Search results

meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011. 2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply. 3. Where reference

the NAIH's employees. Based on constitutional provision, the Act CXII of 2011 on the right to informational self-determination and on the freedom of information

‘Advice paper on special categories of data (“sensitive data”)’, 20 April 2011, p. 6 (available here). Walker, in Kühling, Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Article

'consent' under the GDPR. WP29, ‘Opinion 15/2011 on the definition of consent’, 01197/11/EN WP187, 13 July 2011 (available here); and EDPB, ‘Guidelines 05/2020

Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011. In that context, the Commission should consider specific measures for micro

GDPR); the Directive on Patients' Rights in Cross-Border Healthcare (Directive 2011/24/EU), regarding personal data processed within healthcare services and

2015 Ετήσια έκθεση 2014 Ετήσια έκθεση 2013 Ετήσια έκθεση 2012 Ετήσια έκθεση 2011 Ετήσια έκθεση 2010 Ετήσια έκθεση 2009 Ετήσια έκθεση 2008 Ετήσια έκθεση 2007

declaration in EU law (such as 14 days for online purchases under Directive 2011/83/EU), the right to withdraw consent has no limit. This makes long-term

Edition), citing 'Cavoukian Privacy by Design - The 7 Foundational Principles', 2011, p. 1 (available here). See also, AEPD, Guía de Privacidad desde el Diseño

of religion in general. For instance, under Article 10(1)(b) of Directive 2011/95/EU, “[t]he concept of religion shall in particular include the holding

Karimnia v. Turkey, 2009, §§ 114-115; M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], 2011, §§ 301-304 and 319; Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], 2012, § 204 CJEU

ECLI:EU:C:2016:572, paragraphs 137-154 or in case C-70/10, Scarlet Extended, ECLI:EU:C:2011:255, margin number 99.” EDPB, ‘Guidelines 10/2020 on restrictions under Article

relevant findings to the Committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council as established under this Regulation

2020). In CJEU, Case C-468/10 and C-469/10, ASNEFF and FECEMD, 24 November 2011, margin number 38 (available here) , the CJEU named two elements for a test

2016/680) The Data Protection Acts 1988 and 2003 The 2011 “ePrivacy Regulations” (S.I. No. 336 of 2011 – the European Communities (Electronic Communications

for, or the provision of, health care services as referred to in Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (9) to that natural person;

fill this section! In Hungary the GDPR is implemented by the Act CXII of 2011. You can help us fill this section! You can help us fill this section! You

users of mobile phone equipment and services and other provisions; 4) L. 3917/2011 on the retention of data that is produced or processed based on the provision

conjunction with Article 58(2) GDPR. According to Article 6 of National Law 3917/2011, records, such as the ones in question, are to be kept for a period of 12

concerning the sound recording and the cameras' field of view. Back as far as 2011, the Greek DPA issued a national directive for the CCTV at workplaces, and

processing via means of video surveillance, especially under HDPA Order 1/2011 on the use of video surveillance systems for the purposes of the protection

GDPR personal data is involved. Second, as the data subject was sentenced in 2011 and had served their prison time by 2016, the search results relate to old

the articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree lg. 1 September 2011, no. 150, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

by way of a step action regarding all contribution increases in the years 2011 - 2016, finding that all contribution increases are ineffective are and payment

DE-2011-title50/html/USCODE-2011-title50-chap36-subchapVI- sec1881.htm and https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-title50/html/USCODE-2011-title50-chap36-

this could not be inferred from the wording of the provision. The Directive 2011/24/EU also speaks against such a surrender of entire documents: its Article

immediately received a copy of the inspection report (document B.11). On 27 July 2011, the appellant submitted her defences (documents C.1 and C.2). On 17 September

sentence in full and that the arrest warrant had ceased to be valid since April 2011. Consequently, the information was no longer necessary for the purposes for

18, 2002 - VII ZR 260/01, NJW 2002, 2952, 2953 and from 29.03.2011 - VI ZR 117/10, NJW 2011, 1815 para. 8 each with further reference; OLG Köln, VersR 2020

the supplements to the insurance policy and the supplements from the years 2011 to 2020. Despite careful research, it was not possible to determine where

Authorization No. 2600/2011, which refers precisely to the General Population and Housing Census operation. 298. Authorization No. 2600/2011 was never subject

Inspection Service to Recommendation 1Recommendation of initiative n° 03/2011 of 25 May 2011 on the copying of identity cards as well as their use and electronic

as the articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree 1 September 2011, n. 150, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

No 1049/2001 Decided: 23.11.2011 Parties: Case Number/Name: T-82/09. Dennekamp I European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2011:688 Reference from: Language:

2001/29 Directive 2004/48 Directive 95/46 Directive 2002/58 Decided: 24.11.2011 Parties: Scarlet Extended SA Société belge des auteurs, compositeurs et éditeurs

free movement of such data, PbEG 1995, L 281/31. 4 HR 9 September 2011, ECLI:NL:HR:2011:BQ8097 (Santander), para. 3.3. 5 Parliamentary Papers II 2017/18

DE-2011-title50/html/USCODE-2011-title50-chap36-subchapVI- sec1881.htm and https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-title50/html/USCODE-2011-title50-chap36-

the articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree lg. 1 September 2011, no. 150, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

DE-2011-title50/html/USCODE-2011-title50-chap36-subchapVI- sec1881.htm and https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-title50/html/USCODE-2011-title50-chap36-

2016/679 (hereafter GDPR) and the way in which the Authority’s Directive 1/2011 on video surveillance systems should be interpreted in the light of the Regulation

Also, the CCTV system in question falls under the provisions of HDPA's 1/2011 directive, which is the main point of reference for the use of CCTV video-surveillance

usuarios@madrileña.es , to request the gas consumption made in the house during the years 2011 and 2012. The claimed entity, considering that the applicant of such information

the years 2011 to 2016 based on the respective tariffs. On the other hand, the 14th Justifications and supplementary sheets for the years 2011 to 2016.

3471/2006). However, with the provisions of article 16 par. 1 and 2 of law 3917/2011, par. 1 and 2 of article 11 of law 3471/2006 were amended, so that with article

obligation. Because the Courts and the Legal Register Centre made errors between 2011 and 2017, this information, turned out to be inaccurate and transferred without

obligation. Because the Courts and the Legal Register Centre made errors between 2011 and 2017, this information, turned out to be inaccurate and transferred without

has said that the wanted notice in question has not been valid since April 2011. The applicant has emphasized that the online content in question specifically

by national law, Directive 01/2011 and Law 4624/2019, as well as the GDPR. According to Article 9(4) of Directive 01/2011, the transmission to third parties

Code itself and to the measures prescribed by provision no. 192 of 12 May 2011, containing "Requirements regarding the circulation of information in the

which leaves the question open; VG Berlin ruling v. May 24, 2011 - Az. 1 K 133/10, BeckRS 2011, 52814; Bay. State Office for Data Protection Supervision

juris = NZA 2020, 227; BAG, judgment of March 23, 2011 - 10 AZR 562/09 - paragraph 24, juris = ZTR 2011, 561). Membership of the works council is generally

Tribunal refers here to the Civil Ombudsman's decision of 17 August 2012 in case 2011/2718 (imposition of an infringement fee under the Aquaculture Act), where

Court referred to the case law of the CJEU (see CJEU 25 November 2011, ECLI:EU:C:2011:685, eDate Advertising GMBH/Martinez), from which it follows that

September 2011 on the documentation of the course of studies (Journal of Laws of 2011, item 201, No. 1188, as amended. - in force since 1 October 2011, repealed

10.1990 - 11 UE 3005/89 - ESVGH 41, 105; VG Frankfurt a.M., Urt. v. 29.07.2011 - 5 K 156/11.F - juris; to § 9 MRRG Medert/Süßmuth, Melderecht, Stand 3.

obligation to publish those data in accordance with art. 73 of D. Lgs. 118/2011. Is the online publication of personal information of a debtor in compliance

15 GDPR) was overridden by more specific provisions in the Spanish law 16/2011, of June 24, on consumer credit contracts (LCCC). However, the DPA issued

Nacional November 24, 2011, C-468/10; par. 52; EDPB Guidelines 3/2019, par. 32-35. 16JudgmentAsociación Nacional 24 November 2011, C-468/10, para. 56. 1

of patients, as provided in other cases (cf. article 35 N. 3978/2011 OJ A' 137/16-6-2011) “Project Agreements” The importance for the issue under consideration

managing director of a regional association of a charitable organisation. In 2011, this regional association had a financial deficit of almost one million

However, with the provisions of Article 16 par. 1 and 2 of Law No. 3917/2011 amended paras. 1 and 2 of Article 11 of Law No. 3471/2006, so that Article

regulatory measures enforced by the HDPA in Greece. Important to Note: Directive 1/2011, Article 16, paragraph 2 of the Hellenic Data Protection Authority, which

through bill 32339: Lower House, session year 2010-2011, 32 339, no. 8 (Letter from the Minister 8 February 2011) (p.1) Lower regulation implementation of the

152 of the Code and Article 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150 of 1 September 2011, an objection to this measure may be lodged with the ordinary judicial authority

facilities under a contract for the provision of services signed on 07/01/2011 (copy of the contract attached). In the copy of the literal of the burofax

[appellant] refers to the judgment of the Division of 20 April 2011, ECLI:NL:RVS:2011:BQ1871, and the judgment of the Court of Justice of 20 December

NZKart 2015, 272, 275 et seq. [Silostellgebühren III]; decision of 10 August 2011 - KRB 55/10, NJW 2012,164, 165 [Versicherungsfusion]; OLG Düsseldorf, judgment

Golly Telly; judgment of 4 November 2010 - I ZR 139/09, GRUR 2011, 633 marginal 34 = WRP 2011, 858 - BIO TABAK; aA Ohly in Ohly/Sosnitza, UWG, 7th ed, §

83(4) GDPR Article 83(5) GDPR Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients’ rights

information purpose otherwise not achievable (provision no.508 of 30 December 2011 [Doc. web1873945 ], prov . n. 364 of 10 July 2014 [Doc. web n. 3352396 );

responded with reference to the decision of the Federal Labor Court of March 23, 2011 (- 10 AZR 562/09 -), both radio tions are compatible with each other. The

the right to an effective judicial remedy guaranteed by article 79 GDPR. In 2011 Rabobank loaned 70K EUR to the appellants with a monthly payment of 700 EUR

company assessments and professional assessments relating to the years from 2011 onwards, the data are visible in the applications HR in self-service mode

of the Charter (see ECJ, judgment of 24 November 2011, ASNEF and FECEMD, C-468/10 and C-469/10, EU:C:2011:777, marginal no. 40 et seq.Judgement of 13 May

"Kreditwürdigkeit" in § 7 VKrG, in Blaschek/Habersberger (eds.), Eines Kredites würdig? (2011) 22). A tendency to breach the contract - such as a lack of financial self-control

directly of the jurisprudence emanating from the CJEU in its judgment of 10/24/2011 (matters accumulated C-468/10 and C-469/10, Asnef, Fecemed) that declares

been fulfilled. In 2017, the parliamentary ombudsman concluded that, between 2011 and 2017, courts had assigned the wrong codes to judgements, because a factual

No. 715 of 23 June 2011 on the provision of electronic communications networks and services [3] Executive Order No. 715 of 23 June 2011 on the provision

the articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree lg. 1 September 2011, no. 150, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

the articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree lg. 1 September 2011, no. 150, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

the articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree lg. 1 September 2011, no. 150, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

wrongly considered that the Santander judgment (HR 9 September 2011, ECLI: NL: HR: 2011: BQ8097) has the same test as art. 21 GDPR . 3.2 These grievances

processing in question. 17 16 See Opinion 15/2011 of the Article 29 on the definition of consent, WP187.13 July 2011, p.25. 17See in this regard EDPB, Guidelines

value='2013' > 2013</option><option value='2012' > 2012</option><option value='2011' > 2011</option><option value='2010' > 2010</option><option value='2009' > 2009</option><option

is prior to the administrative court proceedings (cf. e.g. VwGH 13.12.2011, 2011/22/0316). 3.2.3. In the present case, the complainant argues that there

within the term pursuant to art. 10, paragraph 3, of d. lgs. n. 150 of 1/9/2011 envisaged for the submission of the appeal as indicated below (Article 166

prejudicial for the administrative court proceedings (cf. eg VwGH 13.12.2011, 2011/22/0316). A legal question is also prejudicial to a “merely” similar legal

Reference is made to the judgment of the Supreme Court of 9 September 2011 (ECLI: NL: HR: 2011: BQ8097). 4.5. Rabobank states that it has fully complied with

over-indebted natural persons, Law Library, 2011, pp. 56 - 59. 5 See IrPatron 218/2020, IrAtal 183/2016, IrAth 142/2011 & 127/2011. 6 See in this regard I. Venieris

others, the Next: - That the facial recognition system was installed from the 2011-2012 academic year. - That the purpose pursued was to reduce absenteeism

of the geolocated vehicle, see also, in general terms, provision 4 October 2011, no. 370, doc. web no. 1850581; see, in relation to specific cases, the provisions

of expression and are accurate because they referred to a sentence, dated 2011, that the citizen is currently serving, and (2) according to Facebook, the

as well as art. 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree 1 September 2011, n. 150, opposition to this provision may be filed with the ordinary judicial

nuncwithout object; 1Compare with Brussels 2018 AR1293 and Brussels 29 March 2011, TBO 2011, 176. rPAGE 01-00002223628-0010-0011-01-0-� l!I·• L _J{ -- Court of

decision of the ECtHR, Sigma Radio Television Ltd v. Cyprus, dated 21 July 2011, applications number 32181/04 and 35122/06) is under the right of the previous

(see also art. 10, paragraph 3, of the legislative decree no. 150 of 1/9/2011), the offender has the right to settle the dispute by paying, within the

Independent Data Protection Centre Germany, (ULD) made a decision on 3rd November 2011 against the company ordering them to deactivate the fan page within the prescribed

unsolicited direct marketing emails, between the dates of 11th of October 2011 and 5 of June 2013, were added to the complaint. Deco Proteste claimed that

The defendant refers to fax documents from the years 2011 and 2012 (letters of 10 February 2011 and 9 September 2012). The plaintiff has already objected

... website (hereinafter: Website) on the data management of Act CXII of 2011 on the right to information self-determination and freedom of information

referred to in article 10, paragraph 3, of legislative decree no. 150 of 2011 provided for the filing of the appeal, the transgressor and the jointly and

within the term referred to in art. 10, paragraph 3, of d. lgs. n. 150 of 1/9/2011 envisaged for the filing of the appeal as indicated below (Article 166, paragraph

publishes a video, without the consent of the claimant, that was made in the year 2011 or 2012, being a minor (there was not yet (...)) and, in addition, it was

Privacy Appeals Board later upheld the DPA's decision. A data subject was in 2011 sentenced to four years in prison for a serious case of corruption and for

in 2011, 2012, 2013, 2015 and most recently in 2019. [91] As part of extensive e-mail traffic, he received a first 18-page PDF file on June 9, 2011. After

referred to in Article 10, paragraph 3, of Legislative Decree no. 150 of 1/9/2011 provided for the lodging of the appeal as indicated below (Article 166, paragraph

it should be borne in mind that in its judgment of 9 September 2011 (ECLI:NL:HR:2011:BQ8097), the Supreme Court considered that the Wbp, which was still

Administrative Procedure (Act CL of 2016) and the Hungarian Privacy Act (Act CXII of 2011). According to section 51, if an authority exceeds the administrative deadline

the plaintiff had been aware of this privacy statement at least since June 2011. The storage of previous residential addresses - with the note "moved" -

of 10 April 2018; Opinion No. 15/2011 on the definition of consent - WP 187, adopted by the Art. 29 Group on 13 July 2011; Recommendation CM / Rec (2010)

Article 21 paragraph 1 GCI. 13.6. In its decision of 9 September 2011 (ECLI:NL:HR:2011:BQ8097), issued under the (then) Personal Data Protection Act, the

of the above woman in 2011. The said Turkish Cypriot even submitted a complaint to the Administrative Commissioner in August 2011, which was answered in

crisis Covid-19 ”from the Ministry of Health, dated May 14, 2020. - "Law 33/2011, of October 4, General of Public Health". - “Law 31/1995, of November 8,

” 9 See, e.g., GwH, No. 50/2008, March 19, 2008, B.15.12; No. 35/2011, March 10, 2011, B.5-B.6; No. 23/2016, 18 February 2016, B.14.3. See also A. ALEN

information is related to a search warrant that has not been valid since 2011. The information affects his business. The articles referenced in the links

applying for the SZÉP Card also changed in the current semester. The previous 55/2011 on the rules of issuing and using the Széchenyi Pihenő Card. (IV. 12.) of

g) of Law 36/2011, of October 10, Regulating Social Jurisdiction. SECOND. - In accordance with the provisions of article 97, 2 of Law 36/2011, of October

Debtor [..]. The content of the request did not comply with Article CXII of 2011 on the right to information and freedom of information. Act (hereinafter:

been. Likewise, analyzed in the Infamous of this AEPD 469/2011 of December 30, December 2011. in which the following is indicated: "In this point. It should

personal data by the City of San Giorgio Jonico, all rejected by judgment (2009, 2011, 2014, 2019). In the case in point, the Guarantor has contested the processing

accordance with the provisions of Articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, 2011, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter

regional and state authorities' websites. The solution has been used since 2011 on Y Municipality's website. Y Municipality has stated that it is responsible

municipality (data controller), but KMD could not deny that information dates from 2011 and 2012. Due to the deletion, KMD could also not state with certainty what

provided by art. 10, paragraph 3, of the legislative decree no. 150 of 1.9.2011 for the submission of the appeal as indicated below (art. 166, paragraph

referred to in Article 10, paragraph 3, of Legislative Decree no. 150 of 1/9/2011 provided for the lodging of the appeal as indicated below (Article 166, paragraph

links referred to in this case contained publications from the years 2008, 2011, and 2012. The HDPA considered that the information in question was outdated

the appeal proceedings (general opinion, cf. BGH, decision of 24 October 2011 - IX ZR 244/09, NJW-RR 2012, 688 [marginal no. 6]; decision of 8 April 2015

Authority, taking into account, inter alia, in particular, the Opinions 15/2011 “ on the definition of consent” and 5/2014 “ on anonymisation techniques”

Telekommunikationsgesetz Paragraph 47(1) Telekommunikationsgesetz Decided: 05.05.2011 Parties: Deutsche Telekom AG Bundesrepublik Deutschland Case Number/Name:

publication of the news. Indeed, from the date the news was published (August 2011) and the date you exercised the right of cancellation (July 2015) not even

set out in art. 10, paragraph 3, of Legislative Decree lgs. no. 150 of 1.9.2011 envisaged for the lodging of the appeal as indicated below (art. 166, paragraph

European law, cf. the judgment of the European Court of Justice of 24 November 2011 in joint cases C-468/10 ASNEF and C-469/10 FECEMD section 43. The methodological

national registry number are sufficient to identify her. The fact that until 2011, the mention of the title of nobility on the passport was optional furthermore

office and this was allowed to be made public under the Hungarian Act CXII of 2011 on Informational Self-determination and Freedom of Information. The photo

information and documents regarding all contribution adjustments from January 1, 2011. The defendant refused the request. Subsequently, the plaintiff engaged in

accordance with the provisions of Articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, 2011, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter

its part, refers to the Accounting Board's General Guideline of 1 February 2011 on Accounting Methods and Materials for the definition of business correspondence

the (still) lacking certainty of the entitlement to benefits (cf. BGH, NJW 2011, 1815 para. 8, beck-online; Zöller/Greger, ZPO, § 254 para. 6). On the other

injury. In this sense, the Judgment of the National High Court dated 03/28/2011 establishes: “It must therefore be concluded that although the rights of

stated that the accounts of Recht-Net CV and Credial CV were opened on 6 May 2011 and terminated in 2012 and therefore existed for more than six months. Although

October 2011), ECLI:EU:T:2011:560), paragraph 266. 403 See, inter alia, Caffaro Srl v Commission (Case T-192/06, judgment delivered on 16 June 2011, ECLI:EU:T:2011:278)

the Authority, together with the submission of supporting evidence. CXII of 2011 on the right to information self-determination and freedom of information

consideration the Judgment of the Audiencia Nacional de 29/11/2013, (ECR 455/2011), on the basis of the Sixth warning regulated in article 45.6 of the LOPD

8. Google LLC is also requested 1Executive order no. 1148 of 9 December 2011 on requirements for information and consent when storing or ad- access to

also operates an online service, with which the plaintiff registered on 13.6.2011 (...). This service can be used, for example, to track the progress of a

referred to in art. 10, paragraph 3, of Legislative Decree lgs. no. 150 of 1.9.2011 envisaged for the lodging of the appeal as indicated below (art. 166, paragraph

Constitutional Law, Kluwer 2011, p. 917 ff. 11A. ALENen K. MUYLLE, Handbook of Belgian Constitutional Law, Mechelen, Kluwer, 2011, 918EYBROUCK and S. OTTIAUX

explained in AstraZeneca UK Ltd v Albermarle International Corp [2011] EWHC 1574 (Comm), [2011] 1 All ER (Comm) 510, at para 35, the standard of proof is not

Action Group) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] UKSC 54, [2011] 2 AC 15, Mohamud v William Morrison Supermarkets plc [2016] UKSC 11; [2016]

2008/05/0129; 09.12.2010, 2009/09/0260; 26.04.2011, 2011/03/0015; 09.11.2011, 2011/22/0284; 13.12.2011, 2011/22/0316). According to the case law of the Administrative

on television on 5 April 2011 and repeated on 6 April 2011. The episode can (still) be seen on the internet. 2.4. On 6 April 2011, an article appeared in

processing of personal data (hereinafter "GDPR"), Law No. 4624/2019, Directive 1/2011, and Guideline 3/20191 of the EDPS on the processing of personal data through

Then you can mention the judgment of the Supreme Court of 24 November 2011, no. 100/2011 where tried on goals freedom of expression according to Article 73

stated to not have this power under Article 10 of Legislative Decree No 150 of 2011. The Italian DPA appealed this decision to the Italian Supreme Court. The

remuneration obligation of § 628 Para. 1 S. 1 BGB (BGH, Urt. v. 29.3.2011 - VI ZR 133/10, NJW 2011, 1674 with further information). 29 (1) The defendant is accused

Regulation, Article 152 of the Code and Article 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, it is possible to appeal against this measure before the ordinary judicial

data subject and the bank ended in 2012 and all data is from the period 2009-2011. The retention period of 7 years has been exceeded already by several years

concept of civil and commercial matters (ECJ, judgment of 18 October 2011 - C-406/09, NJW 2011, 3568 para. 39). This concept must be interpreted autonomously

Regulation, of art. 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, against this provision it is possible to appeal before the ordinary judicial

December 2020, ECLI:NL:GHARL:2020: 105648 Supreme Court 9 September 2011, ECLI:NL:HR:2011:BQ8097

within the term set out in art. 10, paragraph 3, of the d. lgs. n. 150 of 1/9/2011 provided for the filing of the appeal as indicated below (Article 166, paragraph

also art. 10, paragraph 3, of the legislative decree no. 150 of 1 September 2011); ORDER pursuant to Section 166(7) of the Code, the publication of this provision

supplement, the right to information self - determination and the CXII of 2011 on freedom of information. Section 60 (1) of the Information Act (hereinafter:

Directive 2011/24/EU supersedes the GDPR according to the principle lex specialis derogat legi generali. Apart from that, Art f, Directive 2011/24/EU provides

“public” or . is. 10The plaintiff went through the registration process in 2011. Despite the Senate's advice dated June 30, 2023 (page 264 f. of the second

the institutions of the executive power, on the basis of Act no. no. 115/2011, on the Government Council of Iceland. Furthermore, the school has a legal

relevance allegedly stole certain objects from said center commercial, on May 4, 2011, whose publication had an important media relevance, on which no action was

accordance with the provisions of Articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, 2011, on Common Administrative Procedure for Public Administrations (hereinafter

art. 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150 of September 1, 2011, an appeal against this measure may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

04.07.2011 by administrative decision of 4 July 2011, the Presidency of the from the membership register. This decision became final on 24.08.2011. Then

digitization strategy 2011 to 2015 In its analysis and assessment, KL has repeatedly referred to the joint public digitization strategy 2011 to 2015, which was

Respondent's General Terms and Conditions of Business (version of 7 July 2011 https://www.n***.at/agb), which were valid then and are still valid today

accordance with the provisions of Articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, 2011, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter

well as articles. 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree 1 September 2011, n. 150, an opposition to the ordinary judicial authority may be proposed

with some studies or professional experiences referring to years such as 2011, 2015, October-November2015, and one of 2016 as the chronological points

Regulation, Article 152 of the Code and Article 10 of Legislative Decree 150/2011, an appeal against this measure may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

child. 3.11 It follows from the Supreme Court decision of 9 September 2011 (NJ 2011, 595, Santander), which can be deemed not to have lost its validity under

for local elections, it is Local and Provincial Electoral Decree of 8 July 2011 (hereinafter: Local Electoral Decree) applicable. 3 41. Article 3 of the

Regulation, of art. 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, against this provision, it is possible to lodge a judicial appeal before

investigation of the alleged breach of obligations by the Customer Act CXII of 2011 on the right to information self-determination and freedom of information

Constitutional Law, Kluwer 2011, p. 917 ff. 18A. ALEN and K. MUYLLE, Handbook of Belgian Constitutional Law, Mechelen, Kluwer, 2011, 91EYBROUCK and S. SOTTIAU

controller points out that the guidelines have been subject to the EDPS '2011 decision, according to which professionals responsible for treatment decisions

2021, 15 Verg 4/21, juris, marginal no. 28; OLG Düsseldorf, order of 13.04.2011, VIl-Verg 58/10, juris, marginal no. 53; OLG Frankfurt, order of 09.07.2010

relation to what the Privacy Board had expressed in PVN-2010-11, see Prop.47 L (2011-2012) section 4.6. In reality, however, the content of the exception is the

municipality's legal obligations. Appellant has been receiving welfare since 2011. In 2017, the municipality carried out an investigation triggered by an anonymous

law applicable in this context. It referred to the Local Government Act 138/2011 which establishes that the local government must ensure that inhabitants

in art. 10, paragraph 3, of Legislative Decree lgs. no. 150 of 1 September 2011 envisaged for the filing of the appeal as indicated below. HAS pursuant to

act quality is (assumed) to be lacking (cf. VG NW, judgment of November 21, 2011 - 4 K 817/11.NW, with further references). The State Statistical Office as

also recorded Claims for injunctive relief (cf. Senate, GRUR 2011, 558 para. 6 f. =AfP 2011, 265 – www.womanineurope.com; BGH, GRUR 2016, 1048 para. 17

Regulation, Article 152 of the Code and Article 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, it is possible to appeal against this measure before the ordinary judicial

School of Aeronautics in 2009. He successfully completed this training in 2011. 1.3. At that time [claimant] and his partner had a child. He works full-time

publication of the news. Indeed, from the date the news was published (August 2011) and the date you exercised the right of cancellation (July 2015) not even

infringement of their rights and the receipt of unsolicited newsletters. Act CXII of 2011 on the right to information self-determination and freedom of information

Regulation, of art. 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, against this provision, it is possible to lodge an appeal before the ordinary

152 of the Code and Article 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150 of 1 September 2011, it is possible to appeal against this measure before the ordinary judicial

-Refers to the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 24/11/2011 matter accumulated C 468/2010 National Association of Financial Credit Establishments

Regulation, as well as art. 152 of the Code and 10 of the d. lgs. 1 September 2011, n. 150, against this provision, opposition may be proposed to the ordinary

which the Legal Registry Center has granted the data controller on 31 May 2011 permission to receive from the decision and decision notification system

within the term set out in art. 10, paragraph 3, of d. lgs. n. 150 of 1.9.2011 provided for the submission of the appeal as indicated below (Article 166

in art. 10, paragraph 3, of Legislative Decree lgs. no. 150 of 1 September 2011 envisaged for the filing of the appeal as indicated below. HAS pursuant to

referred to in art. 10, paragraph 3, of the legislative decree n. 150 of 2011; b) conform the treatments carried out through the video surveillance system

referred to in art. 10, paragraph 3, of the d. lgs. n. 150 of 1 September 2011 foreseen for the filing of the appeal as indicated below. HAS pursuant to

in art. 10, paragraph 3, of Legislative Decree lgs. no. 150 of 1 September 2011 envisaged for the filing of the appeal as indicated below. HAS pursuant to

(sentence 547/2011, of 20 July), which are accentuated in cases of physical and psychological abuse (sentences 128/2011, of March 1, and 547/2011, of July 20)

under § 73(1) German Asylum Act (AsylG), Article 11(1)(e) and (f) Directive 2011/95/EU and Article 1 C Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees

in art. 10, paragraph 3, of Legislative Decree lgs. no. 150 of 1 September 2011 envisaged for the filing of the appeal as indicated below. HAS pursuant to

in the art. 10, paragraph 3, of the legislative decree. lgs. n. 150 of 1.9.2011 provided for the filing of the appeal as indicated below (art. 166, paragraph

Code (see also art. 10, paragraph 3, of Legislative Decree no. 150 of 1/9/2011); HAS the publication of this provision on the Guarantor's website pursuant

is prior to the administrative court proceedings (cf. e.g. VwGH 13.12.2011, 2011/22/0316). A legal question is also prejudicial to a "merely" similar legal

2018-1125 of 12 December 2018, their content is remained unchanged since 2011. 116. The restricted committee then notes that on the basis of these provisions

30 Act no. 91/2008 on elementary schools, as well as regulation no. 1040/2011 on the responsibility and obligations of the school community in primary

the defendant in the contract concluded between the parties in the years 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 Insurance number .

in art. 10, paragraph 3, of Legislative Decree lgs. no. 150 of 1 September 2011 envisaged for the filing of the appeal as indicated below. HAS pursuant to

art. 10, paragraph 3, of the legislative decree. lgs. n. 150 of 1 September 2011 provided for the filing of the appeal as indicated below. HAS pursuant to

not attacked by the association (BGH, judgement of 17 January 2006). August 2011 - I ZR 148/10, juris para. 19 - Glücksspielverband; BGH, judgment of 17 September

request, the institution as a data controller is not aware of the CXII of 2011 on the right to self-determination of information and freedom of information

Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L 119, 04.05.2011, p. 1). 2016, p. 1 and EU Official Journal L 127 of 23.05.2018, p. 2), hereinafter

absence of this principle. The Judgment of the Supreme Court of February 4, 2011 being especially revealing relapse into Appeal No. 425/2007, which analyzes

the STS of 02/08/2012 (Rec. 25/2008). The STS relied on the STJUE of 04/24/2011 which resolved the issue preliminary ruling from Spain; declared invalid

of the matter but on defaming the person, is not protected (see OGH 29.06.2011, 15 Os 81/11t). Art. 10 ECHR protects not only stylistically high-quality

diets 2Par.56 of the ECHR judgment of 13 December 2011 (Ludana against Slovakia), ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1213JUD003182702). 2Par.125 of the ECHR judgment of

Four Freedoms, ed.), rd (5 2016, 17. 3 Compare CJEU judgment of 24 November 2011, Asociación Nacional de Establecimientos Financieros de Credito and Federación

in art. 10, paragraph 3, of Legislative Decree lgs. no. 150 of 1 September 2011 envisaged for the filing of the appeal as indicated below. HAS pursuant to

out in art. 10, paragraph 3, of Legislative Decree lgs. no. 150 of 09/01/2011 envisaged for the lodging of the appeal as indicated below (art. 166, paragraph

data protection rules with the cookie order (order no. 1148 of 9 December 2011), which falls under the Danish Business Authority's area. In this context

Group Security” (d) The Site Security Procedure Document from March 2011 (“the 2011 document”) states its purpose is the prevention of access by unauthorised

referred to section 6.5.3 of the control report." 7.3 Supervision in 2011 In 2011, the Norwegian Data Protection Authority carried out an inspection (case

in 2011, 2012, 2013, 2015 and most recently in 2019. [91] As part of extensive e-mail traffic, he received a first 18-page PDF file on June 9, 2011. After

24 March 2010, file no. stamp 30 Cdo 3655/2009, dated 26/10/2011, sp. stamp 30 Cdo 3155/2011, or from 9 May 2018, file no. stamp 30 Cdo 1257/2018). 69.

until March 31, 2011) and, later, due to the illness of Mr. Jesús Carlos (since July 13, to September 8, 2011 and from October 7, 2011 to December 4, 2012)

occasion of the provision of such assistance, in accordance with the Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council; any number, symbol or

protected by them (see ECJ, judgment of 21 July 2011, Fuchs and others, C-159/10 and others, EU:C:2011:508, para. 61 et seq. - with reference to Article

referred to the decision of the European Court of Justice of 12 July 2011 (C-324/09, EuZW 2011, 754) - albeit with regard to questions of liability - in which

referred to in art. 10, paragraph 3, of the d. lgs. n. 150 of 1 September 2011 envisaged for the filing of the appeal as indicated below; ORDER pursuant

Regulation, of the articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, against this provision it is possible to appeal before the ordinary judicial

Courts apply: 1) The Sentence of the AP Navarra, sec. 3ª, S 12-19-2011, No. 289/2011 (…); 2) The Sentence of the Second Section 2nd of the Provincial Court

sent to the GP, as part of the "Sun Project" which the patient had joined in 2011. 2. The preliminary activity. In relation to the aforementioned notification

reside centrally on Sky systems (the so-called Reitek platform, in use since 2011, managed by Sky Italia), all outbound calls addressed to prospects are made

2018 repealed by BGBl 04/30/2011 to 01/31/2013 last amended by BGBl. I No. 107/2010 ZaDiG § 66 valid from 05/21/2010 to 04/29/2011 last amended by BGBl May

more details. DECISION Court of Amsterdam Facts and circumstances 1.1. From 2011 up to and including 15 June 2018, the plaintiff was registered as an attorney

is prior to the administrative court proceedings (cf. e.g. VwGH 13.12.2011, 2011/22/0316). The questions submitted by the Court of Appeal to the ECJ deal

contractually owed service by way of the implied agreement (BAG March 23, 2011 - 10 AZR 562/09 - 29; Federal Labor Court of September 29, 2010 - 10 AZR

referred to in art. 10, paragraph 3, of the d. lgs. n. 150 of 1 September 2011 envisaged for the filing of the appeal as indicated below. HAS pursuant to

Regulation, as well as art. 152 of the Code and 10 of the d. lg. 1 September 2011, n. 150, an opposition to this provision may be proposed to the ordinary

also fall within the scope of this judgment (see ABRvS 30 November 2011, RECLI:NL:RVS:2011:BU6383). The mere mentioning of 'job title' is not sufficient and

video surveillance for the purpose of protecting persons and property No 1/2011 Directive of the Authority, the provisions of which shall apply to in combination

Code (see also Article 10, paragraph 3, of Legislative Decree no. 150 of 1/9/2011); HAS - the publication of this provision on the website of the Guarantor

term referred to in art. 10, paragraph 3, of d. lgs. n. 150 of 1 September 2011 envisaged for the filing of the appeal as indicated below. HAS pursuant to

duty to maintain confidentiality, according to Article 31 of Order INT / 318/2011 and that, according to Article 32.1 of the Law of Private Security, it corresponds

in art. 10, paragraph 3, of Legislative Decree lgs. no. 150 of 1 September 2011 envisaged for the filing of the appeal as indicated below. HAS the publication

a purpose falling under Art. 5 Para. 3 Sentence 1 GG (cf. OLG Celle, ZUM 2011, 341, 345 [juris para. 32]) . The protection conferred by Article 5(3) sentence

Reference is made to the judgment of the Supreme Court of 9 September 2011 (ECLI:NL:HR:2011:BQ8097). 4.13. The following circumstances are relevant to the assessment

Court held in its judgment of 8 March 2011, upheld by the Bucharest County Court in its decision of 4 October 2011, that there had been no medical negligence

administration of church taxes by the Berlin tax authorities of December 19, 2011 (OJ 2011, 3041) transferred to the tax offices. The determination of the facts

Supreme Administrative Court of Appeal in Białystok in the decision of 6 April 2011, I ACz 279/11 (not published), emphasising that neither the telecommunication

Regulation, Article 152 of the Code and Article 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, an appeal against this measure may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

Regulation, of art. 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, against this provision, it is possible to appeal before the ordinary judicial

that the National Court, in its Judgment of November 29, 2013, (Rec. 455/2011), Sixth Legal Basis warns, regarding the legal nature of this figure, which

the interests of the data subject. In its decision of 9 September 2011 (ECLI:NL:HR:2011:BQ8097), issued under the (then) Personal Data Protection Act, the

art. 10, paragraph 3, of the legislative decree. lgs. n. 150 of 1 September 2011 provided for the filing of the appeal as indicated below. HAS pursuant to

NL: HR: 2007: BA3529. 7 A.o. Amsterdam Court of Appeal 5 July 2011 ECLI: NL: GHAMS: 2011: BR3020, Supreme Court 29 June 2007 ECLI: NL: HR: 2007: AZ4663

the Santander assessment criterion (Supreme Court, 9 September 2011, ECLI: NL: HR: 2011: BQ8097). The Den Bosch Court of Appeal also ruled in the above

the articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree lg. 1 September 2011, no. 150, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

standards. In the opinion of the court, the (successive) standards NEN 7510:2011 and NEN 7510-2:2017 are relevant to the points of dispute at hand. Here too

what was clarified by the Guarantor with the general provision of 15 June 2011 (in www.garanteprivacy.it, web doc. 1821257) with specific regard to the

Google from that particular device).” Executive Order No. 1148 of December 9, 2011 on requirements for information and consent when storing or accessing information

commercial law, the Court of Justice decided in its judgment of 25 October 2011 eDate Advertising42 : « 48. It is therefore necessary to adapt the connecting

the ICO based its legal reasoning in previous similar ICO decisions dated 2011 (FS50290504) and, specially, 2016 (FS50577377). In this last one, it highlighted

measure expressed (SSAN of January 20, ro 2013, rec. 577/2011, and of March 20, 2013, rec. 421/2011). However, the specific terms in which the controversy

inspection has in case of violations of 2 See, for example, DI-1309-2011, DI-1787-2011 and DI-1057-2016. the Data Protection Regulation a number of corrective

of Justice of 24 November 2011, Asociación Nacional de Establecimientos FinancierosdeCrédito,C-468/10andC-469/10,ECLI:EU:C:2011:777,paragraph28. 639DESAs

Regulation, as well as art. 152 of the Code and 10 of the d. lg. 1 September 2011, n. 150, against this provision, opposition may be proposed to the ordinary

the articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree lg. 1 September 2011, no. 150, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

within the term set out in art. 10, paragraph 3, of the d. lgs. n. 150 of 1.9.2011 envisaged for the submission of the appeal as indicated below (Article 166

as well as articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, opposition to the ordinary judicial authority may be lodged against this

art. 10, paragraph 3, of the legislative decree. lgs. n. 150 of 1 September 2011 provided for the filing of the appeal as indicated below. HAS pursuant to

the principles of proportionality and subsidiarity (HR 9 September 2011, ECLI:NL:HR:2011:BQ8097, Santander). This means that the infringement of the interests

Regulation, as well as art. 152 of the Code and 10 of the d. lg. 1 September 2011, n. 150, against this provision, opposition may be proposed to the ordinary

as well as Articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, opposition to this measure may be lodged with the ordinary judicial authority

protocol of the former notary of that city, *** NOTARY. 1. That on December 7, 2011 as a result of the retirement of the person was a notary of this city ***

Applicant, the Applicant violated the information self-determination CXII of 2011 on the right to freedom of information and freedom of information Act (hereinafter:

within the term set out in art. 10, paragraph 3, of d. lgs. n. 150 of 1.9.2011 provided for the submission of the appeal as indicated below (Article 166

consultation and access" to the d.b.u. (as well as the provision of April 7, 2011, web doc. n. 1810351 and the provision of January 14, 2016, web doc. n. 6053915)

liability to other parties (see, in this regard, provision dated 15 June 2011, web doc. no. 1821257). The same third-party companies, linked by a commercial

poll. The Directives and Guidelines for Sacramental and Pastoral Practice (2011) (the “Guidelines”) state that any alteration to the baptism register must

incorrect (see e.g. judgments of the Supreme Administrative Court of May 17, 2011, file reference number I OSK 113/11; of January 20, 2006, file reference

term referred to in art. 10, paragraph 3, of d. lgs. n. 150 of 1 September 2011 envisaged for the filing of the appeal as indicated below. HAS pursuant to

must take account of the circumstances of the case (HR 9 September 2011, ECLI:NL:HR:2011:BQ8097). 4.13. In this case, the District Court of The Hague may

chamber meeting (see Groß, in: Kluth, Handbuch des Kammerrechts, 2nd ed. 2011, § 7 marginal 50). They are, without being expressly mentioned, consistent

Legislative Decree no. 196 of 2003, art. 152 and by Legislative Decree no. 150 of 2011, art. 10, paragraph 10. The Attorney General dismissed the appeal. The hearing

2002 - VII ZR 260/01, NJW 2002, 2952 , 2953 and from 03/29/2011 - VI ZR 117/10, NJW 2011, 1815 para. 17). This is the case here, however: The information

NL: RVS: 2020: 901.5 See the decision of the AbRS of 2 February 2011, ECLI: NL: RVS: 2011: BP2842.

Danish Business Authority has referred to the Ombudsman's statement in FOB 2011 21-1 [2]. The recordings are thus made to develop the quality of the agency's

art. 10, paragraph 3, of the legislative decree. lgs. n. 150 of 1 September 2011 provided for the filing of the appeal as indicated below. HAS pursuant to

referred to in art. 10, paragraph 3, of the d. lgs. n. 150 of 1 September 2011 foreseen for the proposition of the appeal as indicated below. HAS pursuant

authorised by Decision No. 2011-224 of the National Commission for Information Technology and Civil Liberties (CNIL) dated 21 July 2011, the identity of asylum

Furthermore, the Inspectorate refers in this regard also to Recommendation No. 03/2011 in order to ing requirement and support the offer of an alternative. The

section 26 or to provide such information in writing. In his case law (10 May 2011 No 2680/41/2010 and 12 September 2013 No 2240/523/2013), the Data Protection

has been on the list1 of the 10 most used vulnerabilities between 2003 and 2011 and has affected hundreds of thousands2 of websites around the world despite

Ombudsman's (formerly the Civil Ombudsman's) decision of 17 August 2012 in case 2011/2718 and NOU 2003: 15 «From fine to improvement» section 5.7.11 (page 102)

security on the house [name of the house] , which finally took place in January 2011. Since at least May 2009, the Bank was aware of my private mobile number:

referred to the decision of the European Court of Justice of 12 July 2011 (C-324/09, EuZW 2011, 754) - albeit with regard to questions of liability - in which

on the ground that his rights guaranteed by EU law were infringed by the 2011 Act governing the retention of such data, on which the police investigation

between confidentiality and finding the truth, wrote the following in her 2011 dissertation (footnotes not taken from the original): “That is the case in

the legality. And the Sentence, also of the AN, of 10/15/2012 (resource 608/2011), which assesses “the active participation of the Administration ”, which

in the art. 10, paragraph 3, of the legislative decree. lgs. n. 150 of 1.9.2011 provided for the filing of the appeal as indicated below (art. 166, paragraph

GDPR and the Santander decision of the Supreme Court of 9 September 2011, ECLI:NL:HR:2011:BQ8097. [applicant] argues that his legitimate interests in removing

category B driving licence (No. (...), issued on print M (...), 5 December 2011 by the Starost of S.) for a period of 3 months, starting from the date of

Council of 27 April 2016 on consent and Directive 2019/2161 amending Directive 2011/83/EU, articulated as follows: - Question 1: Are Articles 2(f) and 5(3) of

within the term set out in art. 10, paragraph 3, of the d. lgs. n. 150 of 1/9/2011 provided for the submission of the appeal as indicated below (Article 166

set out in art. 10, paragraph 3, of Legislative Decree lgs. no. 150 of 1.9.2011 envisaged for the lodging of the appeal as indicated below (art. 166, paragraph

set out in art. 10, paragraph 3, of Legislative Decree lgs. no. 150 of 1.9.2011 envisaged for the lodging of the appeal as indicated below (art. 166, paragraph

other hand, the Supreme Administrative Court has, with a decision (HFD 39: 2011), appealed against an appointment without review. The current case concerns

taxpayer, which is not dependent on further behavior. (...) "- STS 2 1045/2011 of October 14 bre- and as stated in STS 2ª 367/2018 of July 23 -is-: "..

such Such a standard is not included in Article 11c of the Act of 12 May 2011 on the National Council of the Judiciary (Journal of Laws of 2018, item 389

Staatsrecht, Mechelen, Kluwer 2011, pp. 917 ff. 12 A. ALEN and K. MUYLLE, Handboek van het Belgisch Staatsrecht, Mechelen, Kluwer, 2011, 918; K. REYBROUCK and

doc. no. 2483269; 9 February 2012, no. 56, web doc. no. 188699; 17 November 2011, no. 434, web doc. no. 1859558; 26 February 2009, web doc. n. 1601522). Moreover

is prior to the administrative court proceedings (cf. e.g. VwGH 13.12.2011, 2011/22/0316). A legal question is also prejudicial to a "merely" similar legal

well as art. 152 of the Code and 10 of the legislative decree 1 September 2011, n. 150, opposition to this provision may be filed with the ordinary judicial

Regulation, as well as art. 152 of the Code and 10 of the d. lg. 1 September 2011, n. 150, against this provision, opposition may be proposed to the ordinary

Meta has complied with the orders. 1Executive order no. 1148 of 9 December 2011 on requirements for information and consent when storing or ad- access to

in the art. 10, paragraph 3, of the legislative decree. lgs. n. 150 of 1.9.2011 provided for the filing of the appeal as indicated below (art. 166, paragraph

in art. 10, paragraph 3, of Legislative Decree lgs. no. 150 of 1 September 2011 envisaged for the filing of the appeal as indicated below. HAS the publication

obligations of members of the school community in compulsory schools no. 1040/2011. Although it can be accepted that compulsory schools have an obligation to

telephony devices that allow the location of the interested party, in Opinion 13/2011 on services of geolocation in smart mobile devices (document WP185): “Smart

harm could it possibly do?"&#13; &#13; Similarly, in Ambrosiadou v Coward [2011] EWCA Civ 409 Lord Neuberger MR said at [30]:&#13; &#13; "Just because information

Ombudsman's (formerly the Civil Ombudsman's) decision of 17 August 2012 in case 2011/2718 and NOU 2003: 15 «From fine to improvement» section 5.7.11 (page 102)

Rep. 246, paragraph 86 and case law cited; and Case E-4/11 Arnulf Clauder [2011] EFTA Ct. Rep. 216, paragraph 49 and case law cited). This necessarily includes

Regulation applies to the processing of data in the present case. Act CXII of 2011 on the right to information self-determination and freedom of information

of personal data is also relevant.The Ministry also refers to Meld.St.11 (2011–2012) Privacy - prospects and challenges chapter 6 where legal authority

ProvincialeFractionOverijsselPartijvoordeVrijheid (PVV), act date15 March 2011, accessed on August 29, 2019, Appendix 8 to the Investigative Report. Date

subject to compliance with said standard" (in this sense STS of 24 November 2011, Rec 258/2009). To the foregoing must be added, following the judgment of

Regulation, of art. 152 of the Code and 10 of the legislative decree 1 September 2011, n. 150, against this provision, it is possible to appeal to the ordinary

Regulation, of art. 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree 1 September 2011, n. 150, against this provision, it is possible to appeal before the ordinary

Regulation, of art. 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree 1 September 2011, n. 150, against this provision, it is possible to appeal before the ordinary

example, the CJEU judgment on ASNEF, 24 November 2011, nos. C-468/10 and C-469/10, ECLI: EU: C: 2011: 777, para. 48 and judgment on M5A-ScaraA, 11 December

the Data Protection Authority. In the Agency's ruling of 22 June 2011 in case no. 2011/198 tried to explain the provision of point 2. Paragraph 1 Article

judicial authorities to rewrite history 5EHRM May 10, 2011, 48009/08, Mosley t. UK, § 112. 6EHRM May 10, 2011, 48009/08, Mosley t. UK, § 113. 7 ECtHR, 19 June

September 2015, ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2015:2332, and Hof Amsterdam 5 July 2011, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2011 :BR3020.

Code (see also Article 10, paragraph 3, of Legislative Decree no. 150 of 1/9/2011); HAS the publication of this provision on the website of the Guarantor pursuant

administrative court (see the judgment of the Supreme Court of 24 June 2011, ECLI:NL:HR:2011:BP8929). Pursuant to Section 7:1(1)(f) of the General Administrative

Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016; - Organic law n° 2011-833 of 29 March 2011; - Law no. 78-17 of 6 January 1978; - the Code of Administrative

in the art. 10, paragraph 3, of the legislative decree. lgs. n. 150 of 1.9.2011 provided for the filing of the appeal as indicated below (art. 166, paragraph

appropriate or not, the main Subject to legal proceedings (see OLG Karlsruhe 16.02.2011 - 4 W 108/10 - Rn.17) - 4 - a) In view of the specific circumstances of the

response to the 101 complaints. Share blogs or news articles here! Act CXII of 2011 on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information

than that adopted by the Supreme Court in the Santander decision (ECLI:NL:HR:2011:BQ8097), namely that it is in the first instance up to the rightholder to

articles. 152 of the Code and 10 of the Legislative Decree. lg. 1 September 2011, n. 150, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

Regulation, of the articles. 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, it is possible to appeal against this provision before the ordinary judicial

with their data, including going to e-mail address, registration date 07/05/2011. The informative data collection literal indicates: -The purpose of the data

well as articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree 1 September 2011, n. 150, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

reference is made to the judgment of the Supreme Court of 9 September 2011 (ECLI:NL:HR:2011:BQ8097). The applicable GDPR does not intend to change this. Even

Regulation, articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150 of 2011, it is possible to appeal against this provision before the ordinary judicial

2020: 900 and ECLI: NL: RVS: 2020: 901. 5 Order of 9 September 2011, ECLI: NL: HR: 2011: BQ8097. 6 Directive 95/46 / EC of the European Parliament and

as well as articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree n. 150/2011, an opposition to the ordinary judicial authority may be proposed against

the articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree lgs. 1 September 2011, no. 150, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

the articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree lg. 1 September 2011, no. 150, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

note: exact name not reproduced for reasons of pseudonymization from *3.*4.2011 to *7.*3.2015, further abbreviations marked with **** from the same reason]

occasion of the provision of such assistance, in accordance with the Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (1); any number, symbol

34/15; BGH, judgment of March 7, 2013 - VII ZR 223/11, BGH, judgment of May 5, 2011 - VII ZR 179/10, BGH, judgment of November 27, 1998 - V ZR 180/97) . Such

C-112/00, EU: C: 2003: 333, paragraph 79; September 6, 2011Patriciello, C-163/10, EU: C: 2011: 543, paragraph 31.)- A 7/2014. (III. 7.) AB in the wording

del Regolamento, nonché degli articoli 152 del Codice e 10 del d.lg. n. 150/2011, avverso il presente provvedimento può essere proposta opposizione all'autorità

not taken a position on the rules in executive order no. 1148 of 9 December 2011 on requirements for information and consent when storing or accessing information

obligations of members of the school community in compulsory schools no. 1040/2011. Although it can be accepted that compulsory schools have an obligation to

2013. His gross annual income at the time was approximately €300,000. 2.2 In 2011, Aegon granted [applicant] et al. a mortgage loan of € 1,093,750 for the

in the art. 10, paragraph 3, of the legislative decree. lgs. n. 150 of 1.9.2011 provided for the filing of the appeal as indicated below (art. 166, paragraph

set out in art. 10, paragraph 3, of Legislative Decree lgs. no. 150 of 1.9.2011 envisaged for the lodging of the appeal as indicated below (art. 166, paragraph

within the term set out in art. 10, paragraph 3, of the d. lgs. n. 150 of 1.9.2011 envisaged for the submission of the appeal as indicated below (Article 166

in the art. 10, paragraph 3, of Legislative Decree no. 150 of 1 September 2011 provided for the filing of the appeal as indicated below. HAS pursuant to

Regulation, of the articles. 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, it is possible to appeal against this provision before the ordinary judicial

to one of the two spouses". Fifth. Article 4 "Registrable Facts" of Law 20/2011, of July 21, on the Civil Registry, indicates that: "They have access to

in the art. 10, paragraph 3, of the legislative decree. lgs. n. 150 of 1.9.2011 provided for the filing of the appeal as indicated below (art. 166, paragraph

receiving healthcare services or the related provision referred to in Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council; a number, symbol or

subject to compliance with said standard" (in this sense STS of 24 November 2011, Rec 258/2009). To the foregoing must be added, following the judgment of

170/16 -, juris, marginal nos. 46 f.; LG München I, judgement of 21 October 2011 - 20 O 19879/10 -, juris, marginal no. 26). In this case, the surveillance

Articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150 of 1 September 2011, opposition to this measure may be lodged with the ordinary judicial authority

actions required to take place. (i) Regarding the archiving process, since 2011 the Bank has started the scan various agreements and forms signed by the

Workplace Video Surveillance and the Use of Biometric systems and (e) Directive 1/2011 issued by the Hellenic Data Protection Authority Personal Use for the use

considerations expressed in general terms by the Guarantor with the measure of 15 June 2011 (in www.garanteprivacy.it, web document no. 1821257), according to which

following the shooting incident in Alphen aan den Rijn on 9 April 2011" from September 2011 made the following recommendations: "RECOMMENDATIONS The Council

therefore not suitable. Google secretly tracked Apple iPhone users between late 2011 and early 2012 and using their data collected in that way for commercial

supplements to insurance certificates and supplementary sheets from the years 2011 to 2017 and 2020. They can no longer be found. 2. The admissibility of the

South in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government Act no. 138/2011. The South Iceland Health Committee is also in charge of the Health Inspectorate

as the articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree 1 September 2011, n. 150, opposition to the ordinary judicial authority may be lodged against

Pursuant to articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial authority

self-determination and freedom of information due to its necessary investigation CXII of 2011 Act (hereinafter: Infotv.) with regard to Section 60 (1), the Authority 2021

Regulation, of the articles. 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, it is possible to appeal against this provision before the ordinary judicial

KSchG], JBl 2011, 141 [142]; cf also Koziol, Auslegung und Beurteilung der Sittenwidrigkeit von AGB-Klauseln im Verbandsprozess, RdW 2011, 67 [69]: Irrelevance

well as articles. 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree 1 September 2011, n. 150, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

can be legitimately achieved by other means”. Also in the TRL decision of 2011-02-11, proc. 4987/07.4TVLSB-A.L1-1, rapporteur Afonso Henrique, and with

does not need it therefore. Gambling law is a final regulation (see BGH GRUR 2011, 440 marginal no. 18 - Spiel mit). c) The aforementioned regulations do not

the articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree lg. 1 September 2011, no. 150, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

well as articles. 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree 1 September 2011, n. 150, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

September 26th, 2006, X ZB 14/06 , juris para. 61; Senate, resolution of 07/11/2011, 15 Verg 5/11, juris para. 17; resolution of 03/10/2015, 15 Verg 11/14, juris

Regulation, as well as art. 152 of the Code and 10 of the d. lg. 1 September 2011, n. 150, against this provision, opposition may be proposed to the ordinary

Regulation, of art. 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, against this provision, it is possible to appeal before the ordinary judicial

of the articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree 1 September 2011, n. 150, against this provision it is possible to lodge an appeal before

78 of the Regulation, 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, against this provision it is possible to lodge an appeal before the ordinary

2013 last changed by Federal Law Gazette I No. 100/2011 VStG § 19 valid from 01.02.1991 to 31. 12.2011 VStG § 5 today VStG § 5 valid from January 1st, 2019

well as articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree 1 September 2011, n. 150, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

Board in PVN-2020-09 Processing of pass data in AutoPass, where it says: "In 2011, the Privacy Board dealt with two cases concerning the question of how long

in the art. 10, paragraph 3, of Legislative Decree no. 150 of 1 September 2011 provided for the filing of the appeal as indicated below. HAS pursuant to

in the art. 10, paragraph 3, of the legislative decree. lgs. n. 150 of 1.9.2011 provided for the filing of the appeal as indicated below (art. 166, paragraph

any unlawful encroachment on foreign legal spheres (BGH NJW 1956, 911; NJW 2011, 2518; Schultzky in Zöller, Zivilprozessordnung, 33rd ed. 2020, section 32

Member States shall notify those provisions to the Commission by 25 May 2011 at the latest and shall notify it without delay of any subsequent amendment

decision of the VwGH of May 22, 2012, 2009/04/0187 and from April 9, 2013, 2011/04/0207). Objective, however, was on that Restrictions of Section 17 (3)

the articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree lg. 1 September 2011, no. 150, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

law, in addition to the provisions of regulations no. 897/2009 and no. 1040/2011. Reference is also made to section 26.1 of the main primary school curriculum

protection of their personal data. 21 Supreme Court 9 September 2011, ECLI:NL:HR:2011:BQ8097, r.o. 3.3 and Supreme Court 3 December 2021, ECLI:NL:HR:2021:1814

the Applicant, on the right to information self - determination and CXII of 2011 on freedom of information. Section 60 (1) of the Information Act (hereinafter:

payment history data, four of which were “opened” in 2010, another three in 2011 and one in 2012 (OZ 1, S 11; 17 f). 1.3. By July 24, 2020 at the latest,

Art. 7 lit. f of Directive 95/46/EC the judgment of the ECJ of 24 November 2011, C-468/10 and C-469/10 [ASNEF and FECEMD] para. 38) (cf. the Notice of the

matters that fall within the scope of Executive Order no. 1148 of 9 December 2011 on requirements for information and consent when storing or accessing information

judgment). In a decision pursuant to the repealed Personal Data Act (10.5.2011 dnro 2680/41/2010), the Data Protection Commissioner has held that a representative

Personal Data (CPDP), with which on the basis of Art. 42, para. 1 (ed. SG No. 81/2011) of the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA), a property sanction of BGN 3

78 of the Regulation, 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, against this provision, it is possible to appeal before the ordinary judicial

well as art. 152 of the Code and 10 of the legislative decree 1 September 2011, n. 150, an opposition to the ordinary judicial authority may be proposed

what was clarified by the Guarantor with the general provision of 15 June 2011 (in www.garantepivacy.it, web doc. 1821257) with specific regard to the fact

rights (cf. BGH, judgment of March 9, 2011 - VIII ZR 132/10, para. 23 f ., juris; judgment of December 13, 2011 – VI ZR 274/10, paragraph 20 f., juris)

Regulation, of art. 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, against this provision, it is possible to appeal before the ordinary judicial

well as articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree 1 September 2011, n. 150, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

Regulation, of the articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, against this provision it is possible to bring a judicial appeal before

Pursuant to articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial authority

Practical Concordance in Constitutional Judicial Review, Judicial Bulletin 2/2011. 6 The applicant's view that the courts of first and second instance should

November 19, 2019 - II ZR 263/18 -, juris para. 27; BGH, judgment of January 11, 2011 – II ZR 187/09 –, juris para. 17. It is sufficient for the members to declare

matter of fact and degree - see K v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 439; [2011] 1 WLR 1827, para 10(3). In relation to journalistic, literary

institution after the death of the customer and their procedural enforcement, ÖBA 2011, 166 (185)). In the present case, a clear distinction must be made between

from the then Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology dated May 11, 2011 with the request for a test report from the Federal Office regarding the

Act no. 15/2016 and paragraph 2. Article 57 Local Government Act no. 138/2011. It can also be considered whether data is of the nature to ensure proof

itself. Pursuant to art. 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree n. 150/2011, against this provision, opposition may be proposed to the ordinary judicial

General Data Protection Regulation and information self-determination CXII of 2011 on law and freedom of information. Act (hereinafter: Infotv.) § 38 Based

well as articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree 1 September 2011, n. 150, opposition to this provision may be filed against the ordinary judicial

person which are provided to the individual in accordance with Directive 2011/24 / EU for the purposes of healthcare referred to in Directive (9) of the

European Public Prosecutor's Office. Article CXII (1) (f) and Article CXII of 2011 on the right to information self-determination and freedom of information

of articles 152 of the Code and 10 of the legislative decree 1 September 2011, n. 150, opposition to this provision may be filed with the ordinary judicial

be noted that according to para. Article 28 Local Government Act no. 138/2011, every member of the local government has the right to familiarize himself

"creditworthiness" in § 7 VKrG, in Blaschek/Habersberger (editors), Worthy of a loan? (2011) 22). A tendency towards behavior contrary to the contract - such as a lack

articles. 152 of the Code and 10 of the Legislative Decree. lg. 1 September 2011, n. 150, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

proceedings in an accusable manner (BGH NJW 2006, 3206; BGH NJW 2009, 999; BGH NZM 2011, 752). In view of this, service is "imminent" if it takes place within a

within six weeks of the date on which this decision was sent. 1(ECLI:NL:RVS:2011:BR5704) 2(ECLI:NL:RVS:2012:BX4694) 3ECLI:EU:C:2017:994

78 of the Regulation, 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, against this provision can be used to appeal to the judicial authority ordinary

Regulation, of art. 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, against this provision, it is possible to appeal before the ordinary judicial

routines that involve access 6 See the Data Inspectorate's decision of 21 June 2011 in case no. 1745-2010. 7 EDPB Guidelines 3/2019 on processing of personal

articles. 152 of the Code and 10 of the Legislative Decree. lg. 1 September 2011, n. 150, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

in the art. 10, paragraph 3, of Legislative Decree no. 150 of 1 September 2011 provided for the filing of the appeal as indicated below. HAS pursuant to

78 of the Regulation, 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, against this provision it is possible to lodge an appeal before the ordinary

Regulation, of the articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, against this provision it is possible to lodge an appeal before the ordinary

made in a manner other than that provided for by law (see again VwGH 11.10.2011, 2008/05/0156). Accordingly, according to the last sentence of § 1 (1) BVwG-EVV

had agreed on a care arrangement with the mother. Paragraph2 In December 2011, the plaintiff's former wife drew the defendant's attention to problems with

are drawn up schematically (cf. KG Berlin, decision of 11 May 2011 - 24 U 28/11, BeckRS 2011, 14067; LG Berlin, judgment of 3 July 2012 - 16 O 309/11, NJOZ

had ruled in the case of ASNEF and FECEMD (C-468/10 and C-469/10, ECLI:EU:2011:777) that the Member States may neither introduce new principles concerning

78 of the Regulation, 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, against this provision, it is possible to appeal before the ordinary judicial

the articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree lg. 1 September 2011, no. 150, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

well as articles. 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree 1 September 2011, n. 150, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

Paragraph 1 BetrVG has not been sufficiently complied with (BAG November 3, 2011 - 2 AZR 748/10, juris Rn. 38; BAG July 19, 2012 - 2 AZR 352/11, juris Rn

reviews. If the so-called record of incidents, which is discussed in the OM 316/2011 of 1/02 on the operation of alarm systems saves any relation to the logs

(point 12). [2] Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia Decision II Ips 340/2011 of 17 July 2014. [3] … [4]…

04/04/1990 - 5 AZR 299/89, NZA 1990, 933; BAG of 11/16/2010 – 9 AZR 573/09, NZA 2011, 453). The employer may also provide information against the will of the

information to be provided at the last stage (cf. BGH, judgment of March 29, 2011, VI ZR 117/10). The connection of § 254 ZPO, on the other hand, is not available

the Regulation, as well as articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Leg september 2011, no. 150, opposition to this measure may be lodged to the ordinary judicial

Regulation, of the articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, against this provision it is possible to lodge an appeal before the ordinary

in art. 10, paragraph 3, of Legislative Decree lgs. no. 150 of 1 September 2011 envisaged for the filing of the appeal as indicated below. HAS the publication

regulation. About the right to informational self-determination and CXII of 2011 on freedom of information. Act (hereinafter: Infotv.) § 61. (6) 2 until the

(see also art. 10, paragraph 3, of Legislative Decree no. 150 of 1 September 2011); HAS the publication of this provision on the Guarantor's website pursuant

with Article 57 (1) (h) of the General Data Protection Regulation CXII of 2011 on the right to self-determination and freedom of information Act (hereinafter:

InformationCommissioner's ffice 9. Under section 55A (1) of the DPA (as amended by PECR 2011 and the Privacy and Electronic Communications (Amendment) Regulations 2015)

natural person according to the European Parliament and the Council directive 2011/24/EU, a number, a symbol or a characteristic such as the physical the person

declarations (cf.: judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of April 19, 2011 , I OSK 125/11; of April 9, 2015, I OSK 1108/14; of October 12, 2017, I OSK

2019). 2. The facts : X describes the statement of facts as follows: "In 2011, Mr. X placed special capstones on his fireplace to prevent recoil from prevent

78 of the Regulation, 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, against this provision, it is possible to appeal before the ordinary judicial

objectively (VwGH 1994-01-24, 93/10/0192; 6 Nov 2001, 97/18/0160; January 19, 2011, 2009/08/0058; cf. also VfSlg 17.082/2003), with regard to the submission

of articles 152 of the Code and 10 of the legislative decree 1 September 2011, n. 150, opposition to this provision may be filed with the ordinary judicial

articles. 152 of the Code and 10 of the Legislative Decree. lg. 1 September 2011, n. 150, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

under the Reykjavík City School and Leisure Department from September 12, 2011 until January 1, 2022, when the Quality and Supervision Agency for Welfare

registration for, or provision of, healthcare services as referred to in Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (9 ) to that natural

Pursuant to Article 152 of the Code and Article 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, an objection to this measure may be lodged with the ordinary judicial authority

unlawful action of the perpetrator (see the Court of Appeal in Warsaw, June 10, 2011, VI ACa 84/11 , Legalis No. 363615). The evidence in the case does not show

WVVO, 1989, § 121 marginal no. 2; see also König in Reinhardt/Hasche, WVG, 2011, § 74 marginal no. 5. 30 In the present case, the defendant has, in support

78 of the Regulation, 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, against this provision it is possible to lodge an appeal before the ordinary

to the articles. 152 of the Code and 10 of the Legislative Decree. n. 150/2011, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial authority

right to self-determination of information and freedom of information CXII of 2011 Act (hereinafter: Infotv.) on the basis of Section 60 (1) - a After fulfilling

78 of the Regulation, 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, against this provision it is possible to lodge an appeal before the ordinary

well as articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree 1 September 2011, n. 150, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

Regulation, of the articles. 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, it is possible to lodge an appeal against this provision before the ordinary

the RGPD, of the arts. 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, against this provision, it is possible to appeal before the ordinary judicial

January 5, 2011, the Electoral Code, and - as inconsistent with Art. 35 section 3 u.s.g. in connection with art. 1 of the Act of January 5, 2011, Electoral

Regulation, of the articles. 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, it is possible to appeal against this provision before the ordinary judicial

investigation, the Company produced a partnership agreement signed on 11 October 2011 between Ediscom, XX and XX (attachment 7-bis to the minutes of 23 November

recipientsof a personal nature ”, note under CJEU, December 22, 2010, RDTI, n ° 43, 2011, p. 73 in Tombal, T., “ Page 23 Decision on the merits 15/2021 - 23/32125

case, the company FACEBOOK FRANCE, registered in France since February 3, 2011, is the headquarters of the French subsidiary of the company META PLAFORMS

secret evidence (so in each case VwGH 17.6.2004, 2003/03/0157; 25.9.2014, 2011/07/0006). In certain, exceptional cases, however, it may be necessary to

he is a public as it keeps medical documentation (according to Act No. 372/2011 Coll., on health services and conditions of their provision), is a public

reports 2.1 Deviation report 1 The discrepancy occurred in the period 13.01.2011 to 27.01.2020 and was discovered on 21.11.2019. The non-conformance report

78 of the Regulation, 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, against this provision, it is possible to appeal before the ordinary judicial

Regulation, of art. 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, against this provision, it is possible to lodge a judicial appeal before

(the “benefit scheme”) at a store outside of the United Kingdom on 8 August 2011, 6 October 2012 and 24 April 2014 respectively. The purpose of the benefit

against violence against women and domestic violence (Istanbul Convention, of 2011), when it establishes that the "application by the parties of the provisions

Directive) (Amendment) Regulations 3 • ICO. Information Commissioner's Office 2011 and the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) (Amendment)

Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive)(Amendment) Regulations 2011 and the Privacy and Electronic Communications (Amendment) Regulations 2015)

is decisive for the decision on consent. This guide refers to Opinion 15/2011 of the Article 29 Data Protection Working Party prior to the European Data

18; April 25, 2001 - 5 AZR 395/99 - to II of the reasons; BGH December 21, 2011 - I ZR 190/10 - para. 12). cc) The last application made by the plaintiff