Search results

time frame in line with Article 4:13(1) of the Dutch Administrative law. The reason for not putting a deadline in the law is because complaints can lead

basis in Union or Member State law. This Regulation does not require a specific law for each individual processing. A law as a basis for several processing

into account the administrative costs of providing the information or communication or taking the action requested; or (b) refuse to act on the request.

uniform European administrative procedural law, the powers of the SAs must in principle be exercised in accordance with the national procedural law of the respective

such as profiling (see also Article 4(4) GDPR); Restriction (marking for limited further processing, see also Article 4(3) GDPR), such as deactivation of

in Article 13(1) and Article 13(2) of the GDPR may not be entirely clear. At first glance, one could argue that the information in Article 13(1) is essential

supervisory authority does not act on a complaint, partially or wholly rejects or dismisses a complaint or does not act where such action is necessary

social protection law in so far as it is authorised by Union or Member State law or a collective agreement pursuant to Member State law providing for appropriate

from 1981. Just like the general principle of transparency in Article 5(1)(a) GDPR and the active information under Article 13 and 14 GDPR and many other

decisions before the Greek Administrative Courts; Additionally, the Law 3471/2006 that transposes the ePrivacy Directive and The Law 3144/2003 (Article 8) regulates

procedural law. Those courts should exercise full jurisdiction, which should include jurisdiction to examine all questions of fact and law relevant to

consulted during preparation of laws and regulations, as well as administrative measures. In this regard Article 36(4) GDPR stipulates that Member States

European or national law. Therefore, a request for administrative assistance may only be refused if the requested SA is forced to act unlawfully, either

in general, if it meets the requirements outlined in Article 4(24) GDPR. What constitutes a relevant and reasoned objection is defined in Article 4(24)

[...] is an issue of national law and the answers to these questions differ significantly between civil law and common law countries". See, Kosta, in Kuner

the Data Protection Act (DSG) refers to the Administrative Procedural Act (AVG). The most relevant elements are: Contrary to the general 6 months deadline

supervisory authority does not act on a complaint, partially or wholly rejects or dismisses a complaint or does not act where such action is necessary

or another legal act under Union or Member State law (processing between the parties "shall be governed by a contract or other legal act"). This is necessary

in national law of each Member State. In many cases, Member States choose to have a single law to implement aspects of the GDPR and the Law Enforcement

uncertainty (Articles 11 and 12(6) GDPR). The act of erasing data constitutes a type of processing as defined by Article 4(2) GDPR. The regulation does not provide

penalties, criminal or administrative, should be determined by Member State law. Article 84 requires Member States to adopt by national law specific provisions

Protection Law, Article 70 GDPR, margin number 4 (C.H. Beck 2019, 1st edition). Meijers Committee, Note on the use of soft law instruments under EU law, in particular

respects the rule of law, access to justice as well as international human rights norms and standards and its general and sectoral law, including legislation

framework through Article 83(4) GDPR. Article 83(4) GDPR provides that the infringement of Article 31 GDPR may be subject to administrative fines up to 10,000,000

confidentiality established by the law. The restrictive approach must be preferred, as obligations of confidentiality in national law differ in each member state

Parliament, and unwritten law. “Law” must be understood to include both statutory law and judge-made “law”. In sum, the “law”is the provision in force

organisational and administrative structure. Recital 121: General Conditions for the Member(s) of Supervisory Authorities The general conditions for the

revocation) may remove or amend the act issued by the Commission by an ordinary legislative act. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify

procedural law. Those courts should exercise full jurisdiction, which should include jurisdiction to examine all questions of fact and law relevant to

State law which constitutes a necessary and proportionate measure in a democratic society to safeguard, in particular, important objectives of general public

propose the DPA to act as “the BCR Lead”. In its application, the group should include all relevant information about a nature and general structure of the

in the foundations of Union law, through Article 4(3) of the Treaty on the European Union ("TEU"), which imposes a general duty of sincere co-operation

required by Union or Member State law shall, designate a data protection officer. The data protection officer may act for such associations and other bodies

provision in the section on the general obligations which cannot be directly penalised with a fine under Article 83(4)(a) or Article 83(5) GDPR. EDPB and

joint representative, appointed in accordance with that Member State’s law, must act as representative to the Board. While the Commission may participate

for requesting such opinion or decision, including for the urgent need to act. 4. By derogation from Article 64(3) and Article 65(2), an urgent opinion or

wording of the Article provides that the Board shall "act independently," indicating that the EDPB must act autonomously in relation to the fulfilment of its

to Article 56 GDPR are Article 4(7) GDPR (definition of controller), Article 4(8) GDPR (definition of processor), Article 4(16) GDPR (definition of main

disclosures not authorised by Union law Any judgment of a court or tribunal and any decision of an administrative authority of a third country requiring

processor should be governed by a contract or other legal act under Union or Member State law, binding the processor to the controller, setting out the

processing. Recital 89: Abolishment of Indiscriminate General Notification Directive 95/46/EC provided for a general obligation to notify the processing of personal

other legal act, the EDPB recommends that such arrangement be made in the form of a binding document such as a contract or other legal binding act under EU

pilot project to implement the administrative cooperation provisions of the GDPR. This decision refers to the Administrative cooperation between SAs (covering

the implementing act regardless. By way of derogation from Articles 4 and 5, under Article 8 of Regulation (EU) No. 182/2011 a basic act may provide that

national law. For example, as far as the Roman Catholic Church is concerned, some Member States allow for canon law to apply instead of national law for matters

requires the identification of the data subject, then the controller should act accordingly, deleting or otherwise hiding the identifying reference to the

Article 82(4) and (5) GDPR set out rules concerning the liability relationships in the case of several damaging parties. According to Article 82(4) GDPR, each

when interpreting European law. European law forms a supranational body of law and has to be strictly separated from national law and traditions, even when

Composition of the EDPB (Articles 4 to 9 RoP) 3.      Adoption of documents and procedure (Articles 10 to 13 RoP) 4.      Secretariat and organisation

European administrative cooperation law as Peuker reports in Sydow, Europäische Datenschutzgrundverordnung, Article 62 GDPR, margin number 13 (Beck 2018

to personal data and access to their premises, Member States may adopt by law, within the limits of this Regulation, specific rules in order to safeguard

administration operating under public law is not required to provide data portability. In accordance with Paragraph 4, the right to data portability must

demonstrate compliance with the GDPR. However, as Article 42(4) GDPR expressly makes clear, the act of becoming certified does not reduce the responsibility

processing in Article 4(23) GDPR. The jurisdiction of a SA is limited to the territory of its own Member State. SAs are entitled to act and exercise their

state or national budget. Recital 121: General Conditions for the Member(s) of Supervisory Authorities The general conditions for the member or members of

of the national law, or even general rules of international law to determine its application. Example: The Austrian Data Protection Act ('Datenschutzgesetz')

cooperation of the supervisory authorities throughout the Union. The Board should act independently when performing its tasks. Recital 91: Conditions Necessitating

Datenschutzgrundverordnung, Article 4 GDPR, margin number 204 (Nomos 2018). Klabunde, in Ehmann, Selmayr, DS-GVO, Article 4 GDPR, margin number 52 (C.H. Beck

constitutional law, which interprets simple majority to mean a majority of the members present. In contrast, there is no uniform Union law understanding

organisational and administrative structure. Recital 121: General Conditions for the Member(s) of Supervisory Authorities The general conditions for the

by a contract or other legal act”. In addition, Article 28(3)(f) GDPR specifically requires that this contract or legal act stipulates that the processor

when terms are not defined in Union law, they take on an autonomous meaning, any definitions drawn from national law cannot be relied upon (Planet49, Case

which can lead to confusion and subsequent errors. The case-law reflects both views. Case-law: The Norwegian Privacy Appeals Board (Personvernrådet) overturned

Protection Act 2017) as well as Spain (Article 88 Spanish Data Protection Law 2007 provided for a similar obligation under their national law. See, Burton

05/2014 on Anonymisation Techniques, 0829/14/EN, 10 April 2014, p. 4, 8 and in general throughout the Opinion (available here). Eichler, in BeckOK DatenschutzR

data protection laws. Regarding the scope of the obligation to inform and advise, all Chapter IV of the GDPR, which covers the general obligations of the

consistency” in data protection law. This is particularly relevant given the fact that Member States may give effect to EU data protection law in ways which differ

consistency” in data protection law. This is particularly relevant given the fact that Member States may give effect to EU data protection law in ways which differ

Article 83 - General conditions for imposing administrative fines 1. Each supervisory authority shall ensure that the imposition of administrative fines pursuant

basis in Union or Member State law. This Regulation does not require a specific law for each individual processing. A law as a basis for several processing

(DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999, as amended; Section 68(2) of the General Administrative Procedure Act 1991 (AVG), Federal Law Gazette 51/1991, as

French law, in particular those which transpose the ePrivacy directive. Consequently, the case law of the CJEU on the application of Article 4 of the former

force. The national act which implemented the EU Directive was the Data Protection Act 1998. Subsequently, when the General Data Protection Regulation

with Articles 5(1)(c), 6(1); 13(1)(c), 13(1)(e). and 13.2. a)AVG - on the grand of art. 101 of the WOG, an administrative fee of 10,000. EUR as a result

Beyond, in International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 27 (2019), p. 102. See also Articles 4(11) and 7(4) GDPR, as well as Recital 43 GDPR

"The Data Protection Act" (Dataskyddslagen). The age of consent in Sweden is 13 years following § 4 of the Data Protection Act. Under Chapter 3 § 3 number

Federal Administrative Court Decision date 09.08.2021 Business number W211 2222613-2 Saying W211 2222613-2/12E DECISION The Federal Administrative Court

that the provision of Section 13, subsection 2 of the Act on the Status and Rights of the Patient (785/1992, Patient Act) requires that the registered

console for G-suite. 4. Justification for the Danish Data Protection Agency's decision 4.1 General It follows from the Public Schools Act, section 2, subsection

decision. Administrative penalty fee According to Section 24 of the Data Protection Act, the administrative fine stipulated in Article 83 of the General Data

Security appears as the creditor entity; for a period of time between 4/13 to 4/13; as a means of publication it is indicated "SSS ELECTR (...) " and as

to identify a will of Meta IE to act in breach of the law, as it cannot be concluded that Meta IE intentionally acted to circumvent its legal obligations

of the law n° 78-17 of 6 January 1978 modified relating to data processing, files and liberties; Having regard to deliberation n° 2013-175 of 4 July 2013

.....................13 2.4 Transfer of personal data to third countries............................................. ....14 2.4.1 Applicable regulations

from the previous case law of the Administrative Court, nor is there any case law; Furthermore, the case law of the Administrative Court is not to be judged

in Sections 13(3) of the Data Protection Act and 50b(2) of the Data Protection Act 2000 infringed Sections 13(3) in conjunction with 62(1)(4) of the Data

under administrative offences law. The penalty notice was therefore issued in a procedure that is not provided for in the Administrative Offences Act and

in case PVN-2021-13. However, the Board is not able to increase the fine due to limitations in the Norwegian Public Administration Act § 34. Share blogs

Lääkäriklinikka Estetic Oy has given a counter-explanation. Administrative law solution The administrative court rejects the appeal and the claim for legal costs

Personal Data Act 2000, before submitting it to the Privacy Board in June 2018. New law on the processing of personal data (Personal Data Act 2018) entered

articles 13 and 14 of the Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and 12 of this organic law.” IV For the purposes of deciding on the imposition of an administrative fine

a); art. 12.1. and 13.1. c) and d) and 13.2. b) AVG. - to impose an administrative fine of 2000 EUR on the basis of art. 100, §1, 13° WOG and art. 101 WOG

the person concerned, shall be determined by Union law or by the national law of the Member States 4.2. Legal basis for obtaining credit information Obtaining

for in Article 4(1) of this Act". Also see Art. 72(1) DPA Act: "Without prejudice to the provisions of this Chapter, the Inspector General and the inspectors

Articles 5, 12 and 13 of the Regulations and of Article 82 of the Data Protection Act, together with a penalty, as well as an administrative fine. He also proposed

inspecting the administrative act, the Business Information System Austria and by questioning XXXX - with regard to possible administrative criminal proceedings

additional provision final fourth of Law 29/1998, of July 13, regulating the Contentious Jurisdiction- administrative, within a period of two months counting

regulated by a special law. Pursuant to Section 2 of the Act on Determining the Criminal Background of Volunteers Working with Children, this Act provides for a

Authority's long case processing time. It is a general and basic principle, both in criminal and administrative law, that cases must be decided within a reasonable

by €50,000 to €440,000. 4.3.3 Proportionality Finally, pursuant to Articles 3:4 and 5:46 of the General Administrative Law Act, the AP assesses whether

under Union law. The effectiveness of Union law is sufficiently safeguarded here by national procedural law. In German administrative procedural law, the party

section 5 of the fourth additional provision of Law 29/1998, of July 13, regulating the Contentious-administrative jurisdiction, within a period of two months

The General Data Protection Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council is immediately applicable law in the member states. The General Data

promotes the purpose of the law. In addition, the provision is also intended to act as a general guide to the application of the law, for example when resolving

of the Personal Data Act The Personal Data Act implements the European Privacy Regulation in Norwegian law. The rules in the law and the regulation apply

office, the Personal Data Act (523/1999) has been applied as the general law regulating the processing of personal data. The General Data Protection Regulation

violations typified in article 83.4 of the RGPD that under the heading “General conditions for the imposition of administrative fines” provides: “Infringements

promotes the purpose of the law. In addition, the provision is also intended to act as a general guide to the application of the law, for example when resolving

with the law of 6 January 1978 relating to information technology, files and liberties (hereafter referred to as the Data Protection Act or the Act of 6 January

promotes the purpose of the law. In addition, the provision is also intended to act as a general guide to the application of the law, for example when resolving

Federal Law Gazette No. 194/1961, of the Agricultural Procedures Act - AgrVG, Federal Law Gazette No. 173/1950, and of the Service Law Procedure Act 1984

to Section 24 of the Data Protection Act, the administrative sanction fee stipulated in Article 83 of the General Data Protection Regulation is determined

body, which are provided for in article 13 of the Law on the National Statistical System (Law No. 22/2008, of May 13). The Defendant highlights, in point

additional provision final fourth of Law 29/1998, of July 13, regulating the Contentious Jurisdiction- administrative, within a period of two months counting

enters into force immediately. According to the Data Protection Act[2] § 41, subsection 2, no. 4, whoever fails to comply with a temporary or definitive restriction

.....................................4 1.3.1 Who has implemented the Tool and for what purpose, etc. ........4 1.3.2 Recipient of the data ..........

Protection Act with regard to version 14.6 of iOS 89. As recalled in point 36, Article 82 of the Data Protection Act is the transposition into domestic law of

implementing Law No. 78-17 of 6 January 1978 on Data Processing, Data Files and Individual Liberties; Having regard to Deliberation No. 2013-175 of 4 July 2013

defendant by the Inspector General are signed by the group [...]. 5. The hearing of July 13, 2020 29. From the hearing of July 13, 2020 - of which a record

relevant to assess an indivuidual's creditworthiness. Neither EU law nor the national Austrian law contain provisions on the allowed storage period of creditworthiness

violations typified in article 83.4 of the RGPD that under the heading “General conditions for the imposition of administrative fines” provides: “Infringements

equipment, has been transposed into national law in Article 82 of the Data Protection Act, within Chapter IV of the Act relating to the Rights and Obligations

which puts an end to the administrative process as prescribed by the art. 114.1.c) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure Common for Public

that in national law nor the law of 3 December 2017 establishing the Data Protection Authority (see its in particular Article 4), nor the Law of 30 July 2018

the inspected with section 4 of chapter 4 of the GDPR. 3. […] the inspectorate [is active in the field of transport] […]. 4. The controlled has approximately

conjunction with Article 233 of the Act of 30 August 2002. Law on proceedings before administrative courts (Journal of Laws of 2018, item 1302, as amended)

section 5 of the fourth additional provision of Law 29/1998, of July 13, regulating the Contentious-administrative jurisdiction, within a period of two months

was transposed into national law at the article 82 of the law "Informatique et Libertés", within chapter IV of the law relating to the Rights and obligations

standard B-VG Art133 Para.4 DSG §4 GDPR Art15 saying W176 2244407-1/18E In the name of the republic! The Federal Administrative Court, through the judge

telematic administrative process, as well as for the experimentation and gradual application of the related updates. In fact, art. 4, paragraph 2, of Law-Decree

section 5 of the fourth additional provision of Law 29/1998, of July 13, regulating the Contentious-administrative Jurisdiction, within a period of two months

article 4 of Organic Law no. 4/2017, of 25 August unconstitutional, with general mandatory force , for violation of the provisions of article 34, no. 4, of

sanctions, including administrative fines, must be subject to sufficient procedural guarantees in accordance with the general principles of the Law of the Union

proportionality, or general principles of the Community law, such as the principles of equity and respect for the law and the law, many of his reflections

character subsidiary, by the general rules on administrative procedures." II The physical image of a person, according to article 4.1 of the GDPR, is data personnel

of the fourth additional provision of Law 29/1998, of 07/13, regulatory authority of the Contentious-Administrative Jurisdiction, within a period of two

............... ......................4 1.3.1 Who has implemented the Tool and for what purpose, etc. ........4 1.3.2 Recipient of the data ..........

clause 4.4 of the data protection information. There is no express provision regarding the relationship between data protection law and the law on general

section 5 of the fourth additional provision of Law 29/1998, of July 13, regulating the Contentious-administrative jurisdiction, within a period of two months

November 4, 2019; *** ATTESTED.3 dated 5 of November 2019; and, ***ATESTADO.4 dated November 12, 2019; all them, presented before the General Directorate

and even with Art. 36 4 sec. 16 of the Land and Mortgage Register Act and Art. 5a sec. 4 of the Geodetic and Cartographic Law Act, it is forbidden to make

which puts an end to the administrative procedure as prescribed by the art. 114.1.c) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure Common of the

irrelevant. [ p a c e 01-00001736224-0003-0010-01-01-4 | Le 4 Court of Appeal Brussels - 2020/AR/1160 -p. 4 The Market Court does not rule as an appellate court

infractions typified in article 83.4 of the RGPD that under the rubric "General conditions for the imposition of administrative fines” provides: Violations of

section 5 of the fourth additional provision of Law 29/1998, of July 13, regulating the Contentious-administrative jurisdiction, within two months from the day

......................................4 1.3.1 Who has implemented the Tool and for what purpose, etc. ........4 1.3.2 Recipient of the data ..........

section 5 of the fourth additional provision of Law 29/1998, of July 13, regulating the Contentious-administrative jurisdiction, within two months from the day

information under Article 13 (2) (d) and Article 12 (4) of the General Data Protection Regulation, which infringes these provisions of the General Data Protection

basis of Section 82 of the General Administrative Law Act (AVG) by applying Section 8:88 of the General Administrative Law Act (Awb). There is no reason

1.a); art. 12.1. and 13.1. c) and d) and 13.2. b) GDPR. Decision on the merits 36/2021 - 5/21 - on the basis of art. 100, §1, 13 ° WOG and art. 101 WOG

THE LAW 1. Because, from the provisions of articles 51 and 55 of the General Protection Regulation Data (Regulation 2016/679) and Article 9 of Law 4624/2019

rules of an administrative lawsuit are defined by Act I of 2017 on the Procedure of Administrative Lawsuits (hereinafter: the Public Procurement Act). A Kp

paragraph 5 of the fourth additional provision of Law 29/1998 of 13 July, regulating the Contentious-Administrative Jurisdiction, within a period of two months

by the general rules on administrative procedures." II Termination of the procedure Article 85 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure

Applicable legal provisions CL of 2016 on General Administrative Procedure. Section 99 of the Act (hereinafter: the Act) the authority, within the limits of

regulations for administrative sanctioning procedures in art. 53.2.b) of Law 39/15 where among the rights of the interested party in the administrative procedure

section 5 of the fourth additional provision of Law 29/1998, of July 13, regulating the Contentious-administrative Jurisdiction, within a period of two months

section 5 of the fourth additional provision of Law 29/1998, of July 13, regulating the Contentious-administrative jurisdiction, within a period of two months

judicial or administrative measures that prevent persistence in abuse ”. Good faith is a general principle of law incorporated into positive law that translates

can be blamed on the offender (compared articles 3:4 and 5:46 of the General Law administrative law; hereinafter: Awb). The factors mentioned in Article

paragraph 1a Basic Law Article 5(1), first sentence VIG § 1, § 2, § 3, § 4 para. 4, § 5 para. 1, para. 4 p. 1, § 6 para. 1, para. 3, para. 4 Regulation (EU)

decision through an administrative lawsuit. The rules of administrative litigation are defined by Act I of 2017 on the Procedure of Administrative Litigation (hereinafter:

provisions of Article 13 of the RGPD, a provision that has been moved from 25 May 2018 to Article 5 of Organic Law 15/1999 of 13 December on the Protection

provisions of Article 13 of the RGPD, a provision that has been moved from 25 May 2018 to Article 5 of Organic Law 15/1999 of 13 December on the Protection

the actions of Mr Skelton. 
 
 
 The Judge himself gave permission to appeal.
 
 
 Background
 It is necessary to describe

section 5 of the fourth additional provision of Law 29/1998, of July 13, regulating the Contentious-administrative jurisdiction, within a period of two months

Authority’s order of 2019 September 30 NAIH/2019/6885/2, Act CXL of 2016 on general administrative procedures (hereinafter: Article 44 of Decree No/of the

primarily be governed by Union law; the liability regime of the Member States is superimposed in this respect (see recital 146 pp. 4 and 5 of the GDPR; cf. further

in the General Data Protection Regulation, data protection was initiated upon request CL of the General Administrative Procedure Act 2016. Act (a hereinafter:

subject to administrative appeal. * * * The rules of administrative litigation are defined in Act I of 2017 on the Procedure of Administrative Litigation

Applicable legal provisions CL of 2016 on General Administrative Procedure. Section 99 of the Act (hereinafter: the Act) the authority, within the limits of

paragraph 5 of the fourth additional provision of Law 29/1998, of 13/07, regulating Contentious-Administrative Jurisdiction, within a period of two months from

violation of the General Administrative Law Act by an administrative body on the basis of Article 8:88 of the General Administrative Law Act. The Division derives

21(2)(a) of the GDPR. 1(b) of Law No. 2472/1997, in conjunction with Article 13 par. 4 of Law No. 3471/2006 and Article 84 of Law 4624/2019. 26 The President

address : xxxxxxx@gmail.com RESOLUTION: Pursuant to clause 85 4) of the Administrative Procedure Act (HMS) I decide: - Dismisses the challenge as the information

are told that 401 GSNA is an Organic Formation of the General Staff, subject to an administrative management relationship and as a result of this it is

protection statement. Such a general privacy regulation Required by Articles 12 and 13 and set out in the controller’s general data protection statement information

data protection law were not fulfilled. Article 24(1) BayDSG was the only legal basis in question. § Article 4(1) Federal Data protection Act (bundesdatenschutzgestz

the fourth additional provision of Law 29/1998, of 13 July 1998, regulating the contentious-administrative Administrative Jurisdiction, within two months

95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation) SLEU L119 (hereinafter: the General Regulation) and Art. Of the Act Implementing the General Regulation

(3) NUM002, between the minutes 3:12:54 and 3:13:04; The video (4) NUM003, between minutes 3:13:34 and 3:13:48; The video (6) NUM004, between minutes 3:20:55

to this decision. Administrative penalty fee According to Section 24 of the Data Protection Act, the administrative fine (administrative penalty fee) stipulated

the processing within the meaning of article 4.7 of the GDPR; - A breach of articles 13.1. a), 13.1 c) and 13.2 of the GDPR in respect of the first defendant

and this organic law. 7. What is regulated in this article is understood without prejudice to the provisions of the Law 5/2014, of April 4, on Private Security

the Administrative Court Procedure Act, Federal Law Gazette I No. 33/2013 as amended (VwGVG) in conjunction with Section 38 General Administrative Procedure

Administration Act on administrative sanctions. With a administrative sanction means a negative reaction that can be imposed by an administrative body, which

through an administrative lawsuit. The rules of administrative litigation are laid down in Act I of 2017 on the Procedure of Administrative Litigation

1 No. 4 DSG 3) a) Section 52 para. 2 no. 7 DSG 2000 in conjunction with § 69 (5) DSG b) Art. 62 Para. 1 No. 4 DSG 4) a) Section 52 para. 2 no. 4 DSG 2000

of the provision Additional fourth of Law 29/1998, of 07/13, regulating the Jurisdiction Contentious-administrative, within a period of two months from the

newsletters. Act CXII of 2011 on the right to information self-determination and freedom of information. law (hereinafter: the Information Act) the right

the Act of 30 August 2002. Law on proceedings before administrative courts (Journal of Laws of 2019, item 2325). Pursuant to Article 74 of the Act of 10

these. C / Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 4/13 FOUNDATIONS OF LAW I By virtue of the powers that article 58.2 of the RGPD recognizes

and is covered by the general rules in the Personal Data Act and the Privacy Ordinance, cf. the Act § 1 and the Ordinance Article 4 nos. 1 and 2. In addition

rules on administrative procedures.” II Previous issues In the present case, in accordance with the provisions of article 4.1 and 4.2 of the RGPD, there is

provision of Law 29/1998, of July 13, regulating the C / Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 10/10 Contentious-administrative jurisdiction

applicants pursuant to Article 263(2) TFEU) to challenge an act, where it is not the addressee. First, the act must have binding legal effects capable of affecting

immediately applicable law in the member states. The general data protection regulation is specified in the national data protection act (1050/2018). According

parties. 28001 - Madrid 6 sedeagpd.gob.es 13/13 Against this resolution, which puts an end to the administrative procedure in accordance with art. 48.6 of

Subdirectorate General for Data Inspection.FOURTH: That for the purposes set forth in art. 64.2 b) of Law 39/2015, of 1 October, on the Common Administrative Procedure

of the Law29/1998, of 07/13, regulating the Contentious-Administrative Jurisdiction, in thetwo months from the day after notification of this act, according

fundamental principle of the RGPD (and of data protection law in general) protection law in general), namely the principle of data minimisation enshrined in

of the Law29/1998, of 07/13, regulating the Contentious-Administrative Jurisdiction, in thetwo months from the day after notification of this act, according

acts constituting an administrative infraction, natural persons and legal, as well as, when a Law recognizes them capacity to act, the groups affected

5 of the fourth additional provision of the Law 29/1998, of 13/07, regulating the Contentious-Administrative Jurisdiction, within two months from the day

section 5 of the fourth additional provision of Law 29/1998, of July 13, regulating the Contentious-administrative Jurisdiction, within a period of two months

Inspectorate under the Administrative Procedure Act or - a complaint to the administrative court according to the Code of Administrative Court Procedure (in

through a public administrative lawsuit. (189) The rules of administrative litigation are determined by Act I of 2017 on the Administrative Procedures (hereinafter:

legality referred to in Article 1, paragraph 2, of Law no. 689/1981, "The laws that provide for administrative sanctions apply only in the cases and times considered

of article 65.4 of the LOPDGDD Law, by this Agency, said claim was transferred C/ Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 – Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 4/60 to the claimed

5 of the fourth additional provision of the Act 29/1998, of 13/07, regulating the Contentious-Administrative Jurisdiction, within two months from the day

the Croatian Media Act (Official Gazette 59/04, 84/15, 81/13) which protects freedom of expression of the media. According to this law, the newspaper has

within the period of one month from the date of Article 13 of the Act, according to article 5 of the Act. Finally, it is noted that, in accordance with the

paragraph 5 of the fourth additional provision of Law 29/1998 of 13 July 1998, regulating Contentious-Administrative Jurisdiction, within two months from the day

number ***TELÉFONO.4 (of which he is BUBO MEDIA, S.L.) at 13:51:09 on 21/10/2019. - from number ***TELÉFONO.1 to number ***TELÉFONO.4 (of which it is BUBO

and information as provided for in Articles 12 and 13 of the DPMR; -in the alternative, an error of law and inadequate statement of reasons for its decision

That a contentious appeal was filed on December 22, 2020 administrative law before the Administrative Litigation Chamber of the National Court, against the

documentation is as a general rule exempt from public access, cf. the Public Access to Information Act § 13 and the Public Administration Act § 13 first paragraph

gob.es 13/13 IMPOSE the GENERAL DIRECTORATE OF THE POLICE, with NIF S2816015H, for a infringement of Article 32 of the GDPR, typified in Article 83.4 of the

provision of Law 29/1998 of 13 July 1998, regulating Contentious-Administrative Jurisdiction, within two months from day following notification of this act, as

section 51 of the Hungarian Code of General Administrative Procedure (Act CL of 2016) and the Hungarian Privacy Act (Act CXII of 2011). According to section

from its register based on a final judgment (section 13 subsection 1.4 of the Credit Information Act) and will not register any new default entries based

Legislative Decree 1/2007, which approves the General Law for the Defense of Consumers and Users, Law 7/1993, on general conditions of hiring. The bodies that

procedure initiated upon the request is CL of 2016 on general administrative regulations. Act (hereinafter: Act) provisions shall be applied with the deviations

LSSI), as provided in article 43.1 of said Law. II Article 85 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure Common of Public Administrations

are not met’. The Authority then imposed an administrative fine to the USL as per Articles 83(5)(b) and 83(4)(a) GDPR. The elements considered to determine

of the Law29/1998, of 07/13, regulator of the Contentious-Administrative Jurisdiction, in thetwo months from the day after notification of this act, according

CL of the General Administrative Procedure of 2016. Act (hereinafter: Act) rules shall apply with the additions specified in the Information Act and the

those Regulations; infringements of Article 48 of Law 9/2014, of May 9, General Telecommunications Law (hereinafter LGT), in accordance with the provisions

violations of Articles 5.1.a, 5.1.b, 6.1.c}, 6.3, and 9.2.i), 12.1, 13.lc}, 13.2.a}, 13.2.d}, 13.2.e}, 35.1 and 35.7; Under Article 100, § 1, 5° of the LCA, to

of the Regulation (EU)2016/679 and in the paragraphs 3 and 4 of article 13 of this organic law " FIFTH: Article 17 of the RGPD states that: "1. The data

15.3 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and in the sections 3 and 4 of article 13 of this organic law. " FIFTH: Article 15 of the RGPD provides that: "one. The

effect. 20 Article 31(1) of the General Administrative Procedures Act (“the Liechtenstein Administrative Procedures Act”) (Landesverwaltungspflegegesetz

infringement of Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (the General Data Protection Regulation, hereinafter GDPR), hereinafter General Data Protection Regulation

case of obligation to- gal. In general, the Public Administrations, the Notarial College and the General Council General of the Notary Public. C / Jorge

the Law 29/1998, of 07/13, regulating the Contentious-administrative Jurisdiction, in the two months from the day following notification of this act, according

character subsidiary, by the general rules on administrative procedures." II Article 85 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure Common for Public

Article 4 of the 16 Act of 31 December 1963 (hereinafter 'the Civil Protection Act') and the Act of 15 May 17 2007 (hereinafter 'the Civil Security Act'). The

section 5 of the fourth additional provision of Law 29/1998, of July 13, regulator of the Contentious-administrative Jurisdiction, within the period of two months

the provisions of the Austrian Administrative Penal Act (Verwaltungsstrafgesetz - VStG) and the Austrian Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz - DSG) apply

15.3 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and in the sections 3 and 4 of article 13 of this organic law. " FIFTH: In the case analyzed here, the complaining party

(Article 12 GDPR) and the te provide information (Article 13 GDPR). Page 4 Substance decision 34/2020 - 4/35 6. On 24 September 2019, the Disputes Chamber will

is a wrongful act in the civil-law sense or a ground for compensation as referred to in Section 8:88 of the General Administrative Law Act (Awb). With reference

to the administrative procedure in accordance with the provisions of article 114.1.c) of Law 39/2015, of 1 October, on the Common Administrative Procedure

those Regulations; infringements of Article 48 of Law 9/2014, of May 9, General Telecommunications Law (hereinafter LGT), in accordance with the provisions

controller did not act in accordance with Articles 27 and 28 of the Act on the Implementation of the General Regulation on Data Protection (the Act). He states

Administration Act on administrative matters sanctions. By an administrative sanction is meant a negative reaction that can be imposed by a administrative body,

of said Law. C / Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 13/13 II Article 85 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure

Article 7, the AP, without prejudice to Articles 3:4 and 5:46 of the General Administrative Law Act (Awb), shall take into account the factors referred

principles from criminal law to administrative sanctioning law, cannot be considered responsible for an administrative offense against a 13-year-old person (a

provision of Law 29/1998, of July 13, regulating the C / Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 16/16 Contentious-administrative jurisdiction