Search results

under Article 6(4) GDPR and further processing for a compatible purpose under Article 6(4) GDPR. See the commentary on Article 6(4) GDPR for details on the

Charter, Article 5(1)(a) GDPR and Article 6(1) GDPR. At the same time Article 6(4) GDPR clearly only further defines Article 5(1)(b) GDPR. Against the clear

(Article 15 GDPR), rectification (Article 16 GDPR), erasure (Article 17 GDPR), restriction (Article 18 GDPR), notification (Article 19 GDPR) or data portability

(Article 4(20) GDPR, Article 47 GDPR); The data transfer for internal administrative purposes (Article 6(1)(f) GDPR) with Recital 48 GDPR); The determination

dealt with in Article 12(6) GDPR. It is unclear why Article 12(2) GDPR refers to Articles 15 to 22 GDPR, while Article 11(2) GDPR only refers to Articles Articles

Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary, Article 32 GDPR, p. 636 (Oxford University Press 2020). Jandt, in Kühling, Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Article 32 GDPR, margin number

of Articles 13 or 14 GDPR and Article 15(1) GDPR often overlaps, the controller has a different obligation under Article 15 GDPR to include the ex-post

rights under the GDPR, when relevant information is provided. Article 13 GDPR embodies the principle of transparency in Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, outlining the

Spain. The AEPD is an independent public body in charge of enforcing the GDPR in Spain. Its head office is in Madrid. The requirement to have a data protection

(Article 12(1) GDPR), facilitate the data subject (Article 12(2) GDPR), respond and communicate the measures taken (Article 12(3) and (4) GDPR), the principle

the SA pursuant to Article 58(2) GDPR or failure to provide access in violation of Article 58(1) GDPR. Article 83(6) GDPR is a superfluous provision and

of data established in Article 9(2)(a) GDPR, Article 9(2)(c) GDPR, Article 9(2)(g) GDPR and Article 9(2)(i) GDPR directly correlate with a specific legal

Article 25 GDPR or Article 32 GDPR. This provision assigns a proactive role to the controller who has to ensure compliance with the GDPR at all stages

21(3) GDPR and Article 17 GDPR on the right to erasure must be considered. The tight relationship between Article 21(3) and Article 17(1)(c) GDPR seems

Article 14 GDPR gives expression to the principle of transparency enshrined in Article 5(1)(a) GDPR and further defined in Article 12 GDPR. While Article

since, under Article 28(1) GDPR, a controller shall only use processors providing the same standards under Article 25 GDPR. Manufacturers or producers

protezione dei dati personali) resides in Rome and is in charge of enforcing GDPR and Directive 2002/58/CE (e-Privacy Directive) in Italy. The Garante is a

Regulation (GDPR), Article 7 GDPR, p. 350 (Oxford University Press 2020). Heckmann, Paschke, in Ehmann, Selmayr, Datenschutz-Grundverordnung, Article 7 GDPR, margin

compliance with the GDPR. Article 28(3)(h) GDPR enables such a task in case processors are used. According to Article 28(3)(h) GDPR, the processor should

Article 28 of the GDPR. Article 33(2) GDPR instructs processors to notify controllers once they become “aware” of a personal data breach. The GDPR does not elaborate

Article 82 GDPR – like almost all provisions of the GDPR – is directly applicable in all Member States without any act of implementation. Article 82 GDPR leaves

to Article 60 GDPR, Article 61 GDPR, Article 62 GDPR, Article 63 GDPR, Article 64 GDPR, Article 65 GDPR, Article 66 GDPR and Article 56 GDPR. The SA is also

Authority for Belgium. It resides in Brussels and is in charge of enforcing GDPR in Belgium. The DPA consists of five bodies and an Executive Committee. The

of the most innovative elements in the GDPR related to the accountability principle (see Articles 5(2) and 24 GDPR). This provision regulates the cases in

resolution mechanism under Article 65 GDPR in connection with Article 63 GDPR is triggered (Article 60 (4) GDPR). Article 60(2) GDPR clarifies that also in cross-border

compliance with the GDPR under Article 58(2)(d) GDPR or even ban it under Article 58(2)(f) GDPR. Therefore, complaints under Article 77 GDPR should extend to

processing of personal data of deceased persons. Article 2 GDPR sets out the material scope of the GDPR. Paragraph 1 clarifies that the Regulation applies to

meaning Recital 86 GDPR). However, Article 34 GDPR does not provide a specific deadline of 72 hours as is the case in Article 33 GDPR. Instead, timelines

Article 57 GDPR (tasks of SAs), Article 58 GDPR (powers of SAs), as well as Article 65 GDPR (dispute resolution by the board), Article 63 GDPR (consistency

Authority for Denmark. It resides in Copenhagen and is in charge of enforcing GDPR in Denmark. Datatilsynet is made up of the Data Council (Datarådet) and a

Authority for Romania. It resides in Bucharest and is in charge of enforcing GDPR in Romania. The Romanian DPA is a public authority with legal personality

22(2)(c) GDPR. Finally, decisions based on explicit consent are also subjected to the safeguards laid down in Article 22(3) GDPR. Article 22(3) GDPR lays down

provisions of the GDPR require the controller to keep track of individual recipients. For example, Article 15(1)(c) GDPR and Article 19 GDPR require the disclosure

(Article 12 GDPR), information (Articles 13 and 14 GDPR), access (Article 15 GDPR), rectification (Article 16 GDPR), erasure (Article 17 GDPR), restriction

(Article 15 GDPR), rectification (Article 16 GDPR), deletion (Article 17 GDPR), restriction of processing (Article 18 GDPR), objection (Article 21 GDPR) and the

Article 9 GDPR or Article 10 GDPR data on a large-scale. A DPO is always required when processing is carried out by a public authority or body. The GDPR does

5(1)(d) GDPR gives the controller some leeway to continue processing inaccurate data - see more details under Article 5(1)(d) GDPR. Article 16 GDPR, titled

Authority for Iceland. It resides in Reykjavík and is in charge of enforcing GDPR in Iceland. You can help us filling this section! You can help us filling

application of the GDPR from Article 3 GDPR confirming that there is always a SA competent to supervise and enforce the application of the GDPR whenever it applies

their rights under the GDPR, (ii) as a result of the processing of their personal data in non-compliance with the GDPR. Article 79 GDPR is a data subject right

Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary, Article 38 GDPR, p. 707 (Oxford University Press 2020). Bergt, in Kühling, Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Article 38 GDPR, margin number

important to note that Article 13(1)(f) GDPR, Article 14(1)(f) GDPR, Article 15(1)(c) GDPR and Article 15(2) GDPR, make specific reference to transfers of personal

prevention (Article 23(1)(a-j) GDPR) allow for far fewer GDPR restrictions than those granted by freedom of expression. Article 85(2) GDPR poses one condition for

(Article 36(3)(c) GDPR); the contact details of the Data Protection Officer (DPO) (Article 36(3)(d) GDPR); a copy of the DPIA (Article 36(3)(e) GDPR) as well as

the scope of the LED from the scope of the GDPR. Article 10 GDPR is intended to extend the protection of the GDPR to the processing of certain criminal data

occurs when the GDPR simply refers to applicable national law as a preliminary question under a GDPR provision. In some situations where the GDPR refers to national

Article 23(1)(e) GDPR, which sets out strict requirements for the Union or Member State's law restricting GDPR rights, Article 18(2) GDPR does not make any

57 GDPR should be deemed inadmissible for the purposes of Article 31 GDPR. Article 31 GDPR can be read as a supporting provision to Article 58 GDPR. In

deals with processing within the scope of the GDPR. Part 2 deals with processing outside of the scope of the GDPR. Part 3 deals with processing by competent

Authority for Greece. It resides in Athens and is in charge of enforcing GDPR in Greece, the Greek Data Protection Act 2019, the ePrivacy Directive implementation

or infringes the GDPR or any other applicable laws, including national ones. See commentary under Article 77 GDPR. Article 78(1) GDPR establishes both

exists only in cases of Article 64(2) GDPR but not the context of Article 70(2) GDPR. According to Article 70(3) GDPR, the EDPB is obligated to “forward its

Although Article 40(5) GDPR mentions that the competent DPA will be determined through the application of Article 55 GDPR, the GDPR does not provide concrete

Regulation (GDPR) is in Slovenia directly applicable, as well as in other EU member states. There are however problems in the practical use of the GDPR which

Authority for Finland. It resides in Helsinki and is in charge of enforcing GDPR in Finland. The Office of the Data Protection Ombudsman is headed by the

from any of the GDPR’s protections. → You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 39 GDPR Just as Article 38 GDPR, Article 39 GDPR also shows similarities

(Articles 55-59 GDPR). The GDPR provides for exceptions from provisions entailed in Chapter VI (independent supervisory authorities). Article 85(2) GDPR mandates

encompasses other obligations of controllers under the GDPR. EDPB: This extends to various obligations under the GDPR, including but not limited to the implementation

(“LSA”) (Article 65(1)(b) GDPR), and where a SA is not following an opinion of the EDPB (Article 6(1)(c) GDPR). Article 65(1)(a) GDPR addresses the cases where

Category:Article 45 GDPR Kuner, in Kuner, Bygrave, Docksey, The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary, Article 45 GDPR, p. 774 (Oxford

dialogue, complaints handling and inspection, Datatilsynet oversees the GDPR in Norway and supervises that authorities, companies, organisations and individuals

relevance of Article 29 GDPR were rooted in the fact that Article 28(3)(b) GDPR already seems to cover much of the scope of Article 29 GDPR. More specifically

decision pursuant to Article 45 GDPR shall be used, when it exists; second, appropriate safeguards under Article 46 GDPR, such as binding corporate rules

with the GDPR (Article 31 GDPR). Direct liability of the representative is limited to the obligations set out in Article 30 and Article 58(1)(a) GDPR. Article

pursuant to Article 77 GDPR. Lastly, the NPO may file a legal remedy under Article 79 GDPR against a controller or processor regarding a GDPR infringement. The

authority. Article 61(1) GDPR regulates how independent authorities are to cooperate to enable the uniform application of the GDPR. Supervisory authorities

Category:Article 47 GDPR Kuner, in Kuner, Bygrave, Docksey, The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Update of Selected Articles, Article 68 GDPR, p. 194 (Oxford

of the GDPR enforcement across the Member States. → You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 64 GDPR Caspar in Kühling, Buchner, GDPR Article

directly to children. As such, Article 8 GDPR stipulates additional requirements for consent by children. Article 8 GDPR applies only if the processing of data

France. The authority is established in Paris and is in charge of enforcing GDPR for France, as well as the national law for data protection "Loi Informatique

Article 89(2) and (3) GDPR also allow for specific derogation to the GDPR for these purposes, as further detailed below. Article 89(1) GDPR provides that when

the GDPR by Brave, page 6 - https://brave.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Brave-2020-DPA-Report.pdf Report: Europe’s governments are failing the GDPR by

88(1) GDPR) and a conditional function (Article 88(2) GDPR). While Article 88(2) GDPR determines the scope of the opening clause, Article 88(1) GDPR establishes

Recital 167 GDPR and Article 291 TFEU, the aim of implementing acts is to “ensure uniform conditions for implementing” the GDPR. In its GDPR Certification

60, 63, 64 and 65 GDPR) immediately adopt provisional measures intended to produce legal effects on its own territory. Article 66 GDPR creates strict conditions

Article 19 GDPR therefore requires controllers, subject to certain exceptions, to communicate their exercise to recipients under Article 4(9) GDPR. The first

consideration when the GDPR was drafted. There is consequently no need to 'balance' the GDPR against other rights for a second time, as the GDPR is already the

Article 20(3) GDPR clarifies that the exercise of the right to data portability does not preclude the exercise of any other rights under the GDPR. Thus, if

outlined under other Articles of the GDPR, namely in Articles 51, 52 and 53 GDPR. The second objective, under Article 54(2) GDPR, seeks to regulate the confidentiality

Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 75 GDPR, p. 1105 (Oxford University Press 2020). Dix, in Kühling, Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Article 75 GDPR, margin number 6

apply from 25 May 2018. There is no relevant recital for Article 99 GDPR. Article 99 GDPR sets out the dates of the Regulation's entry into force and application

between Article 42(1) GDPR and Article 42(2) GDPR is that in the former, the applicant for certification is subject to the GDPR, while in latter, the applicant

Articles 13 or 14 GDPR. This can be drawn from the final sentence of Article 11(1) GDPR. It must be assessed with the utmost attention whether GDPR provisions

undefined in the GDPR. “Expertise” is only referred to again under Article 41(2)(a) GDPR, although briefly. Additionally, Article 41(1) GDPR specifies that

purpose (Article 52(4)(5)(6) GDPR). Elements of SAs' complete independence are also addressed in Article 53 GDPR and Article 54 GDPR. The CJEU in the Case of

Article 62 GDPR, margin number 11 (Beck 2018, 2nd edition). Riccio, Scorza, Belisario, GDPR e normativa privacy – Commentario, Article 62 GDPR (Wolters Kluwer

decisions pursuant to Article 65 GDPR (Article 70(1)(t) GDPR). Article 68 GDPR is the first of nine Articles (Articles 68-76 GDPR) governing the EDPB set forth

conduct under Article 83 GDPR should be excluded from penalties issued under Article 84 GDPR is debated. Whilst the wording of the GDPR is simply unclear in

Category:Article 86 GDPR At para. 120 Kranenborg, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 86 GDPR, p. 1216 (Oxford University

Article 97 GDPR. Article 97 GDPR imposes a "comprehensive reporting obligation" upon the Commission. The first paragraph of Article 97 GDPR sets out the

situation, Article 95 GDPR will not be relevant, and the GDPR applies as normal. Notably, Recital 173 GDPR, which relates to Article 95 GDPR, omits reference

n Recital 121 GDPR. Hijmans, in Kuner, Bygrave, Docksey, The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary, Article 53 GDPR, p. 888 (Oxford

Simkus, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 87 GDPR, p. 1226 (Oxford University Press 2020). EU Commission, Survey on

under the GDPR. → You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 94 GDPR Kühling, Raab, in Kühling, Buchner, GVO BDSG, Article 94 GDPR, margin numbers

rights to data subjects as the GDPR. When the provisions of Regulation 2018/1725 follow the same principles as the GDPR, they should be interpreted homogeneously

in Category:Article 74 GDPR For more on this point, see Article 72 GDPR. Dix in Kühling, Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Article 74 GDPR, margin number 7 (C.H. Beck

of the European Union ("TFEU"), within the scope of the GDPR. The function of Article 92 GDPR is to lay down conditions for the delegation of power as

of knowledge between them. This way, Article 50 GDPR expands the exhortation under Article 57(1)(g) GDPR that calls for cooperation between EU DPAs, across

interpreted Recital 144 GDPR to have limited the scope of Article 81 GDPR, as applying only to proceedings instigated under Article 78 GDPR. The first sentence

Article 45(5) GDPR (revocation, change of such determinations); Articles 46(2)(c) and (d) GDPR (standard protection clauses); Article 47(3) GDPR (formats and

Article 72 GDPR regulates the Board's voting procedure. Generally, the GDPR grants the EDPB a high degree of autonomy. In particular, Article 72(2) GDPR entitles

proposed amendments to the GDPR (pursuant to Article 70(1)(b) GDPR). Although not explicitly mentioned in Article 69(2) GDPR, the requirement that the Board

76 GDPR, margin number 1 (C.H. Beck 2020, 3rd edition). Docksey, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 76 GDPR, p

true also under Article 91 GDPR”. See, Tosoni, in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 91 GDPR, p. 1263 (Oxford University

published under Article 70(3) GDPR. Though Article 70(3) GDPR already obliges the EDPB to make these public, Article 71(2) GDPR ensures that the public is

Article 96 GDPR if it is found to be incompatible with other GDPR provisions. → You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 96 GDPR It follows

Article 46(2)(d) GDPR, contractual clauses referred to in Article 46(3)(a) GDPR, or binding corporate rules within the meaning of Article 47 GDPR. In these cases

majority principle under Article 72(1) GDPR would have applied regardless of Article 73(1) GDPR. In addition, the GDPR explicitly legislates for a simple majority

Authority for Poland. It resides in Warsaw and is in charge of enforcing GDPR in Poland. The President of the Personal Data Protection Office performs

with Article 58(1) GDPR. Article 90 GDPR was drafted with a view to regulate potential conflicts between the application of the GDPR on the one hand, and

provisions of the GDPR. This decision refers to the Administrative cooperation between SAs (covering cooperation under Articles 56, 60, 61 and 62 GDPR) and the

when passing the GDPR. In fact, all but one EU Member State (who has sought higher protections) have voted in favor the GDPR. The GDPR is not just consisting

subject to the GDPR or, in cases where they are not established in the EU, act within the material and territorial scope of the GDPR. Article 48 GDPR refers to

data as well (see Recital 163 GDPR). Tosoni in Kuner et al., The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 98 GDPR, p. 1315 (Oxford University

enforcement of the GDPR. → You can find all related decisions in Category:Article 59 GDPR Selmayr, in Ehmann, Selmayr, DS-GVO Kommentar, Article 59 GDPR, margin number

Authority for Hungary. It resides in Budapest and is in charge of enforcing GDPR in Hungary. The National Authority for Data Protection and Freedom of Information

organisation-fined-for-gdpr-rule-breach-1.4255692?mode=amp https://www.irishlegal.com/article/tusla-fined-40-000-in-second-gdpr-breach https://www.dataprotection

Authority for Croatia. It resides in Zagreb and is in charge of enforcing GDPR in Croatia. You can help us by filling in this section! You can help us by

Authority for Netherlands. It resides in The Hague and is in charge of enforcing GDPR in Netherlands. The AP has three commissioners: Aleid Wolfsen (head), Monique

Authority for Cyprus. It resides in Nicosia and is in charge of enforcing GDPR in Cyprus. You can help us filling this section! You can help us filling

Authority for Estonia. It resides in Tallinn and is in charge of enforcing GDPR in Estonia. You can help us by filling in this section! You can help us by

Luxembourg, headquartered in Belvaux, municipality of Salem. The CNPD oversees the GDPR in Luxembourg and advises the national parliament, the government and other

Protection Authority for the German state of Berlin. It is in charge of enforcing GDPR in the private sector, within the German state of Berlin. You can help us

Protection Authority for Malta. It resides in Sliema and is in charge of enforcing GDPR in Malta. You can help us by filling in this section! You can help us by

Authority for Portugal. It resides in Lisbon and is in charge of enforcing GDPR in Portugal. The CNPD, the Portuguese Data Protection Authority, is composed

in Riga and is in charge of enforcing GDPR in Latvia.  The DVI is functionally independent institution. Besides GDPR, the regulation of the operation of

Spanish autonomous region of Catalonia. It is in charge of enforcing the GDPR in the public sector within Catalonia. You can help us by filling in this

Authority for Lithuania. It resides in Vilnius and is in charge of enforcing GDPR in Lithuania. You can help us by filling in this section! You can help us

Protection Authority for Germany. It resides in Bonn and is in charge of enforcing GDPR for Germany for the federal government and private telecommunication services

Authority for Bulgaria. It resides in Sofia and is in charge of enforcing GDPR for Bulgaria. You can help us by filling in this section! You can help us

entity that allegedly violates the GDPR description of the data processing activities that allegedly violate the GDPR list of the personal data (or at least

complementary arrangements to the provisions of the GDPR and references data processing on which the GDPR shall be applicable (§ 2 NDSG). It is more specific

complementary arrangements to the GDPR and regulates specific situations of data processing for which the GDPR is not applicable. So the GDPR is the applicable law

Authority for the German state of Baden-Württemberg. It is in charge of enforcing GDPR in the private sector within the German state of Baden-Württemberg and all

public sector for the German state of Bavaria. It is in charge of enforcing GDPR in the public sector, within the German state of Bavaria. You can help us

Protection Authority for the German state of Hesse. It is in charge of enforcing GDPR in the private sector, within the German state of Hesse. You can help us

for the German state of Rhineland-Palatinate. It is in charge of enforcing GDPR in the private sector, within the German state of Rhineland-Palatinate. You

in articles 70 and 71 GDPR. It includes ensuring the consistent application of GDPR and advising the Commission. Article 71 GDPR states that the EDPB must

Protection Authority for the German state of Saarland. It is charge of enforcing GDPR in the private sector, within the German state of Saarland. You can help

Protection Authority for the German state of Saxony. It is in charge of enforcing GDPR in the private sector, within the German state of Saxony. You can help us

Protection Authority for the German state of Bavaria. It is in charge of enforcing GDPR in the private sector, within the German state of Bavaria. Bavaria has a

Protection Authority for the German state of Bremen. It is in charge of enforcing GDPR in the private sector, within the German state of Bremen. You can help us

Authority for the German state of Saxony-Anhalt. It is in charge of enforcing GDPR in the private sector, within the German state of Saxony-Anhalt. You can

the German state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. It is in charge of enforcing GDPR in the private sector, within the German state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern

Authority for Slovakia. It resides in Bratislava and is in charge of enforcing GDPR and national data protection act in Slovakia. All decisions of the Slovak

Authority for Liechtenstein. It resides in Vaduz and is in charge of enforcing GDPR in Liechtenstein. You can help us filling this section! You can help us filling

Authority for the German state of Brandenburg. It is in charge of enforcing GDPR in the private sector, within the German state of Brandenburg. You can help

for the German state of Schleswig-Holstein. It is in charge of enforcing GDPR in the private sector, within the German state of Schleswig-Holstein. You

Protection Authority for the German state of Thuringia. It is charge of enforcing GDPR in the private sector, within the German state of Thuringia. You can help

autonomous region of the Basque Country. It is in charge of enforcing the GDPR in the public sector within the Basque Country. You can help us by filling

for Finland's autonomous region of Åland. It is in charge of enforcing the GDPR in the regional and municipal governments within the Åland Islands. The Region

German state of North Rhine-Westphalia. It is in charge of enforcing the GDPR in the private sector in the German state of North Rhine-Westphalia and for

Spanish autonomous region of Andalusia. It is in charge of enforcing the GDPR in the public sector within Andalusia. You can help us by filling in this

Authority for Sweden. It resides in Stockholm and is in charge of enforcing the GDPR in Sweden. On 1 January 2021, the Swedish data protection authority changed

practice with the “essentially equivalent” level of protection guaranteed by the GDPR to EU citizens. Maximillian Schrems, an Austrian citizen, had been a Facebook

inviolability of human dignity. You can help us fill this section! In Germany the GDPR is implemented by the Bundesdatenschutzgesetz (BDSG). You can help us fill

In progress. Fill in the name used for the recital if you use it so we can ensure a somewhat streamlined practice. Recital 1: The protection of natural

Regulation provides the new data protection rules for EUls which matches the GDPR, the latter applicable across the EU/European Economic Area. By the end of

Directive 2002/58/EC, and the GDPR to the CJEU. The case was referred to the Court of Justice on 5 October 2017 - before the GDPR became applicable on 25 May

the mere infringement of GDPR provisions in itself is sufficient for the right to receive compensation under Article 82 GDPR or is it required that an

law would undoubtedly not be compatible with Art. 5(1)(f) GDPR, Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR and Art. 6 GDPR. A.9 In its final submission of August 12, 2021, the Second

the Member States. Example: Article 6(1)(a) GDPR Example: Not Art. 6 Abs 1 Lit a GDPR or Article 6 GDPR or GDPR Article 6, Sec 1(a) Recitals are also not

protection authorities (Art. 78.1 GDPR), as well as by the possibility to bring actions directly in court (Art. 79 GDPR). Against the decisions that put

interpretation of Article 15 GDPR. The Supreme Court asked the following preliminary question: 'Is Article 15(1)(c) of the GDPR to be interpreted as meaning

Infringement of Article 6 and 9 GDPR qualifies for the maximum amount for administrative fines as set out in Article 83(5) GDPR: 20,000,000 € or 4% of the total

not fulfilled its obligations under the GDPR in a number of ways: It infringed Articles 5(1)(c), (f) and 5(2) GDPR by not considering the risks to students'

of data undergoing processing pursuant to Article 15(3) GDPR. According to the CJEU, the GDPR does not contain any definition of “copy”. However, this

60 GDPR applicable in this case? Are Google LLC and Google Ireland LTD to be considered as joint controllers within the meaning of article 26 GDPR? Does

Peter Nowak Court: CJEU Jurisdiction: European Union Relevant Law: Article 15 GDPR Article 2(a) Directive 95/46/EC Decided: 20.12.2017 Parties: Peter Nowak

interests under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. On the erasure obligations under Article 17 GDPR, the CJEU held that under Article 17(1)(d) GDPR SCHUFA will be under the

personal data to be provided pursuant to Article 15(1) GDPR: must Article 15(3) first sentence of the GDPR be interpreted as meaning that, due to the nature

law, specifically Article 83 GDPR read in conjunction with Articles 101 and 102 TFEU, would require Germany to allow that GDPR fines may be initiated directly

Article 5(2) GDPR in conjunction with Article 5(1)(a) GDPR. Failure to demonstrate that processing is performed in accordance with the GDPR The DPA noted

In United Kingdom, the GDPR has been transposed into national law through the Data Protection Act 2018. The application of the GDPR is, however, limited

Regulation (GDPR). That approach of the CJEU seems consistent with Article 6 of the General Data Protection Regulation. In addition, the GDPR's article does

of Chapter V GDPR. The complaint was transferred to the Swedish DPA in its quality of lead supervisory authority pursuant to Article 56 GDPR. Following the

right. In Italy the GDPR is implemented by the Codice in materia di protezione dei dati personali. Following the introduction of the GDPR, the Code has undergone

6(1)(a) and 4(11) GDPR in a case concerning the requirements of consent). Always use the most specific sub-paragraph (e.g. Article 6(1)(a) GDPR for consent and

help us fill this section! You can help us fill this section! In Estonia the GDPR is implemented by the Isikuandmete kaitse seadus. You can help us fill this

help us fill this section! You can help us fill this section! In Finland the GDPR is implemented by the Act 1050/2018. You can help us fill this section! You

help us fill this section! You can help us fill this section! In Ireland the GDPR is implemented by the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA). You can help us fill

fill this section! You can help us fill this section! In Liechtenstein the GDPR is implemented by the Datenschutzgesetz (DSG). You can help us fill this

Workspace for Education until they have brought the processing in line with the GDPR. This is the Danish DPA's third decision in the case relating to Helsingor

now follows from § 102 of the Constitution. The national implementation of GDPR follows from the Personal Data Act of 2018 (personopplysningsloven), as well

has been a member of the European Union since May 1, 2004. In Poland the GDPR is implemented by the Personal Data Protection Act of May 10, 2018. By the

provisions in the national law, meaning the age of consent under GDPR is kept, namely 16 (art. 8.1 GDPR). See Article 7 of the national implementing law. See Article

chapters with 34 paragraphs, followed by the GDPR full text. When the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) 2016/679 was enacted, it was transposed into

65(5) GDPR without delay after the IE SA has notified its final decision to the controller920. 919 Article 65(6) GDPR. 920 Article 65(5) and (6) GDPR. Adopted

the first sentence of recital 63 GDPR. Neither the wording of Article 12(5) GDPR nor that of Article 15(1) and (3) GDPR condition the provision (to access

convictions’ within the meaning of Article 8(5) of Directive 95/46 (and Article 10 GDPR). In addition the court judged that a search engine operator does not need

Article 32 GDPR? 4) Does Article 82(3) GDPR allow the controller to be exempt from liability for damages if the data breach as defined by 4(12) GDPR was caused

consistent with the underlying values of the GDPR and cannot be justified in the light of Article 6(1) and Article 9(2) GDPR. It followed, that the companies brought

Must Articles 77(1) and 79(1) GDPR be interpreted as meaning that the administrative appeal provided for in Article 77 GDPR constitutes an instrument for

(2000) | Disputes Act (2005) §20-2 | The Personal Data Act (2018) §1, GDPR A4, GDPR A5 (1) Judge Thyness: Questions and background of the case (2) The case

UK GDPR remains substantively the same as the EU's GDPR. This is acknowledged by the judges in this case at [11] who state 'the content of the GDPR [remains]

regarding Articles 5(1)(b) GDPR and 5(1)(e) GDPR and held that national courts had to determine, using the factors of Article 6(4) GDPR, whether further processing

obligation to provide data subjects with a privacy policy pursuant to Article 13 GDPR. Moreover, the collection of personal data and their use in the training

erasure under Article 17(1)(d) GDPR, as the data processing was not lawful. In any case, the requirements of Article 6 GDPR were no longer met 6 months after

categories of data" under Article 9 GDPR. What is the relationship between national laws (like § 151 GewO) and GDPR? Is a prediction of a political affiliation

9(1) GDPR, Article 15 GDPR, Article 16 GDPR, Article 18(1)(a) GDPR, Article 18(1)(b) GDPR, Article 18(1)(d) GDPR, Article 20 GDPR and Article 21 GDPR for

the meaning of Article 45 of the GDPR and without appropriate safeguards within the meaning of Article 46 of the GDPR. Furthermore, the plaintiff claims

Board assessed if a fine could be imposed as per Article 83(5) GDPR, cf. Article 83(2) GDPR, and in which case, how large it should be. The Board agreed

personal data under Article 9(1) GDPR. Their processing would require the data subjects' explicit consent under Article 9(2)(a) GDPR and § 151(4) GewO, ordered

meaning of Article 4 no. 2 of the GDPR and the term "transfer" within the meaning of Article 44 et seq. of the GDPR. GDPR had to be differentiated. Due to

according to Article 9(2)(a) GDPR. On the basis of the information gathered, the DPA held that the controller had violated Article 9 GDPR. As a result, and in

the applicable law, as the GDPR had entered into force since the initial complaints dating back to 2012. They found that the GDPR would indeed apply. The

controller, to correct its data processing practice in accordance with the GDPR. This decision does not assess the activities of the police in relation to

many waivers from GDPR for research purposes under Article 89 GDPR. It is questionable of the law is constitutional and in line with GDPR. § 151 of the Austrian

certain provisions of the GDPR that do not apply –Article 6 GDPR, Article 9 GDPR, Article 10 GDPR, Article 30 GDPR and Article 34 GDPR, as well as the provision

council in Greece to cease their processing activities, under Article 58(2) GDPR and Article 15(8) of Law 4624/2019, because of an unresolved data breach

of Article 6(1) GDPR; 2. Did not provide the complainant with enough information prior to the processing, in violation of Article 13 GDPR; 3. Processed more

Article 32 GDPR. Retaining personal data of an applicant for a lease after another applicant has been selected also violates Article 5(1)(e) GDPR. The customer

of law. In Netherlands the GDPR is implemented by the Uitvoeringswet Algemene verordening gegevensbescherming (“Dutch GDPR Implementation Act”). In relation

Convention of Human Rights. According to Article 29(2), Article 14 GDPR and Article 15 GDPR apply insofar as the right to freedom of expression and information

interlocutory decision, on the language to be used in a procedure concerning GDPR complaints filed by complainants in various Member States against IAB Europe

judicial order, as well as § 71 which concerns personal liberty. In Denmark the GDPR is implemented by the Databeskyttelsesloven (Data Protection Act). The age

the documents or files containing their personal data under Article 15(3) GDPR and Article 12 of the ePrivacy Directive. However, there is a right to a

Article 46 GDPR. In 2020, noyb lodged a complaint with the Austrian DPA alleging that the controller breached the provisions of Chapter V GDPR. The complaint

Fashion ID Court: CJEU Jurisdiction: European Union Relevant Law: Article 80 GDPR Article 1 Directive 95/46 Article 1(1) Directive 2009/22/EC Article 10 Directive

Protection Authority (BDPA Act). You can help us fill this section! In Belgium the GDPR is implemented by the Data Protection Act (2019). You can help us fill this

repealing Directive 95/46 / EC (General Data Protection Regulation, hereinafter “GDPR”); In view of the law of 3 December 2017 establishing the Data Protection

of Chapter V GDPR. The complaint was transferred to the Swedish DPA in its quality of lead supervisory authority pursuant to Article 56 GDPR. Following the

rights. This right is explicitly enshrined in Article 38. In Slovenia the GDPR is not implemented by the national law. Slovenia remains the only EU country

of Chapter V GDPR. The complaint was transferred to the Swedish DPA in its quality of lead supervisory authority pursuant to Article 56 GDPR. Following the

help us fill this section! You can help us fill this section! In Hungary the GDPR is implemented by the Act CXII of 2011. You can help us fill this section

help us fill this section! You can help us fill this section! In Iceland the GDPR is implemented by the Lög um persónuvernd og vinnslu persónuupplýsinga. You

help us fill this section! You can help us fill this section! In Croatia the GDPR is implemented by the Zakon o Provedbi Opće Uredbe o Zaštiti Podataka. You

us fill this section! You can help us fill this section! In Luxembourg the GDPR is implemented by the Loi du 1er août 2018. You can help us fill this section

help us fill this section! You can help us fill this section! In Latvia the GDPR is implemented by the Fizisko personu datu apstrādes likums. You can help

us fill this section! You can help us fill this section! In Slovakia the GDPR is implemented by the Zàkon o ochrane osobných údajov. You can help us fill

us fill this section! You can help us fill this section! In Lithuania the GDPR is implemented by the Asmens Duomenų Teisinės Apsaugos Įstatymas. You can

help us fill this section! You can help us fill this section! In Malta the GDPR is implemented by the Data Protection Act (2018). You can help us fill this

fill this section! You can help us fill this section! In Czech Republic the GDPR is implemented by the Zákon č. 110/2019. You can help us fill this section

attribution to an unique national number to the citizens. In Portugal the GDPR is implemented by the Lei n.º 58/2019. In Portugal the Age of consent is

Chapter 2 § 1 The Fundamental Law on Freedom of Expression. It is unsure if the GDPR is compatible to the constitutional protection. The stance of the Swedish

reference to which the Constitutionnal Council can adjudicate. In France the GDPR is implemented by the Law "Informatique et Libertés", as modified by the

infringing Article 6(1) GDPR, in relation with the lawfulness principle established by Article 5(1)(a) GDPR. Article 5(1)(d) GDPR establishes that personal

DPA is competent to act under Articles 55 and 56 GDPR, it may exercise the powers conferred by the GDPR on its national territory, irrespective of the Member

(Article 8(1) CFR, Article 9A Greek Constitution, Recital 64 GDPR), underlined that the GDPR totally respects all fundamental rights and freedoms included

telemarketing practices which revealed that Vodafone was in violation of several GDPR articles. Vodafone was ordered to implement more appropriate measures to

the principles of data processing of Article 5(1) GDPR, underlined that, based on Article 5(2) GDPR, it is the data processor's responsibility to conform

did not react either. GDPR applicable? (Article 3(2) GDPR) The DPA held that the GDPR was applicable pursuant of Article 3(2) GDPR. Because the controller

processing of data concerning health laid down in Article 9(1) GDPR is possible under Article 9(2)(h) GDPR) in a case such as the present one, are there further

Article 58(2) GDPR and impose on the respondent the responsibility to restore the fulfilment of Article 5(1)(a) GDPR and of Article 5(1)(b-f) GDPR, as well

5(1)(b) and (e), 9(2)(j), 89(1) GDPR and Section 7(1)(1) and (2)(1) GDPR. In particular, it follows from Article 9(2)(j) GDPR that the processing of data relating

The Greek DPA also considered whether or not the criteria of Article 6(4) GDPR had been respected. In this respect, the DPA found that the customers had

compliance with the principles of Article 5 GDPR and that they could be based on the legal basis of Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. The BVwG ruled that the principle of

violation of article 15 (1) cond. 12 par. 2, 3 and 4 GDPR and c) 30,000 euros for violation of Article 25 (1) GDPR because it did not in practice have the necessary

continued into 2018 (and later), after the GDPR had taken effect, everything above is referenced with GDPR Articles. Consequently, the DPA's decision item

application of the GDPR. While the DPC was arguing that it had purposefully limited the scope of its own-volition inquiry to Articles 12, 13 and 14 GDPR, and that