] and, in both cases, (iii) data is processed automatically. For example, data which is only available on paper and manually processed falls out of the scope data portability.
Responsibilities of Controllers
Controllers that address portability requests ("sending controllers") act on behalf of a data subject and are responsible for providing prior information about the right’s existence (e.g. in the privacy notice) and clearly explaining the difference between the right of access and the right to data portability; processing the request without undue delay, within 1 month (up to 3 months); carrying out authentication; setting safeguards to ensure they genuinely act on the data subject’s behalf (e.g. ensure that they transmit the exact type of personal data that the data subject wants to receive); in light of the principles set forth in Article 5(1) GDPR, ensuring that the data transmitted is accurate and up to date; and, taking all necessary security measures for transmissions.
Data controllers that receive portability requests ("receiving controllers") have an obligation to "clearly and directly" state the purpose of the new processing before they accept the request in accordance with the transparency requirements set out in Article 14 GDPR; process the request without undue delay, within 1 month (up to 3 months); ensure that the data they accept is relevant and not excessive for the intended data processing; delete the personal data which are not necessary to achieve the purpose of the new processing as soon as possible. The receiving controllers can decide whether to accept and process data from a portability request.
Data Format
According to Article 20(1) GDPR the data should be provided to the data subject in a "structured, commonly used and machine-readable format". Beyond this requirement, the GDPR does not call for a specific format to be used.
According to Recital 68, the data should be available in an "interoperable format", which data controllers "should be encouraged to develop". The WP29 defines interoperability as the "capability to communicate, execute programs, or transfer data among various functional units in a manner that requires the user to have little or no knowledge of the unique characteristics of those units".[4]
The Commission has published a Communication on 'ICT Standardisation Priorities for the Digital Single Market', which may be used as a basis on which to develop standards for the purposes of data portability.[5] The WP29 recommends that data controllers offer several options to the data subject. They suggest, for instance, that data subjects should be offered an opportunity to directly download the data as well as to transmit it directly to another data controller, and that this could be implemented by making an Application Programme Interface ('API') available.
Cormack expresses doubts regarding the viability of this solution, noting that many organisations will hold their data on internal databases that are securely firewalled from internet access as opposed to APis. Without standards leading to interoperability, the right to data portability may "remain more a declaration of principle than a real and effective tool for individual self-determination in the digital environment".[6]
(2) Right to have Personal Data Directly Transmitted to Another Controller
Data subjects can also ask the controller to send their personal data directly to another controller, if this is technically feasible. The sending controllers are, however, not responsible for the processing handled by the data subject or by another company receiving personal data. "In this respect, the data controller is not responsible for compliance of the receiving data controller with data protection law, considering that it is not the sending data controller that chooses the recipient".[7] Data portability is supposed to facilitate the reuse of personal data concerning the data subject provided that the copy of the data should be transmitted in the defined format. Controllers are therefore encouraged to use interoperable formats in order to facilitate such an exchange of personal data between each other. Companies in the same industry may create sector-specific interoperable formats to allow for easier transmissions of personal data (see above).
(3) Right to Erasure
The exercise of the right to data portability does not preclude the exercise of any other rights under the GDPR. Thus, if data subjects want to delete their data from the controller's system (right to erasure under Article 17 GDPR), the controller cannot justify its denial to erase such data because of the data portability request.
(4) Rights of Third Parties
The portability request should not include any third party data if there is a likelihood that the new processing will adversely affect the rights and freedoms of the other data subjects. "Such an adverse effect would occur, for instance, if the transmission of data from one data controller to another, would prevent third parties from exercising their rights as data subjects under the GDPR."[8] The rights and freedoms are unlikely to be adversely affected if the receiving controller processes the data of other data subjects for the same purpose it was processed by the sending controller.
Decisions
→ You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 20 GDPR
References
- ↑ Herbst, in Kühling, Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Article 20 GDPR, margin number 11 (C.H. Beck 2020, 3rd Edition).
- ↑ Lynskey in Kuner, Bygrave, Docksey, The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary, Article 20 GDPR, p. 503 (Oxford University Press 2020). Along the same lines, the recent EDPB, Guidelines 01/2022 on data subject rights - Right of access, 18 January 2022 (Version 1.0), p. 32 (available here).
- ↑ However, according to the WP29, it is a good practice to address portability requests also in such cases that do not explicitly provide for a general right to data portability, i.e. when processing is based on the legitimate interests or for the performance of a task carried out in the public interest. See, WP29, ‘Guidelines on the right to data portability’, 16/EN WP 242 rev.01, 5 April 2017, p. 8 (available here).
- ↑ WP29, ‘Guidelines on the right to data portability’, 16/EN WP 242 rev.01, 5 April 2017, 17 (available here).
- ↑ EU Commission Communication on ICT Standardisation Priorities for the Digital Single Market (Available here).
- ↑ Lynskey in Kuner, Bygrave, Docksey, The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary, Article 20 GDPR, p. 505 (Oxford University Press 2020).
- ↑ WP29, ‘Guidelines on the right to data portability’, 16/EN WP 242 rev.01, 5 April 2017, 6 (available here).
- ↑ WP29, ‘Guidelines on the right to data portability’, 16/EN WP 242 rev.01, 5 April 2017, 11 (available here).