Search results

§ 8(1) GenDG (German Genetic Diagnostics Act). § 5(6) and (9) PAuswG (German Passport and Identity Card Act). § 7 and § 14 TPG (German Organ Transplant

establishment has the power to have such decisions implemented, in which case the establishment having taken such decisions is to be considered to be the main

set out in paragraph 2. 6. Court proceedings for exercising the right to receive compensation shall be brought before the courts competent under the law of

accordance with the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (the ‘Court of Justice’) and the European Court of Human Rights. Recital 42: Proof

Appeals against decisions are possible in the German administrative jurisdiction. Court of first instance is the district administration court (Verwaltungsgericht)

than 1.600 of their decisions in the Austrian decision database RIS.bka.gv.at since 1994. Not all decisions are published, only decisions that are novel or

annulment of decisions of the Board before the Court of Justice under the conditions provided for in Article 263 TFEU. As addressees of such decisions, the supervisory

legislation. Mrs Lindqvist appealed that decision, and in the context of these proceedings, the national court referred several questions to the CJEU. One

broad reading. Case law: In Hauptpersonalrat der Lehrerinnen und Lehrer, the Court acknowledged that as the GDPR does not define the terms ‘employees’ and ‘employment’

damages on its own behalf and forward any compensations received through the court proceedings to the data subject. The Collective Redress Directive (Directive

The German DPAs regularly do not publish their decisions in full text. The higher German courts regularly publish their decisions. If a decision by German

usually allows to manipulate individual decision making, no matter if this concerns individual purchase decisions, decisions by others about work, life and love

to ensure the complete independence of their SAs. In Commission v Germany the Court specified that the notion of “complete independence” must be given

sufficient. The Court emphasized that inaction is insufficient to establish whether the consent is a “freely given and informed decision”. The Court concludes

Example: The German "Oberlandesgericht Köln" becomes the "High Regional Court Cologne (Oberlandesgericht Köln - OLG Köln)". Example: The German "Oberlandesgericht

appealed to the Court of Appeal. The court granted the injunction but only in part. The court ordered the Federal Republic of Germany to refrain from storing

publication of these decisions on the debt discharges in the German insolvency register was erased after 6 months. SCHUFA Holding AG (SCHUFA), a German credit information

cases to come to similar decisions in the EEA. Further decisions are expected soon. For details see here and here. Another decision was published by the French

articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. Court Federal Administrative

announcing your intention to appeal. The Court will then request the file from the AEPD. The Court will contact you to submit your arguments. It may take

articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. Court Federal Administrative

The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. 33 O 376/22 District Court of

not find its way into German decisions. Share blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer

the form: One for DPA Decisions (Data Protection Authorities) One for Court or Tribunal* Decisions One for CJEU Decisions (Court of Justice of the European

subject appealed against this decision. The Administrative Court Wiesbaden suspended the proceedings and referred it to the Court of Justice of the European

the judgment of the Local Court Sarız. The Regional Court Kayseri had obviously not been aware of the decision of the Local Court and had assumed that the

the German Constitutional Court raising the issue of the protection of fundamental rights between private actors. The German Constitutional Court decided

blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details.

blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. & #

fine is brought to the police who present the case in court. As such, appeals will go through the court system. Datatilsynet post the focus of their planned

by the Court in Commission v Germany, which interpreted the phrase “complete independence” in the context of Directive 95/46/EC. Here, the Court emphasised

Administrative Court Pursuant to Section 27 (1) of the DSG, the Federal Administrative Court, through its Senate, decides on appeals against decisions of the data

which consist of profiling a natural person, particularly in order to take decisions concerning her or him or for analysing or predicting her or his personal

own motion. Appeals against decisions by the Italian Garante can be taken by the parties concerned before the civil court (Article 152 of the Code, which

Council of State. For decisions given in French For decisions given in Dutch If you want to have a complete overview of the decisions given by the Belgian

blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. 1fact:

with the decision of the Federal Court of Justice in the judgment of the Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof) in the case of the German Federal

Administrative Court for a decision by letter dated July 16, 2020. 7. With its decision of February 18, 2021, line 6 Ob 159/20f, the Supreme Court submitted

articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. Court: VG Berlin 1st

highest administrative court (Conseil d'État). This applies to sanctions, guidelines or any decision of the authority. Decisions by the Conseil d'État are

overturn decisions issued by the DPA, in part or in full. Their decisions are final under the administrative procedure, but can be appealed to the courts. Decisions

able to accept the cited decisions of the Federal Court of Justice of 20 February 2018 and 23 September 2018.The Federal Court of Justice merely states

--Information about the Court--> |Jurisdiction= |Court-BG-Color= |Courtlogo= |Court_Abbrevation= |Court_With_Country= <!--Information about the decision--> |Case_Number_Name=

--Information about the Court--> |Jurisdiction= |Court-BG-Color= |Courtlogo= |Court_Abbrevation= |Court_With_Country= <!--Information about the decision--> |Case_Number_Name=

the NAIH decision shall be submitted to the authority itself within thirty days of its communication. Only attorney at law can act at the court on behalf

The German Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht - BVerfG) issued two decisions in parallel proceedings regarding the “right to be forgotten”

here (in German). Share blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original

(ZVOP-1) are still valid and in use, which was confirmed also by some late court decisions. These are of course parts of 2007 ZVOP-1 which are not in contradiction

A German Higher Regional Court ruled that a compensation claim under Article 82 GDPR requires that damage occurred to the data subject. Further, to assert

legally binding decision may appeal against the decision with in 28 days. Further appeals on a point of law to the Hight Court or Appeals Court are possible