Search results

Original Language(s): English Original Source: ICO (in EN) Initial Contributor: At33

of “aware” likely reflects its meaning under Article 33(1) GDPR (see above). According to Article 33(2) GDPR, the processor has the obligation to notify

Original Language(s): English Original Source: ICO (in EN) Initial Contributor: At33

Original Language(s): English Original Source: ICO (in EN) Initial Contributor: At33

Original Language(s): English Original Source: ICO (in EN) Initial Contributor: At33

Original Language(s): English Original Source: ICO (in EN) Initial Contributor: At33

supervisory authority under Article 33 GDPR. Hence, not all breaches must be communicated. On this point,see Article 33 GDPR. Bensoussan, Reglement europeen

by a data breach which triggers the notification obligations under Article 33 GDPR and Article 34 GDPR. This provision is closely connected to Article 34(4)

budget for 2022 amounts to €2,523,000 Year 2020 Complaints: [] Fines: With 33 decisions fines of 90,500 euros were imposed Decisions: [] Opinions: [] Breach

Fontenoy, TSA 80715, 75334 PARIS CEDEX 07 Webpage: cnil.fr Fax: +33 1 53 73 22 00 Phone: +33 1 53 73 22 22 Twitter: @CNIL and @CNIL_en Procedural Law: n/a

under Article 30(1) GDPR, documenting personal data breaches under Article 33(5) GDPR or performing a data protection impact assessment under Article 35

the other refers to the controller’s." When a data breach occurs (Articles 33-34 GDPR), the processor shall notify the controller without undue delay. The

unnecessarily disruptive to the use of the service for which it is provided. Recital 33: Consent for Scientific Research It is often not possible to fully identify

of secrecy are laid down in the EDPB's Rules of Procedure (“RoP”). Article 33(1) RoP stipulates that in “accordance with Art 76 (1) GDPR”, discussions of

Valby DENMARK Webpage: datatilsynet.dk Email: dt@datatilsynet.dk Phone: +45 33 1932 00 Twitter: n/a Procedural Law: n/a Decision Database: Link Translated

action on the part of the controller or processor, for instance, Articles 33 and 36 GDRP. To illustrate, Article 36 GDPR obliges the controller to consult

(Article 32), responsibilities of the DPO in case of data breaches (Articles 33 and 34), and preparation of data protection impact assessments and prior consultation

Article 84, margin number 1 (C.H. Beck 2018, 2nd edition). CJEU, Rewe, Case C-33/76, 16 December 1967 (available here) cited by Lynskey in Kuner et al., The

Hornung, Spiecker gen. Döhmann, Datenschutzrecht, Article 30 GDPR, margin number 33 (C.H. Beck 2019). Scholars note that the requirement to specify the responsible

DVI has 33 employees as per 1st October 2022 out of totally approved 34 positions. About 76 % are women, 24% are men.   Historical numbers: 2021: 33 positions

personal data breaches and determining the undue delay referred to in Article 33(1) and (2) and for the particular circumstances in which a controller or a

Transparency under Regulation 2016/679’, 17/EN WP260 rev.01, 11 April 2018, p. 33 (available here).

Articles 12-23 GDPR; the obligation to notify data breaches pursuant to Article 33 GDPR; the obligation of data protection by design and by default, pursuant

number 47 (available here). CJEU, Case C-212/13, Ryneš, margin numbers 31 and 33 (available here). Especially, CJEU, C-101/01, Lindqvist, 6 November 2003,

personal data breaches to the supervisory authority and data subjects (Articles 33 and 34), conducting Data Protection Impact Assessments (Articles 35 and 36)

on data subject rights - Right of access’, 28 March 2023 (Version 2.0), p. 33 (available here). For example, the District Court of Amsterdam has held that

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

(available here). Paal, in Paal, Pauly, DS-GVO BDSG Article 23, margin number 33 (C.H.Beck 2021, 3rd Edition) and Bäcker, in Kühling, Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG

especially where there is a reason for urgency. It must be noted here that Articles 33(3)(b) and 34(2) GDPR on post-data breach communications both require the controller

rules regarding the processing of personal data of deceased persons. Recital 33: Consent for Scientific Research It is often not possible to fully identify

Ehmann, Selmayr, Datenschutz-Grundverordnung, Article 12 GDPR, margin number 33 (C.H. Beck 2018, 2nd Edition). XXX FOOTNOTE XXX See Bäcker, in Kühling, Buchner

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

'personal data breach' is relevant for the notification duties under Articles 33 and 34 GDPR. The definition of a data breach requires a security breach, such

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

Database: n/a Translated Decisions: Category:BayLDA (Bavaria) Head Count: 33 (2021) Budget: 1.893.200 (2021)

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

Ziebarth, in Sydow, Marsch, DS-GVO/BDSG, Article 57 GDPR, margin numbers 32-33 (Nomos 2022). Boehm, in Kühling, Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Article 57 GDPR, margin

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

and the rights of data subjects (right of access, right of erasure, etc.). 33 opinions on draft laws or regulations (compared to 24 in 2020) — In addition

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

and letter f., Article 5, paragraph Article 6 (1) (a) Article 32 (1), (1), (33) 1 and 35, para. 1. Below is a more detailed review of the case and a justification

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. 33 O 376/22 District Court of Cologne IN THE NAME OF THE PEOPLE Judgment In the

width="15%"><select class="newMainText" id=_piref33_15473_33_15453_15453.etos name=_piref33_15473_33_15453_15453.etos style="width:140px;" ><option value="-1"

restrictions to this right that Articles 23 GDPR and 33 Law 4624/2019 provide. More specifically, Article 33 mentions that the right to access cannot be fulfilled

relieve the doctor of his obligation to notify a breach, as required by Article 33 GDPR? During the hearing before the CNIL, the doctor explained his position

measures in place to guarantee security of processing. Violation of Article 33(1) for failing to notify the Garante of the violation of personal data Violation

authority in accordance with Article 33(1) of Regulation 2016/679, which must contain the information set out in Article 33(3) of that Regulation, and to notify

dnung, Bundesdatenschutzgesetz (DS-GVO/BDSG3), C.H. Beck, 2021, Art 15 RZ 33f, the term copy in para. 3 refers to the information to be provided pursuant

the Federal Constitutional Court has clarified that the provision of Art. 33 Para elected constituency (BVerfG, decision of September 20, 2016 - 2 BvR

particular the complainant's statement of 22 January 2019, page 2 (OZ 1 p 33). They also rely on the statement of the complainant of 22 January 2019, page

HDPA - 33/2023 Authority: HDPA (Greece) Jurisdiction: Greece Relevant Law: Article 5(1)(a) GDPR Article 5(1)(c) GDPR Article 6(1)(c) GDPR Article 17(1)

deleted when the purposes have been fulfilled (C‑553/07, EU:C:2009:293, point 33). It also held that each processing operation should be compliant with Articles

violation of Article 33 GDPR. The DPA imposed a fine of EUR 3,0000 for breach of Article 32 GDPR and a warning for breach of Article 33 GDPR. Also, the DPA

of Article 33(1) and 33(5) GDPR found by the LSA: In relation to the objection of the FR SA on the absence of an infringement of Article 33(1) GDPR, the

subject, and for failing to notify this data breach, in violation of Articles 5, 33 and 34 GDPR. A data subject filed a complaint with the Greek DPA (Hellenic

Dutch original for more details. Litigation Chamber Decision on the merits 33/2020 of 19 June 2020 File number : DOS-2019-05200 Subject : Complaint about

being informed of the data breach contrary to the requirements of Article 33 GDPR. Based on a data subject's complaint, the Romanian DPA started investigations

The Spanish DPA (AEPD) held that a rare disease foundation violated Article 33 GDPR by failing to notify a data breach within the prescribed 72 hours. In

in accordance with Art. 33 paragraph. 1 of the Regulation 2016/679, which must contain the information specified in art. 33 paragraph. 3 of the Regulation

found the violation of the provisions of art. 32 para. (1) and (2) and art. 33 para. (1) of the General Data Protection Regulation. The operator DADA CREATION

security breach in its voicemail box function. Had Telenor Norge violated Article 33 GDPR by failing to notify the Datatilsynet of the data breach? Had Telenor

DPA fined a magazine company €31,200 for violating Articles 5(1)(f), 32, and 33 GDPR because of a personal data security breach caused by vulnerabilities

breach to the supervisory authority, in accordance with Article 33 GDPR. Under Article 33, the controller should have reported the breach within 72 hours

been notified with regards to the security incident, in breach of Article 33 GDPR, for which the controller was fined RON 4,918.3 (approximately €1,000)

limit mandated by Article 33(1). Did the secretariat of the DPA breach its data security obligations under Articles 32(1), 33(1), and 34(1)? The Datatilsynet

rambling, abstract explanations in the reasoning for the appeal (pages 12 to 33) were noted and examined, but were not considered to be definitive. They justify

(controller) notified the Romanian DPA of two data breaches in line with Article 33 GDPR. Following the notifications, the DPA launched an investigation which

The Datatilsynet issued a decision on Articles 32 and 33 GDPR due to unencrypted e-mails sent by the controller. After carrying out investigations at its

didn't consider the incident to have triggered this requirement as per Article 33 GDPR. * Innovation Norway is state-owned and the Norwegian government's instrument

The AEPD approved a transport hub's compliance with Articles 32 and 33 GDPR after having used its investigation powers. After a security guard of Madrid’s

Authority: AEPD (Spain) Jurisdiction: Spain Relevant Law: Article 32 GDPR Article 33 GDPR Article 34 GDPR Type: Investigation Outcome: No further action Started:

violation of Articles 32, 33 and 34, violations all of which are typified in article 83.4.a). V The violation of articles 32, 33 and 34 of the RGPD are criminalized

Belgian DPA assessed whether the controller had violated Articles 5, 24, 28, 33 and 34 GDPR, however they found that none of these provisions were breached

the under General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679. According to Article 33 of GDPR, in the case of a personal data breach, the Data Controller shall

loss itself, that the information and measures mentioned in Article 33(1)(b) to Article 33(1)(d) GDPR must also be communicated to the data subject. However

referred to in Article 33(1) of the AVG.15 15 File note 1, Notification of personal data breach 7-2-2019. P 5. 3.4.3 Assessment Article 33(1) of the AVG provides

data breach was an isolated incident and the controller complied with Article 33 GDPR. An investigation was started on 20 December 2019 over the practices

à l’obligation de notifier la violation de données à la CNIL 33. Aux termes de l’article 33, paragraphe 1, du RGPD, en cas de violation de données à caractère

and the minimization of data, as well as the national legislation (d.lgs. 33/2013), which obliges the community to publish the compound emoluments received

Protection Agency is of the opinion that Zoo's description, cf. Article 33, subsection Article 33 (3) (d) of the measures taken to deal with the breach was not correct

notified the DPA too late about the data breach in violation of the Article 33 GDPR. The DPA also ordered the controller to communicate the data breach to

September 2021, the Danish DPA found violations of Articles 5(2), 5(1)(a), 32(1), (33)(1) and (35)(1) GDPR. It ordered the Municipality to bring its processing

obliged to notify the data breach to the AP within 72 hours pursuant to Article 33(1) GDPR. The AP recalled that the main purpose of this obligation is to encourage

in accordance with Art. 33 paragraph. 1 of the Regulation 2016/679, which must contain the information specified in art. 33 paragraph. 3 of Regulation

authority, in accordance with art. 33 sec. 1 Regulation 2016/679, which must contain the information specified in art. 33 sec. 3 of this source of law, but

NOK 100,000. The notified fee of NOK 150,000 was thus reduced by approx. 33.33% with reference to the company's financial situation. The Authority considers

Jurisdiction: Spain Relevant Law: Article 4(12) GDPR Article 32 GDPR Article 33 GDPR Type: Investigation Outcome: No Violation Found Started: Decided: Published:

obligation to document a personal data breach (Article 33 GPDR) The DPA also determined a violation of Article 33 GDPR. The documentation provided by the controller

Article 67 of the Bulgarian Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA), supra Article 33 of the GDPR, and violation of the requirement for communicating the personal

and officially notified the HDPA of the breach in accordance with Article 33 GDPR. Corrective measures to fix the issue were also implemented. Despite

obligation under the articles5 (1) (f), 5 (2), 15, 32 and 33 of the Regulation, as well as article 33 (1) (y) of Law 125 (1) / 2018and she was asked to submit

(hereinafter 'the Code'); HAVING REGARD to Article 5, of Legislative Decree no. 33 of 14 March 2013 on "Reorganization of the rules concerning the right of civic

level of security, as required by article 32, read in conjunction with article 33 GDPR. The Garante examined the notification by the university “la Sapienza”

Authority: AEPD (Spain) Jurisdiction: Spain Relevant Law: Article 32 GDPR Article 33 GDPR Type: Investigation Outcome: No Violation Found Started: Decided: 06

that BroBizz's processing of personal data was in accordance with Article 33 (2) of the Data Protection Regulation. 1 and Article 34 (1). First The following

insufficient took precautions to prevent the data breach b. Articles 33.1 and 33.5 and 34.1 GDPR, given that defendant did not mention it data breach to

Public Health Service of Madrid for violating Articles 5(1)(f), 25(1), 32 and 33 GDPR due to a website failure which resulted in the exposure of personal data

Jurisdiction: Spain Relevant Law: Article 5(1)(f) GDPR Article 32 GDPR Article 33 GDPR Type: Investigation Outcome: No Violation Found Started: Decided: 06

outcome of the survey n ° [...] carried out with the public establishment A 33/33

case. C / Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es Page 33 33/35 Regarding the seriousness of the offense, it already concurs as an aggravating

E/08501/2019 Authority: AEPD (Spain) Jurisdiction: Spain Relevant Law: Article 33 GDPR Type: Investigation Outcome: n/a Started: Decided: Published: 21.01.2020

investigation to determine whether the Ministry of Tourism contravened Articles 33, 34 and 37 GDPR. First, the Ministry of Tourism argued that whilst it is the

and therefore lacked a legal basis. The Court also held that Articles 32 and 33 UAVG (Dutch law for the implementation of the GDPR) were the only provisions

properly respond to an access request, in violation of Articles 15(3) and 33 GDPR. The data subject made an access request to the controller, Vodafone

art. 24 sec. 1, art. 25 sec. 1, art. 32 sec. 1 lit. d, art. 32 sec. 2, art. 33 paragraph. 1 and art. 34 sec. 1 of the Regulation of the European Parliament

breach notification to be will-independent information. In view of article 33(5) of the GDPR, OLVG is required to document all personal data breaches, together

For its part, the security of personal data comes regulated in articles 32, 33 and 34 of the RGPD, which regulate the security of the processing, notification

a warning to a local administration for violating Articles 5(1)(f), 32 and 33 GDPR. The administration had mistakenly published an Excel sheet containing

art. 28 sec. 3 lit. h, 32 sec. 1 lit. b and lit. d, art. 32 sec. 2, art. 33 paragraph. 1, art. 34 sec. 1 Regulation of the European Parliament and the

the competent authority when the conditions for the application of Article 33 of the RGPD are gathered together. In this case, no such notification has

processed, or the unauthorized disclosure of or access to such data. Article 33.1 of the RGPD states the following: In the event of a breach of the security

against security risks, so that no infringement of Article 32 and Article 33can be established in this case. The defendant 2claims that there is no processing

breaches of personal data security to the Authority in accordance with Article 33 of the Data Protection Regulation. Journal number: 2020-432-0037 Summary The

entry into force of Legislative Decree 101/2018), in relation to Articles 33 and 154, paragraph 1, lett. c) of the same Code; NOTING that, by examining

no breach of Article 5.2 of the GDPR, Article 24.1 of the GDPR and Article 33 of the GDPR can be established. - As regards the involvement of the Data Protection

security and at least contain the information and measures referred to in Article 33 (2). 3 (b), (c) and (d). The deadline for compliance is January 7, 2020 .

Creditinfo reviews the obligations imposed on lenders according to Act no. 33/2013 on consumer loans, which, among other things, aims to prevent lending

it should be noted that Article 15 of Legislative Decree no. 33 of March 14, 2013, no. 33 regulates the publication obligations concerning the holders

addition, again in the two-year period, the Company: "imposed 33 penalties" in relation to "33 conduct that did not comply with the provisions of the mandate

Spanish administrative law were invoked, leading to a reduced fine of EUR 33.000. On 26/12/2018 AEPD received a complaint against XFERA MOVILES, S.A (YOIGO)

not strictly necessary for the purpose pursued, and therefore excessive. 33. 33. Nevertheless, it notes that the Company has, prior to the initiation of

photos showing the plaintiff and bearing his name, the defendant infringed Sec. 33 of the German Data Protection Act (DSG) as well as Sec. 78 of the Copyright

further surveys. In addition, the discrepancy includes 43 document titles about 33 employees from 2018 - 2019. The breach personal data security has arisen as

adopted on 29 November 2017 by the Group 29, p. 9-10. Page 33 Substance decision 34/2020 - 33/35 107. Fourth, it should be noted that the retention period

legal basis for making the decisions is the Personal Data Act 2018 § 26, cf. § 33, cf. Personal Data Act 2000 § 46. On the basis of the Directorate of Customs'

EU:C:2021:504, paragraph 61, judgment Nowak, C-434/16, EU:C:2017:994, paragraph 33 and judgment Rijkeboer, C-553/07, EU:C:2009:293, paragraph 59. Page 14 of

municipality "for fifteen consecutive days, unless specific provisions of law". 33/2013, which - respectively - provide that "data, information and documents

as required by Article 33 GDPR. For the purposes of this Penalty Notice, the Commissioner does not rely on any breach of Article 33 GDPR and any prior finding

complaint against companies AMPNI and EY Greece for alleged violations of Article 33 GDPR. According to the complainant people related to the defendants entered

"Robinson List" regardless of the contractual obligation. According to Article 33(2) of the Spanish data protection law (LOPDGDD), Raise Marketing is responsible

public authority. This is underpinned by the differentiated regulation in Art. 33 and 34 of the GDPR regarding the notification obligations towards the authority

effects of the PDB and has duly complied with the requirements of Article 33(3) of the GDPR.   DECISION According to Article 83 (4) (a) of the GDPR, the

notified the Romanian DPA of the data security breach pursuant to Article 33 GDPR, prompting an investigation by the DPA. The investigation revealed that

Regulations of 15 December 2000 no. 1265. (2018) § 33. According to the Personal Data Act (2018) § 33, the rules «which applied at the time of action» shall

number. Furthermore, the defendant violated the obligation set out in Art. 33 GDPR to inform the competent supervisory authority in the event of a data

legal prosecution. and dismiss the defendant's appeal. The defendant requests,,33The defendant requests, 34 rejecting the plaintiff's appeal, the judgment of

country transfers must be assessed based on its specific legal context (point 33). 7 The security-enhancing measures mainly consist of the responsibility for

of 04.05.2016, p. 1, hereinafter referred to as "the Regulation"): DSGVO). 33 § Section 12 sentence 1 BMG old stipulated that if stored data are incorrect

1(g) Law 4629/2019 Article 9 Law 4629/2019 Article 15 Law 4629/2019 Article 33 Law 4629/2019 Type: Complaint Outcome: Other Outcome Started: Decided: 30

"Hospital") notified the Authority of two personal data violations, pursuant to art. 33 of the Regulation, dated XX and XX, concerning, respectively: a) entering

describe the categories of personal data concerned, in accordance with Article 33 (1) of the Data Protection Regulation. In a specific case, which was further

call to order against him. 2. Regarding the taking of corrective measures 33. In his additional letter to the statement of objections of 3 August 2020

notified this Authority of the personal data breach referred to in Article 33 of the Regulation, consisting in the loss of a device containing personal

.................33 5.3 Positionofthe LSA onthe objections ........................................................................33 5.4 Analysisofthe

becoming aware of the incident, it shall be immediately investigated and Article 33 (1) of the General Data Protection Regulation has been notified to the Authority

("Terms and Conditions") (Exhibit 33). 32 CJEU judgment of 10 July 2018,C-25/17, Jehovah's Witnesses, ECLI:EU:C:2018:551. 33Terms and Conditions for the IAB

2020. In total, these third parties had copied and stolen 389,000 records of 33,200 affected persons. The attackers were able to access the whole IT system

of appeal in labour and social law cases of 12 August 2019, GZ 11 Ra 45/19w-33, which did not allow the appeals of both parties against the judgment of the

dispensation from the licensing obligation pursuant to the Personal Data Act § 33 third paragraph, as the relevant processing of sensitive personal data lacks

Federal Public Service Finance, with registered office in Koning Albert II-laan 33/014, with company number 0308.357.159, hereinafter “de defendant” Decision

regards the relevance of compliance with Protocol No. 7 to the Treaties on the 33 Privileges and Immunities of the European Union (the ‘Protocol’) , the EDPS

the website Nieuwbouw-Eindhoven.nl used price indication. This amounts to 33 homes in total at € 11,046,775. The homes have been sold individually. This

data breaches from more than twenty Danish banks in accordance with Article 33 GDPR. The reported data breaches concern the accidental disclosure of personal

1 March 2021: "The appeal is rejected, cf. the Public Administration Act § 33 second paragraph." A submitted a timely appeal against the Data Inspectorate's

paragraph33. 313AT SAObjection,p.11;DESAs Objection,p.9;FI SAObjection,paragraph43;NLSAObjection,paragraph33. 314 NLSAObjection,paragraphs32-33. 315NLSAObjection

legislation”. As such, the court also refused to grant summary judgement. [31]-[33] On Misuse of Private Information and Breach of Confidence: The court found

to theprotection of the processing of personal data.23. Pursuant to article 33 § 1 LCA, the Litigation Chamber is the litigation bodyadministrative ODA.

Section 17 of the Administrative Court Procedure Act, Federal Law Gazette I No. 33/ 2013 as amended (VwGVG) in conjunction with Section 38 of the General Administrative

insurer (see Armbrüster in MüKo VVG, 2nd edition 2016, § 3 marginal number 51). 33d) Likewise, a claim does not follow from Section 3 (3) VVG, since the defendant

presumably follows from the transitional rules in the Personal Data Act 2018 § 33, cf. the Privacy Board's decision PVN-2018-14. This also has support in the

security and at least contain the information and measures referred to in Article 33 (2). 3 (b), (c) and (d). The deadline for compliance is January 7, 2020 .

notified Datatilsynet of several personal data breaches pursuant to Article 33 GDPR concerning the use of the Vigilo-app. Through the use of the app, biological

of which has been adopted on April 11, 2018 (hereinafter: “WP 260 rev.01”). 33. Note that the EDPS took up and reapproved the documents adopted by the said

controller notified the Greek DPA of a personal data breach under Article 33 GDPR by the processor related to the transmission of the data. The DPA considered

Poliambulatorio Talenti S.r.l. with registered office in Rome, via Padre Semeria, 33 C.F. 1961330584/ P.IVA 01021921000, (hereinafter the "health facility"), the

notification of data security breach, according to the provisions of art. 33 of the RGPD.

the new law came into force. It follows from the Personal Data Act 2018 § 33 that the rules on the processing of personal data that applied at the time

2017 - 2 A 662/17 - juris, marginal 38; Schild, in: BeckOK Datenschutzrecht, 33 Ed. 1 August 2020, DS-GVO, Art. 4, marginal 34). b) Personal data are also

notwithstanding the findings of the inspection report and the terms of the complaint 33. On several occasions in its submissions, the second defendant points out

inseparably linked with those of the data controller, in this case Google LLC. 33. At this stage, the Litigation Chamber makes a preliminary observation on

this was addressed by management and that awareness was being looked into. 33 After the first four data leaks in 2016, UWV decided to take organizational

that 2 co-owners [indicating their names and financial situation] do not pay 33 their monthly advances”. He believed that the controlled "used the personal

of the RGPD with penalty of warning. 2. Infringement of articles 25, 32 and 33 of the RGPD in relation to the article 5.1.f) of the RGPD, typified in article

interested parties and the consequent active amendment provided for by art. 33 GDPR for data breach situations "which, therefore, would be" attributable

these terms have an ordinary meaning and do not create legal uncertainty (B.30-33). The creation of the passenger database and its administration by the PIU

(2000). There is a special transitional rule in the Personal Data Act (2018) § 33 first paragraph infringement fine, which reads: «The rules on the processing

breach and contain at least the information and measures referred to in Article 33 paragraph 3 points b), c) and d) of Regulation 2016/679 , i.e: (1) the name

structure of 7 faculties, 2 schools, 4 research institutes, 27 departments, 33 services and administrative Units, and 4 management centres, and the data

MB and the BF1 for comments. I.7. With a statement of May 4th, 2021 (VWA ./33, see point II.2), the MB stated that they only use the free version of XXXX