Search results

The ICO (International Commissioner's Officer) has fined the Valca Vehicle Ltd 80,000 GBP (€92,718) for sending more than 95,000 nuisance, marketing messages

The ICO issued a decisions regarding refusal to access to third party personal data. The complainant has requested information from University of Leicester

government schemes that did not exist and the ICO received a high number of complaints regarding them. As a result, the ICO issued a fine of €176,000 (£150,000)

pandemic. Members of the public have made to the ICO highest number of complaints to date, over 10000. ICO has also issued to Leads Works Ltd a 30 day enforcement

FOIA. The ICO had to determine whether the Council had correctly withheld information on the basis of section 40(2)of the FOIA. First, the ICO had to assess

FOIA. The ICO had to determine whether the Council had correctly withheld information on the basis of section 40(2)of the FOIA. First, the ICO had to assess

The ICO issued an Enforcement Notice and 100,000 GBP fine against a controller due to unsolicited direct marketing calls to individuals who were on the

The ICO held that the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) was entitled to withhold disclosing one name on a document on the grounds that there

Further, ICO examined whether the conditions under section 55A Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA) for the imposition of a monetary penalty are met. ICO confirmed

UK DPA (Information Commissioner’s Office - ICO) issues £130.000 fine for serious contravention to Privacy and E-Communications Regulations (EC Directive)

for making 1,718 unsolicited direct marketing calls. In August 2020, the ICO noticed a number of complaints made to the Telephone Preference Service ('TPS')

direct marketing purposes. The ICO found that LTH contravened Regulation 21 of PECR, and issued a £170,000 fine. The ICO stated that the conditions for

Subject] as required for the case." The data subject complained to the ICO. The ICO held that First Choices unlawfully failed to comply with the data subject's

to, not having registered with the ICO’s public data protection register) as well as a lack of cooperation with the ICO regarding the investigation. Share

The ICO issued a decision on the necessity of a disclosure of information hold by a public entity to satisfy the legitimate public interests of accountability

finding by the ICO that it had failed to comply with a large number of subject access requests without undue delay. Then, in January 2019 the ICO "was made

The UK DPA (ICO) served an Enforcement Notice against the credit reference agency Experian, after it found that Experian violated the transparency principle

The UK DPA (ICO) found that the Neath Port Talbot Council correctly withheld information about the name of a person submitting a complaint about another

On April 14, 2020, the ICO supported the decision of the Insolvency Service to withold the information it held about insolvent companies. Furthermore,

The ICO rules that there is sufficient legitimate interest in disclosure of the information relating to the job description of the CCG officers commissioning