Search results

not as a rule aim at a uniformity of the protection of fundamental rights (aa), and on the presumption that a level of protection of fundamental rights

the travel agency AA has been in contact with the data protection commissioner's office by phone on 17 November 2021. According to AA, all information about

receive the information that no payment history data was stored on the AA, and the AA would thus receive the same credit rating as a person who had always

regarding the "personal data" processed by the defendant (application no. 1 aa), the action was inadmissible because it was vague, especially since it had

for the protection of legitimate interests of the defendant (on this under aa.) or a third party (on this under bb.). The "Rules of Conduct for the Verification

parties are competitors within the meaning of Section 8 (3) no. 1 UWG. 57. aa) The status as a competitor pursuant to Section 8(3) No 1 UWG requires a concrete

officer. A degree of independence is required of the data protection officer. aa) Since the law requires the appointment of a company data protection officer

obligation to raise a complaint pursuant to Section 160 (3) sentence 1 GWB. aa. The complaint regarding the non-inclusion of the costs for the implementation

(see in detail in the comments on Art. 32 Para. 2 GDPR under II.1.b.aa.(2). (e).(aa)) of the data is to be assigned exclusively to the sphere of the defendant

within the meaning of Article 6 (1), first subparagraph, letter a, DSGVO (aa) nor was video surveillance carried out in accordance with Article 6 (1),

principles of supranational cartel sanction law are to be applied is disputed. aa) The German legislator has not answered this question unambiguously: In Section

DIMITION A.A.A. AND B.B.B. OF FOUNDATION SYNDROME 5P To: A.A.A. < ***EMAIL.1> , AA B.B.B. ***EMAIL.2 • The Foundation has written to the members of the Foundation

in the national damages regime cannot be relied upon without further ado (aA Schweiger in Knyrim, DatKomm Art 82 DSGVO Rz 2). [14] According to Recital

benefits and interest from this premium share (appeals to 4 a) and 4 c). 15 aa) The lower court also correctly decided that the assertion of the complaints

and å in their name will experience that the letters change to ae, oe and aa in, for example, international airlines' customer registers. Nor should this

justified, which means that only what has been demanded has to be fulfilled. aa) According to the understanding of the Appeals Chamber, the right to information

rights of the Basic Law (aa). This does not affect reserve reservations in the event of a fundamental loss of this protection (bb). 43 aa) The fact that the

be lawful at the present time. The scope of application of the Act is open (aa). The person summoned is entitled to claim; his request is not abusive (bb)

data for "journalistic purposes" within the meaning of Article 38 BayDSG. aa. Although the defendant is to be endorsed at least in so far as such regulations

administrative files or parts thereof, four different issues must be distinguished: 40 aa) On the one hand, information on data protection law without cause - derived

explained that WP29 and EDPB have assisted ESMA and IOSCO with the drafting of the AA during the last two years (six rounds of comments) in order to ensure that

6193-22 15. AA's complaints to the Swedish Privacy Agency have not led to those of him the requested measures. It follows from the foregoing that AA has the

OLG Stuttgart, order of 1 February 1993 - 4 Ss 573/92, MDR 1993, 572). 13 aa) In doing so, the Chamber does not overlook the fact that in the legal literature

rejected AA's appeal there. As a reason for the decision stated that the appealed decision did not affect him on such way that it is appealable. 5. AA appealed

and province of the holder of said supply point that is required in letter aa) of this same article. d) Town of the supply point, which includes the name

political function in XXXX. The AA stated that the information provided by the JA XXXX was correct. In the meantime, the AA had asked the trade union to delete

expressly named by the AA, it was not up to the data protection authority to change such a designation and to exchange the party with whom the AA wished to engage

suffering by the complainant can be considered under Article 82.1 of the GDPR. aa) The District Court should not have decided, without a reference for a preliminary

CoronaVO is unlikely to succeed (aa). The issue of a temporary injunction is also not required in the above sense (bb). 21 aa) The application for a review

data for "journalistic purposes" within the meaning of Article 38 BayDSG. aa. Although the defendant is to be endorsed at least in so far as such regulations

third-country national has committed a serious crime. Such a situation exists here. aa) There is reasonable suspicion against the plaintiff that he was involved

action is only partially justified. a) The application for 1) is unfounded. aa) On the one hand, the plaintiff is asserting the right to information according

jurisdiction of the court, the perrea Kp. Pursuant to Section 13 (3) (a) (aa), the Metropolitan Court has exclusive jurisdiction. Pursuant to Section 27

Strasser/Jabornegg/Resch, ArbVG § 96 Rz 140; Reissner in Zellkomm3 § 96 ArbVG Rz 24 aA Goricnik, replica to Reissner/Schneeberger, note to OGH 9 ObA 23/15w DRdA

in the national damages regime cannot be relied upon without further ado (aA Schweiger in Knyrim, DatKomm Art 82 DSGVO Rz 2). [14] According to Recital

reference is made to the relevant statements in the judgment mentioned. 35 aa) According to Section 24 (2) KSchG, an operation "within the meaning of this

70 (1) FamFG. § Section 14 (4) sentence 7 TMG does not indicate otherwise. aa) For the provision of information pursuant to Section 14 (3) of the German

judgment in its entirety. He alleged a violation: 1.Art. 145 § 1 point 1 of the AA in connection with joke. 134 § 1 of the p.s.a. in connection with joke. 5

the defendant. 32 a) Such a claim would not arise from Art. 82 I GDPR. 33 aa) Based on the plaintiff's submissions, there would already be no violation

higher-ranking law. c) The regulations mentioned do not violate higher-ranking law. aa) The defendant rebukes without success that the regulations violated the reservation

the deadline for filing a lawsuit under Section 61 b (1) of the ArbGG. 68 aa) According to Section 61 b Paragraph 1 ArbGG, a claim for compensation according

action is inadmissible as a step action within the meaning of § 254 ZPO. 35 aa) According to § 254 ZPO, the specific indication of the services claimed by

Section 13 (3) a) The General Court has exclusive jurisdiction under point (aa) of A Kp. Section 27 (1) In a dispute in which the tribunal has exclusive

Section 13 (3) a) The General Court has exclusive jurisdiction under point (aa) of A Kp. Section 27 (1) In a dispute in which the tribunal has exclusive

within the jurisdiction of the court. Section 13 (3) Under subparagraph (a) (aa), the Metropolitan Court has exclusive jurisdiction. A Kp. Pursuant to Section

E-Mail dated 25.06.2014 (Supplement ./2), E-Mail dated 13.06.2011 (Supplement ./AA), Trade Licence of the Defendant for Trade and Industry "Adressenverlag und

Section II.2)aa), p. 18. 149 DE-HH SA Order, Section II.2)aa), p. 17. 150 DE-HH SA Order, Section II.2)aa), p. 17. 151 DE-HH SA Order, Section II.2)aa), p. 16

1953" solely by reference to the entry to that effect in his Turkish passport (aa)). The Senate is also not bound by the judgment of the Regional Court of Kayseri

Sections 27 (2), 28 (2), 29 (1) sentence 2 and 34 (1) BDSG" are not enforceable. aa) By referring to other legal regulations, which in turn contain numerous legal

(a) The applicant's request for information is not of a property-law nature. aa) Pecuniary disputes are disputes in which the claims are directed to money

pretending to be present) (cf. BAG December 16, 2021 - 2 AZR 356/21 - Rn. 31 ff.).aa) According to the consistent submissions of both parties, the plaintiff bindingly

caused by the alleged violation of public procurement law, Section 160 (2) GWB. aa) Since the Respondents have not yet awarded any bids, proper notification

article 2 par. 1-2 of the said 6632/2021 C.Y.A.: "For the hotels of sub-para. aa' of para. a' of par. 2 of article 1 of Law 4276/2014, Annex I applies, which

government 35 a) Significance and technical background of stock data information 36 aa) Statistical 36 bb) Technical development of IP address allocation 42 (b)

constitutes an administrative act within the meaning of § 35 VwVfG M-V. Paragraph32 aa. An administrative act is any order, decision or other sovereign measure taken

basis for the claim (aa)) and ultimately rightly assumed that the factual requirements for the right to correction are not met (bb)). 23 aa) The basis of the

(see aa)) and on the other hand if the disclosure conflicts with interests of the persons concerned which are worthy of protection (see bb)). 20 aa) With

cumulative grading of those criteria, as follows: [...] c) Social criteria: (AA) Number of children: three (3) units for each minor child for whom the applicant

detailed medical records 252 individuals and check-in books from Vík, as well as AA record books from the treatment center in Sogni. Then there was additional

assumed that the posters in question show a portrait of the plaintiff. 15 aa) If a person is represented by another person - for example an actor - the

management level, are subject to the obligation to publish under the HmbTG. aa) Addressee of the publication obligation according to § 3 Paragraph 1 No.

probably also Schiff in Ehmann/Selmayr Datenschutz-Grundverordnung² Art 9 Rz 2 f; aA Schulz in Gola Art 9 Rz 13; Weichert in Kühling/Buchner (Hrsg), DSGVO² Art

parked vehicles to the police inspection does not violate data protection law.aa.The scope of the GDPR is open, because the recordings of photographs of illegally

pseudonymised data stored in the Hamburg Cancer Registry are personal data (aa.). The assignment of this data to the plaintiff is neither actually (bb.)

portrait reporting violates the plaintiff inadmissibly her personal rights. aa. The admissibility of portrait publications is to be judged according to the

9-11 Fax: +36 1 391-1410. (XII. 14.) MNB decree § 28 in point a) subpoint aa) (transfer), point b) subpoint bb) (cash payment) to a payment account), point

I.6), ./15 - e-mail from the MB to the AA of October 3rd, 2021 (see point I.7), ./16 - file submission by the AA of October 5th, 2021 (see point I.8) ,

to carry it out. 52 a) The following principles are to be assumed here. 53 aa) The implementation of the bEM is not a formal prerequisite for the effectiveness

been opened up and the substantive conditions for making a claim are met (aa). The interested party is entitled to make a claim; his request is not abusive

GDPR, provided that the limits of necessity and data economy are observed. aa) The Senate does not ignore the fact that agreements between a general contractor

attributed to it. 49 c) The defendant, however, did not violate Art. 34 GDPR. 50 aa) The defendant immediately informed the plaintiff about the data incident

including the corrections, are "personal data" of the plaintiff (see below (aa)). The corrected exam exams are not automatically "processed" by the State

foregoing and therewith also expressly taking into account the fact that CP & Aa medium-sized enterprise is in the sense of article 2a UAVA, taking into account

conditions are met in the case at issue with regard to § 7 para. 2 no. 2 UWG. 26 aa) The court of appeal regarded the objectionable declaration of consent as

provided with a list of members, including the e-mail addresses, for himself. aa) Basic concerns 41 However, the plaintiff no longer claims that he needs the

following can be said about the conflicting fundamental rights positions: (aa) The information interest of press representatives is very important. The

falls within the jurisdiction of a court; Pursuant to Section 13 (3) (a) (aa), the Metropolitan Court has exclusive jurisdiction. A Kp. Pursuant to Section

[...] 2. Business premises: [...] e) in the case of gastronomy customers: aa) first name bb) name cc) telephone number dd) email address ee) table number

com/resources/assets/slt3lc6tev37/1M1j5uuFDuLTYiZJJDPBag/bda8d591447971b3df2bccf5aa4e0916/Customer_DPA_v.3_1_-_en_1_Oct_2020.pdf https://edpb.europa.eu/news/

the tax office Mitte/Tiergarten (aa)) and against the tax office Mitte/Tiergarten (bb)) is fulfilled. Paragraph 21 aa) The decision of the Berlin Commissioner

personal and a their children born or adopted after submitting a loan application aa) name ab) birth name, ac) their mother's name, ad) their place and time of

for the plaintiff - at least for the year 1988 - are objectively incorrect (aa). However, the Chamber is not convinced that the information provided by the

GDPR for the violations alleged by the plaintiff should not already be open (aa.), but in any case the defendant cannot be accused of a violation of the GDPR

The requirements for a claim to data information are met "on the merits" (aa.). However, the plaintiff is not entitled "to the extent" to the requested

amount of the coveted compensation for pain and suffering at EUR 2,000.00. aa) Due to the alleged violation of the defendant against the provisions According

does not exist because the challenged data processing is not unlawful. 15 aa) According to Art. 6 Para. 1 Sentence 1 DS-GVO, the processing of personal

administrative files or parts thereof, four different disputes must be distinguished: aa) On the one hand, information on data protection law without cause - derived

lawsuit is subject to the provisions of Art. Pursuant to Section 13 (3) (a) (aa), the Metropolitan Court has exclusive jurisdiction. A Kp. Pursuant to Section

information on good faith according to Section 242 of the German Civil Code (BGB). aa) According to Section 242 of the German Civil Code (BGB), the debtor is exceptionally

applicable to the processing of personal data by the defendant tax office (aa.). The claim of the plaintiff, who is personally entitled to claim as the

damages under private law are independent of each other and have equal priority. aa) 49 By establishing the supervisory authorities, the legislator wanted to

13 (3) a) The General Court has exclusive jurisdiction under subparagraph (aa) of A Kp. Section 27 (1) (b), legal representation is mandatory in litigation

entitled to claim damages from the person responsible or the processor. 18 aa) According to one view, Art. 82 (1) DS-GVO is to be interpreted broadly in

to compensation for pain and suffering from a violation of Art. 82 DS-GVO. aa) It can be left open at this point whether an interference with the right

decision at least withstands the legal examination in terms of the result. aa) According to Art. 6 Para. 1 Sentence 1 DS-GVO, the processing of personal

under the contract of use. She was not authorized to delete the posts. 76 aa) The defendant has no right to delete the plaintiff's disputed contributions

plaintiff has a claim under Art. 17 (1) DS-GVO to their deletion Status. 16 aa) The plaintiff only raised an objection within the meaning of Art. 17 (1)

the lawsuit is referred to in the Kp. § 13, subsection (3) a) Based on point aa), the Metropolitan Court is exclusively competent. The Kp. Section 27 (1)

contact a person on Bosis of his nadm and, in appropriate cases, anm i ni m to m aa nta I o nd e re i the ntificatie ge give ns;4 The members 7 and 2 shall apply

13 (3) a) The General Court has exclusive jurisdiction under subparagraph (aa) of A Kp. Section 27 (1) Legal representation shall be mandatory in proceedings

falls within the jurisdiction of the court. Pursuant to Section 13 (3) (a) (aa), the Metropolitan Court has exclusive jurisdiction. A Kp. Pursuant to Section

in Section 6 Paragraph 5 Sentence 1 of the WahlO is necessary. Paragraph 14 aa) The data to be recorded in accordance with Section 6 Paragraph 5 Sentence

v. 23.3 .2007 – 1 BvR 2228/02 – BayVBl 2007, 624). That's not the case. 7 aa) The administrative court correctly decided that the claim asserted by the

the legal basis of the decision. unjustified, pursuant to art. 151 of the AA, adjudicated as in the operative part of the judgment The case was examined

affected if they could be individualised or identified without being named. 18 aa) The information requested by the applicant is already not personal data.

2019 - 1 BvR 587/17 - BVerfGE 151, 173 Rn. 32 with further references). 15 aa) The plaintiffs argue that the contested order violates their fundamental

definition in Art. 4 No. 1 Sentence 1 of the GDPR are affected. Paragraph23 aa. Personal data is any information relating to an identified or identifiable

applicable). b) The principles of suspicion reporting have been observed. aa) The principles of suspicion reporting are applicable. The plaintiff denies

was justified, so that there is a claim for injunctive relief in each case. aa) Insofar as the defendant accuses the plaintiff of having given false information

million. We understand it so that everyone companies that are registered in the Aa register have initially had the opportunity to access the workplace. Employers'

failed to comply, the defendant deleted his profile already on March 9, 2019. aa. In such a constellation, one may assume that the present dispute between

This also applies in the context of text reporting (not separately attacked). aa. The admissibility of portrait publications is to be assessed according to

not lawfully according to Art. 17 Para. 1d in conjunction with Art. 6 DSGVO. aa) The plaintiff has consented to the processing of his personal data Data not

being enforced, not even for special circumstances of the individual case. 24 (aa) The order to surrender documents is formally lawful In particular, there

into account, acting pursuant to art. 145 § 1 point 1 lit. a) and c) of the AA 200 of the BRL. When re-examining the case, the authority should take into

groups of retail outlets formed by Article 3 no. 3 letter a double letter aa and cc of the Twenty-eighth Ordinance on the Adaptation of the Regulations

lawsuit is referred to in the Kp. Section 13 (3) Based on subparagraph a) point aa), the Metropolitan Court is exclusively competent. The Kp. Pursuant to § 27

on transparency and online publication mentioned above, has provided all pp.aa. specific indications on how to reconcile the transparency and publicity obligations

not opened up in part, otherwise the encroachment is justified in any case (aa-cc). The installation also does not violate Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (b).a)

it should be noted that the aforementioned provision provides that the pp.aa. must publish "the lists of measures adopted by the political bodies and managers

58 GDPR or § 38 Paragraph 1 Clause 6, Paragraph 5 BDSG old version. 17th aa) According to Art. 78 GDPR, every natural or legal person has the right to

a PCR or PoC antigen test at the school, the application is admissible. 19 aa) The application is also permissible with regard to the applicability of the

at the litigation secretariat of the Council of State, Ms. W ... A ..., Mr. AA ... U ... and Mrs Y ... O ... ask the Council of State: 1 °) cancel for excess

resignados (Ora), estos last considered in AA (through the chat) and the primeros los pedidos that since the AA no son aceptados en los primero 30 segundos

relating to an identifiable natural person ("data subject"); identifiable by aa natural person who, directly or indirectly, in particular by an identifier

rejection according to Art. 8 Para. 1 Clause 1 No. 1 BayUIG do not exist. 31 aa. The coveted information is, as the District Office correctly explains, personal

GDPR provides a comprehensive right to information about personal data. 18 aa) Article 4 No. 1 GDPR defines the term “personal data” as all information

also results from the degree of harmonisation sought by the GDPR. Recital18 aa) Since the sanctioning of breaches of order by associations in the EU is based

ordering the defendant to take supervisory measures in accordance with Art. 17 aa) According to Art. 78 GDPR, every natural or legal person has the right to

plaintiff are administrative acts within the meaning of § 35 S. 1 HVwVfG (aA VG Ansbach, judgment of 16.3.2020 - AN 14 K 19.00464 – juris para. 15 without

purely national situations, did not make any corresponding differentiations. 23 aa) After the negative decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union

on the outcome of the case. Moreover, as results from Art. 134 § 1 of the AA, the Court adjudicates within the limits of a given case, without being bound

while..., - 8 - Due to the behavior of the customer, no possibility of an AA" (Fact 2) In "Information 2" on page 101 under "Where does the processed data

Civil Code. 45bb) Due to the serious breaches of duty by the plaintiff under aa), the defendant was unreasonable if the defendant was given a further adherence

Criminal Court falls within the jurisdiction of the court. 13. § (3) (a) (aa), the Metropolitan Court has exclusive jurisdiction. A Kp. Pursuant to Section

enable, are not violated in their rights (§ 113 para. 1 sentence 1 VwGO). 21 aa) The legal basis of the contested decision is the provision of Section 25

13 (3) a) The General Court has exclusive jurisdiction under subparagraph (aa) of A Kp. Pursuant to Section 27 (1) (b), it is an administrative matter within

if at least one of the conditions set out in Art. 6 (I) of the GDPR is met. aa) According to Art. 4 No. I GDPR, "personal data" means any information relating

according to Paragraph 3 of Art. 15 GDPR. Although the BGH expressed itself aaO. Rn. 17 such that a copy is made available, since the question of such a

is worthy of protection, outweighs the plaintiff's interest in information. aa) This follows from § 5 paragraph 1 sentence 2 IFG. According to this, special

the lawsuit is referred to in the Kp. § 13, subsection (3) a) Based on point aa), the Metropolitan Court is exclusively competent. The Kp. Section 27, paragraph

above-mentioned circumstances, the Court, acting pursuant to Art. 151 of the AA, ruled on the dismissal of the complaint.

jurisdiction of the court, the lawsuit is subject to the Kp. 13. Paragraph 3 (a) (aa) the Metropolitan Court has exclusive jurisdiction. A Kp. Pursuant to Section

courts, the proceedings are governed by the Kp. § 13, paragraph (3), point a) aa) on the basis of subsection, the Metropolitan Court is exclusively competent

referred to in the Kp. On the basis of § 13, paragraph (3) point a) point aa), the Metropolitan Court is exclusively competent. The Kp. On the basis of

paragraph 1 of article 4 of Directive EC/95/46, of October 24, 1995, as well as aa fnea c) of paragraph 3 of article 4 of Law 67/98, of 26 October, which transposed

application. 33c) The application is unfounded because it is too broad. 34aa) Even if one assumes that the defendant's terms of use do not effectively

substantiated the fact that he suffered considerable damage. In detail: 49aa) 50The plaintiff is initially authorized to act. For his own claim, this is

months later, the City Hall awarded the contract to company D., patronized by AA. Jr. (photo), at the price of 230 lei/sqm/year, i.e. 59,800 lei annually.

protection. Data protection law is, at least in part, Consumer Protection Law. aa. According to § 2 paragraph 2 sentence 1 no. 11 UKlaG belong to the consumer

13 (3) a) The General Court has exclusive jurisdiction under subparagraph (aa) of A Kp. Pursuant to Section 27 (1), legal representation in administrative

the jurisdiction of the court Section 13 (3) Pursuant to subparagraph (a) (aa), the Metropolitan Court has exclusive jurisdiction. A Kp. § 27 Paragraph

53ae ea195b4a6303a794024f943b780a7bcc53e4e237 5bb123241e708622c749354f6bf0aa974b50a85a a4e04c590badc8453e5c023b019497d0743706af f4dee9d5bf57d506aecb781f920e23df4addef42

the above-mentioned sense. The applicant has rightly pointed this out. 147 aa) The uniformity of the aim of the action is not sufficient to accept a single

to compensate for non-material damage cannot be used without further ado (aA Schweiger in Knyrim, DatKomm Art 82 GDPR margin no.2). 2. According to Recital

has not been adequately presented or proven, and otherwise not available. 49 aa) Right from the beginning of the video surveillance, there was no danger in

referred to in the Kp. On the basis of § 13, paragraph (3) point a) point aa), the Metropolitan Court is exclusively competent. The Kp. On the basis of

the lawsuit is referred to in the Kp. § 13, subsection (3) a) Based on point aa), the Metropolitan Court is exclusively competent. The Kp. Section 27, paragraph

contrary to the requirements of good faith (§ 307 para. 1 sentence 1 BGB). 41 aa) A violation of the requirement of transparency (§ 307 para. 1 sentence 2

referred to in the Kp. Section 13, paragraph (3). Based on point a) subpoint aa), the Metropolitan Court is exclusively competent. The Kp. Section 27 (1)

falls within the jurisdiction of the court. Pursuant to Section 13 (3) (a) (aa), the Metropolitan Court has exclusive jurisdiction. A Kp. Section 27 (1)

responsible or the processor. 70a) The GDPR is applicable to the present case. 71aa) The temporal scope is open because the incident in dispute occurred after

lawsuit is referred to in the Kp. On the basis of § 13. (3) point a) point aa) paragraph, the Metropolitan Court is exclusively competent. The Kp. On the

justified - on the basis of the current regulation. It lacks a viable legal basis. aa. Any encroachment on the fundamental right to protection of personal data

K 16.5928). f. The deletion of the plaintiff's contribution was unlawful. aa. According to the consistent case-law of the Federal Constitutional Court

the recordings of the plaintiff's video surveillance to 72 hours is lawful. aa) The legal basis for the disputed limitation on the storage duration of the

referred to in the Kp. Section 13, paragraph (3) 20 Based on point a) subpoint aa), the Metropolitan Court is exclusively competent. The Kp. Section 27 (1)

needs to be dealt with. Partial dispute costs 4.12. Pursuant to Article 1019aa Rv, the costs incurred by the person suffering loss or injury (in this case

age - cannot be based on any of the legal bases mentioned in Art. 6 GDPR. 28aa) After the plaintiff If it is undisputed that no consent is obtained from

reflected in this presentation: https://www.caa.si/upload/editor/file/filed7ed2aa0336d929.pptx IP further clarifies that, with respect to the use of drones

video recordings or still images directed outside the stadium to the flock of AaB fans, both before and after they are detained and handcuffed, also outside

referred to in the Kp. Section 13, paragraph (3). Based on point a) subpoint aa), the Metropolitan Court is exclusively competent. The Kp. Section 27 (1)

lawsuit is referred to in the Kp. Section 13 (3) Based on subparagraph a) point aa), the Metropolitan Court is exclusively competent. The Kp. Pursuant to § 27

within the jurisdiction of the court Section 13 (3) Under subparagraph (a) (aa), the Metropolitan Court has exclusive jurisdiction. A Kp. Pursuant to Section

damages either under Article 82 (1) GDPR or on any other basis for the claim. 32aa. The scope of application of Article 82 Para. 1 GDPR is open in terms of time

1089/2010 of November 23, 2010 on the implementation of Directive 2007 / 2AA / E of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the interoperability

for an adequate level of data protection in the USA as a third country (see aa)) nor due to consent pursuant to Art. 49 Paragraph 1 Sentence 1 Letter a)

not violate the plaintiff's rights (Section 113 Paragraph 5 Sentence 1 VwGO).aa) The basis for the plaintiff's request is Article 15 Paragraph 3 Sentence

within the jurisdiction of the court. Section 13 (3) Under subparagraph (a) (aa), the Metropolitan Court has exclusive jurisdiction. A Kp. Section 27 (1)

referred to in the Kp. Section 13, paragraph (3). Based on point a) subpoint aa), the Metropolitan Court is exclusively competent. The Kp. Section 27 (1)

collection by the creditor (ExplanatoryRV 2111 BlgNR 24. GP 14; Kietaibl/Ladler aaO Rz 18; Stabentheiner in Fenyves/Kerschner/Vonkilch, Klang3 [ErgBd; 2017]

credible any circumstances that carry a corresponding right of disposal: 66aa. With a reasonable interpretation (analogous to §§ 133, 157 BGB), the request

of the deplored ones. After the constant iurisdiction of the senate (senate aaO; judgement from 13 February 2018 - 4 U 1234/17 -, juris) the minimum lower

any circumstances to riders from other countries "(see minutes cit., p. 2); aa. during the access to the systems it was ascertained that: "The default access

extended to proceed to the intervention of a "Microphone with number Air Space AA003", and photographs showing the location of this device in a false ceiling

20-year limitation period in asbestos cases (HR 28 April 2000, ECLI:NL:HR :2000:AA5635 (Van Hese/De Schelde, NJ 2000/430). In any case, the judge is expected

review has the following reference number: 2ca746503d826e268cbc6d6f23c1543aa7b67c1d. Summary From May 2018 to April 2021, it has been possible - via an

2023 - 2 O 198/22; LG Heilbronn, judgment of March 3rd, 2023 - 1 O 78/22). 45aa) The amount in dispute for the claim to 1. results from the (minimum) amount

payment of compensation for pain and suffering in the amount of €5,000.00. 36aa. For immaterial damages according to Art. 82 GDPR, those developed within

§ 254 para. 7). 50b) However, the request for information is unfounded. 52aa) 53The asserted right to information does not result from Art. 15 Para. 1

to compensate for non-material damage cannot be used without further ado (aA Schweiger in Knyrim, DatKomm Art 82 GDPR margin no.2). 2. According to Recital

or non-compliance with labour laws (Section 1.1. sub y and Section 1.1. sub aa, respectively, of the SUWI Decree). 4.24. To date, the Inspectorate SZW has

Mail Group Limited Of: 185 Farringdon Road, London, United Kingdom, EC1A 1AA 1. The Information Commissioner (“the Commissioner”) has decided to issue

of the complaint within the periods specified there ( OVG Rheinland-Pfalz aaO, juris marginal note 37), the Senate does not share this assessment. Because

its three statements. The prosecuting authority was also unable to find the AA's telephone number in the course of an online search in two common online

within the jurisdiction of the court Section 13 (3) a) Pursuant to point (aa) of the Act, the Metropolitan Court has exclusive jurisdiction. A Kp. Section

referred to in the Kp. Section 13, paragraph (3). Based on point a) subpoint aa), the Metropolitan Court is exclusively competent. The Kp. Section 27 (1)

euros. 165a) The requirements of Article 82 Para. 1 GDPR are basically met. 166aa)The plaintiff is entitled to claim as a natural person. The defendant is the

to the The judgment of the Supreme Court of 31 March 2000, ECLI:NL:HR: 2000:AA5319, paragraph 3.2.2. It may be deduced from this that the court may, on an

Que Choisir à l'encontre de la société Google sera en conséquence rejeté. aa) Clause n° 33 des Règles de confidentialité de Google Version du 20 décembre