Search results

(l) give advice on the processing operations referred to in Article 36(2); (m) encourage the drawing up of codes of conduct pursuant to Article 40(1) and

section! You can help us by filling in this section! The Hamburg DPA fined H&M Hennes & Mauritz Online Shop A.B. & Co KG. in October 2020 an amount of 35

guidelines, recommendations and best practices referred to in points (e) and (f); (m) issue guidelines, recommendations and best practices in accordance with point

authority the results of verifications of the measures referred to in point (j); (m) the mechanisms for reporting to the competent supervisory authority any legal

Article 21 GDPR, margin number 8 (C.H. Beck 2021, 39th Edition). LG Frankfurt a. M., 20 December 2018, 2/5 O 151/18, (available here). Herbst, in Kühling, Buchner

2019, 1st edition) ECHR, Abdolkhani and Karimnia v. Turkey, 2009, §§ 114-115; M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], 2011, §§ 301-304 and 319; Hirsi Jamaa and

personal data. Case Law: In C-708/18 - TK v Asociaţia de Proprietari bloc M5A-ScaraA the CJEU had to provide guidance on how to assess whether processing

audit. The ICO is the best-funded DPA in Europe with a total budget of €61m in 2019, according to a Brave study. The ICO had 680 staff in 2019, far outnumbering

6 practice. However, the European Court of Justice has in the judgment M.I.C.M. from 2021 and in the judgment Breyer struck provided that dynamic IP addresses

with far too little funding for the caseload it has. The current budget is 25M euro and 180 FTE employed. Independent analysis by KPMG concludes it requires

visiting the Website can will constitute personal data. Justices Breyer and M.I.C.M. provides support for the assessment that dynamic IP addresses i all cases

be issued, Art. 33 Para. 1 M 158/10 -, resolution of September 14, 2012 - 1 M 94/12 - and resolution of October 25, 2012 - 1 M 103/12 -, each juris). The

17 practice. However, the European Court of Justice has in the judgment M.I.C.M. from 2021 and in the judgment Breyer struck provided that dynamic IP addresses

i practice. However, the European Court of Justice has in the judgment M.I.C.M. from 2021 and in the judgment Breyer struck provided that dynamic IP addresses

lawsuits became PEIRAIOS LEASING M.A.E. Therefore, the Hellenic DPA considered the controller to be PEIRAIOS LEASING M.A.E., and considered both complaints

o,g,r,a,m){i['GoogleAnalyticsObject']=r;i[r]=i[r]|| function(){ (i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)

its registered office at [place of business] , defendant, attorney at law M.M.C. van Graafeiland in The Hague. The parties will hereinafter be referred

official authority was not transferred to the defendant (cf. LG Frankfurt a.M., judgment of 20 December 2018 - 2/5 O 151/18 - NZI 2019, 342). However, the

Brussels Court of Appeal on 16 September 2020 by: M. BOSMANS - President-in-Office of the Council A-M. WHITETERSRaadsheer , O. DUGARDYN Alternate Counsellor

contact the ***TELEPHONE number from 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. which I do not do, because I receive it at 7:04 p.m. When I arrive at my home, I try to enter

President M.V. Polak as chairman and councilors C.E. du Perron, M.J. Kroeze, H. M. Wattendorff and G. C. Makkink, and pronounced in public by Counsel H.M. Wattendorff

protection violations in H&M's service centre 01.10.2020 - H&M In the case of the monitoring of several hundred employees of the H&M service centre in Nuremberg

Content Management & Consulting (M.I.C.M.) Limited Proximus NV Telenet BVBA Scarlet Belgium NV Case Number/Name: C-597/19 M.I.C.M. European Case Law Identifier:

tribunal has deemed the d between tta m e n to d e i d a ti p e rs o n a li d e g li a d e re n ti a l sris te m a M evalaute because validated by consent

pour attributaire M. [...]. Par un courrier électronique du 2 octobre 2019, la délégation de contrôle a notifié le contrôle en ligne à M. [...], après l’avoir

appropriate technical measures to guarantee security processing. 17. The counsel for M. [...] replies that his client had no desire to allow free access to these

protection law, in particular the data protection and state hospital law (DSG M-V, LKHG M-V). He also referred to an article he wrote about the GDPR in the magazine

OF THE NETHERLANDS, established in The Hague , defendant, attorney at law M.M.C. van Graafeiland, The Hague. The parties will hereinafter be referred to

considered proven facts PROVEN FACTS FIRST: On February 18, 2018 at 6:27 p.m. an email was sent from the address ecooltra@email.ecooltra.com to ***USER

a certain period of time has elapsed as a human rights concern (see ECHR, M. L. and W. W. v. Germany, judgment of 28 June 2018, nos. 60798/10 and 65599/10

different codes of conducts under Article 41 GDPR (redacted as "code S***", code M*** and code U***"). These codes had been approved by the DSB under Article

ECLI:NL:HR:2016:1483, NJ 2017/262 m.nt. S.D. Lindenbergh and J.S. Kortmann, Ars Aequi 2017, p. 41 ff. m.t. W.H. van Boom, JOR 2016/332 m.nt. M.M.C. of the Moosdijk and

appellant, Attorney at law: Mr. J.M. Molkenboer in Tilburg, by ING BANK N.V. , based in Amsterdam, Intimate, Attorney at law: Mr. I.M.C.A. Reinders Folmer, Amsterdam

its content. This state of affairs is confirmed by the explanations of Mrs. M. K., ZSO teacher, classroom teacher [...] (the protocol of acceptance of oral

Handels- und Betriebsgesellschaft m.b.H. and stored there. In the past, employees of XY Handels- und Betriebsgesellschaft m.b.H. had access to the image material

fine on Ms M. Z. conducting business activity under the name K., the President of the Office for Personal Data Protection establishing that Ms M. Z. conducting

appeal. Thus determined by C.H.M. van Altena, Chairman, and C.M. Wissels and C.C.W. Lange, Members, in the presence of M.H. Kuggeleijn-Jansen, Registrar

brief dated November 4th, 2020, the plaintiff brought an action before the M. District Court. This was given to the defendant on Delivered on December 10th

represented by its agents. Third Party is represented by its agents and M.J.M. Piels. Considerations Why doesn't the court grant the plaintiff's request

otto.m***@at.com If you have any questions or concerns about the processing of your personal data, please feel free to contact contact us: otto.m***@at

qualified as minor for the purposes of the statute of limitations in Article 74.m) of the LOPDGDD. FOURTH: On 16/06/2020, FUNDACION SINDROME 5P MENOS DE C.V

for the data prepared in connection with epidemiological measures, e.g. á m. data obtained by sampling for COVID-19. The data received by the epidemiologist

lawyers, - Zs. Biró-Tóth and M. Z. Fehér, representing the Hungarian government, in the capacity of attorney, - T. Machovičová, M. Smolek and J. Vláčil, representing

cloudflare.com/terms/ httos://www.cloudflare.com/resources/assets/slt31c6tev37/1 M 1 j5uuFDuLTYiZJJDPBag/bda8d591447971 b3df2bccf5aa4e0916/Customer OPA v,3 1

XXXX p.m. The complaint regarding XXXX was submitted via ERV at XXXX p.m. The complainant's complaint regarding XXXX was filed via ERV at XXXX p.m. The complaint

his family, mother L. V., father Ž. V., brother I.V. and common-law wife M.M., so he could not determine with certainty who ... at ... hours was driving

(further) prosecution is undesirable (a so-called policy dismissal). T he M arket h o w a t w a ck both respect the orm e le and the material obligation

Office for Personal Data Protection to perform his tasks, i.e. to consider Mr. M. K.'s complaint about irregularities in the processing of his personal data

Inspection Service, 6 January 2020 (Exhibit 53), pp. 99 ff. 86C. SANTOS , M. OUWENS , M. OTH, N. IELOVA, V. OCA, "Consent Management Platforms Under the GDPR:

installation and use of surveillance cameras (hereinafter the Cameras Law), M.B., May 31, 2007. 6 Decision 19/2020 regarding the consultation of the National

resolution could lead to the commission of the offense typified in article 72.1 m) of the LOPDGDD, to be sanctioned, in accordance with art. 58.2 of the RGPD

mobile line was allegedly active with activity fraudulent since 2:52 p.m. until 7:22 p.m. on April 1, 2022. FUNDAMENTALS OF LAW Yo Competence In accordance

the complaint to the APO are as follows. On February 18, 2020, Ie p/loving [M. X] is terminated by the defendant [Y]. Before handing over your equipment

truth (cf. ECtHR decision of 27 June 2017, Satakunnan M a r k k i n a p ö r s s i O y k a i S a t a m e d i a O y k a t a F i n l a n d i a s § 165). Also

pharmacies via an Internet trading platform. 2. The plaintiff runs a pharmacy in M. . 3. The defendant is also a pharmacist and operates a pharmacy in O., which

motorway at a speed of 116 km/h was only 20 m away and thus less than 4/10 of half the speedometer value (58 m). The photograph taken by the police showed

profile (*** URL.2) the defendant exposed on 10/11/2018 from 12:01 a.m. to 2:49 p.m., the claimant's instance of 01/17/2018 containing name and surname

thisresolution could lead to the commission of the offense considered in article72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, in accordance with art. 58.2 GDPR

entrusting by the Housing Community with its registered office in S., ul. (…), (…) M.G. conducting business activity under the business name “(…)”, ul. (…), processing

regulatory content in this respect (OLG Hamburg MMR 2015, 740 m. Hansen/Struwe; KG MMR 2020, 239 m. Anm. Heldt, Ls. 5; Hacker, ZfPW 2019, 148 (184); Moos, in:

Authority and the imposition of an administrative fine. By letter of 31. s.m. The City of Reykjavík requested more information and explanations regarding

there have been a number of incidents related to the Bank's EDB Central A.M.B.A's (hereafter BEC) IT system. The incidents have resulted in accidental

further sanctioning of Vodafone España by the AEPD pursuant to Article 72(1)(m). The AEPD does not specify the provision of Article 21 on which it bases its

Code 188607912 Consultation tel. (8 5) 212 7532, Monday to Thursday, 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. and 1pm to 3pm © Government of the Republic of Lithuania Data 2121 2021

or failing to provide access in violation of Article 58(1).” Article 72.1 (m) of Organic Law 3/2018 on the Protection of Personal Data on the Personal Data

Madrid was alerted to a possible information leak on Sept. 16, 2020, 6:20 p.m. • On September 17, a data copy is detected from the network drive did the

owner of the line telephone *** TELEPHONE. 2 on January 31, 2020 at 11:34:50 a.m., and specifically in its ownership since October 2, 2019. The investigated

controller). RESULT OF INVESTIGATION ACTIONS 1. Regarding the facts:  Around 2:30 p.m. on *** DATE.2, the SGNEC states that it received telephone communication regarding

suitable basis for a claim. 27a) 28 A right to information from Section 666 i. V. m. Section 675, Paragraph 1 of the German Civil Code (BGB) is out of the question

and aldermen of the municipality of Dongen (defendant) (Agents: mr. W.C.J.M. Dankers and [name of attorney] ). Introduction 1. In this judgment, the court

confirms the challenged statement. Thus established by mr. A.W.M. Bijloos, chairman, and G.T.J.M. Jurgens and mr. J.Th. Drop, members, in the presence of mr

operating room report or delivery record. l) The pathological anatomy report. m) The evolution and planning of nursing care. n) The therapeutic application

k) The operating room report or delivery record. l) The pathology report. m) The evolution and planning of nursing care. n) The therapeutic application

within ten days would be considered a violation pursuant to Article 72(1)(m) of the LOPDGDD, which would be sanctioned according to Article 58(2) GDPR

euros). Thus determined by J.E.M. Polak, chairman, and E.A. Minderhoud and E.J. Daalder, members, in the presence of M.A.E. Planken, registrar. The chairman

by whoever had been represented, but also because of having consulted the R.M. could have known that the claimant no longer held the administrator status

forward, the claimed). The claimant states that on June 19, 2020 at 7:55 p.m. hours received on his mobile a phone call made from the number *** TELEPHONE

resolution could lead to the commission of the offense considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, in accordance with art. 58.2 of

classified as very serious for the purposes of prescription in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which is sanctioned in accordance with art. 58.2 of the GDPR

request for access was submitted on... via FAX to number... around the time... p.m., then by e-mail about the time..., and due to a missed connection, on... were

Lawyers: J.M. Brölmann and S.C.M.J.V.L. Kloppers in Utrecht, and 2 ABN AMRO Bank N.V, established at [place of business] , Attorney at law: Mr. C.M. Jakimowicz

ground. The area monitored in the K.-garten is rectangular in size of 60 m x 80 m. A total of ten cameras are installed there. Eight of them are permanently

Nineteen A of the Court of Appeal in Brussels 30jun2021 by M. BOSMANS Councilor dd. chair A.M. WITTERS Councilor O.DUGARDYN Deputy Councilor B. VANDERGUCHT

(respondent) from **** D***stadt, represented by R*** T*** Rechtsanwälte Ges.m.b.H. from **** B***, for violation of the right to deletion as a result of

2018, and that the last call was received on last August 21, 2019 at 7:08 p.m. from the calling line *** PHONE. 2. C / Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 -

Personal Data and Guarantee of Digital Rights (LOPDGDD) in its article 72.1 m), under the heading "Infringements considered to be very serious," he says:

the invitation of its President in a meeting on Tuesday 31.5.2022 at 10.00 a.m., in order to examine the case referred to in the present history. The President

Internet platform, TopfSecret Lower court: VG Munich, decision of 16.09.2019 - M 32 SN 19.2574 Place where it was found: BeckRS 2020, 6798   Tenor I. The appeal

with further information to ensure fair and transparent processing, e.g. á m. how long personal information will be stored or, if that is not possible,

hearing; reserves any further decision. This decision was made by J.F.M. Pols, M. van Ham and R.J. Voorink and was pronounced in public on 10 September

on March 31, 2023 I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal Administrative Court, judged by Mag. Bernhard SCHILDBERGER, LL.M. as chairperson and

Decided: 17.02.2021 Published: 03.06.2021 Fine: €15,000 EUR Parties: Purple Sea M.I.K.E. National Case Number/Name: 23/2021 European Case Law Identifier: n/a

certificate is NEGATIVE, It has been provided as a reason for the denial: “M. Tax Crime ”, for their transfer and that could request a review before the

ABN AMRO BANK N.V., established in Amsterdam, Intimate, Attorney at law: M.J.M.T. Keulaerds, The Hague. 1 Procedure The parties are hereinafter referred

and 15 hours he was working, paying its ordinary working day from 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. a) The claimant states that she received the complaint from the DGT,

subject of this claim, it was created on February 4, 2022 at 10:39 p.m. Spanish time (8:39 p.m. UTC time ), and was available until at least April 22, 2022. Both

only the date is seen in the first 08/20/2019 screen and another at 11:22 p.m. At the top is the line *** TELEPHONE. 1, parts of the conversation indicated

will be incorporated into the processing system owned by the company HOLIDAY M. OESTE, S.L, with registered office at Calle Rozabella, nº 6, 28290, Las Rozas

van de GBA stelt de verweerder dat de interne beslissing van de verweerder (m.b.t. het overschakelen van Microsoft tools naar een intern ontwikkelde oplossing)

on the same basis. In the decision of the European Court of Human Rights, M.L. and W.W. vs Germany (issued on June 28, 2018), it has been stated that in

(cf. BGH, judgment of May 27th, 2014 -XI ZR 264/13, NJW 2014, 3312 para. 24 m.w.N.). However, the latter is clearly the plaintiff's aim here. 27 (4) Finally

parties. Personal protection received the complainant's reply by e-mail on 11 a.m. 1. Complainant's point of view The complainant, who lives in an apartment

Authority met in a Chamber by teleconference on Wednesday 21-04-2021 at 10:30 a.m. at the invitation of its Chairperson, in order to examine the case mentioned

the telephone number to contact. On the same day, at approximately 2:00 p.m., a man who introduced himself as an "attorney [...]" called the Controller

for the period from Monday, August 16 2021 at 6:00 a.m. until Monday, August 23, 2021 at 6:00 a.m." (Government Gazette B' 3793). In addition, at the time

criminal offences, see paragraph 44. I also refer to judgment 18 April 2013 M.K. v. France paragraph 42 and Brunet v. France paragraph 37. (67) Furthermore

was pronounced in the public session of 09 October 2019 by M.BOSMANS Councilor dd.chairman A-M.WITTERS Councilor O.DUGARDYN Deputy Counselor B. VANDERGUCHT

place of business in the Republic of Estonia. On 12 August 2020, at 11:44 a.m., the applicant visited the controller’s website https://www.kuldnebors.ee

based on §§ 41, 50 ZPO. Supreme Court, Vienna, 18 February 2021 Dr S c h r a m m For the correctness of the copy, the head of the business department:

cents). Thus determined by J.E.M. Polak, chairman, and E.A. Minderhoud and E.J. Daalder, members, in the presence of M.A.E. Planken, registrar. The chairman

telephone number ***TELÉFONO.1 was provided for reservations between 9:15 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Information is provided at the bottom of the advertising brochure:

datapersonal (in Dumortier, F., Vander Geeten, V., Dargent, M., Docquir, B. and Forget, C., Knockaert, M., “Introduction »in Legal obligations for cybersecurity

statement was made by mr. VE van der Does, chairman, and mr. MP Glerum and mr. M. Eversteijn, members, in the presence of mr. MEC Bakker, registrar. The decision

20.40. This judgment was given by D.J. Post, judge, in the presence of Mr. M.W. Bolzoni, court clerk. The decision was publicly pronounced on: December

(instead of all Simitis/Schantz, DatenschutzR, 2019, Art. 6 marginal no. 98 f. w.m.n.). The data processing must be "necessary" to safeguard the legitimate interests

company had issued to M.M. M. Bricka as follows: KLD DECISIONS CPC November - December 2022 39 1. Serial No. *** with author and holder M.M., with author and

data In the answer of 10.11.2022, the data processor, i.e. M&M Inkasso OÜ, stated that M&M Inkasso The basis for publishing personal data published on

07/22/2013. Provides a screen print of an SMS received on 10/11/2021 at 8:25 p.m. SECOND: In accordance with article 65.4 of Organic Law 3/2018, of 5 December

in reference to a treatment THE HONORABLE To E :G: D D t ot  m m F Fi Genl register number 30123/2022 Sectional number 4327/2023 General collection

E document contains the applicant’s request that “on 26 May 2018 (5:14 p.m. camera recording is saved by the company’s management ’because this is the

2009/341 m.nt. F.C.B. van Wijmen, AV&S 2005/37 m.nt. W.M.A. Kalkman and L.E. Kalkman-Bogerd, JA 2005/94 m.nt. M.H. Elferink and GJ 2005/104 m.nt. A.C.

The infringements also concern the carrying out of the Impact A s s e s s m e n t on the data protection. This obligation was only carried out after the

that you have been misinformed. 2.12. By e-mail of November 2, 2018 (11:58 a.m.) [defendant 2] then asks: Can you give me some indication of what time you

secret, non-official data transfer by M., so of course only M. himself could be responsible for his data sharing. Only M. decided on his own that he had improperly

Stoffels (Roerdalen), R. Timmers (Valkenburg aan de Geul), M. Orasanin (Vaals) and Mr. A.A.C.M. Gidding-Baade and C.E.A. Bemelmans-Palmen (Brunssum) were

The IMY went through each complaint and determined that H&M had taken too long to react. As H&M is such a large company, it is important that it has functioning

or not, in possession of the data the ostension of which is requested". P.Q.M. accepts the first ground of appeal; declares the remaining reasons absorbed;

resolution could lead to the commission of the offense considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, in accordance with article 58.2

AEPD, otherwisecould incur a very serious infraction typified in article 72.1.m) of the LawOrganic 3/2018, of December 5, Protection of Personal Data and Guarantee

Knuddels must also bear the costs of the proceedings (§§ 105, 107 OWiG 1.V.m. with § 464 (1), § 465 StPO). The procedural fee is 5% of the fine, but at

resolution could lead to the commission of the offense considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be penalized, in accordance with art. 58.2 of the

approximately circular crater with a diameter of approx. 20 m and a depth of approx. 1.4 m formed. The plaintiffs' neighboring properties were also affected

Furthermore, the Board, represented by mr. M.B.J. Thijssen and mr. L.J. Gerritsen, both lawyers in Nijmegen, and C.A.M. Berntsen, heard. Considerations preface

of these actions by the C. Ges .m.b.H. or now the D. Ges.m.b.H., FN ..., had to be prescribed. or now by the D. Ges.m.b.H., FN ..., actions owed (within

April 24, 2019, in a letter from the client M. S. (1), who received a file with data by e-mail. The client of M. S. (1) asked the Company whether he should

DECISION The Federal Administrative Court decides by Judge Mag.a Barbara SIMMA LL.M. as chairperson and the expert lay judge Margareta MAYER-HAINZ and the expert

VG München - M 3 E 22.667 Court: VG München (Germany) Jurisdiction: Germany Relevant Law: Article 6(1)(c) GDPR Article 6(1)(e) GDPR Article 6(2) GDPR Article

The defendant "H.M.B." EAD is represented by Adv. M. with a power of attorney presented at the meeting and a valid lawyer's card. Lawyer M. contests the appeal

proceedings (cf. BGH ruling of January 17, 2023 - VI ZR 203/22, r+s 2023, 265 Rn. 14 m. w . N.). 53(2)              The application submitted at the Senate meeting

measuring devices are read by the representative of M ... at equal intervals if possible or at the request of M ... by the connection owner himself. He must ensure

resolution could lead to the commission of the offense considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, in accordance with art. 58.2 of

a simplified procedure on 24 March 2021, a case concerning a complaint by M. M. against the decision of the President of the Office for Personal Data Protection

within the framework of integral youth care of a motivation document, called M-document, drawn up by the controller as a result of the alarming situation

cf. in particular the ECHR's Grand Chamber judgment of 28 June 2018 G.I.E.M. S.r.l. with others against Italy (EMD-2006-1828) and the ECtHR's judgment

salary of the attorney at law. This order was made by A.M.A. Verscheure, F.J. Verbeek and A.C.M. Kuypers and was pronounced publicly on 3 March 2020 by

respondent consulted the data of the complainant on January 3, 2019 at 10:03 p.m., i.e. the day after the finding (from January 2, 2019 - see point 4 above)

(instead of all Simitis/Schantz, DatenschutzR, 2019, Art. 6 marginal no. 98 f. m.w.N.). The data processing must be "necessary" to safeguard the legitimate

the proceedings. The data subject was contacted by cleaning tool company T.S.M. Srl. (the controller) to take part in a professional course, and received

the defendant from §1004 para. 1 sentence 1 BGB analogous i. V. m. § 823 para. 1 BGB i. V. m. the general right of personality from Art. 2 Para. 1, Art. Para

Hopper who is known to the labor court in M... – Appendix 3 39 C. AGG Hopper fails before the labor court in M... 40 https://www.rechtsanwalts-kanzlei-w

337 F 1616/15, 337 F 3484/15, 337 F 3643/15, 337 F 1033/16, 442 M 10036/16 and 442 M 21 343/16 and a copy of the accounting transactions relating to the

Protection Authority met as a Department by teleconference on 03-23-2022 at 09.30 a.m. at the invitation of its President, in order to examine the case referred

following chronology of events: FIRST: PROMOFARMA, on August 6, 2019, at 5:30 p.m., was aware of a news item published in a foreign media regarding an alleged

documentation I have to provide. All the best".  November 9, 2018, 6:45 p.m. Once the study of Ms. B.B.B. (sister of the claimant) have to provide collateral

letter dated 3 May 2021. The plaintiff alleged that on 27 April 2021 at 2.18 p.m. he boarded a train of the defendant at the Schönhauser Allee station in Berlin

resolution could lead to the commission of the offense considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, in accordance with art. 58.2 of

resolution could lead to commission of the offense typified in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which is sanction, in accordance with art. 58.2 of the RGPD

03 hrs, the following article (Annex B 41) was posted on page "M" at F (Annex B 19): "M" will boycott Christmas again this year. We do not celebrate German-Christian

processing of personal data by M. Sp. z o. o. with its seat in K., ul. F. [...], hereinafter: "Company", "M." found a breach by M. of the provisions of Art

3:21 p.m. and 6:58 p.m. hours, from the telephone number *** TELEPHONE. 2. - On July 15, 2020, he received two calls, at 3:53 p.m. and 4:40 p.m. hours

“today” to 4:35 p.m.  Screen print of a telephone showing a "missed call" from the telephone number *** TELEPHONE.4 “yesterday” at 7:59 p.m.  Screen print

Frankfurt a.M., Urt. v. 25 May 2018 - 16 U 134/17; Frankfurt am Main Regional Court, judgment of 18 January 2018 - 2-03 O 156/17; LG Frankfurt a.M., judgment

rights were violated by Internet users using pseudonyms (nicknames) A., M., a., A., M. and demanded that their personal data (forenames, surname) be disclosed

also discussed the military's powers to access, inspect and monitor, e.g. á m. taking photographs and taking photographs , to all the places where Act no

by EASYJET from the email address ***EMAIL.3, dated 04/01/2022 at 10:22 a.m., to the complaining party (***EMAIL.5), with the subject “Data Request-A.A

jurisdiction to take cognizance of the request. This decision was given by mr. M.C.H. Broesterhuizen, assisted by mr. P.C.N. van Gelderen, Registrar, and pronounced

resolution could lead to the commission of the offense considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be penalized, in accordance with art. 58.2 of the

that "With regard to making a call dated January 10, 2019 between 5 and 8 p.m. from the calling number ***PHONE.1, we confirm that on that date and time

could lead to the commission of the infringement considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, in accordance with article 58.2

resolution could lead to commission of the offense typified in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which is sanction, in accordance with art. 58.2 of the RGPD

Federal Administrative Court decides through the judge Mag.a Barbara SIMMA LL.M. as chairwoman and the expert lay judge Margareta MAYER-HAINZ and the expert

tried to settle the dispute amicably. In an email of August 12, 2020 (2:48 p.m.), Mr. De Haan stated that the parties were unable to reach an amicable settlement

resolution could lead to the commission of the offense considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, in accordance with article 58.2

could lead to the commission of the infringement considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, according to art. 58.2 of the RGPD

deadline granted until 19 August s.á. At 12 p.m. received a reply letter from ANR and the other 18. s.m. received an email from YAY ehf. where it was confirmed

jurisdiction of the Market Court (fifth plea in law of the GBA - eleventh m i- del by X: 10.1. X holds that if the Market Court annuls the contested decision

to keeping track of transactions on the transaction chip, in Debit M/C and Business M/C debit cards that are issued do not comply with this requirement

enter the land and buildings, premises or other premises between 6.00 a.m. and 10.00 p.m., 2. access documents and information directly related to the scope

it and a session of face-to-face training at the Clinic from 2:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. The attendance control sheet for said training is attached as Doc.6

previous one. (activation fraudulent was operational from 7:09 p.m. on 09/02/2021 until 2:26 p.m. approximately on 09/03/2021, in which the claimant was able

(ECJ, Judgment of 16 June 2005 - C-105/03, NJW 2005, 2839 marginal no. 47 [M. Pupino]; KK-OWiG/Rogall, § 3 marginal no. 83 with further references). ),

first email sent at 2:55 p.m. is sent to the complainant and does not mention the request for erasure. Asecond email sent at 3:30 p.m. the same day, addressed

Surveillance Authority in accordance with Article 66(1) of the GDPR and Article 1(m) of the Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 154/2018. 7 3. Advance notification

from the Federal Office dated August 24, 2020, 3:24 p.m., and September 29, 2020, 7:32 a.m. and 7:33 a.m., at ......... However, such communication can still

after 9:00 p.m., however, do not result in the update at 10:30 p.m., as the banking day at the banks' Accounting Office ends at 9:00 p.m. If the claim

1, Paragraph 2 Sentence 1 No. 11 lit. b) i. V. m. § 3 Abs. 1 Nr. 1, 4 UKlaG as well as from § 3a i. V. m. Section 8 Paragraph 1 Paragraph 3 No. 3 UWG. The

connection with the complainant's work permit application by the city, i.e. on m. the delivery of a medical certificate to the city attorney for a legal assessment

Berlin NJW 2016, 1966; LG Frankfurt a.M., Urt. v. 27.09.2018 - 2-03 O 320/17, BeckRS 2018, 25130; LG Frankfurt a.M., Judgement of 10.10.2019 - 2-03 O 500/18

received sent by GUREAK LANEAN SA in which they show that on February 9 at 5:30 p.m. have detected the creation of a user with an Administrator profile as well

could lead to the commission of the infringement considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, according to with art. 58.2 of the

November 2019 in the matter of [plaintiff] at [place] , plaintiff, Lawyer M.A.C. de Vilder-van Overmeire in Amsterdam, against: the State of the Netherlands

resolution could entail the commission of the violation considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, of according to art. 58.2 of the

resolution could lead to the commission of the offense considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, in accordance with art. 58.2 of

Thursday December 10, 2020 Rapporteur Ms. Myriam Benlolo Carabot Public reporter M. Alexandre Lallet Lawyer (s) SCP BASEMENT, MOLINIE Full Text FRENCH REPUBLIC

may lead to the commission of the infringement considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, in accordance with article 58.2

broadcast of videos from a second phone number on May 31, 2019 at 11:45 a.m. corresponds to the contact number of the association. In the pictures provided

where [the appellant], assisted by L.A.M. van der Geld, attorney at law in Groningen, and the Board, represented by M.L.M. Lammerschot, appeared. Considerations

to you because of their status as employees of N*** Strassenbaugesellschaft m.b.H. were announced during customer visits, stored on your private mobile phone

at 1:20 p.m., from the account (...), with the matter "Informative newsletter Torremar Vol. 7.” — Message sent on 09/23/2021, at 1:34 p.m., from the account

- city. CHAIRMAN: MEMBERS: Vencislav Karadzov /m/ Tsanko Tsolov /m/ Maria Mateva /m/ Veselin Tselkov /m/ DECISION No. ппН-01-70/2022 Sofia, 01.12.2022

also been filed by fax. In the period from December 28, 2020, 8:45 p.m. to 10:44 p.m., five transmission attempts were made to the number #31036..., all

stated, however, that the document had already been handed over to P. M. P. M. then stated that she had submitted the document to B. Z., who denied it

"XXXX, XXXX (LDA)" <XXXXXXXX@lda.bayern.de> Date: December 21, 2023, 1:58 p.m. To: Legal <legal@noyb.eu> Your reference: C044 --------------------------

documents. On the 20th p.m. sent the complainant part of the requested data in a locked document to the City of Reykjavík. On the 23rd p.m. The complaining city

the republic! The Federal Administrative Court, by Judge Barbara SIMMA LL.M. as chairperson and the expert lay judge Margareta MAYER-HAINZ and the expert

defendant informed neither the responsible data protection authority, the O.H.C.M., nor the plaintiff about the incident. 12In a letter from a lawyer dated June

exemption from the application of Article 6 (1) (f) to the public authorities m: fasin clarification through practice. The Danish Data Protection Agency also

and attaches a screenshot taken at 6:11 p.m. The complainant adds in his e-mail from July 8, 2022 sent at 6:16 p.m. that his address is equivalent to personal

La chambre des litiges de l'autorité de protection des données, composée de M. Hielke Hijmans, président et MM. Dirk Van Der Kelen et Jelle Stassijns, membres ;

Chamber of the Court of Appeal in Brussels, composed of: M.BOSMANS Councilor dd.chairman A-M. WITTERS Councilor 0.DUGARDYN Deputy Counselor who have attended

data on the same basis. In the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights M.L. and W.W. vs Germany (dated 28 June 2018), on the other hand, states that

the case of the plaintiff Dr F***** B*****, represented by Robert Haupt, LL.M., Rechtsanwalt in Vienna, against the defendant Ö*****, represented by Wolf

could lead to the commission of the infraction considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, in accordance with art. 58.2 of

fifty-three cents). Thus established by Mr C.J. Borman, Chairman, and Mr S.F.M. Wortmann and Mr J. Gundelach, Members, in the presence of Mr P. Klein, Registrar

complainant, and by extension a/le customers, only of can benefit from discounts by m_ ddel of their electronic identity card, and by the the defendant is not offered

residing at [place of residence] ,applicant, hereinafter [applicant],lawyer mr. A.M. van Schaick in Tilburg, against the foundation STICHTING BUREAU CREDIT REGISTRATION

Department of the company, will attend the call on March 27 of 2023 at 10 a.m., at its registered office at Calle Goya 18 and that they will not allow the

an annual INFORMATION / INFORMATION about the insurancehis contract number M-056482, but the RIGHT OF ACCESS EXERCISE OF HIMTHE INSURANCE CONTRACT HAS NOT

Germany (September 21, 2017, ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0921JUD005140512), judgment M.L. and W.W. v. Germany (28.6.2018, ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0628JUD006079810) and

to make harassing calls, which is why K's client filed a complaint with the M police for stalking. 3. The Federal Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom

The complainant later withdrew that application by notification, dated. 11 p.m., and was subsequently ordered to leave the country within the prescribed seven-day

authorized representative: Mr. M.H. Elferink, and Dutch Data Protection Authority, hereinafter: AP, authorized representative: Mr. J.M.A. Koster. Introduction

personnel file or from the factual files kept at the Federal Police Directorate in M. that were before the administrative court - except for the requested removal

2022. A reiteration was sent on the 15th s.m. received a reply from the company by e-mail, i.e. the 20th p.m., but in the attachment the document in question

legally defined. However, administrative acts within the meaning of § 35 VwVfG M-V and according to § 35 VwVfG fall unproblematically under it. The right of

the granted conclusion periods, both the complainant (Ms. H.J.M.) and the parties (Ms. H.J.M.) submitted new elements that were not relevant to the subject

H&M was fined €50,000 for monitoring its employees with surveillance cameras in violation of the GDPR and of national labor provisions. Following a report

Protection, dated 19. p.m., with a request for specific information and data, but that letter was answered with a letter dated 30. s.m. As a result, a letter

BV, located in Wormerveer, defendant, lawyers mrs. J.G. Reus, T.J.M. de Weerd and A.M. van Aerde in Amsterdam. Parties are hereinafter referred to as Blauw

legal costs to an amount of € 1,068. This statement was made by mr. A.J.G.M. van Montfort, judge, in the presence of C. Cooper, Registrar. The verdict

than 14 pixels - Publication is ordered for a period of 4 days from 12:00 p.m., Paris time (France), on the seventh day following notification of this deliberation

resolution could lead to the commission of the offense considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, in accordance with with art. 58

operating room report or birth record. l) The pathological anatomy report. m) The evolution and planning of nursing care. n) The therapeutic application

resolution could lead to the commission of the offence referred to in Article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned in accordance with Article 58.2 of

resolution could lead to the commission of the offense considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, in accordance with art. 58.2 of

C" (hereinafter the "publication"), which bore the signature of a certain M. Theodoros, a journalist (hereinafter the "journalist"). The article, both

resolution could lead to the commission of the offense considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, in accordance with art. 58.2 of

in the Law Foundation III, since thecomplainant, on July 8, 2019 at 2:27 p.m. received a business callon your personal mobile phone from the person claimed

[place of residence], applicants, hereinafter: [applicants], lawyer mr. C.M. Sent in Amsterdam, against the legal entity under public law GEMENTE LANGEDIJK

TELEPHONE 1 It was imported to the one claimed from YOIGO on 11/05/2018 at 02:00 a.m. TELEFÓNICA MÓVILES ESPAÑA, SAU and XFERA MÓVILES, SA (YOIGO) with C / Jorge

on weekdays from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., on Saturdays from 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., and on Sundays from 4:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. According to the respondent's

12:28 p.m., the plaintiff canceled the appointment for health reasons. He had previously booked a hotel room in R. on November 30th, 2021 at 12:28 p.m. for

for sending an unsolicited e-mail advertisement. 2 On 18.05.2020 at 11:26 a.m., the plaintiff received, at the email address of his law firm, [...], from

decision is unfounded. This statement was made by mr. L.M. Reijnierse, judge, in the presence of mr. M.M. van Luijk-Salomons, Registrar. The decision was handed

workers, M.B. of July 2, 1981. 9Article 118, paragraph 1 of the coordinated law of 14 July 1994 on compulsory health care and compensation insurance, M.B. of

at www.bvwg.gv.at DECISIONS D A T U M 2 0 . 1 2 . 2 0 2 1 BUSINESS NUMBER W 2 7 4 2 2 4 2 6 3 8 - 1/1 0 E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal

the lake, or otherwise expert finish. This decision has been taken by mr. M. A. M. Essed, district court judge, and the public expressed on the 9th of February

simplified procedure on 23 March 2021, a case concerning a complaint filed by M. S. against the decision of the President of the Office for Personal Data Protection

of the municipality of Zundert, defendant, authorized representative mr. S.M. skipper. Process sequence In the decision of July 29, 2019 (primary decision)

April 2020 regarding [plaintiff] living at [place], plaintiff, Agent: Mr. M.M.J. Arts, by The foundation FOUNDATION NIJESTEE, having its registered office

they requested an inspection of the complaint file, on 12/28/2023 at 9 a.m. 1.2.7 On 12/30/2022, I re-approved the requested extension of time and informed

Instagram, etc.) and WhatsApp. […] FIRST.- On January 6, 2022, around 3 a.m., he was in the ***ADDRESS.1, with his dog (…). My client (…) found himself

of access to administrative documents, pursuant to law no. 241/90 and ss. m. and i., in the manner indicated therein, and not through the instrument of

the requirements of other provisions of the Act have been violated, e.g. á m. Paragraph 1 Article 7 the same law on, among other things, fairness, proportionality

operating room report or birth registration. l) The pathological anatomy report. m) The evolution and planning of nursing care. n) The therapeutic application

object was granted on that issue, as well as access to relevant data, i.e. on m. out of a case due to the aforementioned complaint of the Consumers' Association

within two weeks of the date of this decision. This decision was made by mr. M.G.J.M. van Kempen, chairman, and mr. R. den Ouden and mr. V.F.R. Woeltjes, in

Karlsruhe, judgment of 02.08.2019 - 8 O 26/19, ZD 2019, 511, 512; LG Frankfurt a.M., Judgment of 18.01.2021 - 30 O 147/20, cited after Leibold, ZD-Aktuell 2021

complaints (with items G.D.1 to G.D.7 and G.E.71 in the Appendix) e) PLEGMA NET M.E.P.E. (henceforth GRID): seven (7) complaints (with G.E.1 to G.E.7 details

organized according to functional or geographical aspects". According to the H.M., this term is essentially equivalent to the term file used in the predecessor

at www.bvwg.gv.at DECISIONS D A T U M 2 4 . 0 3 . 2 0 2 2 BUSINESS NUMBER W 2 5 3 2 2 2 6 2 6 1 - 1/8 E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal

by mr. J.J. Catsburg, chairman, and mr. P.J.M. Mol and mr. A.A.M. Elzakkers, members, in the presence of mr. M.L. Bressers, clerk. The verdict was pronounced

residence] , claimant (Agent: J.H.P.M. Raaijmakers), and the Minister of Finance, defendant (Agents: J.L. Lam MSc LL.M. and I.H.H.L. Kolthof). Process sequence

any further decision. This decision was made by Mrs. M.F.J.N. van Osch, M.P.C.J. van Bavel and H.M.J. van den Hurk and was pronounced in public in the presence

grade was formed. In the reply sent by e-mail on June 24, 2021 at 10:19 p.m., the Representative requested the date of entry or modification of all the

that the rights and freedoms of those employees are taken into account. J.M. (the data subject), a former employee and a customer of a bank in Finland

defense. The hearing took place on October 12, 2020. Its directors M. Hoffer and M. Balken, and its agents, appeared on behalf of Plaintiff. The defendant

June 28, 2018, 60798/10 and 65599/10, M.L. and W.W. t. Germany, §104. 12 ECtHR June 28, 2018, 60798/10 and 65599/10, M.L. and W.W. t. Germany, §104. 13 Decision

personal data by V.M.P. Sp. z o.o. based in W, President of the Office for Personal Data Protection by establishing an infringement by V.M.P. Sp. z o.o. with

following: JUDGMENT on the appeal registered under no. 24739/2021 RG proposed by: L.M., domiciled ex lege in Rome, piazza Cavour at Chancellery of the Court of Cassation

was made by V.E. van der Does, chairman, and P.J.M. Mol and M.E.J. Sprakel, members, in the presence of M.E.C. Bakker, registrar. The decision was publicly

unfounded. Adopted by mr. C.H.M. van Altena, chairman, and mr. C.M. Wissels and mr. J. Gundelach, members, in the presence of mr. A.M.E.A. Neuwahl, clerk. w.g

for decision The action is admissible, but unfounded. I. The LG Frankfurt a.M. has international and local jurisdiction. This is not in dispute between the

returned to the airport and at 6:25 a.m. boarded Ryanair flight NUM000, bound for Tenerife and arrival in said city at 9:00 a.m., given the circumstance that the

December 2nd. Received the municipality's answers with today's letter. 8. s.m. With a letter on June 13, 2022, the complainant was given the opportunity

plaintiff in the main defendant in the incident, authorized representative: mr. M. Hamidy, against [defendant01] , city: [hometown01] , defendant in the main

clarifications from Gallup by letter dated 24 p.m., and the company's more detailed answers were received by e-mail on July 14 p.m. The complainant was then given the

convictions in this judgment to be enforceable in stock. Thus rendered by C.L.J.M. de Waal, cantonal judge, and pronounced at the public hearing on 22 July 2020

is a company registered under FN 3***45n with its registered office in *020 M***, Z***gasse 5, whose business purpose includes the manufacture of window

confirmed by the FNMT certificate in the file. 4. On 04/03/2019, at 10.30 a.m., the complainant accepted the agreement to initiate PS/006/2019, since the

its Spanish translation, are the following: “[…] On July 26, 2019 at 6:00 p.m., the agents of the Guardia Urbana de Figueres with *** TIP.1 and *** TIP.2

before the court, hereinafter referred to as Brain, represented by mr. I.C.M.A. Reinders Folmer, against Ziggo B.V., which is located in Utrecht, that the

YYYY), [ZIP] [City], [Street] [HNr.] Time of the offense: DD.MM.2019, 7:35 p.m. Crime scene: [ZIP] [city], [street, ONr.] (WC facilities on the upper floor

case on December 13, 2021 at the hearing, where the Board, represented by M.L.M. Lammerschop, has appeared. [Appellant] participated in the hearing via a

paid of € 178. This statement was made by mr. M.M. Verberne, chairman, and mr. T.L. Fernig - Rocour and mr. M. Greebe, members, in the presence of mr. L.N

claimed. This order was made by Mr. L. Voetelink, Judge, assisted by Mr. M.M. de Keizer, Registrar, and pronounced in public on October 26, 2023.1

I. Kamińska, M. Rozbicka-Ostrowska, Act on access to public information. Commentary, Warsaw 2012, p. 87; M. Bidziński in: M. Bidziński, M. Chmaj, P. Szustakiewicz

deadline was requested, until 23.00 p.m. With a letter from the Personal Protection Agency to the company, dated 18. s.m., says that if the organization does

plaintiff's data, were and are in a document archive at the company in Frankfurt a.M.. The defendant ended the contractual relationship with the company at the

contact a person on Bosis of his nadm and, in appropriate cases, anm i ni m to m aa nta I o nd e re i the ntificatie ge give ns;4 The members 7 and 2 shall

of the first respondent at www.[REDACTED]at/ on August 14, 2020, at 10:45 a.m.. During the visit, he had been logged into his Google account, which was linked

Baldan Kaya The oral hearing took place on 18 July 2022. Nowadays: - mr. A.M. Koene, district judge - drs. A. Panjer-Hartman, clerk After the case was declared:

is intended for schools and other parties that work with children, e.g. á m. preschools and primary schools, but the main activity of InfoMentors ehf.

information that would take place at Íslensk erfðagreining's office, e.g. á m. procedures that may have been established, documentation of information security

February 2015. According to the sick note and certificate from Dr. medical [M. P.] from May 2014 (you have them) I was on sick leave until mid-February 2015

HessVGH, Urt. v. 30.10.1990 - 11 UE 3005/89 - ESVGH 41, 105; VG Frankfurt a.M., Urt. v. 29.07.2011 - 5 K 156/11.F - juris; to § 9 MRRG Medert/Süßmuth, Melderecht

otherwise advanced. This order was issued by B.J. Lenselink, J.W. Frieling and M.M. Kruithof and was pronounced at the public hearing on 16 June 2020 in the

given the opportunity to provide comments on [B]'s answers via e-mail on 20.s.m. and received them by email the same day. In light of the responses received

right to a effective remedy under the EU Data Protection Regulation. CLAIMS, M.M. 6. AA pursues its claim. 7. The Privacy Protection Authority considers that

composed of E. Regan, President of the Chamber, D. Gratsias (Rapporteur), M. Ilešič, I. Jarukaitis and Z. Csehi, Judges, Advocate General: G. Pitruzzella

. Delivered on December 30, 2021 President : Signed: M. Rémy Schwartz The rapporteur : Signed: M. Bruno Delsol The Secretary : Signed: Mme R ... AC ..

Executive Board of Eindhoven University of Technology, defendant (Agents: mr. M.E. Lips and mr. Ah Abdollahi Nejat). Process sequence In the decision of 14

the case of [plaintiff] , residing at [residence] , plaintiff, lawyer mr. M. de Boorder in The Hague, against the foundation CREDIT REGISTRATION OFFICE

COURT IN ZAGREB Avenija Dubrovnik 6 and 8 Business number: UsI-4017/23-6 IN I M E R E P U B L I K E H R V A T S K E P R E S U D A The Administrative Court

father of [applicant] , - mr. M.P. Hearts, aforesaid, - mr. [name 2], advisor security affairs at the Rabobank, - mr. K.M. van Zwieten, lawyer of the Rabobank

This judgment was rendered by M.A.H. Span-Henkens, judge in preliminary relief proceedings, in the presence of A. W.C.M. Frings, registrar. This judgment

and the Chamber of Commerce (Chamber of Commerce), defendant (Agent: mr. J.P.M. van der Ende). and the State of the Netherlands (the Minister of Justice and

protection regulation, he shall have the right to one effective remedy. CLAIMS, M.M. 6. The Privacy Protection Authority demands that the Supreme Administrative

that the complainant upheld that "[m]y complaint isn't about teams as I log in with the email provided by ii. that "[m]y complaint is the fact that lecture

appeal. Thus established by C.H.M. van Altena, chairman, and C.M. Wissels and C.C.W. Lange, members, in the presence of M.H. Kuggeleijn-Jansen, registrar

of e-mail sent by “*** COMPANY.1,” on the 13th of February 2020 at 12:06 p.m., which contains the following text: Dear Ladies and Gentlemen, Further to

12.12.2018 - M 9 K 18.4553Fundstelle:BeckRS 2020, 10398TenorI. The judgement of the Administrative Court of Munich of 12 December 2018 - M 9 K 18.4553 -

at www.bvwg.gv.at DECISIONS D A T U M 2 9 . 0 4 . 2 0 2 2 BUSINESS NUMBER W 2 5 8 2 2 4 7 0 2 8 - 1 / 1 1 E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal

representative of the defendant access to their water meter on June 9, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. to inspect and, if necessary, replace their water meter and to enter their

Personal protection requested more information from Advania by letter dated 26 a.m., and the company's answers were received on 14 October s.á. The complainant

ground. The area monitored in the K.garten is rectangular and measures 60 m x 80 m. 3 In a letter dated November 23, 2017, the local police inspector sent

44 (1) sentence 2 BDSG and Article 17 (1) c) EuGVVO i. V. m. Art. 18 (1) EuGVVO, each i. V. m. §§ 12, 13 ZPO. Since the provisions establish the same international

time slot in which She goes to the ER at 3:46 a.m. until you are discharged the same day at 10:12 a.m. About investigations of accesses. A copy of the

2006 at 10:44 a.m. under his user name Waltera*** written. Screenshot of the original source text from February 26, 2006 at 10:44 a.m. (formatting not

Case law of the European Court In Joined Cases C-141/12 and C-372/12 YS and M and S v Minister for Immigration, Integration and Asylum (hereinafter the Immigration

Administrative Court recognizes through the judge Mag.a Elisabeth SCHMUT LL.M. as chairperson and the expert lay judges Dr. Claudia ROSENMAYR-KLEMENZ and

Applicant on appeal, hereinafter referred to as: [applicant], Attorney at law: Mr. M. de Boorder in The Hague, by ING Bank N.V, located in Amsterdam, defendant

(hereinafter, the claimed one). The claimant states that on 10/12/2019 at 9:02 p.m., from the account of the social network *** ACCOUNT.1, belonging to B.B.B

server was related to its restart by the processing entity - IDFT based in M. na B. , which , under the contract of [...] March 2018, was entrusted with

essentially "reactive". The hour records of this one oscillate between 8 p.m. and 108 hours per month, i.e. between 0.125 FTE and 0.7 FTE. 66. The monthly

Decision The court declares the appeal unfounded. This decision was made by Mr M.M. Meijers, judge, in the presence of Mr Tijsma, Registrar. registrar judge

representative: mr. L.H.E.M. Berendse-de Gruijl, and the Minister for Legal Protection, defendant, authorized representatives: S.M.T. Damman and J. Gouma

residing at [residence] , plaintiff by summons dated August 31, 2022, lawyer mr. M. de Boorder in The Hague, the limited liability company ING BANK N.V., Based

The parties have negotiated disputes without being able to agree. Claims m.m. The union has demanded that the Labor Court order the company to it pays

was answered on the 13th and 24th p.m., but as a result, a letter was received from the organization, dated 28. s.m. In the letter, the organization draws

having its registered office in The Hague, the Netherlands, defendant, Lawyer M.M.C. van Graafeiland, The Hague. The parties will hereinafter be referred to

made by mr. JEC Vriends, chairman, and mr. V.M. Schotanus and mr. I.M. Josten, members, in the presence of mr. M.A. de Rooij, on 22 April 2021 and made public

Complainant, 05/20/2021, at 11:19 a.m., who insists that his questions have not been answered.  Claimed, 05/28/2021, at 10:46 a.m. Indicates that information

(see W.-R. Schenke in: Kopp/Schenke, VwGO, 29th edition 2023, § 121 Rn. 9f. m.w.N. ). The legal issues that are the subject of the action for annulment are

applicant appeared, assisted by her agent. The Board was represented by R.H.E.M. van de Sanden. Considerations 1. On the basis of the documents and the proceedings

The Federal Administrative Court, through judge Mag.a Elisabeth SCHMUT LL.M. as chairwoman and the expert lay judges Dr. Claudia ROSENMAYR-KLEMENZ and

sense means any service provided to a person in which the distance of 1.5 m from person to person cannot be complied with. Since both cosmetic treatments

10:30 a.m. to remove the recording because he had not consented to it. The Applicant therefore removed the recording from the group at 10:15 a.m. THE According

10555 Berlin Office hours: Mon.-Fri. 10 a.m. - 3 p.m., BERLIN Entrance: Alt-Moabit 60 Thursday 10 a.m. to 6 p.m., or by appointment 1. Subject of input On

apartment to grant a representative of the respondent on June 9, 2021 at 10 a.m. to check and, if necessary, replace the previous water meter, access to it

one hand, his data includes the email address m*****@*****.at, which does not exist, and his email address m ***** @ **** * .at, which he did not specify

Information (https://www.11888.) shows that the number in question belongs to M and not to I, who is listed as the complainant, and therefore the complainant

opened the hearing on February 8, 2021, where the AP, represented by mr. J.M.A. Koster and mr. O.S. Niveld, has appeared. Connexxion was also present, represented

amended), after administrative proceedings regarding the complaint of Mr. M. D., against the processing of his personal data by A. S.A. and their disclosure

(s) have been committed as a result: They have - on June **, 2019, 1 *: 11 a.m. (time of the offense) - using an appropriate terminal a message by email from

□□□□14295□3-□□14-□□ 15-□2-□1-;-] m� L _J, Court of Appeal Brussels-2019/AR/741-p.15 This judgment was handed down in the open barjun2019 thorn 12 M. BOSMANS Councilor

are to be kept ready: Letters and parcels (excl. RSa and RSb letters, parcel M with Shipment tracking) Newspapers, information, mail amounts of money I am

arrangements made, MB was employed as a teacher at the Primary School M. K. in M. [...] June 2019, received a notice of termination of the employment contract

at www.bvwg.gv.at DECISIONS D A T U M 2 2 . 1 2 . 2 0 2 1 BUSINESS NUMBER W 2 7 4 2 2 4 6 3 5 5 - 1/2 0 E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal

in which She goes to the emergency room at 3:46 a.m. until he is discharged the same day at 10:12 a.m. About access investigations. A copy of the appropriate

(approx. 5:45 p.m.). The managing director stated the time of becoming aware of the security incident was March 6, 2023 (approx. 6:30 p.m.). With regard

The defendant has been represented by his representative. Also present was M. Sussenbach of the Faculty of Engineering Governance and Management. Considerations

received on 22. s.m. The complainant was then given the opportunity to submit comments to the City of Reykjavík's responses by letter, dated 30 p.m., and they

the vice president M.J. Kroeze and Councilors A.E.B. ter Heide, S.J. Schaafsma and F.R. Salomons, and pronounced in public by Counsel H.M. Wattendorff on

changed. Rather, the old, non-functioning camera was only installed about 1 m further to the left. A photo (image 2) and a screenshot of the camera on the

confirms the origin of funds depends on the circumstances at hand, e.g. á m. customer explanations of the origin of funds and the purpose of transactions

judgments and decisions, thus anticipating the entry into force of this provision (M.B., 16 May 2019). FOR THESE REASONS, The Litigation Chamber of the Data Protection

07/10/2020, 10/30/2020 (2:33 p.m.), 10/30/2020 (12:37 p.m.), 12/03/2020 and 01/26/2021. In the one dated 10/30/2020 (2:33 p.m.), addressed to a "collaborator"

had been prepared on the processing of personal data processed by S.Á.Á. on m. procedures that may have been established or other documentation of information

located in Paris, The defendants, - Lawyers Mr. C. C. Jeloschek and Mr. S.A.M., M. Meijer in Amsterdam. The plaintiff will be called [Claimant] and defendants

receiving a response to your rectification request on July 9, 2019, at 1:09 p.m. In the response sent from the email fireflycus- tomercarespain@fireflycarrentl

imposed on the latter. 13 Cf. article 25 KBV KBV. 14 A. MAST, J. DUJARDIN, M. VAN DAMME, J. VANDE LANOTTE, Overview of Belgian administrative law, Mechelen

Administrative Court (BVwG): "This does not include provisions totalling EUR 18m for an administrative fine imposed on Austrian Post by the Austrian Data Protection

of applicant], at [place of residence of applicant], applicant (Agent: F.L.M. van Haren), and The State Secretary for Justice and Security, Repatriation

(LG Gießen, decision of 23.06.2020, ref.: 3 O 196/20 and OLG Frankfurt a. M., decision of 12.08.2020, ref.: 7 W 19/20) were rejected in both instances

defendant's arcades on December 4, 2016 in the time between 2:20 p.m. and 2:30 p.m. and found that no access control had been exercised. For further details

of the single-member chamber, in the presence of A.M.E.A. Neuwahl, registrar. in the presence of A.M.E.A. Neuwahl, Registrar. Member of the Single Chamber

dated 5 p.m., the Data Protection Authority requested more information from the University of Iceland and received it by letter dated 26. s.m. The University

euros). Thus determined by J.E.M. Polak, chairman, and E.A. Minderhoud and E.J. Daalder, members, in the presence of M.A.E. Planken, registrar. The chairman

against the chairman, which had been lodged in person at the post office at 3 p.m. on 12 November 2019, was sent by the same mail as the official opinion of

the protection of individuals with regard to processing of personal data, M.B. 05/09/2018 (implementing provisions of the “e-Privacy Directive”) and 3

President of the Office for Personal Data Protection stating that N.B. and T.M., partners in the civil law partnership Kancelaria PIONIER [...] s.c. with

yet been conclusively clarified by case law (cf. Sesing MMR 2021, 544, 547 m.w.N. ). In the event of a dispute, the question of such a requirement of equivalence

is not final (as of June 29, 2021). HG Vienna May 26th, 2021, 57 Cg 32 / 20m Legal representative: Dr. Stefan Langer, lawyer in Vienna To the news. Share

28.04.2020 - 1 S 1068/20 -, and of 30.04.2020 - 1 S 1101/20 -, each with w.m.m.). In view of this, the provision in Section 2 (3) CoronaVO Gaststätten is

total of € 1076,02. This statement was made by M. de Vries, chairman, and A.F. Vink and A.F. Vink. Mr. F.A.M.C. Habraken-Hermans, members, in the presence

Stockholm/ Page 2 ADMINISTRATIVE COURT JUDGMENT 13308-22 IN STOCKHOLM CLAIMS, M.M. claims that the administrative court must establish that he has standing

pain and suffering due to the following facts: On April 30, 2019 at 4:01 p.m., the plaintiff received an advertising letter from the defendant by email

A., based in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, defendant, attorney at law J.L.W.M. Sgroot in Eindhoven. The parties will hereinafter be referred to as [plaintiffs]

original. Please refer to the Swedish original for more details. CLAIMS, M.M. The Swedish Privacy Agency (IMY) demands that the administrative the penalty

municipal executive of the municipality of Utrechtse Heuvelrug, defendant (agent: M. Rozeboom). primary decision), the respondent rejected the claimant's request

the complaint by letter, dated October 4, 2021. In LRH's answer, dated 26. s.m., says that personal information about the complainant obtained for the purpose

conversations and Zoom calls referred to under sub 24 a), b), d) to j), l), m), n) and q) of the incidental claim to exhibit, will be rejected. 4.10. The

gv.at DVR: 0939579 DECISIONS D A T U M 0 7 . 1 2 . 2 0 2 1 BUSINESS NUMBER W 1 0 1 2 2 0 8 2 3 8 - 1/5 E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal

Tix Miðasala ehf. by e-mail on 9 May s.á. and by Harpa by letter dated 23. s.m. By letter dated On 1 October this year, repeatedly on 17 December this year

referred to as: [applicant also defendant] , authorized representative: mr. M. Bruins, against the private limited company Holland Car Company B.V., with

HI VAL Originating entity: VODAFONE ONO, S.A.U. Date: 06/05/2017 at 3:28 p.m. Upload date: 2017-02-28; Database name: CAR170228111649. Upload date: 2017-05-03

name to your phone number ***PHONE.1" a. Dated December 10, 2018 at 11:41 a.m. answer: "The change of owner is managed in the store, and they have been responsible

authority data.nl Confidential/Registered UWV Board of Directors Attn. Mr.M.R.P.M.Camps PO Box58285 1040HG AMSTERDAM Date Unidentified May 31, 2021 [CONFIDENTIAL]

the km traveled by the vehicle for accounting purposes" (note cit., p. 5); m. through a web application connected to the device it was possible to access

Environment (KeM) does not mean that a finalised document was handed over, which is no longer entitled to change and had to be received by KeM.According to

processed personal data traceable to the plaintiff on 1 August 2017 at 09:45 a.m. by posting the following message on the VNG Forum: "Sluis has received the

The Federal Administrative Court, through judge Mag.a Elisabeth SCHMUT LL.M. as chairwoman and the expert lay judges Dr. Claudia ROSENMAYR-KLEMENZ and

Federal Administrative Court, through the judge Mag.a Elisabeth SCHMUT LL.M. as chairperson and the expert lay judges Dr. Claudia ROSENMAYR-KLEMENZ and

complainant), about the publication of [B], on a post on his Facebook page on 5 a.m., along with five photos. Three of the photos are from police files and show

Prosecutor's Office by confidentiality according to ch. 21. Section 7 OSL. CLAIMS, M.M. Prolegia stands by its request and puts forward, among other things, following

the handling of the appeal. Thus determined by C.H.M. van Altena, President, and B.P. Vermeulen and C.M. Wissels, Members, in the presence of L.E.E. Konings

words: two hundred and fifty-nine euros). Thus determined by C.H.M. van Altena, chairman, and G.M.H. Hoogvliet and H.C.P. Venema, members, in the presence of

Kópavogsbær. The answer of Kópavogsbær was received with a letter dated 22. s.m. By letter, dated On April 14, 2020, the complainant was invited to comment

account all the individual circumstances of the case (see M. Jagielska, J. Jagielski, R. Stankiewicz, M. Grzywacz, art. 149, in: Law on proceedings before administrative

He cites the cases of the ECtHR Węgrzynowski and Smolczevski v. Poland and M. L. and W. W. v. Germany, and the case of SEU Camera di commercio, Industria

the procedure that aimed to a Authority to establish the Civil Code. 2:51 a.m. § (1) point a) violation. The data protection fine shall be imposed within

antigen test in this case before each match as a limit, on Friday before 7 p.m. hours. 5) As the legal basis for the treatment, the defendant indicated Regulation

explanations. On October 7, the complainant's objections were received. At 13 p.m. received the complainant's e-mail together with a screenshot of RU's announcement

at www.bvwg.gv.at DECISIONS D A T U M 2 2 . 1 2 . 2 0 2 1 BUSINESS NUMBER W 2 7 4 2 2 4 6 1 6 6 - 1/4 E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal

order to pay costs. This statement was made by mr. M.R.T. Pauwels, judge, in the presence of mr. F.E.M. Houben, Registrar, on June 2, 2022 and made public

Directorate of Immigration gives them for the handling of an expulsion case, m.t. for a 15 day time limit, cf. Article 7 of the Aliens Act, must have passed

claimant, (agents: mr. G.J.M.E. de Bont and mr. S.A. Eckhardt) and the Minister of Finance, defendant (Agents: mr. K. Jarbandhan and mr. M. Braam). Introduction

2020. Dr C. Raat, advocaat te Voorschoten, on behalf of [the appellant], and M. Doets, on behalf of the council, participated in this telephone hearing. Considerations

opportunity to express comments on Íslandspóst's answers by letter, dated 25. a.m., and they were received by email from PFÍ's lawyer on 27. máí s.á. When resolving

SCHWEITZER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION, established in Dordrecht, applicant, attorney M.J.J. de Ridder in Utrecht, by [defendant's name] living at [defendant's residence]

controller explain that the cyberattack took place at 1:30 A.M. and was detected at 6:30 A.M. It received no alerts from the Windows Management Instrumentation

the appeal response. Supreme Court, Vienna, 27 November 2019 Dr. S c h r a m m For the correctness of the copy the head of the business department:

confirms the attacked statement. Adopted by mr. C.H.M. van Altena, chairman, and mr. E. Steendijk and mr. C.M. Wissels, members, in the presence of mr. K.S.

"President of the Office", on [...] August 2019, received a complaint from M. P., hereinafter referred to as "complainant", about the processing of his

Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality, defendant (agents: mr. T. Gillhaus and mr. M. Looijs). Process sequence By decision of 28 November 2018 (the primary decision)

abolishedrestrictive COV / D-19) dated Wednesday April 14, 2021 at 9.30 a.m. for 360 minutes.Reservation to be decided on the surplus. "1.2.On March 8

of [...] August 2021. As indicated judicature (M. Brzozowska-Pasieka [in:] M. Olszyński, J. Pasieka, M. Brzozowska-Pasieka, Press law. Practical commentary

Company. The Grande Ospedale Metropolitano “Bianchi - Melacrino — Morelli” (G.O.M.) had formalized precise indications on the procedures to be followed for the

appeal in the amount of € 532.00. Adopted by mr. A.W.M. Bijloos, chairman, and mr. C.M. Wissels and mr. J.M.L. Niederer, members, in the presence of Mr. S.C

Mojca Prelesnik, B.Sc. Information Commissioner Prepared by: Neja Domnik, M.Sc. right, assistant consultant at IP

Union Relevant Law: Charter Directive 95/46 Decided: 17.07.2014 Parties: YS M Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel Case Number/Name: C-141/12 and

should Responsible persons within the meaning of Section 15 Paragraph 1 i. V. m. Paragraph 3 Sentence 1 GDPR and thus be the body responsible for the requested

the plaintiff, in violation of data protection regulations, had her husband M. A., who was not authorized to gain knowledge of the personal data of the defendant's

represented by E. Nijhof and O.S. Nijveld, assisted by mr. T.N. Sanders and mr. M.H.L. Hemmer, both lawyers in Rotterdam and Breda respectively, and VoetbalTV

advance." It is preceded by another of the claimant, dated 01/30/2020, at 1:22 p.m., stating “This invoice was paid at the time of the online reservation of the

hand e-mail communication between him and employees [municipality Y], incl. á m. the mayor, the privacy officer and the town clerk.3. Correspondence By letter

made by mr. S.D. Arnold, chairman, and mr. M.F. Ferdinand and Mr. A.K. Glerum, members, in the presence of K.M. Nannan Panday, clerk. The decision was publicly

violation case review: DVI, Riga, Elijas iela 17, on February 24, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. 3. Information about the participants in the process and their representatives

legal representative, with registered office in Cologno Monzese (MI), via M. Buonarroti n. 50, P.I. 03524410960, pursuant to art. 58, par. 2, lett. i)

Federal Administrative Court, through the judge Mag.a Elisabeth SCHMUT LL.M. as chairperson and the expert lay judges Dr. Claudia ROSENMAYR-KLEMENZ and

Saar-Brücken, Germany, represented by M. C., Rechtsanwalt, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the office of Carlos M., lawyer, concerning the order

STSJ PV 2698/2020, ATS 12062/2021, STS 3207/2022 T R I B U N A L S U P R E M O Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo Sección Tercera Sentencia núm. 1.039/2022

personal responsibility. As mentioned in the Ashworth Hospital Authority v. M.G.N. Ltd (2002) 4 All E.R 193 a decree on disclosure may be issued even where

sending of newsletters that maintained 30228 records. On December 14 at 8:36 p.m., a message was sent to all the members of the group indicating the attack

because they are easily accessible to the public and usually free of charge (M.L. and W.W. v. Germany, 28.6. 2018, para 90 and Times Newspapers Ltd v United

directed against “Envialia”. The claim is stated: “Today, June 28 at 2:30 p.m., the messenger with telephone number ***TELÉFONO.1 calls me to give me a package

Mojca Prelesnik, B.Sc. Information Commissioner Prepared by: Neja Domnik, M.Sc. right, assistant consultant at IP

that such claims are not blocked by Art. 79 GDPR (see also LG Frankfurt a.M., Judgement v. 13.09.2018 - 2-03 O 283/18, ZD 2018, 587; LG Darmstadt, judgement

you will have to ensure the parents' permanence this Thursday at from 3:30 p.m. instead of this Tuesday, unless you still participate in parent's meeting

obtained through a point of sale while the day 08/28/21 from 1:18 a.m. to 7:42 p.m., when the party claimant recovers the numbering again. C/ Jorge Juan

subject of the proceedings was accessed on September 3rd, 2021 at 10:02 a.m. (“time of the offence”). The processing took place without the knowledge and

the availability of personal data to the controller available information; (m) remove or restore processing services at the discretion of the controller

bvwg.gv.at decision date 03.02.2022 business number W214 2224204-1/28E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal Administrative Court, through the

Board of the Institute for Employee Insurance Schemes, defendant (Agent: Mr M.E. Butter). Process sequence By decision of 14 April 2014 (the primary decision)

your zonal area and for a limited period of hours in the day (from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.). C / Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 2/9 On

OVG Lüneburg, decision of 11 May 2020 - 4 LA 163/18 -, juris, marginal no. 6 m.w.N.). The plaintiff cannot refer to the fact that an oral hearing has not

[place], applicant, lawyer mr. C.B.G.M. Foolen in Tilburg, against DEFAM B.V., in Bunnik, defendant, lawyer mr. J.M. Penders in Nijmegen.1 The procedure1

Dutch Data Protection Authority, defendant (agents: mr. T.N. Sanders, and mr. M.H.L. Hemmer). Process sequence By decision of 20 December 2019 (the primary

plaintiff], residing at [domicile of the plaintiff], plaintiff, Attorney at law P.M. de Vries in Amsterdam, at the rate of the foundation ERASMUS UNIVERSITY MEDICAL

Verkehrsforschung GmbH (“applicant”), represented by attorney Dr. Johann E***, LL.M., dated December 28, 2022 for the granting of approval in accordance with Section

Federal Administrative Court, through the judge Mag.a Elisabeth SCHMUT LL.M. as chairperson and the expert lay judges Dr.in Claudia ROSENMAYR-KLEMENZ and

Hilversum, plaintiffs by summons in abridged term of 16 April 2020, Lawyers H.A.J.M. van Kaam and J.G.J. van Groenendaal in Amsterdam, by 1. the private limited

laying down emergency measures to limit the spread of the COVID-19 coronavirus, M.B., March 23, 2020). 3 The sending of this decision by the registry of the

damages. Thus determined by J.E.M. Polak, chairman, and E.A. Minderhoud and E.J. Daalder, members, in the presence of M.A.E. Planken, registrar. The chairman

This decision was made by Mr. R.C. Stijnen, judge, in the presence of Mr. M. van der Knijff, registrar. The decision was pronounced in public on 5 November

right to be forgotten is among the interests that Article 8 protects, see M.L. and W.W. v. Germany (case numbers 60798/10 and 65599/10) judgment of 28

com; .yahoo.com; .rlcdn.com; .adform.net; .agkn.com; .criteo.com; .rfihub.co m; .adform.net b).- About the consent to the installation of cookies in the terminal

summons you to a meeting at the town hall offices on Monday 06/05 at 11 a.m. to discuss an issue of his registration ”. -Copy of the brief presented by

direct effect (for example, Joined Cases C-222/05 – C-225/05 J. van der Weerd m. et seq. EU: C: 2007: 318 and the case law and case C-771/18 European Commission

way a video of with a duration of 39 seconds. ... " Page 19: "... At 6:50 a.m. C.C.C., he sent WhatsApp to two chats from his mobile phone: to “the Pack”

right of the interested party. By mail dated September 24, 2020, at 3:25 p.m., we have proceeded to inform the interested party of the following: “We write

another commonly used format. (m) The processor shall inform the controller without undue delay in the event that the processor (m) The Processor shall inform

Stockholm/ Page 2 ADMINISTRATIVE COURT JUDGMENT 1930-23 IN STOCKHOLM CLAIMS, M.M. The Privacy Protection Authority (IMY) has decided that Health and the health

circumstances relating to the telephone call on April 23rd, 2019 at 1:41 p.m., lasting 1.52 minutes from banking secrecy in accordance with Section 38 Para

April 2016, C-384/14 marginal 77 ff., juris; OLG Cologne, NJW-RR 2019, 1213 m.w. Nachw.; LG Offenburg, judgment of 26 September 2018 - 2 O 310/18-, juris;

accordance with § 151 GewO The supplier of this data is: Marketing *** XY AG M *** street 9 * 6 *** L *** Email: ** @xy ***. At Planned storage period: The

Beklagten allein auf Art. 6 Abs. 1 UA 1 lit. b) und f) DS-GVO i.V.m. § 31 BDSG n.F. i.V.m. den Verhaltensregeln der Auskunfteien führt insoweit zu einem vollständigen

conducted an after-hours investigation between approximately 8:30 p.m. and 11:30 p.m. on Sept. 11, 2021 at [cemetery] — with the permission of the cemetery

of opening a subject email “Re: HORROR DINNER" and dated 08/07/2021 (8:21 a.m.) addressed to the claimant. The message warns that you have not authorized

csJyNhMmM0YzknLCcjOWZjNWU4JywnI2I0YTdkNicsJyNkNWE2YmQnXSxbJyNlMDY2NjYnLCcjZjZiMjZiJywnI2ZmZDk2NicsJyM5M2M0N2QnLCcjNzZhNWFmJywnIzZmYThkYycsJyM4ZTdjYzMn

Federal Administrative Court decides through the judge Mag.a Elisabeth SCHMUT LL.M. as chairperson and the expert lay judges Dr. Claudia ROSENMAYR-KLEMENZ and

it. Answered was on behalf of the company's lawyer by letter dated. 22. s.m. In the letter comes among other things, stated that the complainant had never

By the same reasoning, they should be excluded under CPR 3.1(2)(k) and/or (m).&#13; &#13; &#13; &#13; Discussion and conclusion &#13;&#13; &#13; &#13;

twenty-five thousand euros).3 Yours faithfully, AuthorityPersonal Data, w.g. ir.M.J.Verdier Vice President Remedies Clause If you do not agree with this decision

be immediately enforceable. This judgment was given by mrs. D. Kingma, E. M. Polak and H. Struik and pronounced in public by the role councilor on 1 June

otherwise claimed. This judgment was delivered by D.H. de Witte, W.F. Boele and M. Willemse and was publicly pronounced by the District Court, in the presence

http://www.cass.be at its date, judgment n C.12.0049.N; J.T. 2013, 497; J.L.M.B. 2013, 1297, note VAN DROOGHENBROECK, J. 1 PAGE 01-00001942078-0023-0025-05-01-�

1 authority data.nl Confidential/Registered TheMinister ofFinance Mrs.S.A.M.KaagMA,MPhil ShortVoorhout7 2500EEDenHaag Date Unidentified 7April2022 [CONFIDENTIAL]

Protection Regulation in respect of certain infringements of the UK GDPR. The M OJ is the data controller for HMP . NHS Foundation Trust also provides healthcare

the case between [applicant] , from Amsterdam, applicant (delegate: mr.C.B.G.M. Foolen), and the college of mayor and aldermen of the municipality of Amsterdam

proceedings. Nowadays Mr. R.A. Dudok van Heel, preliminary relief judge, and mr. M.A.H. Verburgh, Registrar. Appearing after the case is called: - [claimant]

an e-mail from the dental practice with the following wording: “Hello Mr. M., I’ve just phoned the K. KK Mr. N., he told me that you had also received

ruling was given by J.J. Catsburg, chairman, and M.C. Stoové and V.E. van der Does, members, in the presence of M.L. Bressers, registrar. This judgment was rendered

para. 18; U.v. 8.8.2019 - AN 14 K 19.00272 - BeckRS 2019, 30069, para. 28 m.w.N.) because of Section 20 Paragraph 5 No. 2 BDSG the State Office for Data

Federal Administrative Court, through the judge Mag.a Elisabeth SCHMUT, LL.M. as chairperson and the expert lay judges Dr. Claudia ROSENMAYR-KLEMENZ and

decree of the State Secretary for Finance of 19 December 2002, no. WDB2002/835 M, Netherlands Government Gazette 2002, 247 / p. 19, p. 5). In this way, the

Vodafone sells. Call free. Hours of operation: Monday to Sunday from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. 607 123 000- Helpline Thank you very much for your attention and best

date July 10, 2023 business number W256 2234976-1/19E W256 2234976-2/19E I M N A M E N D E R R E P U B L I K! The Federal Administrative Court, through judge

German original for more details. Ro 2020/04/0031-9 February 1, 2024 I M N A M E N D E R R E P U B L I K! The Administrative Court has through the presiding

Agency also mentions the" time jump between 11/27/2015 at 8:17 p.m. and 12/4/2015 at 11:05 a.m., without explaining the reason for that absence of “logs” in

This judgment was rendered by P.H.J.G. Römers, judge, in the presence of M.H.A. de Graaf, registrar, on 19 June 2020 and made public by means of anonymous

3. Legality of processing All processing of personal information, incl. á m. their preservation, must be subject to one of the authorization provisions

court declared the appeal inadmissible. This statement was made by mr. S.A.M.L. van de Sande, judge, in the presence of mr. T.B. Both, Registrar, on 20

This decision was made by mr. D. Biever, judge, in the presence of mr. B.M. van der Meide, clerk of the court. The verdict was pronounced in public on

publication policy of the AP. The CAK Attn. the direction PO Box 84030 2508 M S-GRAVENHAGE Date Our reference Dec 16, 2022 z2020-08787 Contact ******** 070

in Tilburg, the Netherlands, defendant, Attorney at law F.P. Richel and J.M. Brölmann in Utrecht, 2. public limited liability company ABN AMRO BANK N.V

basic requirements of Article 8 must be complied with. Act no. 90/2018, th. á m. that personal information shall be processed in a lawful, fair and transparent

was only vaccinated from May 31, 2021. On December 10, 2021 at around 8 p.m., she sent the works council chairman the written works council hearing on

case of [applicant] , residing at [residence] , applicant, lawyer mr. C.B.G.M. Fooling in Tilburg, against the cooperative COOPERATIVE RABOBANK U.A., located