Search results

an opinion on the certification requirements referred to in Article 43(8); (r) provide the Commission with an opinion on the icons referred to in Article

institution would also fall within the scope of Article 89 GDPR. Under Recital 160 “[w]here personal data are processed for historical research purposes, this Regulation

convictions under Article 10 GDPR. See, Albers, Veit, in BeckOK DatenschutzR, Article 9 GDPR, margin number 18 (C.H. Beck 2021, 38th Edition). The CJEU

Not to be offered to the Recipient Interim opening practicability H o w F o f b o a r d s Treatment round: 27/01/2021,(1 B ru ssel Section Market Court room

16Council of State no. 43.526, June 29, 1993, Arr. R.v.St. 1993, z.p.; BREED. 1993, z.p.; TBP 1994, 225. rPAGE 01-00003026497-0021-0025- □2- □1-� �Jl.� � L

first senate of 15. Dezember 1983 - 1 BvR 209/83, 1 BvR 269/83, 1 BvR 362/83, 1 BvR 420/83, 1 BvR 440/83, 1 BvR 484/83 (in DE) (Abstract in EN) - ECLI:

prosecution is undesirable (a so-called policy dismissal). T he M arket h o w a t w a ck both respect the orm e le and the material obligation to state reasons

§ 3 WG (cf. BGH, judgment of April 10, 2004 - IV ZR 75/03, r+s 2004, 404, 405; OLG Hamm, r+s 1992, 390 each on § 5 WG old version). However, the plaintiff

and Mr W have been involved in a dispute for some years. a dispute. The dispute concerns, inter alia, harassment and verbal aggression by Mr W and the

d violation of articles 11 of Legislative Decree no. 196 of 2003 and 5 of r R egolam ent (U E) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and o Council, because

own profile (applications r) - v)) and - "Group 4": improved means of contacting the defendant for paying doctors (applications w) - x)). With regard to the

article/and 5.1. c); 6.1.; 13.1. (c);13.1(e) and13.2(a)AVG: r PAGE 01-00001582885-0002-0033-01- □1-� r L _JCourt of Appeal Brussels - 2019/AR/1600- p. 3 - •

period of time has elapsed as a human rights concern (see ECHR, M. L. and W. W. v. Germany, judgment of 28 June 2018, nos. 60798/10 and 65599/10, § 100)

not outweigh the interests of the data subject (op. cit. marginal 101 f. m.w.r.). In this weighing up of interests, not only the type (criticality) and scope

203/22, r+s 2023, 265 Rn. 17; BGH ruling of April 22, 2022 – VI ZR 147/21, r+s 2022, 478 Rn. 6; BGH judgment of March 7, 2017 – VI ZR 125/16, r+s 2017,

data. This is in line with case-law by the Austrian Administrative Court (W 258 2217446-1 on the presumed "affinity for a political party"). the data subject

case of the plaintiff party C***** W*****, represented by T*****, against the defendant party Ö*****, represented by W*****, for EUR 2,500.00 s.A, on the

plaintiff, (Agent: mr. R.J.G. Ensink), and The college of mayor and aldermen of the municipality of Dongen (defendant) (Agents: mr. W.C.J.M. Dankers and [name

officio 4. 3R.v.St., June 29, 1993, e.g. Vedesca, no. 43,526. 4 MAREEN, D., The motives of the administrative legal act, TBP 2000, 20-38. See also: R.v.St.,

2018, against the N*** party E***stadt (respondent), represented by Erich R***, for violation of the right to secrecy as follows - The complaint is dismissed

GmbH). Company A used the services of company C (Amazon Web Services EMEA S.à r.l.) a subsidiary of company D (Amazon Web Services, Inc.) based in the United

reasons cited must suffice to Decision to wear. r PAGE 01-00001823325-0031-0040-02-01-� �!l�l!I L oo-w. _J, Court of Appeal Brussels -2020/AR/813- p. 32

AFFICHE_W in addition to verifying that they are not necessary cookies, are identified by the website itself as advertising, IDE and AFFICHE_W or, They

for example, KG Berlin, Order of 4 July 2017 - 1 W 153/16 - StAZ 2018, 183 and of 1 August 2013 - 1 W 413/12 - StAZ 2013, 348). 51 In administrative court

regard to bringing the processing into line with aforementioned provisions. r PAGE 01-00002223628-0002-0011-1-01-01-� L _JCourt of appeal Brussels-2021/AR/282-

confirms the contested decision. This decision was made by Mrs. A.R. Sturhoofd, J.H. Lieber and J.W. van Zaane and pronounced in public on June 1, 2021 by the

ECLI:NL:HR:2017:208, NJ 2017/134 m.nt. S.D. Lindenbergh and YES 2017/56 m.t. M.R. Hebly (Donata/New India), para. 3.3.3 (which statement is also cited in footnote

v. Commissioners of Customs & Excise (1973) 2 AllE.R 943 and Banker’s Trust v. Shabira (1980) 1 W.L.R 1274 are covered by this Law and, by extension, are

processing of data, determined in a G e . m P E P ro p o r ti o n d of f a l e r e c t a r e n t s o S R C T P AV deceived by interested parties. Since then

Federal Administrative Court Decision date 09.08.2021 Business number W211 2222613-2 Saying W211 2222613-2/12E DECISION The Federal Administrative Court decides

as: [defendant] , authorized representatives: mr. O.A. Sleeking and mr. A.W.D. lensink. 1. The process 1.1. The course of the procedure follows from the

principle of 3DPG refers to ECLI:NL:RBOVE:2021:1296,r.o.8. 3DPG refers to ECLI:NL:RVS:2020:2833,r.o.5.2. 3Research reportAP of September 29, 2021, appendix

appeal. Adopted by mr. J.A.W. Scholten-Hinloopen, chairman, and mr. J.J. van Eck and mr. B. Meijer, members, in the presence of mr. E.R. Fernandez, clerk. The

appellants, by ABN AMRO BANK N.V., established in Amsterdam, Intimate, Lawyer: Mr. R.L. Ubels in Amsterdam. 1Process 1.1 Appellants are hereinafter jointly referred

hedonists 11.54% The supplier of the above data is: W *** Direkt GmbH ***Street * 1 *** Vienna Email: office@w***.at Planned storage period: If data transfer

212-1, L.212-3, L.2141-1, L.211-1, L.232-1, R.631-3, L.621-1, L.621-2, L.621-7, L. 621-8, R.111-2, R.111-3, R.212-1, - Considering the law n ° 78-17 of January

the provisions on the protection of personal data by Ms. K.W. running a business under the name W. with its place of business in O. at ul. (…), President

and Food Safety Act (GESG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 63/2002 as amended. R E G R O U N D U N G A. Arguments of the parties and procedure Arguments of the

entity: H**** non-profit housing AG (FN 1*5*9* r) The accused legal entity, based in **** R***stadt, W***straße 1*-5* (hereinafter “H****”), is the responsible

was written on the patient A. W. But these are not the data of this patient. The data belongs to patient A. W. Patient A. W. does not exist with such data

Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court 15 May 2018, ECLI:NL:GHARL:2018:4396, JA 2018/99 m.nt. R.W.M. Giard, r. 4.5. 49Parliamentary Papers II 1989/90, 21561, no. 3 (explanatory memorandum)

Social Welfare Center in G., the Housing Cooperative in G. G., U. Sp. z o. o. w G .. The need to obtain the requested personal data was justified by the fear

reasons disapproved by the court (see W.-R. Schenke in: Kopp/Schenke, VwGO, 29th edition 2023, § 121 Rn. 9f. m.w.N. ). The legal issues that are the subject

defendant herself, but their data protection officer Ms. J. R., who is based at the parent company R. According to Art. 12 (1) GDPR, a person responsible only

submitting an application through a broker or R. SA, an agent cooperating with the broker or an employee of an outlet of R. SA is involved in the process of submitting

spelling, grammar and punctuation errors have been corrected.] NOTICE S P R U C H The DPA decides on Gustav A***'s privacy complaints (Appellant) of August

situation applicable at the time of the last oral hearing. 25 Cf. W.-R. Schenke / R.P. Schenke, in: Kopp / Schenke, VwGO, 27th edition 2021, § 113 Rn.

the AP, represented by W. van Steenbergen and J.M.A. Koster, have appeared. Connexxion, represented by mr. E.C. de Vries and mr. J.R. van Dorp, lawyers in

Chamber),composed of D. Spielmann, President, V. Valančius (Rapporteur) and R. Mastroianni, Judges,Registrar: V. Di Bucci,having regard to the written part

downloadable at the address: h t t p: / / a r e a d o c u m e n t a l. s e r v i z i r l. i t / a t t i / d o w n l o a d /AAAAYBnbrd+mLfAGu+72pN0QYxN3M4