Search results

Court derived this right from Article 2.1 of the Basic Law (Grundgesetz - GG), the right to free development of personality, and from Article 1.1 of the

the Basic Law (GG), from Article 103(2) GG, from the general freedom of action in Article 2(1) GG and from human dignity in Article 1(1) GG. Without a link

general right of personality, Article 2 Paragraph 1 GG in conjunction with Article 1 Paragraph 1 GG, or from Section 823 Paragraph 2 BGB in connection with

11 LA 104/19, ECLI:DE:OVGNI:2020:0722.11LA104.19.00 Article 1 (1) GG, Article 2 (1) GG, § 7aF DSG ND, § 43 VwGO Proceedings VG Osnabrück, 30 January 2019

the court also assessed the case under German Constitution (Grundgesetz - GG) but did not find any violations. As a result, the disclosure of the audit

non-binding assessment of the defendant. Finally, the applications No. 1 a dd to gg were inadmissible because the plaintiff only wanted to obtain basic information

in Greece shall be exercised by the Authority established by Law 2472/1997 (GG I 50).’; 6. Whereas, pursuant to Article 3 (a) of Law 4624/2019, the provisions

granted a fair hearing according to Art. 103 (1) GG or his right to legal protection (Art. 19 (4) GG) as violated by the refused inspection of the files

EWG_DSGVO Article 88 GG Art GG Article 1 GG Art GG Article 2 Paragraph GG Article 2 Paragraph 1 GG Art GG Article 5 Paragraph GG Article 5 Paragraph 1

Code (BGB) in conjunction with Article 34 of the German Constitution (GG). Art. 34 GG. The claim under Art. 82 GDPR is advantageous for the data subject because

comprehensive advice is part of his professional right protected by Art. 12 GG. The applicant also has a legitimate interest in inquiring about the date

Court decided that the fundamental rights of the Basic Law (Grundgesetz - GG) constitute the ground in this legal dispute, which falls within the field

that the N***GG would monitor them at crime scene 1 at their workplace using a video surveillance system. The managing directors of N***GG have the opportunity

1969, 1707; BVerfGE 34, 269 (281) = NJW 1973, 1221, BeckOK GG/Lang, 42nd Ed. 1.12.2019, GG Art. 2 para. 41). This includes both the domestic area as well

1 (1) and Art 10 (1) of the German constitution (Basic Law – Grundgesetz – GG) for lack of consideration of the principle of proportionality. In particular

in connection with Art. 1 Para. 1 GG), possibly even interference with the inviolability of the home (Art. 13 Para. 1 GG). The right to informational self-determination

within the meaning of Article 31 GG incompatible with federal law. In particular, there is no collision i.S.d. Art. 31 GG compared to §§ 285 sentence 1 No

(3) sentence 2 EUV 2016/679, Section 626 (1) BGB, Art 3 (1) GG, Art 12 (1) GG, Art 14 (1) GG Suggested citation: Federal Labor Court, judgment of August

Basic Law that is alleged to have been violated, § 93a.2 letter b of the BVerfGG. This decision can be taken by the Board because the relevant constitutional

2, 1004 BGB analogously in connection with Art. 2 para. 1, Art. 1 para. 1 GG, Art. 17 para. 1 lit. d) DSGVO, because her personal data is stored according