Search results

unsolicited direct marketing messages received by subscribers. In the ICO's view, is a clear attempt to capitalise on, and profiteer from, the national health crisis

solution. The DPA held that the controller could not obtained a valid consent under Article 6(1)(a) GDPR for the use of cookies when the first solution was used

Officer) has fined Leads Works Ltd 250000 GBP (€291,237) for sending more than 2.6 million nuisance and unlawful direct marketing text messages to customers without

requirements of Article 6(1)(a) of the GDPR, read in conjunction with Article 7 thereof, which cannot be replaced by invoking Article 6(1)(b) thereof? 2

and application of Article 20.1 c) by the AEPD implies the exclusion of the weighting required by the legitimizing basis of Article 6.1.f) of the RGPD and

is also a claim for damages by the plaintiff pursuant to Article 82(1) GDPR, since there have been violations of Article 6(1)(a) GDPR and Article 34 GDPR

deliberation on Article 82 of the Loi n° 78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés. Could the CNIL decide a prohibition

the processing lacked a legal basis under Article 6(1) GDPR and breached the principle of good faith under Article 5(1)(a) GDPR. As a result, the DPA ordered

three-part test (Article 6 GDPR) - i) Legitimate interest ii) Necessity and iii) Balancing tests. The Commissioner has established that there is a legitimate

e-mail box without a legal basis, cf. the Privacy Ordinance Article 6 No. 1 letter f, for failure to assess protests, cf. , cf. Article 13. Background to

connection with the violation of article/and 5.1. c); 6.1.; 13.1. (c);13.1(e) and13.2(a)AVG: r PAGE 01-00001582885-0002-0033-01- □1-� r L _JCourt of Appeal Brussels

in Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, as the company processed personal data without having any of the legal titles listed in Article 6(1) GDPR

that the infringement of Article 5.1 b) GDPR and Article 6.1 a) GDPR is proven. However, the controller expressly acknowledges a serious mistake in which

SOLUCIONES ENERGÉTICAS, S.A., with NIF A85818797, for a violation of Article 6.1 of the GDPR, typified in Article 83.5 of the GDPR, a fine of 50,000 euros (fifty

accountability with the principles of Article 5(1) and par.2 in conjunction with Article 6(1) GDPR. B. imposes on NEW YORK COLLEGE S.A. the effective, proportionate

statement of the law, Article 10 defines the Authority’s competence in compliance with Article 55 GDPR.Article 55 GDPR provides for a restriction only in

defendant wrongfully relied on Article 6(1)(f) GDPR as a legal basis and acted contrary to Article 5(1)(a) GDPR and Article 5(1)(c) GDPR. After the defendant rejected

infringement of article 6.1 of the GDPR, infringement typified in article 83.5 of the aforementioned Regulation 2016/679. II breached obligation Article 6.1 of the

The Danish DPA found that Securitas A/S had a legal basis under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR for disclosing the personal data of an employee to the Police Intelligence

controllers lacked a legal basis for processing in violation of Article 6(1) GDPR and failed to inform data subjects pursuant to Article 13 GDPR. In addition