Search results

trends and can be found on dsb.gv.at. DSB - Annual Report 2022, Page 8 - https://www.dsb.gv.at/dam/jcr:ee7b155a-0a1f-4d00-98e9-902314c7022d/Datenschutzbericht%202022

428451, 25 November 2020, (available here). Datenschutzbehörde, DSB-D124.1177/0006-DSB/2019, 22 January 2021 (available here). Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten

specifying the facts and legal considerations for, e.g., rejecting the complaint or dismissing the complaint, i.e., not investigating it further, with a view

Article 14(1)(d) GDPR. Similar to the ex-ante information in Article 13(1)(e) and 14(1)(e) GDPR, Article 15(1)(c) GDPR requires the controller to disclose information

LLC, the DSB held that Chapter V. of the GPPR only imposes legal duties on the data exporter but not on the data recipient. Consequently, the DSB dismissed

(Rhineland-Palatinate) ULD (Schleswig-Holstein) Datenschutzzentrum (Saarland) DSB (Saxony) LfD (Saxony-Anhalt) TLfDI (Thuringia) You can help us fill this section

Direct marketing and data broking On 23 October 2019, GZ: DSB-D550.148/0017-DSB/2019, the DSB imposed a fine of € 18,000,000.00 on Österreichische Post

alone, but always in the context of their processing, i.e. as part of a whole document (such as an e-mail) or an extract from a database that goes beyond

Business number DSB-D124.1177 / 0006-DSB / 2019 Appeal at the BVwG / VwGH / VfGH This decision is final. text GZ: DSB-D124.1177 / 0006-DSB / 2019 of January

Authority (Datenschutzbehörde - DSB) started an ex-officio investigation against the Austrian Postal Service. The DSB investigated i.a the records of processing

(effective November 1, 2017). 1.7. On May 13, 2019, the BF sent the following e-mail to the MP with the subject “Business suspended, data protection”: "Dear

Subsequently, the data subject filed a complaint before the Austrian DPA (DSB). The DSB decided that the right to be forgotten was not infringed and rejected

the Austrian DPA (Datenschutzbehörde, DSB) claiming a violation of his right to access under Article 15 GDPR. The DSB partially upheld the complaint of the

number W245 2252208-1/36E W245 2252221-1/30E Written copy of the verbal decision announced on March 31, 2023 I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal

2019 Case number DSB-D130.073/0008-DSB/2019 Contestation before the BVwG/VwGH/VfGH This decision is final. Text GZ: DSB-D130.073/0008-DSB/2019 of 9.10.2019

judgments. in line with the DSB's stRsp on physician evaluation platforms (cf. the decision of 15 January 2019, GZ DSB-D123. 527/0004-DSB/2018 mwN), it was also

Identifier (ECLI) ECLI:AT:DSB:2019:DSB.D122.970.0004.DSB.2019 Last updated on 09.01.2020 Document number DSBT_20191108_DSB_E122_970_0004_DSB_2019_00 To the top

Identifier (ECLI) ECLI:AT:DSB:2019:DSB.D123.768.0004.DSB.2019 Last updated on 17.03.2020 Document number DSBT_20191218_DSB_D123_768_0004_DSB_2019_00

until the end of the proceedings before the DSB also applies on violations of Article 13 (and 14) GDPR. The DSB held that § 24(6) DSG also applies on violations

details. DSB-D122.844/0006-DSB/2018 dated 21.6.2018 Note Processor: Names and companies, legal forms and product names, addresses (incl. URLs, IP and e-mail

that is easily accessible to the data subject, e.g. as a complete information sheet in a central location (e.g. information desk, reception or checkout) or

2020 (case number: DSB-D205.023) [Note processor: names and companies, legal forms and product names, addresses (incl. URLs, IP and e-mail addresses), file

2020 (case number: DSB-D550.279) [Note processor: names and companies, legal forms and product names, addresses (incl. URLs, IP and e-mail addresses), file

(procedure number: DSB-D124.3158) [Editor's note: Names and companies, legal forms and product names, addresses (incl. URLs, IP and e-mail addresses), file

(procedure number: DSB-D124.2399) [Editor's note: Names and companies, legal forms and product names, addresses (incl. URLs, IP and e-mail addresses), file

The DSB fined a betting store € 5.280 for video surveillance (CCTV) that was recording a wide area in front of the location, without protocols of the usage

the DSB if these rights are violated. The DSB further held that the procedural provisions of the DSG - which deal with the procedure before the DSB - also

its application: "In its decision of 26 January 2018 (ref. no.: DSB-D122.756/0005-DSB/2017), the data protection authority found (amended by the decision

had been withdrawn. European Case Law Identifier ECLI: AT: DSB: 2019: DSB.D123.921.0005.DSB.2019

interpreting the right to secrecy (cf. the decision of the DSB of October 31, 2018, GZ DSB-D123.076/0003-DSB/2018). According to Section 1 (1) DSG, everyone has

provide certain information (i.e name, phone number, e-mail address and table number) on customers to the local authorities. The DSB acknowledged that the collection

(procedure number: DSB-D124.2138) Note Processor: Names and companies, legal forms and product names, addresses (including URLs, IP and e-mail addresses)

Austrian Data Protection Authority (DSB) imposed a fine of only EUR 150 under Article 83(5)(a) GDPR. It must be noted that the DSB did not apply § 12 and § 13

subject lodged a complaint with the Austrian DPA (Datenschutzbehörde - DSB). The DSB rejected the complaint and the data subject filed an appeal with the

the decision of the DSB of August 13, 2018, only if the two requirements of Section 9 (1) DSG are met. GZ: DSB-D123.077 / 0003-DSB / 2018). In all other

2022 (case number: DSB-D179.309) [Editor's note: Names and companies, legal forms and product names, addresses (including URLs, IP and e-mail addresses),

Administrative Court (BVwG) remitted a case to the Austrian DPA (DSB) because the DSB had failed to establish the facts of the case properly and merely

codes had been approved by the DSB under Article 40(5) GDPR. Inverstigations by the DSB showed that: The holder of the DSB-approval for code S*** explicitly

always decide on the admissibility of evidence (DSB, recommendation of 03/02/2017, GZ: DSB-D213.453/0003-DSB/2016, RIS, also relating to § 50a DSG 2000 and

2022 (case number: DSB-D124.4108) [Editor's note: Names and companies, legal forms and product names, addresses (including URLs, IP and e-mail addresses)

of proceedings: DSB-D122.871) Note Processor: Names and companies, legal forms and product names, addresses (including URLs, IP and e-mail addresses),

|DPA_Abbrevation=DSB |DPA_With_Country=DSB (Austria) <!--Information about the decision--> |Case_Number_Name=DSB-D122.844/0006-DSB/2018 |ECLI=ECLI:AT:DSB:2018:DSB

|DPA_Abbrevation=DSB |DPA_With_Country=DSB (Austria) <!--Information about the decision--> |Case_Number_Name=DSB-D122.844/0006-DSB/2018 |ECLI=ECLI:AT:DSB:2018:DSB

.. ] "). In contrast to Art 15 GDPR, Art 13 Paragraph 1 lit e and Art 14 Paragraph 1 lit e GDPR does not state the data subject's right to information

"affinity for a political party", the DSB imposed a 18 Mio Euro fine on the Austrian Postal Service. In detail, the DSB held the Austrian Postal Service responsible

account for authentication. On 15.06.2016, that DSB issued its decision that consisted of three rulings: I) The DSB held, that Google Inc. violated Article 15

since the settlement, as set out in the decision of 7 December 2018 DSB-D123.193/0003-DSB/2018. The BF then states that if the authority then refers to the

Federal Administrative Court denies legal aid for an appeal from the DSB (Austria) over the right to access Article 15 GDPR. A citizen requested a copy

time of receipt and for legal cases received by post or other physical means (e.g. by messenger) on the time of actual receipt at the office and, if necessary

and 22.07.2013 (Supplement ./X), E-Mail dated 02.08.2012 (Supplement .N), E-Mail dated 25.06.2014 (Supplement ./2), E-Mail dated 13.06.2011 (Supplement