Search results

senates. Pursuant to section 27 of the Data Protection Act (DSG) as amended (which essentially corresponds to section 39 DSG 2000, which was in force until

rnhofer/Kunnert/Riedl, DSG (2018), page 145). The deviating provision in § 12.4 no. 1 of the DPA on the previous search termDSG of the next search term

Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz - DSG) exempted them from the necessity of a legal basis under Article 6 GDPR (note: Under § 9 DSG, Chapters II to VII and Chapter

with number 27 "Rek 1 - garage entrance" records the inside garage entrance of staircase 2. The position and recording range of camera number 27 is as follows:

Section 24 (1) DSG only involves the processing of personal data contrary to the provisions of the GDPR, § 1 or Article 2 1st main part of the DSG can be combated

2019 - VG 27 K 292.15, juris marginal no. 179 ff. ; BVerfG, resolutions of October 23, 1986 - 2 BvL 7/84, 2 BvL 8/84, juris marginal note 27; of June 30

2016 p. 1; Sections 18 (1) and 24 (1) and (5) of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999 as amended; Section 3b (1) of the Experts

person filed a complaint under the Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG), in which it was summarised that the Company (appellant in this case - a

provides for decisions to be taken by senates. Under Section 27 of the Data Protection Act (DSG) as amended, the Federal Administrative Court decides on appeals

responded to the assessment of those affected in a public response dated September 27, 2022: [Editor's note: The accused's answer, reproduced here as a facsimile

1 Directive 2016/680/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing

as further supported by way of the recent decision of Saini J in Warren v DSG Retail Limited [2021] EWHC 2168 QB)[5], ten minutes later Mr Metcalfe formally

GDPR in conjunction with Article 22 (1) DSG. In a first part, compliance with the provisions of the GDPR and the DSG is generally checked, which is why various

1 and sections 8 as well as 62 para. 1 line 1 of the Data Protection Act (DSG) by Österreichische Post AG (the co-participating party). The complainant

GDPR) and a parliamentary body (§ 2 (3) Datenschutzgesetz Rheinland-Pfalz - DSG RP) were involved. As regards the claimant's statement of not being able to

the extent of the fine imposed with the contested decision. According to § 27 Administrative Court Procedure Act Federal Law Gazette I 2013/33 as amended

Individuals with regard to the Processing of Personal Data (Data Protection Act - DSG) reads (in excerpts): (constitutional provision) Basic right to data protection

Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing

took the view that an (implied) objection was to be seen in his letter of 27 March 2018 anyway (Annex K 46). The plaintiff is further of the opinion that

an implied contradiction would in any case have to be seen in her letter of 27 March 2018, sent before the DSGVO entered into force. The plaintiff is further

for the decision to be made by senates. According to Section 27 of the Data Protection Act (DSG) as amended is decided by the Federal Administrative Court

decision on the applications of the Subpoenas dated October 6, 2020 and April 27, 2021 for information about and a copy of the recording of the video surveillance

train is in operation. The recordings are stored for 48 hours. By e-mail of 27 April 2021, the plaintiff informed the defendant that he had boarded the S-Bahn

entitled to process the MB's data, the complaint based on Section 24 (5) DSG should be rejected. With regard to the also asserted right to erasure, the

HKG ND, Section 85a HKG ND, Section 85a (1) S 1 HKG ND, Section 5 (1) S 2 DSG ND, Section 46 (2) KomWG ND, Section 51 S 2 WahlG ND PROCEDURE VG Stade, 3

senates. Pursuant to section 27 of the Data Protection Act (DSG) as amended (which essentially corresponds to section 39 DSG 2000, which was in force until

legal representative here - introduced extracts from notarial contracts dated 27 September 2017 (Cert. no.: x and Cert. no.: y), which, inter alia, show the

Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing

referred to a ruling by the Vienna Regional Administrative Court dated February 27, 2023, VGW-101/007/15504/2022, which ordered this change to the civil status

Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of April 27, 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of

proceedings against the person concerned. By administrative fine decision of 27 November 2019, the BfDI imposed a fine of EUR 9,550,000 on the party concerned

Art. 17 para. 27 with reference to the ECJ, judgment of May 13, 2014– C-131/12, Google Spain and Google -, juris para. 71– 72, 75, 92). 27 Because the data

Art GG Article 5 Paragraph GG Article 5 Paragraph 1 SaarlDSG § 22 paragraph 1 sentence 1 SaarlDSG § 4 paragraph 2 TV-L § TV_L § 3 paragraph TV_L § 3 paragraph

the matter. 26 bb) The order of 31 January 2020 is also materially lawful. 27 The legal basis of the decision on point I is Section 74(1) sentences 1 and

application of the General Data Protection Regulation (e.g. Senate judgment of July 27, 2020 - VI ZR 405/18, BGHZ 226, 285, para. 11 et seq.) has been opened. 10

para. 25; OLG Cologne, judgment of 18 April 2019 - 15 U 215/18, juris para. 27). margin number25 bb. Personal data must be distinguished from factual data

were still being conducted against the accused with regard to Section 63 DSG, since administrative criminal proceedings are only applicable on a subsidiary

law referred only to contractual, but not to data protection law provisions. 27 § Section 13(6) of the Telemedia Act was to be qualified as a provision exclusively

- 25 NE 21.2634 - BeckRS 2021, 36742 Rn. 39 ff. with further references). 27 (b) Insofar as the applicants assert that Section 4 (1) sentence 5, 8 16th

application of the data Basic Protection Ordinance (cf. Senate judgment of July 27, 2020 - VI ZR 405/18, BGHZ 226, 285 Rn. 11 et seq.) has been opened. b) The

detailed data protection violation by the plaintiff (cf. also VG Hannover, U.v. 27.11.2019 - 10 A 820/19 - juris marginal note 19; VG Mainz, U.v. 17.12.2020

2021, BayMBl. 2021 No. 615) in the version of Amendment Ordinance of October 27, 2021 (BayMBl. 2021 No. 757), to be temporarily suspended by issuing a temporary

subjects have consented or the public interest in the Announcement predominates. 27 a. This reason for rejection is not excluded because of the emissions clause

health risk for the residents according to the current state of knowledge (2). 27 (1) However, the consumption quantities recorded in an electronic (wireless)

an interest worthy of protection and objectively justifiable (BVerwG, U. v. 27 March 2019 - 6 C 2/18 - marginal number 25 at juris (still to § 6b paragraph

of equity and debt (Reiner, in: MünchKomm-HGB, 3rd edition 2013, § 264 Rn. 27; see also Maatsch / Schnabel, loc. cit., § 3 Rn. 136). The obligation to disclose