Search results

The District Court of Amsterdam held that a data subject’s right to be forgotten under Article 17 GDPR overrode the interests of a credit ranking agency

websites (para. 3), five of which are in detail (viata.nl, brandfield.nl, otto.nl, jaap.nl and kookwinkel.nl). In par. 3 include the following: “During the loading

controller's refusals, the data subject filed a claim with the District Court of Amsterdam, requesting that his negative registration be removed (erasure request)

subject's name, links to certain websites (www.zwartelijstartsen.nl and www.drimble.nl) appeared between the search results. These links referred to articles

Locations Rechtspraak.nl Enhanced pronunciation Share pronunciation print Save as PDF Copy link Pronunciation order COURT OF AMSTERDAM Private Law Department

Data Protection Regulation), OJEU 2016, L 119/1. 2 Amsterdam District Court 21 January 2021, ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2021:174. 3 Directive 95/46/EC of the European

Krediet Registratie (BKR) of an Amsterdam client removed. Locations Rechtspraak.nl Enriched pronunciation Ruling COURT IN AMSTERDAM Private law department Case

Ekker in Amsterdam, against the private company with limited liability UBER BV , Located in Amsterdam, defendant, lawyer mr. GH Potjewijd in Amsterdam. The

may be made 'at any time' and the decision of the Amsterdam Court of Appeal of 5 November 2019, ECLI: NL: GHAMS: 3966, in which it was held that it is indeed

the municipality. By decision of 10 February 2020, the District Court of Amsterdam dismissed the appellant’s appeal against that decision as unfounded. The

General Data Protection Regulation. Sites Rechtspraak.nl Enriched pronunciation Ruling COURT IN AMSTERDAM Department of Civil and Tax Law, Team I Case number :

[plaintiff] at [place] , plaintiff, Lawyer M.A.C. de Vilder-van Overmeire in Amsterdam, against: the State of the Netherlands, Ministry of Security and Justice

been complied with. Locations Jurisprudence.nl JAR 2019/234 Enriched pronunciation Pronunciation AMSTERDAM COURT OF APPEAL civil and tax law department

AVG; art. 6 paragraph 1 under c AVG; art. 21.1 AVG. Rb and court reject request. Sites Rechtspraak.nl Enriched pronunciation Pronunciation COURT OF APPEAL

conjunction with Article 7.3.9(1) of the Youth Act is granted. Locations Rechtspraak.nl Enhanced pronunciation Share pronunciation Print Save as PDF Copy link Statement

UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM, 2. FACULTY STUDENT COUNCIL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM FACULTY OF ECONOMY AND BUSINESS, both established in Amsterdam, 3. [appellant

Den Haag) rejected an appeal and upheld the District Court of the Hague's (Rb. Den Haag) decision. There it was decided that the interest in keeping a data

decide on it. Allocation of subsidiary removal request. Locations Rechtspraak.nl Enhanced pronunciation Share pronunciation print Save as PDF Copy link Pronunciation

anonymised utterance from www.rechtspraak.nl. Sites Rechtspraak.nl Enriched pronunciation Ruling available at COURT IN AMSTERDAM Private law department Case number

sin-nl.org and www.drimble.nl. She pointed out that the website www.sin-nl.org is closely intertwined with the website www.zwartelijstenartsen.nl, the

2020, lawyer mr. RH Bouwman in Amsterdam, against the legal person under Swedish law HOIST FINANCE AB , Located in Amsterdam, defendant, attorney mr. HAP

FOUNDATION YOUTH PROTECTION REGION AMSTERDAM , Located in Amsterdam, defendant, lawyer mr. JK van den Heuvel in Amsterdam, 2. [interested party] , residing

Locations Rechtspraak.nl Enhanced pronunciation Share pronunciation print Save as PDF Copy link Pronunciation order COURT OF AMSTERDAM Department of private

lawyer mr. AH Ekker in Amsterdam, against the private company with limited liability OLA NETHERLANDS BV , Located in Amsterdam, defendant, attorney mr

Locations Rechtspraak.nl Enhanced pronunciation Share pronunciation print Save as PDF Copy link Pronunciation COURT OF AMSTERDAM Administrative law case

processed of the plaintiff." Locations Rechtspraak.nl Enriched pronunciation Pronunciation COURT OF AMSTERDAM Administrative law case number: AMS 22/4916 ruling

unfounded. Locations Rechtspraak.nl Enriched pronunciation Share pronunciation Print Save as PDF Copy link Statement COURT AMSTERDAM Administrative lawsuit number:

Locations Rechtspraak.nl Enhanced pronunciation Share pronunciation print Save as PDF Copy link Pronunciation police report COURT OF AMSTERDAM Private Law Department

proceedings of 11 October 2022 in the case of Brain Foundation which is based in Amsterdam, who has lodged an appeal and who acted as plaintiff before the court,

different judgment issued 2 weeks later by the same Court on 11 March 2021, Rb. Amsterdam - C/13/692003/HA RK 20-302, which partially found in Uber's favour on

municipality of Amsterdam. The defendant mandated this jurisdiction to Kredietbank Amsterdam. In the exercise of this power, Kredietbank Amsterdam therefore

The District Court of Amsterdam upheld the Dutch DPA’s decision not to handle a data subject’s complaint regarding an access request based on the low societal

limited liability company ING BANK N.V., Based in Amsterdam, defendant, lawyer mr. D.J. Posthuma in Amsterdam. The parties will hereinafter be referred to as

sikkom.nl/tag [internet address] 2. https://www.sikkom.nl [internet address] 3. https://www.sikkom.nl [internet address] 4. https://www.sikkom.nl [internet

Locations Rechtspraak.nl Enhanced pronunciation Share pronunciation print Save as PDF Copy link Statement decision COURT OF AMSTERDAM Private Law Department

2007, ECLI: NL: HR: 2007: AZ4663, ECLI: NL: HR: 2007: AZ4664 and ECLI: NL: HR: 2007: BA3529. 7 A.o. Amsterdam Court of Appeal 5 July 2011 ECLI: NL: GHAMS:

appeal with the District Court of Amsterdam against the defendant's refusal to make a (correct) decision. The Court of Amsterdam registered this appeal under

Appeal unfounded. Locations Rechtspraak.nl Enriched pronunciation Share pronunciation Pronunciation COURT OF AMSTERDAM Administrative law case number: AMS

preliminary relief judge of the Amsterdam District Court referred preliminary questions about this to the Supreme Court (ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2021:174). The Advocate

advertisers has been granted. Locations Rechtspraak.nl Enriched pronunciation Ruling judgment COURT IN AMSTERDAM Private law division, civil judge in preliminary

The Dutch District Court of Amsterdam referred preliminary questions to the CJEU about the scope of legitimate interest. In particular, whether a commercial

participation council CENTRAL STUDENT COUNCIL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM, Based in Amsterdam, 2. the participation council FACULTY STUDENT COUNCIL OF THE

they collected his personal data from the website https://www.enqueteloket.nl on 28 January 2021. The data subject then brought the issue before Court,

safety and quality of healthcare. Defendant sub 1] is chairman of SIN-NL. 2.2. SIN-NL publishes on the internet a "black list of doctors" and a "black list

The District Court of Central Netherlands (Rb. Midden-Nederland) held in a preliminary ruling that AVROTROS can broadcast an episode of the television

G.H. Potty-wide in Amsterdam, in case 706680 / HA ZA 21-789 of the foundation FOUNDATION TAKE BACK YOUR PRIVACY, Based in Amsterdam, plaintiff on the basis

BW? Application HR 25 November 2005 (ECLI: NL: HR: 2005: AU4019) and art. 6 GDPR. Locations Rechtspraak.nl Enriched pronunciation Share pronunciation Print

19. In ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2020:7536, the Amsterdam District Court, with reference to the judgment of the Court of Appeal of The Hague (ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2015:2332)

example concerns Rb. Groningen 24 June 2010, ECLI:NL:RBGRO:2010:BN9168, para. 4.6 (ambulance transport). 42 See for example Rb. Amsterdam September 1, 2017

2020: 674. 4 ECLI: NL: RVS: 2020: 898, ECLI: NL: RVS: 2020: 900 and ECLI: NL: RVS: 2020: 901. 5 Order of 9 September 2011, ECLI: NL: HR: 2011: BQ8097.

liability MOLLIE B.V., Based in Amsterdam, defendant, hereinafter: Mollie, authorized representative mr. J. de Haan in Amsterdam. 1 What this case is about

case of PRIVACY FIRST FOUNDATION in Amsterdam, plaintiff, lawyers mrs. OMBJ Following and FF Blokhuis in Amsterdam against: THE STATE OF THE NETHERLANDS

Tiel, defendant, lawyers mr. H.H. de Vries and mr. C.R.F. de Plaizier in Amsterdam. The parties will hereinafter be referred to as [claimant] and BKR. 1 The

questions without answer no. 2021Z06997 | Overheid.nl> Official announcements (officielebekendmakingen.nl) 2 Antidepressant Discontinuation Syndrome 3 Article

(Loud-juridischadvies.nl) Release of recording Zoom calls for defence against alleged copyright infringement of font and logo (Boek9.nl) Claimant must provide

consequence, the data subject lodged an action with the District Court of Amsterdam, which declared the appeal unfounded. He therefore appealed before the

used. Nor is there any conflict with the GDPR. Locations Rechtspraak.nl AR-Updates.nl 2022-0041 Enhanced pronunciation Share pronunciation print Save as

806/01 European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2023:804 Appeal from: Rb. Amsterdam (Netherlands) ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2021:1019 Appeal to: Unknown Original

FOUNDATION, established in Amsterdam and with offices in Hoofddorp, plaintiff, lawyers mr. D.J.G. Visser and mr. P. de Leeuwe in Amsterdam, in return for the private

have an independent forensic investigation carried out. Locations Rechtspraak.nl Enriched pronunciation Pronunciation verdict ROTTERDAM COURT Trade and port

University of Amsterdam, the Free University of Brussels, the Netherlands Institute for Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, the Free University of Amsterdam, Radboud

the Multi-Judge of 23 November 2020 in the case between VoetbalTV BV, in Amsterdam, plaintiff (authorized representative: mr. QR Kroes and mr. M. Oostveen)

defendant, hereinafter referred to as: T-Mobile, lawyer: mr. Q.R. Kroes in Amsterdam. 1 The further procedure 1.1. In the interim decision of 2 March 2022,

practice. See also: ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2021:3307 Locations Rechtspraak.nl Enriched pronunciation Pronunciation verdict COURT OF AMSTERDAM Private law department

unfounded. The appellant filed an appeal with the Amsterdam District Court. On 29 August 2019, the Amsterdam District Court declared that the appeal lodged

details. DECISION COURT OF AMSTERDAM Department of Civil and Tax Law, Team I Case number: 200.251.466/01 KG case number of the Amsterdam District Court: C/13/655766

PROTECTION OF CIVIL RIGHTS in Amsterdam, 3. STICHTING PRIVACY FIRST in Amsterdam, 4. FOUNDING KOEPEL OF DBC-FREE PRACTICES in Amsterdam, 5. COUNTRY CLIENT'S COUNTRY

the General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679. Locations Rechtspraak.nl Enhanced pronunciation Share pronunciation print Save as PDF Copy link Pronunciation

https://www.dirkzwager.nl/kennis/artikelen/scheidsrechter-autoriteit-persoonsgegevens-teruggefloten-in-kwestie-voetbaltv/ https://static.nrc.nl/2022/pdf/lette

[plaintiff] , residing at [residence] , plaintiff, lawyer mr. P.L. Tjiam in Amsterdam, against the foundation BRAVIS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION, based in Roosendaal

February 2018, ECLI:NL:GHSHE:2018:363, Court of The Hague 1 September 2015, ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2015:2332, and Hof Amsterdam 5 July 2011, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2011 :BR3020

private company with limited liability ING Bank Personnel B.V., Based in Amsterdam, the applicant on appeal, at first instance: applicant, defendant in the

public limited company ING BANK NV, Based in Amsterdam, defendant, lawyer mr. D.J. Posthumous in Amsterdam. The parties will hereinafter be referred to

The District Court of Amsterdam (Rb. Amsterdam) rejected several requests (except one) for further information under Article 15 GDPR. The requests were

The District Court of Amsterdam rejected a request of removal of negative registrations in a credit information system pursuant to Article 17 GDPR, reasoning

The District Court of Amsterdam ordered a lender to remove a data subject from a credit registry. The data subject's interest in erasure outweighed the

The Amsterdam Court of First Instance decided that the rejection of a suspended lawyer's request to the Dutch Bar Association to erase a list showing the

The Amsterdam Court of First Instance decided that the shoe store Manfield cannot compel an employee to use a fingerprint-based authorization system for

appellant, hereinafter referred to as: [appellant] , lawyer: mr. I. Roos in Amsterdam, in return for Safe Home Foundation [foundation], established in [establishment]

The Regional Court of Amsterdam ordered the Dutch Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment to reevaluate its withholding of official information since

original. Please refer to the Dutch original for more details. COURT OF AMSTERDAM Administrative law Case number: AMS 22/5458 judgment of the three-judge

FOUNDATION, established in Amsterdam and with offices in Hoofddorp, plaintiff, lawyers mr. D.J.G. Visser and mr. P. de Leeuwe in Amsterdam, against the private

[domicile of the plaintiff], plaintiff, Attorney at law P.M. de Vries in Amsterdam, at the rate of the foundation ERASMUS UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER ROTTERDAM

The Court of First Instance of Eastern Brabant in the Netherlands (Rb. Oost-Brabannt) rejected request for removal of registration in the Dutch Credit

The District Court of Central Netherlands (Rb. Midden-Nederland) held that the child protection service Samen Veilig was wrong to limit the complainant's

ING Bank N.V. , based in Amsterdam, hereinafter referred to as: ING, Intimate, Attorney at law: Mr. T.J.P. Jager in Amsterdam. 1 The proceedings By application

2. public limited liability company ABN AMRO BANK N.V, established in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, defendant, lawyer Mr. C.M. Jakimowicz in Rotterdam, The